OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

AboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Houston, Texas/Committees and Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Houston BFA Committee Meeting - September 29, 2026: Financial Reports and Bond Transactions

Committees and Commissions — Tuesday, September 29, 2026
BodyHouston, Texas
SessionCommittees and Commissions
DateTuesday, September 29, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 40:21

Transcript — VerbatimClick a line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:22

To the September 29th BFA meeting, I'm Sally Alcorn, Chair of this committee.

0:30

I call this committee to order and would like to welcome all council members in attendance.

0:34

My Vice Chair, Councilmember Mario Castillo, Councilmember Vice Mayor Pro Tem Amy Peck, Councilmember Fred Flickinger, Councilmember Julian Ramirez, and staff from Councilmember Joe Panzarella and Councilmember Salinas, Councilmember Carter, and I think that's it.

0:53

So we will get started, not too busy of an agenda this time.

0:57

We will start with the monthly financial report.

0:59

So I welcome Finance Director Melissa Dubowski and Deputy Controller Will Jones.

1:18

Also welcome Councilmember Joaquin Martinez.

Speaker 2

1:32

All right.

1:33

Okay, I'll start.

1:34

Okay, good morning, uh, Madam Chair, members of council and staff.

1:37

I am pleased to present the monthly financial report for the period ending August 31st, 2026.

1:44

And the general fund, the controlless office is projecting an ending fund balance of 294 million or 11.2 percent of expenditures less debt service and pay as you go for FY 2027.

1:56

This is 45.5 million lower than the projection of the finance department due to a lower revenue projection.

2:04

Based on our current projections, the fund balance will be approximately 97.5 million above the city's target of holding 7.5 percent of total expenditures, excluding debt service and pay as you go.

Unassigned speaker

2:16

The

Speaker 2

2:16

FY27 beginning fund balance is 47.4 million higher than the FY26 ending fund balance reported in the June 30, 2026 monthly financial report.

2:26

This increase is due to year and adjustments to revenues and expenditures that will not be final until FY26 annual comprehensive financial report is published.

2:36

The FY27 general fund projections assumes approximately $104 million in revenue associated with the proposed right-of-way fee because of implementation of the fee remains uncertain.

2:47

This revenue represents a significant risk to the projected ending fund balance.

2:51

If the right-of-way fee is not implemented or the anticipated revenue is not realized, the projected ending fund balance would be reduced to approximately $190 million or 7.3% of expenditures less debt service and pay as you go.

3:07

This would place the general fund below the city's 7.5% reserve target.

3:23

And so moving on to commercial paper and bonds, the city's practice has been to maintain no more than 20 percent of the total outstanding debt for each type of debt in a variable rate structure as of August 31st.

3:35

All outstanding debt is within that threshold.

3:38

Thank you very much.

3:39

And that concludes my report.

Speaker 1

3:41

Thank you, Director.

Unassigned speaker

3:45

Hi,

Speaker 3

3:45

good morning.

3:46

This is the two plus ten financial report for the period ending August 31st, 2026.

3:51

Fiscal year 27 projections are based on two months of actual results and ten months of projections.

3:57

For the general fund, both our revenue and expenditure projections remain unchanged from the adopted budget and the prior month.

4:19

We're currently projecting the ending fund balance to be $339.5 million, which is $66.6 million higher than the adopted budget and represents 13% of estimated expenditures, not including debt service and pay as you go.

4:33

The fund balance is $143 million above the target of holding 7.5% of expenditures, excluding debt service and pay as you go.

4:41

In the enterprise special revenue and other funds, uh we're only projecting changes in the asset forfeiture fund.

4:48

Um this is due to revenues exceeding the budget uh year to date.

4:53

Um we're increasing the revenue projection by 2.8 million uh due to higher than anticipated confiscations.

5:00

And that concludes the report for this month.

Speaker 1

5:03

Thank you very much.

5:04

Vice Mayor Pro Tempek.

Unassigned speaker

5:06

Thank

Speaker 4

5:06

you, Chair.

Unassigned speaker

5:06

Thank you both for the presentation.

Speaker 4

5:09

Regarding the new administrative garbage fee that has now been implemented.

5:14

So I noticed that there is a sales tax on the fee.

5:18

And I do appreciate that it's not $5 plus the sales tax, that it's all the sales taxes included within the $5.

5:25

But in all the briefings and models presented to us, I don't recall us ever talking about sales tax as being part of it.

5:35

Because the models presented to us showed $24 million yearly going to the combined utility system, but it's really $22,176,000 to the combined utility system and over $277,000 going to the general fund because of sales taxes.

5:51

So that's a difference of $1.8 million now going to combined utility system and over $1.5 million now not going to the City of Houston at all because of the sales tax.

6:01

So my questions are do we know that we would have to do a sales tax for this fee?

6:06

And then two, why are we doing a sales tax at all?

6:09

I'm not convinced that it meets the criteria for sales taxes.

6:14

Do we get a comptroller determination on this?

6:17

I mean it doesn't appear that we pay sales taxes and other similar fees like the container lease fee, the drainage fee, stuff like that.

6:24

So can you just explain a little bit more about the sales tax on this?

Speaker 3

6:28

Sure.

6:29

So um when we were looking at the $5 and what we had communicated to the public, we felt that um, you know, like to your point, having the five dollars plus the sales tax wouldn't be what was publicly discussed.

6:40

But um we did work with City Legal to look at um what is taxable, which is governed by state law.

6:47

So um I know we have a representative from the city attorney's office here, so I don't know, Eric, if you could um help with that.

6:53

I mean, please.

6:54

We did talk to legal, yeah.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Aviation██████████12%
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████11%
Water And Wastewater Management███████9%
Sales Tax██████7%
Public Safety█████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Houston BFA Committee Meeting - September 29, 2026: Financial Reports and Bond Transactions

The Budget and Fiscal Affairs (BFA) Committee, chaired by Councilmember Sally Alcorn, met on September 29, 2026, to review the monthly financial report for the period ending August 31, 2026, and to discuss upcoming financial transactions, including combined utility system bonds and airport special facility revenue bonds. Key topics included the right-of-way fee, sales tax on the new garbage fee, and guardrails for utility transfers.

Consent Calendar

  • No consent calendar items were presented.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Dominic Mazoc signed up to speak but was not present. No public comments were made.

Discussion Items

  • Monthly Financial Report: Finance Director Melissa Dubowski presented the general fund projection ending fund balance of $294 million (11.2% of expenditures less debt service and pay-as-you-go) for FY27, which is $45.5 million lower than the finance department's projection due to lower revenue. The fund balance is $97.5 million above the city's 7.5% reserve target. The projection assumes $104 million in revenue from the proposed right-of-way fee; if not realized, the fund balance would drop to $190 million (7.3%), below the target.
    • Deputy Controller Will Jones presented the 2+10 financial report, projecting a $339.5 million ending fund balance (13% of expenditures), $143 million above the 7.5% target. Only the asset forfeiture fund projection changed (increased by $2.8 million due to higher confiscations).
  • Sales Tax on Garbage Fee: Vice Mayor Pro Tem Amy Peck questioned the application of sales tax to the new $5 administrative garbage fee. She noted the models showed $24 million yearly to the combined utility system, but the actual amount is $22.176 million, with $277,000 going to the general fund and $1.5 million to sales tax. She asked whether a comptroller determination was obtained. A representative from the city attorney's office (Eric) confirmed that state law requires sales tax on garbage collection as a real property service. The city received a Comptroller's opinion that when a specific fee (not a tax) is charged, sales tax applies. The drainage fee and container lease fee do not appear to be subject to sales tax. Councilmember Ramirez asked about sales tax on water sold outside the city; the legal representative agreed to report back.
  • Upcoming Financial Transactions: Director Dubowski presented two transactions:
    • Combined Utility System (CUS) Bonds (Series 2026 B, C, and D): Total expected size $1.76 billion. Series B ($785 million) will refund bonds via tender and take out commercial paper. Series C and D ($975 million) will refund variable-rate debt into fixed-rate debt and terminate swap agreements. The transaction also seeks to modernize the master bond ordinance, including adding guardrails on the right-of-way transfer (proposed 9–10% cap on gross revenues, though the FY27 budget is at 5%), establishing an interest and sinking fund for debt service, and defeasing old bonds. Estimated net present value savings of $4 million (0.25%), true interest cost around 4.25%. The transaction requires bondholder consent (at least 50% +1) for ordinance amendments. Next steps: RCA to City Council in October, pricing in November, closing in December.
    • United Airlines Special Facility Revenue Bonds (Terminal B): The remaining $850 million under the $2 billion MOA, after issuing $1.1 billion in 2024. These bonds are supported solely by United's lease payments, not general fund or airport revenues. Anticipated true interest cost 5.8–6.2%. Next steps: council actions in October and November, pricing and closing in November.
  • Discussion on Right-of-Way Guardrails: Councilmember Ramirez asked about the proposed cap on the right-of-way fee, noting the five percent start. Director Dubowski explained the 9–10% range was based on peer cities (e.g., Austin Water 8.2% cap, San Antonio CPS 14% cap) to provide flexibility for future councils. Councilmember Martinez emphasized transparency, asking how future increases would be communicated and tied to water rate studies. Director Dubowski noted that quarterly reports on the CUS financial health will come to BFA. Councilmember Alcorn recalled legislative talk about capping right-of-way fees; Director Dubowski said the city's 5% is conservative compared to peers (e.g., San Antonio utilities transfer as much as property taxes).
  • Airport Bonds Update: Councilmember Martinez asked about the United bonds; Director Dubowski noted that enabling project cost estimates came in under projections, so less than the $624 million in general airport revenue bonds may be needed.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes were taken during the meeting.
  • The committee will receive quarterly financial updates on the Combined Utility System throughout FY27.
  • RCAs for the Combined Utility System bond transaction are expected at City Council in October 2026, with pricing in November and closing in December 2026.
  • For the United Airlines bonds, council actions are anticipated in October and November 2026, with pricing and closing in November 2026.
  • Legal will report back on sales tax applicability for water sales outside the city.
  • The meeting was adjourned; the next BFA meeting is scheduled for November 2, 2026, at 10 a.m.

Meeting Transcript

To the September 29th BFA meeting, I'm Sally Alcorn, Chair of this committee. I call this committee to order and would like to welcome all council members in attendance. My Vice Chair, Councilmember Mario Castillo, Councilmember Vice Mayor Pro Tem Amy Peck, Councilmember Fred Flickinger, Councilmember Julian Ramirez, and staff from Councilmember Joe Panzarella and Councilmember Salinas, Councilmember Carter, and I think that's it. So we will get started, not too busy of an agenda this time. We will start with the monthly financial report. So I welcome Finance Director Melissa Dubowski and Deputy Controller Will Jones. Also welcome Councilmember Joaquin Martinez. All right. Okay, I'll start. Okay, good morning, uh, Madam Chair, members of council and staff. I am pleased to present the monthly financial report for the period ending August 31st, 2026. And the general fund, the controlless office is projecting an ending fund balance of 294 million or 11.2 percent of expenditures less debt service and pay as you go for FY 2027. This is 45.5 million lower than the projection of the finance department due to a lower revenue projection. Based on our current projections, the fund balance will be approximately 97.5 million above the city's target of holding 7.5 percent of total expenditures, excluding debt service and pay as you go. The FY27 beginning fund balance is 47.4 million higher than the FY26 ending fund balance reported in the June 30, 2026 monthly financial report. This increase is due to year and adjustments to revenues and expenditures that will not be final until FY26 annual comprehensive financial report is published. The FY27 general fund projections assumes approximately $104 million in revenue associated with the proposed right-of-way fee because of implementation of the fee remains uncertain. This revenue represents a significant risk to the projected ending fund balance. If the right-of-way fee is not implemented or the anticipated revenue is not realized, the projected ending fund balance would be reduced to approximately $190 million or 7.3% of expenditures less debt service and pay as you go. This would place the general fund below the city's 7.5% reserve target. And so moving on to commercial paper and bonds, the city's practice has been to maintain no more than 20 percent of the total outstanding debt for each type of debt in a variable rate structure as of August 31st. All outstanding debt is within that threshold. Thank you very much. And that concludes my report. Thank you, Director. Hi, good morning. This is the two plus ten financial report for the period ending August 31st, 2026. Fiscal year 27 projections are based on two months of actual results and ten months of projections. For the general fund, both our revenue and expenditure projections remain unchanged from the adopted budget and the prior month. We're currently projecting the ending fund balance to be $339.5 million, which is $66.6 million higher than the adopted budget and represents 13% of estimated expenditures, not including debt service and pay as you go. The fund balance is $143 million above the target of holding 7.5% of expenditures, excluding debt service and pay as you go. In the enterprise special revenue and other funds, uh we're only projecting changes in the asset forfeiture fund. Um this is due to revenues exceeding the budget uh year to date. Um we're increasing the revenue projection by 2.8 million uh due to higher than anticipated confiscations. And that concludes the report for this month. Thank you very much. Vice Mayor Pro Tempek. Thank you, Chair. Thank you both for the presentation. Regarding the new administrative garbage fee that has now been implemented. So I noticed that there is a sales tax on the fee. And I do appreciate that it's not $5 plus the sales tax, that it's all the sales taxes included within the $5. But in all the briefings and models presented to us, I don't recall us ever talking about sales tax as being part of it. Because the models presented to us showed $24 million yearly going to the combined utility system, but it's really $22,176,000 to the combined utility system and over $277,000 going to the general fund because of sales taxes. So that's a difference of $1.8 million now going to combined utility system and over $1.5 million now not going to the City of Houston at all because of the sales tax. So my questions are do we know that we would have to do a sales tax for this fee? And then two, why are we doing a sales tax at all?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com