Horry County Council Regular Meeting - March 18, 2026
Horry County Council Regular Meeting – March 18, 2026
This meeting, held at 6:00 p.m. in the County Council Chambers, covered zoning ordinances, a resolution honoring public safety telecommunicators, and public concern over tree clearing. All votes were unanimous unless noted. Note: The agenda and transcript indicate the meeting occurred on March 17, 2026, but the user-provided date is March 18, 2026; this summary uses the specified date.
Consent Calendar
The following items were approved unanimously as part of the consent agenda:
- Third Reading – Ordinance 14-2026 (rezoning PIN 43701010020 from SF 20 to MSF 20, Juliet Johnson-Richardson)
- Third Reading – Ordinance 15-2026 (rezoning PIN 44015040018 from SF 6 to RE 3, Wilbert Kent Sellers et al.)
- Third Reading – Ordinance 16-2026 (adding SP Hawes Sr. House to the Horry County Historic Property Register)
- First Reading – Ordinance 17-2026 (rezoning a 51.17-acre portion from FA to MRD-P, agent for CM66, LLC)
- First Reading – Ordinance 20-2026 (rezoning PIN 40612020001 from FA & CP to MSF 20, agent for Dorrence Keith Johnson)
- First Reading – Ordinance 21-2026 (rezoning PIN 32208030019 from SF 40 to SF 14.5, agent for Erika H. Roberts)
- First Reading – Ordinance 22-2026 (rezoning PIN 27510040016 from MSF 40 to AG 3, agent for Darel Owen Watts et al.)
- First Reading – Ordinance 24-2026 (amending Articles II & XIV regarding amusement uses)
- First Reading – Ordinance 25-2026 (amending Article VIII, Section 809, Highway 17 Business South Overlay Zone)
- First Reading – Ordinance 26-2026 (amending Article VIII, Section 831, Temporary Vending Overlay Zones)
- First Reading – Ordinance 27-2026 (amending Article VIII, Section 806, Little River Overlay Zone)
Public Comments & Testimony
Kelly La Pietra, a resident of the Forestbrook/Sakasi area, spoke against widespread tree clearing near her neighborhood. She reported that approximately 25–30 acres of trees were removed at the entrance of the Arcadia section, and another 30 acres were cleared along Sakasti Boulevard. She stated the clearing has lowered property values by $20,000–$30,000 per home, increased flood risk, and created an unsightly “war zone.” She called for a permit process for tree removal, notification of nearby residents, and a two-percent transfer tax on home sales to fund land preservation. No other public comments were made.
Discussion Items
- Resolution R-18-2026 (National Public Safety Telecommunicator Week): The resolution declaring April 12–18, 2026, as Public Safety Telecommunicator Week was introduced. Council members praised 911 dispatchers as the “heartbeat of public safety.” The resolution passed unanimously.
- Second Reading – Ordinance 117-2025 (Planned Development District Amendments): Councilman DiSabato moved to amend the ordinance with proposed changes before approval. The amendment was seconded and passed unanimously. The main motion, as amended, also passed unanimously.
- First Reading – Ordinance 18-2026 (Rezoning PIN 25311010003 from LFA to MSF 20): This rezoning request had staff disapproval but Planning Commission approval (7:1). Councilman Hardee moved approval; it passed unanimously.
- First Reading – Ordinance 19-2026 (Rezoning PIN 33710040064 from CFA to MA 1, Tow Yard): The applicant sought rezoning for an existing unpermitted tow yard. Staff and the Planning Commission both recommended disapproval. Councilman Anderson, representing District 7, moved to deny. Public opposition (21-signature petition, 8 speakers against, 0 in favor) was noted. The motion to deny passed unanimously.
- First Reading – Ordinance 23-2026 (Landscape, Buffer, and Tree Preservation Standards): Councilman Allen proposed amending the 60-day grace period for existing plans to 120 days. Councilman Loftus then moved to defer the entire ordinance to the next regular meeting (April 21, 2026) to allow further discussion. The motion to defer passed unanimously; the amendment was withdrawn pending deferral.
- Memorial Dedications: Council members read names of deceased individuals to be honored. The meeting was adjourned in their memory.
Key Outcomes
- Resolution adopted: R-18-2026 (unanimous).
- Ordinance 117-2025: Passed second reading as amended (unanimous).
- Ordinance 18-2026: Passed first reading (unanimous).
- Ordinance 19-2026: Denied on first reading (unanimous).
- Ordinance 23-2026: Deferred to April 21, 2026, to consider amendments (unanimous).
- Consent Agenda: All items approved (unanimous).
- Next meetings: Administration Committee – March 24 at 2:00 p.m.; Transportation Committee – March 24 at 3:00 p.m.; Spring Planning Retreat – April 1 at 9:00 a.m.; Next regular council meeting – April 21, 2026.
Meeting Transcript
It's six o'clock. Good evening. Welcome to the regular council meeting for March 17, 2026. As Mr. Howard said, we start on time so we can finish on time. And we always start with an invitation tonight by Dr. Dukes, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance, led by Mr. Servan. If I can get already, please stand. Heavenly Father, we come before you tonight to thank you for another beautiful day in this county and an opportunity to gather as community leaders, friends, and residents. We ask that you may bless us with wisdom, patience, and your guidance as we all work together to make decisions for the betterment of our residents. Father, we ask that you keep your hand of protection upon our first responders and those that serve each and every day. These things we ask in Jesus' name. Amen. Attention to the flag. I pledge to the flag of the United States of America. One nation. Thank you. Please be seated. All right. We have this wonderful light system. Green is go, go go. Yellow is one minute left, and red. Red is stop. And this is a professional venue. If you signed up and want to talk to us about something that we can do on county council that can help Ori County, we want to hear from you. But this is not a place to come in and um be disrespectful or anything like that because it's a professional venue. We can't help you and less we get a chance. So we had one person signed up, and we will go ahead and get started. Kelly La Piatra talking about tree clearing. Thank you for allowing me to speak here. My name is Kelly La Pietra. I live in the Forest Brook, Sakasi area. And if you see the pictures that um they're putting up on the screen right now, this is the area where my residential area is at the Arcadia section off of Forest Brook Road. About a year and a half ago, um, we had someone come in here and remove all the trees off the entrance of the Arcadia section of uh of our development. And it's been like this for a year and a half, and it looks like a war zone, so I like to call it it looks like Beirut. Um there's no reason to have trees taken down, like at least 25 to 30 acres on off of that property. It's on both sides of Arcadia Parkway. Um it's lowering our uh property uh property values where we had several houses um, you know, trying to sell their homes and they had to take at least a 20 to 30,000 dollar hit on the sale of the house because people purchasing their houses uh are just complaining about um the entrance. It's not inviting anymore. It used to be a tree-lined area. Um I also have here more pictures um inside the Arcadia section, where we had another um further back in the Arcadia section uh by the springs, they had um pictures uh they have trees that were removed at least a good 20 acres behind these homes where a developers just coming in here and just ripping down the trees, and none of us were notified. And there really should be a process where if if anybody's being taking down trees off a property or a lot that's near homes, and residential people should be notified of this removal of all these trees. And I'm I don't like hearing that they're only doing it for logging purposes. I think that's a poor excuse. If they're gonna be taking down trees, there we should be a permit process, and residential should be notified in advance that that these trees would be removed and give us a chance to uh to voice our opinions about the removal of the trees before they actually remove them off the property. There's some there's solutions to this where you can actually people ain't buying people buying houses in the area, they can actually pay a two percent uh transfer tax on to the county, and the county can use you that money for a transfer tax to actually purchase vacant land that still has a whole bunch of trees on it, and it goes for land preservation. That's something that we did in my former state where we had uh a transfer tax to anybody per purchasing a home. Two percent of the sale of the house goes to the county for uh for land preservation, and it's been very successful. Uh it's it alleviates any type of flooding because with no trees, where's the where's the water gonna go?
openpublica.com