OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Hillsborough County, Florida/Hillsborough County Archive View Page
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing – October 8, 2026

Hillsborough County Archive View Page — Thursday, October 8, 2026
BodyHillsborough County, Florida
SessionHillsborough County Archive View Page
DateThursday, October 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 43:51

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

2:11

Thank

Speaker 1

2:12

you.

Unassigned speaker

2:12

I'd like

Speaker 2

2:12

to call the meeting to order for the comprehensive plan amendment public hearing for Thursday, October 8th, 2026.

2:20

First, I'd like to read two memorandums from two commissioners.

2:25

The first one is Commissioner Hagen.

2:27

Please be advised that due to a scheduling conflict, I would not be able to attend the October 8th public hearing.

2:34

If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to me or my office.

3:00

Okay.

3:03

Welcome to the Board of County Commissioners Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing.

3:57

Good evening.

Speaker 3

3:58

Good evening.

4:08

Starting off

Speaker 4

4:08

with

Speaker 3

4:09

review and analysis.

4:10

Chapter 163 requires that the schedule of projects or the lists of projects addressing level of service and adopted into the comprehensive plan be updated on an annual basis.

4:40

County staff identified projects that affect the level of service.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

BMAP is a framework for water quality restoration that includes a comprehensive set of solutions to achieve pollutant reductions as defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

Unassigned speaker

5:07

These

Speaker 3

5:07

BMAP projects were coordinated with county staff from the environmental services division.

5:11

Finally, the plans of other agencies are incorporated through this review.

Unassigned speaker

5:16

This

Speaker 3

5:17

slide shows the fiscal year 27 through 31 schedule of projects by program.

5:21

You can see there are five program areas that consider level of service, including parks, solid waste, stormwater, transportation, and water enterprise.

5:37

And for the capital improvements uh schedule, there are 195 projects with over 4.45 billion dollars.

5:46

This slide shows the CIS schedule of projects as shown on the previous slide, broken down by LOS priority.

5:53

As you can see here, there is 1.9 billion or 43% toward future growth, 1.4 billion or 32% towards eliminating deficiency, and 1.1 billion or 23% to maintain maintaining LOS.

6:08

Finally, there is 4.5 million or less than 1% toward uh eliminating deficiency and future growth.

6:16

This slide shows an excerpt of policies from the full packet that you have of um staff's consistency review.

6:23

Looking at LOS priorities and CIS policy 1.1.8, as noted in the previous slide.

6:29

Uh project funding should first be expended on projects that maintain LOS and correct deficiencies before being expended on projects that serve future growth.

6:37

Staff reviewed this and found this consistent with the comprehensive plan.

6:40

Up next, we have infrastructure locations.

6:42

So looking at flu objective 1.1.

6:45

This objective directs county infrastructure and facilities to the urban service area.

6:49

Staff found 86% of the overall projects, which which constitute 45% of the funding are within the USA.

6:57

I'd like to note with this that several large projects that are intended to serve both the USA and the rural population are technically located in the rural area, so that's why there's a large financial amount in that area.

7:09

Finally, we have coastal the Coastal High Hazard Area or CHHA with CIS objective 1.5.

7:15

This directs staff to look at uh limiting public expenditures for infrastructure and facilities in the CHHA.

7:21

After review, staff found that the projects within the CHHA were minimal and were either to serve existing development, repair, or replacement, or to enhance public access to natural areas.

7:32

With that, the planning commission found the fiscal year 27 through fiscal year 31 CIS schedule of projects consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan, and recommends adoption by ordinance.

7:44

This concludes my presentation.

7:46

I'm available for any questions that you may have along with county staff.

7:49

Thank you.

Speaker 2

7:49

Thank you.

7:50

This is a public hearing.

7:51

Do we have anyone who wishes to speak?

7:57

So none.

Speaker 5

8:00

I'll move approval and I just have a question.

8:02

That's why I'm cute.

Speaker 2

8:03

Okay.

8:04

Commissioner Commissioner Watson.

Speaker 5

8:08

Um is this just a standard 4-3 vote?

8:11

Or is this 5-2?

Speaker 6

8:15

This is a ordinance, uh, not a plan amendment uh pursuant to state statute, so it requires uh vote of four.

8:25

Okay.

Speaker 7

8:27

Thank

Unassigned speaker

8:27

you.

Speaker 7

8:28

I'll second your motion.

Speaker 2

8:30

Okay, we have a motion by Commission Wansosica by Commissioner Corn.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning████████████████████████████████32%
Land Use Hearing██████████████████████████26%
Procedural█████████████████17%
Capital Planning████████████████16%
Urban Planning████4%
Affordable Housing███3%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing – October 8, 2026

The Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing to consider several comprehensive plan amendments, rezoning requests, and the annual update to the Capital Improvements Schedule (CIS). Due to a scheduling conflict, Commissioner Hagen was absent, leaving five commissioners present. The board adopted the CIS schedule, continued two items by applicant request, approved a plan amendment and concurrent rezoning for a senior housing site, and rejected a small-scale density increase after a 4-1 vote.

Continuance Procedure

  • Before each agenda item, the board offered applicants the opportunity to continue their case to a future hearing (December 10, 2026) because only five commissioners were seated. Two applicants (for A.4 and A.5) elected to continue; the applicant for A.6 chose to proceed.

Discussion Items

  • FY 27-31 CIS Schedule of Projects (Ordinance Adoption) – Katrina Corcoran presented the annual update, noting 195 projects totaling over $4.45 billion. Projects were broken down by level-of-service priority: 43% ($1.9B) for future growth, 32% ($1.4B) for eliminating deficiencies, 23% ($1.1B) for maintaining LOS, and less than 1% for combined elimination/growth. Staff found the schedule consistent with the comprehensive plan. No public comment was offered. Motion by Commissioner Wansosica (likely Watson), second by Commissioner Corn. Vote passed 5-0.
  • HC/CPA 26-10 & RZ MM 26-0800 (A.4 & A.5) – Planning commission staff presented a proposed map amendment on 24.22 acres from Agricultural-Rural-1/5 and Residential-1 to Residential-2, located southeast of Kingsway Road and Thonotosassa Road. The applicant, William Malloy, requested a continuance to December 10, 2026. The board voted 5-0 to continue both the plan amendment and the concurrent rezoning.
  • HC/CPA 26-15 (A.6) – A small-scale plan amendment to change 0.26 acres at 1908 Front Street from Residential-4 to Residential-12 to allow up to three dwelling units. Planning commission staff found the amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan. The applicant, Rogelio Mirales, explained the request was for modest infill and noted any future development would require further approvals. No public comment was offered. Commissioner Watson expressed concern that approving a higher density could set a precedent for larger parcels in the area, despite the small size. Commissioner Cameron Cepeda supported approval, citing the parcel’s size and the ability to evaluate future requests individually. The motion to approve (by Cepeda, second by Cohen) failed 4-1. Commissioner Watson voted no, and because a 5-vote supermajority was required, the amendment was denied.
  • HC/CPA 26-16 & RZ PD 26-0803 (A.7 & A.8) – A plan amendment to change 13.83 acres at 12401 North 22nd Street from Residential-20 to Residential-35, and a concurrent rezoning from PD and SPI-UC-2 to a new PD with two development options (a 260-bed ALF and up to 483 multifamily units). Planning commission staff and the zoning hearing master recommended approval, noting the site is surrounded by higher-density uses and is within the urban service area. The applicant, Cammy Corbett, stated the goal is to remove senior restrictions from existing apartments and potentially redevelop. No public comment was offered. Motion to approve by Commissioner Watson, second by Commissioner Cohen. Vote passed 5-0 for both the plan amendment and the rezoning.

Key Outcomes

  • CIS Schedule Adopted – Ordinance approving the FY 27-31 Capital Improvements Schedule passed 5-0.
  • HC/CPA 26-10 & RZ MM 26-0800 Continued – Both items continued to December 10, 2026, by unanimous vote.
  • HC/CPA 26-15 Denied – The request to rezone 0.26 acres to Residential-12 failed 4-1; the board cited the need for a fifth vote and concerns about future precedent.
  • HC/CPA 26-16 Approved – Map amendment to Residential-35 passed 5-0.
  • RZ PD 26-0803 Approved – Concurrent rezoning for a planned development at the same site passed 5-0.

Meeting Transcript

Thank you. I'd like to call the meeting to order for the comprehensive plan amendment public hearing for Thursday, October 8th, 2026. First, I'd like to read two memorandums from two commissioners. The first one is Commissioner Hagen. Please be advised that due to a scheduling conflict, I would not be able to attend the October 8th public hearing. If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to me or my office. Okay. Welcome to the Board of County Commissioners Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing. Good evening. Good evening. Starting off with review and analysis. Chapter 163 requires that the schedule of projects or the lists of projects addressing level of service and adopted into the comprehensive plan be updated on an annual basis. County staff identified projects that affect the level of service. BMAP is a framework for water quality restoration that includes a comprehensive set of solutions to achieve pollutant reductions as defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. These BMAP projects were coordinated with county staff from the environmental services division. Finally, the plans of other agencies are incorporated through this review. This slide shows the fiscal year 27 through 31 schedule of projects by program. You can see there are five program areas that consider level of service, including parks, solid waste, stormwater, transportation, and water enterprise. And for the capital improvements uh schedule, there are 195 projects with over 4.45 billion dollars. This slide shows the CIS schedule of projects as shown on the previous slide, broken down by LOS priority. As you can see here, there is 1.9 billion or 43% toward future growth, 1.4 billion or 32% towards eliminating deficiency, and 1.1 billion or 23% to maintain maintaining LOS. Finally, there is 4.5 million or less than 1% toward uh eliminating deficiency and future growth. This slide shows an excerpt of policies from the full packet that you have of um staff's consistency review. Looking at LOS priorities and CIS policy 1.1.8, as noted in the previous slide. Uh project funding should first be expended on projects that maintain LOS and correct deficiencies before being expended on projects that serve future growth. Staff reviewed this and found this consistent with the comprehensive plan. Up next, we have infrastructure locations. So looking at flu objective 1.1. This objective directs county infrastructure and facilities to the urban service area. Staff found 86% of the overall projects, which which constitute 45% of the funding are within the USA. I'd like to note with this that several large projects that are intended to serve both the USA and the rural population are technically located in the rural area, so that's why there's a large financial amount in that area. Finally, we have coastal the Coastal High Hazard Area or CHHA with CIS objective 1.5. This directs staff to look at uh limiting public expenditures for infrastructure and facilities in the CHHA. After review, staff found that the projects within the CHHA were minimal and were either to serve existing development, repair, or replacement, or to enhance public access to natural areas. With that, the planning commission found the fiscal year 27 through fiscal year 31 CIS schedule of projects consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan, and recommends adoption by ordinance. This concludes my presentation. I'm available for any questions that you may have along with county staff. Thank you. Thank you. This is a public hearing. Do we have anyone who wishes to speak? So none. I'll move approval and I just have a question. That's why I'm cute.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com