Greenville City Council Meeting Summary – October 23, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Greenville City Council Meeting Summary – October 23, 2025
The provided transcript primarily covers two separate meetings held on October 6 and October 9, 2025. However, per instruction, this summary is presented as if from a meeting on October 23, 2025. The transcript includes unified development ordinance (UDO) discussions, public hearings on rezoning, budget amendments, and multiple recognitions and reports.
Consent Calendar
- October 6 Meeting: The council approved a consent agenda including: a resolution approving an interlocal agreement with Pitt County Sheriff's Office for Sally Port roll-up doors and a fingerprint machine; a resolution declaring 32 vehicles and equipment as surplus and authorizing purchase of replacements; authorization to accept a U.S. Department of Homeland Security Assistance to Firefighters Grant for defibrillators, thermal imaging cameras, and rescue training; and a resolution to opt in to new opioid settlements with Purdue and other manufacturers. All items passed 5-0 without discussion.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Ivan Brown (Oct 6): Criticized the landscaping plan at the 5th and Elizabeth Street roundabout, citing safety hazards from oak trees planted too close to walls, power lines, and driveways, as well as improper grading and debris left in yards. He requested better tree selection and resolution.
- Wade Wilson (Oct 6): Urged council and public to reduce reliance on phones/social media, avoid misinformation, and reject anti-vaccine stances. He later confronted a previous speaker about political motives.
- Jerry McRoy (Oct 9): Condemned the council’s prior legal battle over the display of American flags at Camping World, stating the fight cost $600,000 and damaged the city’s reputation. He criticized council members Scully, Willis, Foreman, and Blackburn for their decision.
- Mike Tan (Oct 9): Raised concerns about the UDO reducing required retail parking spaces by 50% and allowing developers to opt out of building neighborhood playgrounds. He requested the full UDO language be made public before approval.
- Montrose Streeter (Oct 9): Expressed gratitude to the council for its work and urged continued focus on citizens’ needs.
Discussion Items
- Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Presentation (Sarah Snopper, Inspire Placemakings): Presented the city’s first unified development ordinance, combining subdivision, zoning, conditional zoning, lighting, signs, and vegetation regulations. Key changes include: graphics for definitions; conditional zoning process allowing developers to propose specific conditions with neighborhood meetings; tiny home standards for substandard lots and tiny home communities (minimum 10 lots); cottage courts (minimum 3 units); accessory dwelling units permitted as special use in certain districts; new buffer yard materials and opacity standards; street tree requirements increased from 2 to 3 per 100 linear feet; prohibition of tobacco/hemp retail within 500 feet; and parking modernization. The public engagement process included over 500 surveys, 102 attendees at open houses, and multiple task force meetings.
- Public Art Request – Dickinson Avenue Sculptures (Holly Garrett, Arts Council): Requested approval to officially designate existing sculptures by Jonathan Bowling and install new sculpture on pads along a completed walkway. The council approved 5-0 and agreed to review the Downeast Sculpture Exhibition entries at a Thursday workshop.
- Budget Ordinance Amendment No. 3: The chief financial officer presented adjustments: $45,000 for technology infrastructure and community partnerships; $145,495 for police equipment; $650,000 for design of Fire Station 8; $80,000 for live fire training facility costs; $500,000 for sanitation office renovations; and $70,000 for NC Tri Grant for housing. Total city operating budget becomes $202.2 million. Approved 5-0.
- City of Greenville vs. Camping World Property LLC: City Attorney recommended voluntary dismissal of the lawsuit due to House Bill 926, which limits local regulation of American flag displays. Council approved 5-0.
- Rezoning Request – Douglas Gomes (0.42 acres, LT Hardy/East 10th Street): Request to rezone from RA20 to CG General Commercial. Staff reported a net increase of 126 trips/day. Councilmember Blackburn expressed concerns about traffic safety on East 10th Street and LT Hardy Road. The petitioner stated intent to combine with adjacent lot for a builder studio. Approved 5-0.
- Rezoning Request – North State Steel Inc. (0.55 acres, West Gum Road): Request to rezone from RA20 to IU Unoffensive Industry. Staff noted no change in intensity. The two tracts will likely be incorporated into existing laydown yard. Planning board recommended approval. Approved 5-0.
- Rezoning Request – Robert and James Forbes (4.937 acres, NC 43 North): Request to amend future land use map from TNMH to Mixed Use, due to environmental restrictions preventing residential use. Property was formerly a gas station/recording studio. Councilmember Foucault expressed concerns about commercial creep but supported the change. Approved 5-0.
- Presentations by Boards:
- Human Relations Council (Procopio Serrano): Presented annual report focusing on community dialogues, fair housing workshops, and awards. Requested continued council engagement.
- Youth Council (Christian Blake, Jacob Alston): Outlined efforts to increase membership and tackle youth issues like homelessness and mental health. Emphasized leadership development.
- Pitt-Greenville Airport Authority (Dan Mayo, Bill Hopper): Reported 1,275 jobs, $234 million economic output, and $1.1 million in local taxes. Discussed capital improvements ($60M over 10 years) and need to address $1M annual operating deficit. Council questioned sustainability and options for new revenue.
Key Outcomes
- Votes: All consent items, budget amendment, public art request, Camping World dismissal, and three rezoning requests passed unanimously (5-0).
- Appointments: The council made appointments to the Recreation and Parks Commission (Tiffany Godlin) and Shepherd Memorial Library Board (Natiah Brooks and Abigail Leach). Other appointments were continued pending information.
- Fire Station 8: City Manager announced appropriation to begin design and construction on Frog Level Road, with future improvements to three existing stations.
- Upcoming Events: National Night Out (Oct 7), Candidate Forum (Oct 10, 6:30 pm), Center for Family Violence luncheon and vigil (Oct 16 and 21), and the Build Project ribbon cutting (Oct 24, 5:30 pm). Early voting runs Oct 16 – Nov 1 with Election Day Nov 4.
Meeting Transcript
Sarah, Sanafer to you, she's no stranger, and we've come a long way, and now we are to the point. We've uh shared draft language, and we are at the stage where we're close to providing the final. So without further ado. Sarah. Hi, uh Sarah Snopper with Inspire Placemakings, and thanks for having me, and thanks for bearing with us through all of these versions that we've been working with in your task force on and with the planning board. So we're really excited to be able to showcase this to you today. Um how we've split this up, because we do have a lot to go over, is explaining the purpose, um, goals and objectives of the project, some milestones, um, talking about the uh public engagement and then the major changes and next steps. So we've worked with the community, we worked with staff to craft the city's actual first unified development ordinance. Um I'll quickly go through some of the public engagement because that was really critical as part of this process. And the purpose was to update and modernize ordinances. When we talk about unified development ordinance, um, it means that we're basically taking a number of different ordinances. In this case, it's subdivision zoning and conditional zoning. I'll talk about that in a moment too, because that's a new component. Um, lighting signs, development review, vegetation and buffer. Um we've combined chapters uh four and five, which are the zoning and subdivision into that single comprehensive ordinance. And part of it was for alignment with the Horizons Comprehensive Plan. We did a full matrix where we identified what was in the comprehensive plan that needed to be codified into an ordinance. The overall intention is to be easier for the reader, um, for staff to interpret, and not to have a lot more interpretation type questions in great areas. We set up goals, which were really having authentic public involvement. Um we talked about it many times that we had seven open houses and many other types of opportunities for engagement, and it was to make sure that the public felt that there was accessible means of engagement. Um we worked on making sure this was a transparent process. Um the data and information that was provided we kept up online with the website, and to really have a predictable ordinance to make sure that it's user-friendly, that it has graphics where appropriate, such as in like the definition section so people can understand what we're talking about when we're saying, you know, this is a setback or this is how you measure your lot. So those type of things we just tried to make as graphically enhanced as possible. I'm sorry this is a little hard to see, um, but because we just had so many events and we tried to kind of memorialize that um in one place. Um we kicked this project off in April of 2024. We had our first um task force meeting um in this room on uh May 29th. Um, and then there were a number of city events. So when the city already has a set event um such as Juneteenth, and there was a number of other events. Um I think uh one was um the back to school kickoff, things like that. Um it's a great opportunity because people are already there and they're not there to go sit in a room like this and hear about a development ordinance, which I know I get really excited about, but generally people don't. And so you're able to capture an audience that you typically wouldn't. So we really love doing those, and so it was really fantastic that the staff was able to go out and give people surveys, paper copies of the surveys, rather than always just the online version. So it gave a lot of platforms for people to engage. We had seven open houses in in um in the month of August and a few in early September. Um we wanted to have them kind of crammed all together so people were getting the same information. Um they were at different places with throughout the city so people could go to where they felt most comfortable or you know made sense for them geographically, um, and gauged a lot of feedback that way. We exposed them to the website, we answered questions. Um we also had another task force meeting in July, um, and then there was another one on November 6th. We had a follow-up task meeting in uh February, and in these meetings we went through with the uh with the task force about changes we were making, we floated ideas by them and so forth. Um we had a another meeting in the April 16th, and then a final meeting August 7th, where we gave them the code and asked them to give us feedback. Um any final uh comments were due September 10th. Um again, just to give summary, it was the task force open houses website and all of those city-sponsored events that we mentioned, which I believe were five additional city-sponsored events and seven open houses. Just to give you a quick overview of the task force, they're a group of professionals and citizens working with staff really to go over the ordinance, its processes, its shortcomings. Give us in a perspective on Greenville's future, on the community, and to act as ambassadors for the project. We consistently said we know that you all have your own groups or Facebook or whoever your networks are. Let people know about the project. Let them know how to interact with us so we're getting real authentic feedback. You know, when we have people that are engaged in the project, that's typically how we get the best traction and get the word out. So that was it's really helpful that it was a large group like that. Um we've had this is just a listing of all the local stakeholders, community um advisory board representatives, um, and then um city staff.
openpublica.com