Howard County Council Legislative Public Hearing - June 15, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Howard County Council Legislative Public Hearing – June 15, 2026
The Howard County Council held a hybrid legislative public hearing on Monday, June 15, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. (meeting started at 7:00 p.m. ET) in the George Howard Building, Ellicott City, and via WebEx. The hearing was broadcast on channels 44 and 1071 and live-streamed. Councilmembers present: Opel Jones (Chair), Christiana Rigby (Vice Chair), Liz Walsh, Deb Jung, and David Yungmann. The agenda included appointments, financial items, general legislation, and one tabled appointment. No votes were taken; written comments remain open, and final consideration is scheduled for July 6, 2026.
Appointments
- CR100‑2026 – Eileen Yao Wu (AAPI Commission): Wu, a rising junior high school student from Clarksville, testified in support of her appointment, citing her co‑founding of the AAPI Angle and work with the Villager of River Hill. Position: Support.
- CR56‑2026 – J. Jason Zhao (AAPI Commission) (Tabled): Zhao, a 13‑year county resident, testified in support, expressing a desire to serve as a bridge between the 20% Asian population and government agencies. Position: Support.
- CR101‑2026 – Elizabeth A. Leiba (Commission for Women): Leiba, an author and professor, testified in support, focusing on workplace equity, pay inequity, and AI’s impact on women. She holds 20 AI certifications. Position: Support.
- CR102‑2026 – Lucia Reyna (La Alianza Latina Commission): Reyna, an immigration paralegal and lifelong county resident, testified in support, emphasizing her work with Hispanic families and desire to improve language access, education, and economic stability. Position: Support.
- CR103‑2026 – Wanda I. Colon Canales (La Alianza Latina Commission): Canales, associate director for Ambiciones at Howard Community College, testified in support, sharing her background in education and community service, including LULAC and YMCA roles. Position: Support.
Financial Items
- CB40‑2026 – Lease Agreement – 38,285 sq. ft. at 7138 Columbia Gateway Drive: Emily Ayaki (Bureau of Real Estate Management) testified in support for a 12‑year lease (with two 5‑year options) and a 365‑day rent abatement. The space consolidates two existing Board of Elections leases (21,688 sq. ft.) into one larger footprint. Position: Administration support.
- CB41‑2026 – Fourth Amendment to Lease – 12,477 sq. ft. at 6095 Marshalee Drive: Ayaki also testified in support of a 5‑year extension (through June 30, 2032) for the police automated enforcement program. Position: Administration support.
- CB42‑2026 – $18,169,588 Bonds – Maryland Water Infrastructure Financing Administration: Rafiu Igile (Director of Finance) testified in support of a 20‑year, 2‑3% interest loan for the Ellicott City Improvement and Enhancement Project (C0737). The bonds were already approved by the State Board of Public Works and the FY26 capital budget. Position: Administration support.
- CR104‑2026 – Endorsing State Financing – First Source Electronics: Jennifer Jones (Economic Development) testified in support of the expansion along Route 1, which creates and retains jobs. The county provides a 10% workforce training grant match. Position: Administration support.
- CR105‑2026 – Adopting HUD Annual Action Plan: Kelly Simoneau (DHCD) testified in support. The FFY26 plan allocates approximately $1.3 million in CDBG and $500,000 in HOME funds. Since 2018, the county has administered $10M CDBG and $4M HOME, funding rental assistance for 6,000 households, housing repairs for 1,200 homeowners/renters, and emergency shelter for 4,000 homeless clients. New affordable housing includes a potential 55‑unit townhome development by Fellow (pre‑development) and accessible units by iHomes (acquisition). Councilmember Walsh asked about new units; Simoneau clarified Fellow’s 55‑unit proposal is for affordable three‑bedroom townhomes (site not yet selected). Position: Administration support; no public opposition.
General Items
- CR106‑2026 – Adopting the School Capacity Chart: Tim Rogers (HCPSS School Planning) testified that the board approved the chart on May 19, 2026. For the test year 2029‑2030, seven elementary schools and four middle schools are constrained (Dunloggin, Hammond, Patuxent Valley, Thomas Viaduct). No high schools are constrained. Councilmember Jung asked why four middle schools were removed from the 2025 chart and now relisted; Rogers cited enrollment fluctuations post‑pandemic. Brent Loveless (public) testified that the chart’s format understates overcrowding and warned of pending upzoning impacts. Positions: Administration support; Loveless critical of adequacy.
- CR107‑2026 – Adopting the Housing Unit Allocation Chart: Jeff Bronow (DPZ) testified in support, noting the chart is based on the HOCO by Design general plan with rolling average adjustments. Brent Loveless testified that the unit count is derived without relation to infrastructure capacity and has grown excessively due to carryovers and exemptions. Positions: Administration support; Loveless critical.
- CB43‑2026 – Howard County Designated Days of Commemoration: Council Chair Opel Jones introduced the bill to codify days honoring religious, ethnic, and cultural traditions. Joe Hurwitz (public) testified with concerns about the process (adding days by CAO, removing by County Executive) and the list being shorter than Montgomery County’s. Jones noted the CAO works in tandem with the County Executive. Positions: Sponsor support; public with questions.
- CB44‑2026 – Board of Appeals – Administrative Agency Required to Appear: Councilmember Walsh introduced the bill to require the administrative agency (e.g., DPZ) to appear as a party before the Board of Appeals. She noted that DPZ rarely appears, leading the Board to interpret non‑appearance as the agency’s admission that its decision is indefensible. Testimony in support: Stu Cohn (HCCA president) strongly supported, citing the WR Grace, Manor Hill, and go‑kart cases and recommending the bill also apply to hearing examiners. Lisa Krauss (Stop Grace Coalition) supported, urging an amendment to include hearing examiner hearings; she reported four recent odor complaints near the WR Grace plastic pyrolysis facility. She criticized DPZ for not appearing in previous zoning complaints. Testimony in opposition: Ashley Asbury (public) vehemently opposed, attacking Walsh personally and calling the bill “political theater.” Joel Hurwitz (public) expressed support for the sentiment but raised questions about definitions (violation appeals vs. conditional use) and fiscal analysis hours. Walsh responded that she had never seen the county appear before the Board of Appeals until the WR Grace case, where Office of Law attorney David Moore sat with WR Grace counsel. Positions: Most speakers support with clarifications; one strongly opposed.
- CB45‑2026 – PILOT Agreements – Reporting Student Yields: Councilmember Walsh introduced the bill to require DHCD to include annual reporting of student yields from PILOT‑facilitated housing in the existing Annual Analysis of Moderate Income Housing programs. Testimony in opposition: Jackie Ng (Housing Affordability Coalition) questioned why only PILOT projects are targeted, recommended that HCPSS collect the data instead of DHCD, and noted privacy concerns. Jennifer Leonard (Enterprise Community Development) opposed, stating that affordable housing does not generate more students than single‑family homes and that HCPSS is best positioned to provide enrollment data. She reported Enterprise is preserving almost 450 affordable homes through PILOTs, including redevelopment of Ranley Court and Waverly Winds (opening summer 2026). Testimony in support: Brent Loveless (public) supported the bill as a “critical first step” for data-driven decisions, citing a recent forum where a housing authority official could not answer whether large PILOT projects receive APFO exemptions. Councilmember Rigby referenced the pupil yield analysis of 2024 (partnership between DPZ and HCPSS) as a potential alternative. Positions: Coalition and developer oppose; public supports; councilmembers seek better data mechanism.
Tabled Appointment
- CR56‑2026 – J. Jason Zhao (AAPI Commission): Heard earlier under Appointments (see above).
Key Outcomes
- No votes were taken; the public hearing is for testimony only. Written testimony remains under consideration.
- The Council will hold a work session on Monday, June 22, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. in the Seaburn Gray Room to discuss agenda items.
- A legislative session for final consideration of these bills and resolutions is scheduled for Monday, July 6, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Banneker Room (hybrid participation).
Meeting Transcript
This webinar is being recorded and summarized. Good evening, everyone. This is the council's June legislative public hearing in which we will hear testimony for legislation introduced on June 1st. This evening is a hybrid meeting which is being conducted in person and via WebEx teleconference. It is also available to the public through live stream on the County Council website and broadcast on channels 44 and 1071. Sign up to testify on legislation that is a subject of this public hearing was done online and was available in person prior to the start of the session. The cutoff for testimony sign up was at 7 p.m. this evening. If needed, the council will hold a work session on Monday, June 22nd at 10 a.m. in the Seaburning Gray Room. Council members, please provide agenda items for the work session to our council administrator no later than 9 a.m. Tuesday, June 23rd. A legislative session for final consideration of certain legislation that is a subject of this public hearing will be held on Monday, July 6th at 7 p.m. in the Banneker Room. Public participation for these meetings will be available in person virtually via WebEx and viewed live stream through the County Council website. At this time, I'm going to do a roll call of the council members. Ms. Rigby. Here. Miss Young. Here. Miss Walsh. Here. Mr. Youngman. Here. And I am Opal Jones. We will now recite the Pledge of Allegiance. We have asked the council administrator to enforce a public participation guideline to help the council and support staff remain focused on the topics of the meeting. Going forward, attendees will not be allowed to approach the horseshoe area or dais before, during, or after council meetings. As has been the practice, when council members are available for public interaction, the individual council member or council members will enter the public seating area to engage in conversation, as you may have seen earlier today. Constituents are encouraged to reach out to the council representative during normal business hours to schedule a convenient time to discuss any issues or concerns. If you have immediate questions regarding the topics of this meeting, please reach out to the designated staff member seated at the table in the back of the room. For questions not related to this meeting, please contact the council office during normal business hours by calling our main number at 410 313 2001. We appreciate your cooperation and helping us maintain a safe, orderly and efficient meeting environment. Thank you. We will now proceed with our regular June legislative public hearing. If there are any students who will be testifying this evening, for those in person, please come up to the front row so we can call on you to testify. Those virtually, please contact Isaiah Anderson by raising your hand on the WebEx or sending him an email at the email addresses Ianderson at Howard County MD.gov. Please note that while we are receiving testimony this evening, we continue to receive written comments, which will be fully considered by the council prior to taking action. Anyone who signed up to testify at this hearing will be called to testify. When you are called upon to testify, please state your name in the city or town of your home address. Representatives from nonprofit organizations will have up to five minutes to testify. Individuals and other organizations have up to three minutes to testify. Individuals who have indicated that they are testifying through an interpreter may be allowed a total of five minutes with interpretive translation. You may not yield your time to another speaker. You will be notified at the 30-second mark to begin wrapping up by the administrator, and then you will be notified when your time to speak is up. You must conclude when your time is up. If you have written testimony, you may also email it to Council Mail at Howard County MD.gov. Students, when you come forward, please state your name and the legislation related to your testimony.
openpublica.com