OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Hollywood, Florida/Hollywood Public Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Planning and Development Board Meeting – October 13, 2026

Hollywood Public Meetings — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodyHollywood, Florida
SessionHollywood Public Meetings
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:37:38

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

7:59

Night's planning and development meeting for October thirteenth.

8:04

Uh, please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance as we start all meetings up.

Unassigned speaker

8:11

I

Speaker 2

8:12

pledge allegiance

Speaker 1

8:13

to the flag of the United States of America to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God, indivisible.

Speaker 3

8:31

Here.

8:34

Joseph Stadlin.

Speaker 1

8:36

Here.

Speaker 3

8:40

Steven Morales.

Unassigned speaker

8:43

I

Speaker 4

8:43

believe Stephen Morales is absent.

8:45

Chair, he emailed you.

Speaker 1

8:46

And excused, yes.

Speaker 3

8:50

Grasmasini.

8:59

Barbara Polmillo.

9:03

Bob Glickman.

9:06

Thank you.

Speaker 1

9:08

Um.

Unassigned speaker

9:14

Thank

Speaker 1

9:14

you much.

9:15

Um is the minutes.

9:19

Has everybody had a chance to review?

9:23

Any comments, corrections?

9:26

Move to approve.

9:27

So moved is there a second.

9:29

Second.

9:29

Moved in second.

9:30

All in favor.

Speaker 5

9:31

Aye.

Speaker 1

9:33

Seeing none, motion carries.

9:35

Thank you.

9:35

Approved.

9:36

Um staff, any additions, deletions, withdrawals, or continuances.

Speaker 6

9:41

There are none.

Speaker 1

9:42

Okay.

9:45

Announcements.

Speaker 7

9:46

Yes, thank you.

9:47

Good evening, everyone.

9:49

Uh, since all items one through five on today's agenda are quasi-judicial.

9:53

I will read our um traditional quasi judicial procedures into the record.

9:58

So please bear with me.

Unassigned speaker

10:00

On these items, um, the board is not setting policy, it is applying the city's existing standards to a specific property, much like a judge would in a courtroom.

Speaker 7

10:08

The board's decision must be based only on competent substantial evidence presented at this hearing.

10:13

General support or opposition on its own is not evidence.

10:17

Board members before before before any vote uh will disclose any communication that they have had about these items outside of this hearing, including who it was with and what it was about, along with any site visits, investigations, or expert opinions they might have received.

10:33

Any written communications that the board members received will be made part of the record.

10:38

Hollywood allows the formal quasi-judicial procedures to be waived, but only if everyone agrees, which includes staff, the applicant, uh, any intervening parties, and the members of this board and every member of the public present.

10:51

Once every application is called up, the chair will ask whether anyone objects to waive of the formalities.

10:57

If no one objects, the hearing proceeds the hearing will proceed in an informal manner.

11:02

If there is an objection, the formal procedures will apply.

11:05

In that situation, the chair will preside, and I, the board attorney, will rule on procedural and evidentiary questions and advise the board on the law and the findings that it must

Unassigned speaker

11:14

make.

Speaker 7

11:15

Everyone who tends to test everyone who intends to testify will be sworn in by

Unassigned speaker

11:19

me.

Speaker 7

11:20

This is a reminder that statements by attorneys or other representatives are arguments, not testimony, unless that person is sworn in and speaking from personal knowledge.

Unassigned speaker

11:29

The

Speaker 7

11:29

order the order of presentation in the quasi-judicial proceeding is as follows.

11:34

First, it will be city staff, then any appellant or intervening party, then the applicant.

11:40

Each party will have up to 30 minutes.

11:42

Members of the public may then speak for up to three minutes each.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use███████████████████████████████31%
Parks and Recreation████████████████████20%
Procedural██████████10%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Public Works██████6%
Zoning And Land Use██████6%
Intergovernmental Cooperation██████6%
Environmental Protection██2%
Planning And Development██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Planning and Development Board Meeting – October 13, 2026

The Hollywood Planning and Development Board met on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, at 6:00 PM in City Hall. The board considered five quasi-judicial applications: a rezoning, a park design/site plan, a self-storage facility with a variance, and two multifamily developments. A special presentation on the Resilient Broward plan was delivered by a city commissioner. The board approved all items, with the rezoning passing 6–2 and the park improvements receiving unanimous support after public speakers urged a deferral. Board members also discussed procedural concerns regarding a prior joint meeting.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes (September 8, 2026): Moved and seconded; approved unanimously without discussion.

Special Presentation

  • Resilient Broward Countywide Resilience Plan: Commissioner presented the plan, which outlines a $28 billion, 50-year investment in climate adaptation, including $9 billion for public infrastructure. The plan relies on private property improvements and strategic land use planning. The commissioner urged the board to consider the plan when evaluating future projects to support funding and insurance goals. The board asked about formal adoption; the commissioner noted the city has not formally adopted it but participates in resilience initiatives.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 2 – Harry Berry Park (25‑DP‑73b): Three speakers commented:

    • Cat (speaker): Requested deferral until litigation on the adjacent 1301 S Ocean Drive tower is resolved. She noted the park is under federal Land and Water Conservation Fund restrictions and suggested a coordinated redevelopment of the entire area.
    • Doug: Supported deferral for similar reasons, citing the need for a symbiotic relationship between the park and any future tower.
    • Terry Cantrell (President, Hollywood Lakes Civic Association): Stated the park (subject to pending litigation) should not be approved until the legal situation is clarified; questioned whether the city had held a design charrette with beach users.
  • Item 1 – Rezoning 2326 Thomas Street: A comment card from Patricia Antrican (North Central Civic Association) was read by the chair, asking why the zoning was changed from RAC to GU, how it benefits the city, and what future development could occur. Staff and the county applicant responded.

  • Item 3 – Self-Storage Facility (24‑DPV‑91): No public comment cards; staff noted two public meetings were held with no questions from attendees.

  • Items 4 & 5 (Multifamily Developments): No public comment cards.

Discussion Items

Old Business

1. Rezoning – 2326 Thomas Street (26‑Z‑32)

  • Staff Presentation (Umar Javid): The applicant (Broward County) seeks to rezone 0.77 acres from DH-1 (Dixie Highway Low Intensity Multifamily) to GU (Government Use). The property has been used for 53 years as a storage/staging facility for Broward County Transit; the current DH‑1 zoning is non‑conforming. No development plans are before the board; rezoning is required by state law and city code for government-owned properties. Staff found the application met all criteria and recommended approval.
  • Applicant Presentation (Arethia Douglas, Premier Design Solutions; Daniel Selayas, Broward County): County confirmed the site will continue as a transit shelter storage/staging yard. A three-phase plan: rezoning, funding acquisition, and future site plan redevelopment. No intention for housing.
  • Board Discussion: Concerns about the site's dilapidated condition; fencing should be opaque. Motion to forward a recommendation of approval to city commission. Passed 6–2 (Christine Corbo and Bob Glickman voted no).

2. Harry Berry Park Improvements – 1301 S Ocean Drive / 301 Azalea Terrace (25‑DP‑73b)

  • Note: Applicant did not waive quasi‑judicial procedures due to pending litigation on the adjacent 1301 tower parcel. Formal hearing conducted.
  • Staff Presentation (Cameron Palmer): The request is for a standalone design and site plan for a 1-story restroom, parking, and improved open space at Harry Berry Park. No changes to the 1301 property or Live Local Act issues are included. The park is zoned GU; staff found compliance with zoning and comprehensive plan. Recommended approval with conditions.
  • Applicant Presentation (Keith Polakoff, PRH 1301 S Ocean Drive LLC): Emphasized that the park site plan is independent of the tower litigation. Additional parking (128 spaces) will be provided along the right-of-way, and 44 spaces on site (including 6 within the park). Open space increases by 73%. Shade will be provided through trees and structures; a state grant (≈$296,000) for park improvements exists, and the developer has agreed to repay it if needed. The applicant argued the park design was directed by the city’s Parks Department.
  • Board Questions: Board members inquired about separation from the 1301 project; the park can be built regardless of tower outcome. Staff confirmed no court injunction stays this review.
  • Public Comments: Three speakers asked for deferral (see Public Comments above).
  • Board Deliberation: The board attorney advised that delaying due to pending litigation is not a valid criterion; the board must rule on the application. Board members expressed support for the park design. Motion to approve the design and site plan with conditions passed unanimously (7‑0).

3. Self‑Storage Facility with Variance – 1109 N 21st Avenue (24‑DPV‑91)

  • Staff Presentation (Adrian Montoya): Applicant proposes a 4‑story, 50,472 sq. ft. self‑storage facility with one residential unit on a currently‑used self‑storage site. Variance requested to reduce the required 10‑foot setback to 0 feet for the new building corner due to a mandatory 30'×30' corner‑cut dedication at 21st Avenue and Garfield Street. Staff found the variance justified (not self‑imposed) and recommended approval.
  • Applicant Presentation (Fernando Silva, Kenneth R. Carlson Architects): The new building will be shifted toward the street to activate the corridor; existing trees will be preserved. No public opposition.
  • Board Questions: Clarified the variance pertains only to the setback reduction. Public participation meetings were held but no comments. Board approved the variance, design, and site plan all unanimously.

4. Multifamily Development – 1504‑1510 N Dixie Highway & 2112 Roosevelt Street (25‑DP‑53)

  • Staff Presentation (Umar Javid): 4‑story, 33‑unit rental building (7 studios, 19 one‑bedroom, 7 two‑bedroom) in DH‑3 district. Ground floor includes parking, lobby, fitness, bike storage. Accessory parking lot across alley. Design exceeds active‑use glazing (70% vs. 60% requirement), provides 33 parking spaces (exceeds 32 required), and includes public art. Staff recommended approval.
  • Applicant Presentation (Joseph Kahler, Kahler Architecture): Building height 51 ft. (max 140 ft.), no variances required. Client chose a lower scale. Worked closely with staff. No public comments.
  • Board Questions: Entrance/exit via alley clarified as pedestrian only; crosswalks will be installed. Board discussed timing but approved design and site plan unanimously.

5. Multifamily Development – 1118‑1126 N 17th Avenue (24‑DP‑83)

  • Staff Presentation (Umar Javid): 4‑story, 27‑unit residential building in FH‑1 district. Setbacks exceed requirements, height 44 ft., 33 parking spaces (exceeds 32 required), 5 bicycle spaces, one EV space. Staff recommended approval.
  • Applicant Presentation (Louis La Rosa): Noted extra effort on finish and articulation. No public comments.
  • Board Questions: Board member Bob Glickman asked about delays; the applicant cited right-of-way and fire exit requirements. Board approved design and site plan unanimously.

New Business

  • Review of DRC Projects: No agenda items for the last two DRC meetings; projects are moving administratively.
  • Summary of City Commission Actions: Staff reported on recent commission approvals: variance at 1980 Grand Street (approved with conditions), beach comprehensive plan amendments, and the Hollywood Beach Overlay District (first and second readings).
  • 2027‑2028 Board Calendar Review: Presented by the board clerk, maintaining second Tuesday of each month, including a placeholder July meeting (potential need). Board member Bob Glickman suggested a June date instead to preserve July recess; staff explained the need for July is determined in late June. The calendar was approved by consensus.

Procedural Discussion – Joint Meeting (June 29, 2026)

  • Board member Bob Glickman raised a concern that only five planning board members were allowed to attend and vote at a joint meeting with the Historic Preservation Board, due to staff guidance. He argued all board members should have been invited. The board attorney noted the meeting was valid under the code, and the issue has been addressed by moving to separate board meetings going forward. Other board members commented on the confusion. The board attorney agreed to share a written memo on the matter. No further action was taken.

Key Outcomes

  • Rezoning 2326 Thomas Street (26‑Z‑32): Motion to recommend approval to city commission; passed 6–2.
  • Harry Berry Park (25‑DP‑73b): Unanimous approval of design and site plan with conditions (7‑0).
  • Self‑Storage Facility (24‑DPV‑91): Unanimous approval of variance, design, and site plan.
  • Multifamily Development – 1504 N Dixie (25‑DP‑53): Unanimous approval of design and site plan.
  • Multifamily Development – 1118 N 17th Ave (24‑DP‑83): Unanimous approval of design and site plan.
  • Board Calendar: Proposed 2027‑2028 meeting dates approved (no formal vote).

Meeting Transcript

Night's planning and development meeting for October thirteenth. Uh, please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance as we start all meetings up. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God, indivisible. Here. Joseph Stadlin. Here. Steven Morales. I believe Stephen Morales is absent. Chair, he emailed you. And excused, yes. Grasmasini. Barbara Polmillo. Bob Glickman. Thank you. Um. Thank you much. Um is the minutes. Has everybody had a chance to review? Any comments, corrections? Move to approve. So moved is there a second. Second. Moved in second. All in favor. Aye. Seeing none, motion carries. Thank you. Approved. Um staff, any additions, deletions, withdrawals, or continuances. There are none. Okay. Announcements. Yes, thank you. Good evening, everyone. Uh, since all items one through five on today's agenda are quasi-judicial. I will read our um traditional quasi judicial procedures into the record. So please bear with me. On these items, um, the board is not setting policy, it is applying the city's existing standards to a specific property, much like a judge would in a courtroom. The board's decision must be based only on competent substantial evidence presented at this hearing. General support or opposition on its own is not evidence. Board members before before before any vote uh will disclose any communication that they have had about these items outside of this hearing, including who it was with and what it was about, along with any site visits, investigations, or expert opinions they might have received. Any written communications that the board members received will be made part of the record. Hollywood allows the formal quasi-judicial procedures to be waived, but only if everyone agrees, which includes staff, the applicant, uh, any intervening parties, and the members of this board and every member of the public present. Once every application is called up, the chair will ask whether anyone objects to waive of the formalities. If no one objects, the hearing proceeds the hearing will proceed in an informal manner. If there is an objection, the formal procedures will apply.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com