EDAC Meeting on Transportation, Zoning, and TIF District - April 15, 2026
EDAC Meeting on Transportation, Zoning, and TIF District - April 15, 2026
The Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) met on April 15, 2026, to discuss transportation challenges, zoning amendments, the failed TIF district vote, and future economic development strategies. Guest James from Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission provided insights on regional transportation planning and potential solutions.
Transportation and Traffic Issues
- James from the Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission described Hooksett as a pass-through town burdened by traffic from northern towns, with a large gap between Hooksett and Concord where there are no highway exits. He noted ongoing roundabout projects on Route 3A and a congestion management process updated every three to five years.
- Discussion of widening Route 3 vs. alternative strategies. James suggested that articulating the problem clearly to DOT and prioritizing projects is key. He provided a list of short- and long-term projects, including EV charging infrastructure and intersection improvements at Exit 11, but noted that none of those projects include a new bridge or highway exit.
- A proposal to remove the toll at Exit 11 was debated. Some members supported removal, citing accidents and hindrance to development, while noting the state's recent announcement to increase tolls complicates the effort. James recommended studying how other towns like Merrimack achieved toll removal.
- Network connectivity: James proposed creating a road network in the Legends Drive area to relieve congestion on Route 3A and open land for development. He suggested a charrette with Plan NH, a nonprofit organization, for visioning, costing about $5,000. EDAC members expressed interest.
Zoning and TIF District
- All zoning amendments recommended by EDAC passed at town meeting. However, the conversion of the mixed-use district to commercial in 2025 inadvertently made industrial uses require a variance instead of a special exception. Members discussed allowing industrial uses at Exits 10 and 11 to attract businesses, noting that opening up zoning would help economic development.
- The TIF district proposal failed to achieve the required two-thirds majority at town meeting. Survey feedback indicated traffic concerns and lack of understanding as main reasons. Members considered amending the TIF to include roadway improvements, but noted complications because roads are state-owned. It was suggested that having DOT representatives present could help.
Inter-committee Communication and Public Input
- EDAC voted to add a public input segment to future meetings, starting next month. The motion passed unanimously.
- Grant reported discussions with Planning Board member Jared Williams about coordinating efforts. The idea of regular joint meetings between EDAC, Planning Board, Zoning Board, and Town Council was raised to align on development projects.
Trail System and Economic Development
- Discussion of the Granite State Trail, a statewide project from Lebanon to Salem. Hooksett is the most missing piece in terms of right-of-way acquisition. Members saw an opportunity to connect existing trails (Pinnacle Pond, Heads Pond, Riverwalk) and create a recreational system that could stimulate business, such as bike shops and coffee shops.
Sewer and Development Updates
- Sewer: The force main project from Martins Ferry pump station to the plant had successful bids and will be completed by August. The gravity section took three weeks through a sandpit. This saves about $3 million that was previously in the TIF plan. Remaining funds may allow new pumps without a bond.
- Development: Washville and Marman pre-construction meetings held; Old Dominion underway. Catholic Charities site fell through but other interest exists. Panera is moving slowly.
Key Outcomes
- EDAC voted to add public input to future meetings.
- Interest in pursuing a Plan NH charrette for network connectivity; staff will help prepare an application.
- Continued work on zoning amendments to allow industrial uses at exits; potential for a town vote in 2027.
- Plan to reach out to state representatives and DOT regarding toll removal and traffic issues; a letter from EDAC was suggested.
- Sewer project savings will reduce TIF bond needs for next year.
Meeting Transcript
When it comes to land use or economics, things that are uh other planning exercises that are not specifically related to transportation, we don't have a dedicated funding mechanism for that. So what we would do is work with the town to identify sort of scope of work and a budget for for doing uh specific uh initiatives. How how large is the region that you cover? It's it's southern New Hampshire, so I'm assuming it's what Concord South or uh it's 14 municipalities. So you guys are uh one of our our northernmost town. We go all the way down to Wyndham, we go as far east as uh uh Candia Deerfield Chester, and then west we're all the way out to Francis Town. How far north? Hooksit. Yeah, you guys are yeah. Yeah. So we had kind of talked about Hooksit is kind of a pass-through town for a lot of towns that are north of us. Um and it it's created a lot of traffic problems in town. Some of that's gonna get worked at worked out to some extent. But we still have what what we believe to be a problem where there's a lot of towns, there's a large gap between Hooksit and Concord where there's no exits, and and that creates a lot of burden on the roadways in in our town because we have people that are trying to go to Pembroke and Suncook and in other parts of Concord uh that you're using Route 3 and 3A for those paths. Um and uh, you know, like like uh we had brought up before, we tried passing a TIP here, and one of the major boundaries we found aside from educating people about what it is, was the traffic concerns. So it's becoming a problem here in terms of us being able to to get some of the initiatives that we feel like we need to get passed in our town to help expand our tax base and drive investment. Um does your group work with uh I assume a central New Hampshire planning group as well. Uh, there is there's is there back and forth between the different regions that could address those types of issues? Yeah, this so there's collaboration amongst them and uh the planning commission when it comes to transportation related projects, um we'll often have the Central Regional Planning Commission come to our meetings. And the reason it works that way where they're coming to us is because we're something we're designated as a metropolitan planning organization, so we get transportation planning funds designated directly to the planning commission, whereas Central does not. Um it's a little in the weeds for what you're asking, but in in general, uh there's a couple things that we do that allow us to track the volume of traffic. Uh we do traffic counseling annual basis. Uh we you know, we have uh an exhaustive analysis of that o over time. Um we have a couple of different public documents that track congestion and travel delay. Uh we have something called a congestion management process. It's a document that we update, you know, every three to five years. Um I interrupt you one quick one second. Greg, I'm assuming a lot of this stuff that he's referring to is probably what just done uh because of the project in relation to the rotaries and stuff, right? Do they do the studies? The uh yeah, there's an engineering report on those roundabouts, but the congestion mitigation plan that James is referring to, I had mentioned it um a couple meetings ago in reference to Route 3A being put on that plan um where it wasn't in in 2020 when they last did the update. Um but yes, there's um it's been several hearings for the roundabout projects, a lot of back and forth that predates my time here. Um but we we do have um like very detailed engineering reports on that. I think it's through preliminary engineering and um at this point they're getting into some more detailed plans. So does it make sense to kind of to share some of what we already have, or does it or do you think that there's a need for more study? So I I think regarding that specific project, the the studies have been have been done and and the projects moving forward. Something that um I had spoke with with James about briefly is um basically how to get in DOT's ear, how to how to most successfully uh pitch to New Hampshire DOT that Hooksit does take on the burden of a lot of off the interstate traffic on on DOT's roads. Um and a point that James made to me that I didn't really fully realize before I spoke to him is you know, everyone at Hooksit says, yeah, we we need the roads to be widened um on Route 3, we need the roundabouts on on Route 3A, but specific to r uh road widening and that never happening and it being so far in the future. My fear is approaching businesses without I think a detailed infrastructure project, which is what everyone's most traditionally aware of. Um they'll say what well what's in it for us, and the answer I don't know how we we we would best phrase this. It would be, well, what's in it for us is we're trying to work on the traffic here and do what we can before DOT can actually widen this road. And I think um James has some points that might be interesting to share about how road widening might not solve the traffic issues in itself. Um but I'm not at the rotaries, and I know that our engineer isn't with us anymore, but the roads are the are they I can't remember, are they two lanes or one? So they're they're two. Yeah, they they would have like a slip bypass lane. Yeah, one slip lane to go directly north or directly south on either side, and then it's a three-way um and I believe they're two late there's two lanes, like the the slip lane would would be the beginning of one, and then it turns into one lane when you're going around it after the slip lane, you've gone past it. So I I think it's I think there's two ways to approach the problem. Um one way is obviously widening what we have here, right? Which we've talked about, we're working on the rotaries. I think another thing on a grander scam and on a long-term plan is to get with the state to try to talk about putting another exit somewhere. And that's a federal thing.
openpublica.com