Hampton City Council Work Session – February 11, 2026
Hampton City Council Work Session – February 11, 2026
The Hampton City Council held a work session on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, beginning at 1:02 p.m. and concluding with a closed session from 2:15 p.m. to 6:25 p.m., followed by certification and adjournment. The meeting focused on three major presentations: a stakeholder report on a proposed camping and storage ordinance amendment, proposed updates to Economic Development Authority (EDA) grant programs, and the I-Value citizen outreach initiative for the Fiscal Year 2027 budget. No formal votes were taken on the presentations; direction was given for further action.
Discussion Items
-
Final Report from Stakeholder Group – Proposed Ordinance Amendment: Camping and Storage on Public Property
City Manager Mary Bunting introduced the item, noting that the original ordinance (proposing a Class 1 misdemeanor for obstructing public rights‑of‑way) was deferred last fall after being perceived as targeting individuals experiencing homelessness. A stakeholder group—including residents, business owners, service providers, individuals with lived experience, public safety officials, and city staff—met over several months and reached consensus. Assistant City Manager Jason Mitchell presented the group’s recommendations: (1) a service‑first, rather than enforcement‑first, approach; (2) prioritization of outreach and voluntary compliance before enforcement; (3) confirm whether a policy (as Newport News uses) could suffice instead of an ordinance (the City Attorney’s Office later determined an ordinance is needed); (4) if enforcement becomes necessary, the penalty for the first violation would be reduced from a Class 1 misdemeanor (with possible jail time) to a Class 4 misdemeanor (no jail), and a Class 2 misdemeanor for subsequent violations (which can provide access to public defenders and behavioral health docket); and (5) continued investment in emergency sheltering, transitional housing, and supportive housing, including hotel stays. Vice Mayor Steven Brown suggested adding “other supportive services” to the language about the behavioral health docket, which staff agreed to incorporate. Council members expressed general support. City Manager Bunting stated that, pending Council concurrence, the City Attorney’s Office would draft an ordinance consistent with the recommendations, potentially for a March agenda. -
Proposed Updates to the Economic Development Authority Grant Programs
Leonard Sledge, Chief Officer for Community and Economic Development, presented recommendations from a staff task force to simplify and improve the accessibility of EDA grants. Key proposals included: (1) increasing the maximum Façade Improvement Grant (FIG) from $10,000 to $15,000 (or $20,000 when adhering to Main Street design standards), (2) allowing applications submitted within 12 months of completed work, (3) removing business plan and financial statement requirements for FIG (since improvements are hard assets that retain value), (4) making service‑based businesses (e.g., barbershops, salons) eligible under the renamed Retail Assistance Grant (up to $30,000), (5) reducing the match requirement for the Manufacturing and Innovation Assistance Grant from 2:1 to 1:1, (6) granting the chief officer authority to approve grants up to $5,000, (7) instituting annual funding limits, (8) replacing individual grant agreements with standardized terms and conditions, and (9) creating an electronic application portal. Since FY2020, the EDA has awarded 29 grants totaling $509,000, with current available funding of just under $1.7 million. Councilmember Randy Bowman supported the removal of prior‑approval requirements. Vice Mayor Brown asked about assistance for businesses struggling operationally; City Manager Bunting noted that the ability to apply retrospectively would free up operating cash. Councilmember Martha Mugler expressed concern about removing financial documentation for newer businesses; Sledge agreed to consider tiered requirements. Councilmember Michelle Ferebee voiced strong support. Councilmember Carolyn Campbell asked whether architectural plan costs for startups could be covered; staff said it would review. Mayor Gray encouraged proactive outreach to businesses in targeted corridors. No formal vote was taken; the recommendations will be forwarded to the EDA for consideration. -
I-Value Citizen Outreach
Dacia Scott, Director of Marketing and Communications, outlined the Fiscal Year 2027 I-Value process, which has been used since 2010 to align the budget with community priorities. She explained the distinction between operating expenses (ongoing services like police, fire, libraries, parks, and salaries) and capital projects (one‑time investments tied to the city’s seven strategic priorities). Examples of potential polling topics included employee pay competitiveness, inflation, new programs, park improvements, playground replacements, flood resiliency, and revenue‑side items such as wastewater, stormwater, solid‑waste fees, permitting fees, school‑age program fees, and real estate tax. Three public engagement opportunities were announced: an in‑person meeting on March 3, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. at the Dr. Mary T. Christian Theatre at Virginia Peninsula Community College; an in‑person meeting on March 7, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. at Kecoughtan High School; and a virtual Facebook Live session on March 5, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. The public survey will be available March 9–16. The City Manager’s recommended budget will be released April 15, with public hearings on April 22 and May 6, and Council adoption scheduled for May 3. Informational postcards will be mailed to all households. Councilmember Hope Harper asked how polling topics are selected; City Manager Bunting responded that items are based on active budget and capital requests before Council, as well as community proposals, and that infeasible items are excluded. She added that potential future topics (e.g., an optional one‑cent sales tax for school construction, marijuana legislation) could be included if state action makes them relevant. City Manager Bunting also announced short educational videos will be produced to explain budget concepts like the Dillon Rule, property reassessments, and the difference between assessments and tax rates.
Key Outcomes
- Camping and Storage Ordinance: Council directed the City Attorney’s Office to draft an ordinance incorporating the stakeholder recommendations, to be brought back for consideration, possibly in March 2026.
- EDA Grant Programs: Council expressed general support for the proposed updates; the recommendations will be transmitted to the EDA for formal action.
- I-Value Process: Council acknowledged the outreach schedule and encouraged public participation; no further action required.
- Closed Session: At 2:15 p.m., Council voted 7‑0 to convene a closed session (per 2.2‑3711(A)(3)(5)(6)(8)(7) and (1)) to discuss a potential mixed‑use project in Coliseum Central, a prospective business location, a downtown zoning enforcement issue, and appointments. The closed session lasted until 6:25 p.m.
- Certification and Appointments: At 6:25 p.m., Council voted 7‑0 to certify the closed session. The session included discussion of appointments to the Citizens Police Advisory Group, Citizens' Unity Commission, Peninsula Alcohol Safety Action Program Advisory Board, Golf Course Advisory Committee, Hampton Economic Development Authority, Hampton Clean City Commission, Grievance Board, Mayor's Committee for People with Disabilities, Peninsula Town Center CDA, and Athletic Hall of Fame. The appointments were approved as part of the certification.
- Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon and welcome to the uh Hampton City Council work session. Uh, Madam Clerk, will you call a roll, please? Councilman Bowman, Vice Mayor Brown, President. Councilwoman Campbell, present, Councilwoman Fairby, present. Councilwoman Harper, present, Councilwoman Muggler, present, Mayor Gray. President, and we have several presentations on the agenda for this afternoon, so I'm going to turn it over to the city manager to introduce the first. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. As you and the council members know, uh sometime, I forget exactly when, last fall, we talked about the possibility of adopting a camping and storage ordinance to deal with some of the problems that neighbors, uh neighborhood residents as well as businesses had expressed about people camping out on public right-of-ways and causing problems in front of their businesses or residences. When we looked at that ordinance, it was misperceived by the public as an attempt to penalize the homeless, which all of us very clearly did not want to do. And so the decision by council was made to postpone consideration on that ordinance, get together a stakeholder group, which would include people who spoke before council at the public hearing as well as other interested stakeholders to see if they might be able to come up with a consensus recommendation on how we dealt with the legitimate concerns of residents and businesses, but also reflected our caring, compassionate spirit as Hamptonians and you know made sure that people didn't think we were trying to penalize the homeless. So for several months, um, all right, we've had a group that has met, and I'm very pleased to say that they came to a consensus, uh, which will be presented to you today by J uh Jason Mitchell, assistant city manager. Um we have several members of the group in the attendance as well, and after he completes the report, if they have anything they'd like to say, I hope you will allow them to do so, because they did put in a lot of really hard work. And um, it's I think it's fair to say that we started off thinking we wouldn't be able to get consensus potentially, and I'm very proud that the group really worked to understand each other and to understand the very serious issues that brought us to the point, but also what we can do to help people who are unfortunately unhoused in our community. So what you're gonna see is a report that talks both about the ordinance, but also because we wanted to validate the other conversation we heard, some next steps as we address a broader issue of homelessness in our community and our region. With that, I'm pleased to introduce Assistant City Manager Jason Mitchell. So good afternoon, Mayor Gray, Vice Mayor Brown, members of council, City Manager Bunting, and City Attorney Sid Noorr. Um as the city manager indicated, I have a brief report today about our camping and storage ordinance uh related to our stakeholder group. I'll start with a little bit of background as our camping and storage ordinance was introduced last year to address problematic behaviors occurring in the city right-of-ways, specifically in front of businesses and neighborhood properties. The original ordinance proposed a misdemeanor one penalty for individuals and or groups that would not leave the right-of-way after being asked to do so. The ordinance was labeled by many outside of government, local government, as a homeless ordinance, although the ordinance did not specify or apply to homeless individuals. There was a widespread concern that the ordinance sought to criminalize homelessness, which it did not. Council and staff believe that there is potentially ways to address the legitimate concerns of businesses and homeowners while also addressing the problems which lead to the original draft ordinance. A stakeholder committee made up of residents and business owners that had both supported and objected the initial ordinance was convened. With the primary question of how might we address public concerns about safety and cleanliness while upholding the dignity and rights of people experiencing homelessness. Sir, our goal. Through this process, we aim to surface insight, build empathy, and generate viable recommendations that respect human dignity, address public concern, and align with Hampton's values as a compassionate city. To frame the problem, public discomfort and safety concerns related to behaviors associated with individuals perceived to be homeless, such as public urination, nudity, obstruction of the right-of-way, have prompted a proposed ordinance aimed at addressing these many issues. While the intent is not to criminalize homelessness, the approach must be carefully considered to avoid unintended consequences that could further marginalize vulnerable individuals. Our challenge is to develop a community-informed, compassionate and effective response that upholds public dignity, health, and safety while advancing solutions that reflect on our shared values of work of all residents. So we had several design steps. Small groups were shared, concerns and generated ideas for amending the camping and storage ordinance to develop practical, compassionate solutions grounded in real-life experiences and community input. Aligned on the term camping and storage ordinance, which helped clarify the conversation, scope, and shift of the narrative away from the broader homelessness debates toward this specific policy at hand. And then lastly, work on changing the affirmed the importance of having a camping ordinance while shifting the tone toward more balanced and compassionate approaches. So the next several slides are talking about our recommendations, and we'll start with the proper tone and framing, as any ordinance should reflect a service-first approach rather than an enforcement first approach. We aim to lead with care and compassion, not punishment for any individual. Our second recommendation is to clarify the intent as compassionate compliance, protect the community while never giving up on any of these individuals. Most people will accept housing when it's safe, dignified and appropriate. A small number of repeated customers refuse to help because they are deeply traumatized. For this group, the answer is not simply tolerance nor self-simple enforcement. It requires balanced strategies. We will pair persistent outreach with a variety of housing options and insist that public spaces remain safe and usable. When someone's behavior is dangerous or disruptive, we will address that behavior directly through outreach co-responder teams and our community court programs if that can be worked out. No one has the right to endanger others and no one should be abandoned. Our third recommendation is the review whether or not our goals can be accomplished through a city policy versus a city ordinance. Other cities, most recently, the City of Newport News has adopted policies that attempt to achieve the same goals. This is the preferred approach. However, if our city attorney's office determines such a policy would not allow us to enforce it, then additional ordinance adoption may be needed. Our fourth recommendation is to suggest changes to the ordinance. That would incorporate language that makes clear that law enforcement shall prioritize voluntary compliance and relocation to lawful areas and/or shelter.
openpublica.com