OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Howard County, Maryland/County Council & Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Howard County Council Special Meeting on Zoning Counsel Contract – October 30, 2026

County Council & Boards — Friday, October 30, 2026
BodyHoward County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Boards
DateFriday, October 30, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:47

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

And summarized.

Speaker 2

0:02

Good morning, everyone.

0:03

This is the council special meeting to discuss the zoning council contract.

Unassigned speaker

0:07

The

Speaker 2

0:07

proceeding this morning is a hybrid meeting, which is available in person and virtual via WebEx.

0:13

It is also available to the public through live stream

Unassigned speaker

0:16

on

Speaker 2

0:16

the Howard County Council website.

0:19

This time I'm going to do a roll call of the council members.

0:21

Ms.

0:21

Rigby.

Speaker 1

0:22

Here.

Speaker 2

0:23

Ms.

0:23

Young.

Speaker 1

0:23

Here.

Speaker 2

0:24

Ms.

0:24

Walsh.

Speaker 1

0:25

Here.

Speaker 2

0:26

Mr.

0:26

Youngman.

0:27

Here.

0:27

And I am Opal Jones.

0:29

We will now proceed with our agenda.

Unassigned speaker

0:33

The

Speaker 2

0:33

Zoning Council contract expires at the end of the year, December 31st, 2026.

0:39

The original contract allowed for a one-year renewal option.

0:43

We are meeting today to discuss whether or not to extend the current contract with Nathaniel Foreman from O'Malley, Miles, Nylon, and Gilmore for one

Unassigned speaker

0:53

year.

Speaker 2

0:53

Any discussion?

0:56

Yes.

Speaker 1

0:58

While I support continuing the contract, I think that we should ask the zoning council attorney to resign his position as I believe it's treasurer of the Maryland Building Builders Industry Association as it can appear as a potential conflict of interest.

Speaker 2

1:23

Okay.

1:24

Any other discussion?

1:26

Go ahead.

Speaker 3

1:29

I realize that you know we're doing this because of a term limit in the original contract, but it's not uh as though the incoming council slash zoning board will be hearing cases, you know,

Speaker 1

1:41

it

Speaker 3

1:43

in the

Unassigned speaker

1:44

what

Speaker 3

1:45

is that phase?

1:46

Is it because he's appearing before the hearing examiner too?

1:48

What's the time sensitivity here?

1:50

Why wouldn't we leave this to the next council?

1:52

I guess is the broader question.

Speaker 2

1:54

I believe, well, I won't get into the philosophy behind it, but they would have to, so at their installment, the only thing they're going to vote on, as I remember, is leadership and uh they wouldn't be voting in an actual legislative session like this, like this, until January after the expiration of the contract.

Unassigned speaker

2:17

The

Speaker 3

2:17

contract doesn't have any kind of carryover term.

Speaker 4

2:22

Um my understanding is not it would expire December 31st, 2026, and unless extended.

Speaker 3

2:30

Okay.

2:35

Yeah, I feel like this is uh something that if we do extend it, it should be for a much shorter period than a year.

2:42

I mean, again, I think this is something that we're doing now that carries over into a group of successors that we have no involvement with other than one-fifth of

Unassigned speaker

2:51

us.

Unassigned speaker

2:53

All

Speaker 2

2:53

right, any further discussion.

Unassigned speaker

2:58

I

Speaker 5

3:00

would just say that I um I think I understand the arguments.

3:05

I think it's probably um wisest to move ahead with um the contract today.

3:10

It's just it's a one-year term.

3:12

Um, and that gives the new body time to

Unassigned speaker

3:14

you

Speaker 5

3:15

know understand the position, decide how they want it to run, um, maybe even come to a collective agreement and um discuss that with Mr.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Summary of Proceedings

Howard County Council Special Meeting on Zoning Counsel Contract

On October 30, 2026, the Howard County Council held a hybrid special meeting to consider whether to exercise the one-year renewal option in the Zoning Counsel contract with Nathaniel Foreman of O'Malley, Miles, Nylon, and Gilmore. The contract was set to expire on December 31, 2026. After discussion, the Council voted 3 to 2 to extend the contract through December 31, 2027.

Discussion Items

  • One councilmember expressed support for continuing the contract but suggested asking the Zoning Counsel attorney to resign as treasurer of the Maryland Building Builders Industry Association, saying it could appear as a potential conflict of interest.
  • Another councilmember questioned the time sensitivity, noting that the incoming council/zoning board would not be hearing cases, and asked why the decision should not be left to the next council. That councilmember also said that if the contract were extended, it should be for a much shorter period than one year.
  • A third councilmember argued that it was wisest to move ahead with the one-year extension because it would give the new body time to understand the position, decide how they want it to run, and discuss the matter with Mr. Foreman. That councilmember made the motion to extend the contract for one year through December 31, 2027.

Key Outcomes

  • The motion to extend the Zoning Counsel contract for one year through December 31, 2027, passed by a vote of 3 to 2.
  • Voting yes: Chair Opel Jones, Vice Chair Christiana Rigby, and Councilmember David Yungmann (listed as Mr. Youngman in the transcript).
  • Voting no: Councilmember Deb Jung (referred to as Ms. Young in the transcript) and Councilmember Liz Walsh.
  • Councilmember Jung stated that she voted no without the contingency she had mentioned—asking the attorney to resign from the Maryland Building Builders Industry Association—because that condition did not appear to be of interest to the majority of the council.
  • The Council then recessed to a legislative wrap-up session using the same WebEx link.

Meeting Transcript

And summarized. Good morning, everyone. This is the council special meeting to discuss the zoning council contract. The proceeding this morning is a hybrid meeting, which is available in person and virtual via WebEx. It is also available to the public through live stream on the Howard County Council website. This time I'm going to do a roll call of the council members. Ms. Rigby. Here. Ms. Young. Here. Ms. Walsh. Here. Mr. Youngman. Here. And I am Opal Jones. We will now proceed with our agenda. The Zoning Council contract expires at the end of the year, December 31st, 2026. The original contract allowed for a one-year renewal option. We are meeting today to discuss whether or not to extend the current contract with Nathaniel Foreman from O'Malley, Miles, Nylon, and Gilmore for one year. Any discussion? Yes. While I support continuing the contract, I think that we should ask the zoning council attorney to resign his position as I believe it's treasurer of the Maryland Building Builders Industry Association as it can appear as a potential conflict of interest. Okay. Any other discussion? Go ahead. I realize that you know we're doing this because of a term limit in the original contract, but it's not uh as though the incoming council slash zoning board will be hearing cases, you know, it in the what is that phase? Is it because he's appearing before the hearing examiner too? What's the time sensitivity here? Why wouldn't we leave this to the next council? I guess is the broader question. I believe, well, I won't get into the philosophy behind it, but they would have to, so at their installment, the only thing they're going to vote on, as I remember, is leadership and uh they wouldn't be voting in an actual legislative session like this, like this, until January after the expiration of the contract. The contract doesn't have any kind of carryover term. Um my understanding is not it would expire December 31st, 2026, and unless extended. Okay. Yeah, I feel like this is uh something that if we do extend it, it should be for a much shorter period than a year. I mean, again, I think this is something that we're doing now that carries over into a group of successors that we have no involvement with other than one-fifth of

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com