OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Howard County, Maryland/County Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Howard County Hearing Examiner Variance Petition (BA26-014V) - September 15, 2026

County Council & Boards — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyHoward County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Boards
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 13:40

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

And summarized.

0:01

All right, good morning.

0:03

It is the 15th of September.

0:05

It is approximately 10 a.m.

0:07

We are here for application 26-014 V, which is an application for a side yard setback variance in order to construct a sunroom.

0:18

The request is from the 7.5 required feet that a 3.5 foot variance be obtained, thereby reducing the side judge set book to four feet.

0:34

So Mr.

0:34

Watkins, Ms.

0:35

Watkins, welcome today.

0:36

It is your case.

0:38

So you get to talk.

0:41

Okay, thank you.

0:43

Yes, we're uh applying for you know permit for the sunroom.

0:50

And I think the 3.5 area that we're asking for is still, I guess it's still on our property line.

1:00

I was just, you know, would like to see if we could get that approved so we can go ahead and move forward with that with that project.

1:12

Okay.

1:13

Let me help you.

1:14

Um there are five requirements that you have to meet.

1:18

And so I need you to help me make the findings for those five requirements.

1:22

Okay.

1:23

All right.

1:23

So the first requirement is that there are unique physical conditions, including irregularity, narrowness or shallowness of the lot, exceptional topography, or other existing features peculiar to the particular lot, and as a result of the unique physical condition, hardships arise in complying strictly with the side yard setback of 7.5 feet.

1:52

So this criteria goes to the actual physical condition of lot.

1:57

All right.

1:58

And in looking at your site plan, I notice that because of the way our code reads, and because of the way your house is situated, by law, what you would think of as your rear yard is really the side yard because of the way your house is situated.

2:18

Okay, and that's where you run into trouble because you're putting the sunroom in the side yard instead of the rear yard.

2:26

But that's because of the way the house is situated.

2:29

So that's why you have such a small setback that you have to comply with.

2:34

So tell me about, in addition to the location of the house, tell me about why your property, the property itself, is um is different than your neighbors, or why it causes you a hardship.

2:53

Are there hills or there?

2:56

Tell me about tell me about the property.

2:58

Does it property slope?

3:00

Are there trees?

3:02

I mean, it it doesn't slope anything like that.

3:05

It's basically on look like it's on this a slight incline, not that much of an incline.

3:12

Um an incline from the street, Woodcrest Drive, towards the back of your property?

3:20

Yeah, it just like so what do you think maybe that incline is?

3:27

Couple feet?

3:30

Yeah, a couple of feet.

3:31

It's not it's not uh I know the d it when you come up the driveway, it slopes going upward.

3:52

You know, so it's not steep.

3:55

It's not a steep incline or anything like that.

4:00

No, but but but there is a raise in topography from the front of your property from from the way we're talking about the front of your property being Woodcrest Drive and the rear being where you want to put the sun roof.

4:12

So you're saying from Woodcrest Drive to the rear of your property, the property slopes upward a couple of feet?

4:20

Yeah, a couple of feet.

4:21

Okay.

4:24

Two to three feet?

4:26

Yeah.

4:27

More?

4:28

No more than that.

4:36

Is your lot physically your your lot is pretty rectangular?

4:43

Is your lot any different in shape than your neighbors?

4:49

No.

4:51

So I'm looking for something that sets your lot apart.

4:55

Okay.

4:55

So that's what I'm struggling with.

5:00

So you've got a rise in your property, your shape is pretty rectangular.

5:04

You just told me that it's like your neighbors.

5:07

I know my neighbor.

5:09

My next door neighbor has a sunroom added on his house.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████83%
Procedural█████████17%
Summary of Proceedings

Howard County Hearing Examiner Variance Petition (BA26-014V) - September 15, 2026

On September 15, 2026, at approximately 10:00 AM, Hearing Examiner Joyce Nichols presided over a hybrid hearing for Case BA26-014V, a residential district variance petition filed by Charles Watkins. The petition requested a 3.5-foot variance from the required 7.5-foot side yard setback to construct a sunroom at 6243 Woodcrest Drive, Ellicott City, MD 21043. The hearing was streamed via WebEx and the Banneker Room.

Discussion Items

  • Variance Request: Applicants Charles E. Watkins and Patricia Rainey Watkins sought approval for a 3.5-foot variance to reduce the side yard setback from 7.5 feet to 4 feet to accommodate a sunroom addition. The Watkins purchased the property in 1996 as the second owners.
  • Examiner's Findings Review: Examiner Nichols walked through the five required criteria for granting a variance:
    1. Unique Physical Conditions: The lot is rectangular with a slight upward slope of 2–3 feet from the street to the rear. The house orientation causes the intended rear yard to be legally classified as a side yard, leading to the setback difficulty. However, the examiner noted the lot shape is similar to neighbors and struggled to identify a unique physical condition beyond the house orientation.
    2. Neighborhood Character: The sunroom would not alter the neighborhood character, as neighboring properties have similar sunrooms. It would not impair adjacent property or public welfare.
    3. Self-Created Hardship: The hardship was not created by the owners; they purchased the property as built in 1996 and were unaware of the side-yard setback issue due to the house orientation. No construction had begun.
    4. Minimum Variance: The requested 3.5-foot reduction is the minimum necessary to allow the family sunroom, which is modestly sized.
    5. Historic District: The property is not in a historic district.
  • Neighbor Input: One neighbor, Mr. Holland, was present but did not offer testimony. The applicants reported speaking with neighbors who voiced no concerns, and no opposition was expressed.

Key Outcomes

  • The hearing was concluded and the record closed. Hearing Examiner Nichols indicated that a decision and order would be forthcoming. No immediate vote was taken; the examiner will issue a written decision.

Meeting Transcript

And summarized. All right, good morning. It is the 15th of September. It is approximately 10 a.m. We are here for application 26-014 V, which is an application for a side yard setback variance in order to construct a sunroom. The request is from the 7.5 required feet that a 3.5 foot variance be obtained, thereby reducing the side judge set book to four feet. So Mr. Watkins, Ms. Watkins, welcome today. It is your case. So you get to talk. Okay, thank you. Yes, we're uh applying for you know permit for the sunroom. And I think the 3.5 area that we're asking for is still, I guess it's still on our property line. I was just, you know, would like to see if we could get that approved so we can go ahead and move forward with that with that project. Okay. Let me help you. Um there are five requirements that you have to meet. And so I need you to help me make the findings for those five requirements. Okay. All right. So the first requirement is that there are unique physical conditions, including irregularity, narrowness or shallowness of the lot, exceptional topography, or other existing features peculiar to the particular lot, and as a result of the unique physical condition, hardships arise in complying strictly with the side yard setback of 7.5 feet. So this criteria goes to the actual physical condition of lot. All right. And in looking at your site plan, I notice that because of the way our code reads, and because of the way your house is situated, by law, what you would think of as your rear yard is really the side yard because of the way your house is situated. Okay, and that's where you run into trouble because you're putting the sunroom in the side yard instead of the rear yard. But that's because of the way the house is situated. So that's why you have such a small setback that you have to comply with. So tell me about, in addition to the location of the house, tell me about why your property, the property itself, is um is different than your neighbors, or why it causes you a hardship. Are there hills or there? Tell me about tell me about the property. Does it property slope? Are there trees? I mean, it it doesn't slope anything like that. It's basically on look like it's on this a slight incline, not that much of an incline. Um an incline from the street, Woodcrest Drive, towards the back of your property? Yeah, it just like so what do you think maybe that incline is? Couple feet? Yeah, a couple of feet. It's not it's not uh I know the d it when you come up the driveway, it slopes going upward. You know, so it's not steep. It's not a steep incline or anything like that. No, but but but there is a raise in topography from the front of your property from from the way we're talking about the front of your property being Woodcrest Drive and the rear being where you want to put the sun roof. So you're saying from Woodcrest Drive to the rear of your property, the property slopes upward a couple of feet? Yeah, a couple of feet. Okay. Two to three feet? Yeah. More? No more than that.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com