Special City Council/Public Financing Authority Meeting on Withdrawal from OCPA - May 16, 2023
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Special City Council/Public Financing Authority Meeting on Withdrawal from Orange County Power Authority (OCPA) - May 16, 2023
At this special meeting, the Huntington Beach City Council and Public Financing Authority considered a motion to withdraw from the Orange County Power Authority (OCPA). After public testimony and council debate, the motion passed 4–3, directing the city manager and city attorney to provide immediate notice of withdrawal.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Carrie Swan opposed OCPA, calling it a "boondoggle" and recalling her earlier opposition since 2017.
- Charlie Jackson supported OCPA, arguing it provides energy choice and 68% green energy alongside SCE.
- Jocelyn Rabbit Sire supported OCPA, citing benefits for the environment and public health, and urged the council not to take away the choice to reduce emissions.
- Danny Gray supported OCPA, noting it offers 100% renewable energy at 2% lower generation rates than SCE, and helps renters and businesses meet carbon goals.
- Jose Trinidad Castaneda (also a councilmember and OCPA board member) encouraged staying in OCPA, stating reforms are underway and that Huntington Beach residents are getting cost savings.
- Linda Kramer (Climate Reality Orange County chapter chair) supported OCPA, saying it offers a real choice for 100% clean energy and that SCE's green rate has been dismal for six years.
- Steve Shepard supported OCPA, reporting personal savings on rates and net metering, and warned that withdrawal would cost him money.
Discussion Items
- Motion to Withdraw from OCPA (Introduced by Councilmember McKeon, seconded by Councilmember Burns):
- Councilmember McKeon argued that OCPA has been a "disaster" due to lack of transparency, mismanagement, whistleblower complaints, audits, and failure to deliver promised 100% green energy at lower rates. He cited the county's analysis showing contracts could be sold at a profit and that OCPA's own net operating income came from selling unused power. He also noted OCPA does not meet the state's minimum Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) of 65%, filing at 61%.
- Councilmember Kalmick opposed the motion, calling it irresponsible to vote without a staff report or fiscal analysis. He noted that OCPA is implementing reforms, has a new interim CEO, offers a 2% discount on base rates, and that the city has no risk as residents can opt out. He warned that withdrawal could cost ratepayers significant sums (potentially $50–80 million) and that the city lacks staff to unwind the arrangement.
- Councilmember Moser echoed Kalmick's concerns about lack of information and the need for a consultant study.
- Councilmember Bolton supported the substitute motion for analysis but ultimately voted against the withdrawal.
- Councilmember Vandermark, Strickland, and Burns supported the withdrawal motion.
Key Outcomes
- Vote on Substitute Motion (to obtain analysis before withdrawal): Failed 3–4 (Kalmick, Moser, Bolton in favor; Vandermark, Strickland, McKeon, Burns against).
- Vote on Original Motion to Withdraw from OCPA: Passed 4–3 (Vandermark, Strickland, McKeon, Burns in favor; Kalmick, Moser, Bolton against).
- Direction: The city manager and city attorney were directed to provide immediate notice to withdraw from OCPA, with no prior fiscal analysis or consultant study conducted.
- Next Meeting: The next regularly scheduled meeting is June 6, 2023.
Meeting Transcript
If I have to share it was me that all along did you wrong thinking that I'll meet you. I'd like to call a special meeting of the City Council Public Finance Authority to order. Clerk, please call the roll. Councilmember Kalmick. Here. Councilmember Mosher. Here. Mayor Pro Tem Vandermark. Here. Mayor Strickland. Here. Councilmember McKeon. Here. Councilmember Bolton. Here. Councilmember Burns. Here. All present. Thank you. Clerk, do we have any supplemental communications? We've received approximately 17 emails at the time of the cutoff at 9 a.m. today. There are several more received, I'm sure, but they'll all be uploaded into the record. Okay, great. City clerk, do we have anyone signed up to speak? We have seven signed up to speak, so I'm gonna call all seven down now. Approach the podium. Carrie Swan, Charlie Jackson, Jocelyn Rabbit Sire, Steve Shepherd, Danny Gray, Jose Trinidad Castaneda, Linda Kramer. Okay, uh, before the speakers go forward, I have to announce this. At this time, the city council will receive comments from members of the public regarding the items on the special meeting agenda. Individuals wishing to provide a comment may do so in person by filling out a request to speak form delivered to the city clerk. All speakers are encouraged but not required to identify themselves by name. Each speaker may have up to three minutes unless the volume of speakers warrants reducing the time allowance. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow discussion or action on topics that are not on the agenda. Members of the public who would like to speak directly with a council member on an item not on the agenda may consider scheduling an appointment by contacting the city council's administrative assistant at 714-536-5553 or emailing the entire city council at city.council at SurfCity.org. So uh with that, uh speakers, uh, thank you so much for waiting and being here, and uh please um continue. You're welcome. I'm back, Carrie Swan here. So I'd like to thank our new council majority for keeping another of their promises to tackle this horrible, horrible boondoggle known as Orange County Power Authority. I came to this podium back in 2017, it was May or June, I think, the first time to speak out against community choice. It was that called community choice aggregation then. Now it's community choice energy. They keep re bank rebranding these bad ideas. At the time it was a study session, but the writing was on the wall. In 2019, Carr joined by Posey and Del Glaze, were dripping with excitement to uh push a feasibility study. What a joke. That passed. And then within days of swearing in, carried jumped with a special meeting to shove this steaming pile of manure down the citizens' throat. Still, hundreds of us fought back. Not that anybody listened, remember two years in a recall attempt because nobody at that dais listened except for Eric Peterson.
openpublica.com