OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Summary – August 6, 2026

Meeting PortalThursday, August 6, 2026
BodyHuntington, New York
SessionMeeting Portal
DateThursday, August 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 48:33

Transcript — Verbatim
0:01

Okay, good evening, everyone.

0:02

Welcome to the zoning board of appeals for the town of Huntington for the meeting of August the 6th, 2026.

0:09

Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag.

0:13

I pledge allegiance to the flag in the United States of America and to the Republic for States.

0:19

One nation under God.

0:20

Indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

0:24

Please be seated.

0:28

Minutes for July 23rd.

0:44

I would entertain a motion to accept the minutes for July 23rd, 2026.

0:49

I'll make that motion.

0:49

Mr.

0:50

McGrath on the motion.

0:51

Mr.

0:51

Castaña on the second.

0:52

All in favor.

0:53

Any opposed?

0:55

Minutes are accepted.

0:56

Dawn, are the appropriate postings and publications done with the appropriate affidavits to give us jurisdiction for the hearings tonight?

1:05

All right, thank you.

1:06

The order for the hearings tonight will be as follows.

1:10

23732, 39 Bunker Hill Drive, 23730, 8 Bayview Drive, Huntington, 23696.

1:29

426 Mount Misery Road.

1:33

23689.

1:36

140 Eaton's Deck Road.

1:39

And finally, 23738 16 Wentworth Drive in Dix Hills.

1:44

Well, the applicant or the representative of the applicant for 23732, 39 Bunker Hill Drive.

1:52

Please address the court.

1:56

Actually, the zoning board of appeals and not the court.

1:59

That was that was some kind of mistake from the old days.

2:04

Good evening.

2:07

I'm here with my wife Sarah.

2:08

We're the owners of the home at uh 39 Bunker Hill Drive.

2:12

We're seeking a variance for uh the swimming pool that is there for the 50-foot setback.

2:19

As you can see, one corner of it is uh at 33 feet, uh that corner right there.

2:25

Um I didn't even know that was a thing until I applied for to close out the permit that that we were in violation.

2:32

Um you can't see it from this um survey, but uh the the land is significantly sloped from where the home is to the edge of my property on Bunker Hill.

2:43

Um so we place the pool where it was logical and in the logical spot for it.

2:48

I will say when on the street when you're on Bunker Hill, you cannot see the pool.

2:52

Um it is not visible.

2:54

It is not visible from any of my neighbors' properties on Bunker Hill.

2:57

It's one acre zoning that we have there.

2:59

There's significant space between uh our pool and our house and and all of our neighbors.

3:05

Furthermore, being at our uh neighbors' homes on Bunker Hill, I I can't even hear the uh the pool.

3:11

Obviously, I could hear the kids if they're if they're yelling, but uh other than that, I don't hear the equipment or anything like that.

3:16

So we're seeking relief for that to be able to close out the permit.

3:19

Okay, thank you.

3:20

Is there anyone in the audience that wishes to be heard regarding this matter?

3:23

23732 Bunker Hill.

3:26

Noticing that no one wishes to be heard.

3:29

I know that the the it's required to be fenced.

3:32

Your property is fenced, and it also has a lot of trees that have been placed on the on the road side of the fence.

3:38

So your commentary about the fact that you really can't see it from any places accurate.

3:44

Umticing that no one wishes to be heard and uh perceiving this to be a de minimis application.

3:51

I'll entertain a motion to grant.

3:53

Motion.

3:53

Mr.

3:53

Castaño on the motion, Mr.

3:56

Capadano on the second.

3:57

All in favor, any opposed.

4:00

Your application is granted.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████58%
Procedural█████████████████████27%
Environmental Protection██████████13%
Historic Preservation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting – August 6, 2026

The Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals met on August 6, 2026, for public hearings and other business. The board approved all five variance applications heard that evening — one with conditions — and also acted on extensions, an encroachment, and several previously filed applications. No meeting minutes were included in the source packet; the transcript shows the board unanimously accepted the minutes of its July 23, 2026 meeting at the start of the session.

Consent Calendar

  • The board unanimously accepted the minutes of the July 23, 2026 meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • For 39 Bunkerhill Drive, no members of the public requested to be heard.
  • For 8 Bayview Drive, no members of the public requested to be heard; the applicant noted letters of support from every affected neighbor.
  • For 426 Mount Misery Road, a neighbor from 87 Old Country Road expressed concerns about stormwater runoff, soil erosion, water pooling and icing on Old Country Road, and construction beginning before approval. She said the structure itself was not the issue, but asked for soil and water mitigation.
  • For 140 Eatons Neck Road, no members of the public requested to be heard.
  • For 16 Wentworth Drive, no members of the public requested to be heard; the board noted letters of support and one west-side neighbor request that was impractical.

Discussion Items

  • Public Hearing #23732 – 39 Bunkerhill Drive (Aristotelis and Sarah Kougemitros): The applicants sought accessory structure relief to legalize an existing inground pool in a technical front yard on a corner lot with two frontages. The applicant stated one pool corner was 33 feet from the required 50-foot setback, the pool was not visible from the street or neighboring properties, and the violation was discovered while closing out a permit. The board called the request de minimis and granted it. Motion by Mr. Castaño, seconded by Mr. Capadano.
  • Public Hearing #23730 – 8 Bayview Drive (Angela and Henry Ludwicki; speaker identified himself as Hank Ludwig): The applicant requested long street side yard and yard modification relief to add a front portico, second-story deck, and two AC units and a fireplace. The speaker requested a 45-inch variance for the portico, a 30-inch variance for a small water-view deck, and a 28-inch variance for an AC unit, describing the property as a 625-square-foot dilapidated bungalow. The board noted neighbor support and granted the request. Motion by Mr. Campadano, seconded by Mr. White.
  • Public Hearing #23696 – 426 Mount Misery Road (Damian Lazares, represented by architect Chris Gray): The applicant sought accessory structure and steep slope relief for a pool cabana with a storage basement. The board questioned the proposed nine-foot basement height, and the architect agreed to reduce it to seven feet. A neighbor raised water and soil concerns. The board granted the application with conditions: seven-foot basement ceiling, no habitable features, no plumbing, seasonal use only, and amended plans submitted to the planning department. Motion by Mr. Capitano, seconded by Mr. White.
  • Public Hearing #23689 – 140 Eatons Neck Road (Myriam Green, represented by Gordon Stedjan): The applicant requested approval to maintain a storage basement under an existing detached garage. The space is about 170 square feet (9 ft by 16 ft), used solely for household storage, not visible from the street, and the house has no basement. The garage was already built. The board granted the application. Motion by Mr. Castagna, seconded by Ms. Whalen.
  • Public Hearing #23738 – 16 Wentworth Drive, Dix Hills (Michael and Ivonne Recupero; architect identified in transcript as Michael Degnan, while the agenda lists Michael J. Duignan RA): The applicants sought front, side, and combined side yard relief to rebuild and expand a fire-damaged dwelling on the existing foundation. The proposed front porch is at a 20.5-foot setback where 23 feet is required. The board confirmed the proposal uses the same foundation from the original R5-era certificate of occupancy, now in an R10 zone, and does not expand the foundation. The board granted the application. Motion by Mr. Capadano, seconded by Mr. White.

Other Business

  • Extension – ZBA 23551: Approved extension of an expired grant for Cheley Deegan due to tenant-locating issues; fee paid.
  • Lawful minor encroachment – 5 Glenhill Court: Approved for a detached accessory cabana/pool house with an existing setback of 9.9 feet where 10 feet is required.
  • ZBA 23321 – 364 Maplewood Road: The board voted to forward correspondence to the building department allowing permits and construction to proceed, because the structures appeared on the plans submitted with the application.
  • Extension – ZBA 23519: Approved extension of a non-expired grant due to weather and gas-line relocation delays; fee paid.
  • ZBA 2326 – 194 Cate Drive: Granted the dimensional variance relief sought (14.5-foot side yard where 20 feet is required; 38.7-foot combined side yard where 40 feet is required) but denied habitable features, requiring removal of sheetrock. Motion by Mr. McGrath, seconded by Mr. Castaño.
  • ZBA 23439 – 194 Cate Drive: The board remanded the accessory dwelling unit matter to the Accessory Apartment Review Board, finding the owner-occupied requirement appeared satisfied after the resident became at least a 10% owner. Motion by Mr. Capadano, seconded by Ms. Whalen.
  • ZBA 23699 and 23701 – LaRue Drive: The board approved both applications seeking minor lot-line-related relief. 23701 involves a proposed lot width of 78.94 feet where 100 feet is required and a 12-foot long street side yard where 30 feet is required; 23699 involves a lot width of 91.93 feet where 100 feet is required. The board emphasized it was not approving a subdivision; the lots already existed and are buildable. Motions by Ms. Whalen, seconded by Mr. Castagna.

Key Outcomes

  • All five public hearing applications were granted: 23732, 23730, 23696 (with conditions), 23689, and 23738.
  • Conditions attached to 23696 include a 7-foot basement ceiling, no habitable features, no plumbing, seasonal use, and submission of amended plans to the planning department.
  • The board approved two extension requests, one lawful minor encroachment, and directed correspondence on one building-department matter.
  • The board granted dimensional relief on 2326 with a no-habitable-features condition and remanded 23439 to the Accessory Apartment Review Board.
  • The board approved the two LaRue Drive lot-line variance applications.
  • The next meeting was scheduled for August 13, 2026.

Discrepancy Note

  • The transcript identifies the 8 Bayview Drive speaker as Hank Ludwig/owner, while the agenda lists Angela and Henry Ludwicki as owners.
  • The transcript identifies the 16 Wentworth Drive architect as Michael Degnan, while the agenda lists Michael J. Duignan RA.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, good evening, everyone. Welcome to the zoning board of appeals for the town of Huntington for the meeting of August the 6th, 2026. Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag. I pledge allegiance to the flag in the United States of America and to the Republic for States. One nation under God. Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Please be seated. Minutes for July 23rd. I would entertain a motion to accept the minutes for July 23rd, 2026. I'll make that motion. Mr. McGrath on the motion. Mr. Castaña on the second. All in favor. Any opposed? Minutes are accepted. Dawn, are the appropriate postings and publications done with the appropriate affidavits to give us jurisdiction for the hearings tonight? All right, thank you. The order for the hearings tonight will be as follows. 23732, 39 Bunker Hill Drive, 23730, 8 Bayview Drive, Huntington, 23696. 426 Mount Misery Road. 23689. 140 Eaton's Deck Road. And finally, 23738 16 Wentworth Drive in Dix Hills. Well, the applicant or the representative of the applicant for 23732, 39 Bunker Hill Drive. Please address the court. Actually, the zoning board of appeals and not the court. That was that was some kind of mistake from the old days. Good evening. I'm here with my wife Sarah. We're the owners of the home at uh 39 Bunker Hill Drive. We're seeking a variance for uh the swimming pool that is there for the 50-foot setback. As you can see, one corner of it is uh at 33 feet, uh that corner right there. Um I didn't even know that was a thing until I applied for to close out the permit that that we were in violation. Um you can't see it from this um survey, but uh the the land is significantly sloped from where the home is to the edge of my property on Bunker Hill. Um so we place the pool where it was logical and in the logical spot for it. I will say when on the street when you're on Bunker Hill, you cannot see the pool. Um it is not visible. It is not visible from any of my neighbors' properties on Bunker Hill. It's one acre zoning that we have there. There's significant space between uh our pool and our house and and all of our neighbors. Furthermore, being at our uh neighbors' homes on Bunker Hill, I I can't even hear the uh the pool. Obviously, I could hear the kids if they're if they're yelling, but uh other than that, I don't hear the equipment or anything like that. So we're seeking relief for that to be able to close out the permit. Okay, thank you. Is there anyone in the audience that wishes to be heard regarding this matter? 23732 Bunker Hill. Noticing that no one wishes to be heard. I know that the the it's required to be fenced.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com