The Hawaiʻi County Council's Committee on Finance held its 41st session on August 4, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. in the West Hawaiʻi Civic Center (Kona Council Chambers), with public courtesy sites in Ocean View, Pāhoa, and Waimea. The committee reviewed routine finance reports, resolutions for grants and multi-year agreements, and four budget bills. A single public testifier spoke in opposition to Bill 173, a proposed new "bed and breakfast home" property tax class. After substantial debate and an amendment to remove a 3% assessment cap, the committee voted 4–4 on Bill 173, forwarding it to the full Council with an unfavorable recommendation. The meeting adjourned at 11:48 a.m.
Hello, welcome to the 41st session for the committee on finance today is August 4th, 2026. It's 9 30 a.m. Today's meetings are being held in the Kona Council Chambers. And we do have our outlaying sites open to the public as well. Calling this meeting to order to my right, I have Councilmember Kimball, Councilmember Galimba, Councilmember Viewgas to my left, I have Councilmember Cogiwata, Councilman Member Houstis, Councilmember Kirkowitz, Councilmember O'Neishi, and Councilmember In Nava is excused. And we also have Mr. Henrix, County Clerk joining us today as our official overseer. Is there any testimony for today? Thank you, Chair Connie Kleinfelder. We do have one testifier here in Chambers. I'll check with Mr. Uracelli if we have any testifiers on Zoom or outer sites before I take our testifier here. Thank you, Mr. Clerk. Just confirming that you do not have any other testifiers at this time. Thank you so much. May I ask Ms. Terry Hawkins to come forward by testimony on bill number 173. Okay. Please activate the microphone when you're ready by pushing the button with the green sticker on it. It should light up red to let you know that it's ready for you. Okay. And then when you proceed, please start by introducing yourself. You have three minutes. Three minutes. Okay. My name is Terry Hawkins. I'm a senior citizen of 73 years. I'm a resident in Hawaii for 23 years. I'm a small business owner of a hosted short-term vacation rental at my home studio for 22 years. I work two jobs at this time to pay my mortgage. I'll always have a mortgage, and I'm not crying the blues about economics here, but I uh work at the university part-time and run my vacation rental to pay my mortgage. The 400% tax increase I paid last week for the first six months is a big economic burden on me. Any extra money, and anybody who knows owns a home knows you have roofing, that's 40,000 cars, that's another 30,000. It's a fine-line margin of profit that I have with this rental. And this proposal 173 will put me out of business. And I'm a small business owner, and a lot of the campaign platforms I read are address protecting small businesses. This isn't protecting it. There's three things I see wrong with this proposal. Number one, it's not addressing the problem of unhosted rentals, which were initially the beef with short-term vacation rentals, and I can totally understand that. Small or short-term vacation rentals, as anyone knows, it's run. We've cut into the business by about 47%. I hear that all the time from my guests. They don't like being gouged when they come over here. Um, and also the bulk of large hotel business, the money goes to the mainland. The money I generate stays and gets spent here. Um, I know right now of two short-term vacation rental hosted studios that are shutting the doors because they said you can't fight something like this. And I don't agree because it's not right. Um, the compromise I proposed, and I sent everybody a letter. I don't know if you read it just by email, but ag already gets the break of what they call a mixed use.