OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Hyattsville, Maryland/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Hyattsville City Council Regular Meeting - July 13, 2026

City Council — Monday, July 13, 2026
BodyHyattsville, Maryland
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, July 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:23:52

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Unmute yourself.

Speaker 2

0:02

Once again, um when I got bounced off, Mr.

0:07

Brooks was about to um speak.

0:09

That was the last thing that took place.

0:12

You want to pick up from there or do this?

Speaker 3

0:15

Yeah, let's do that.

0:16

All right, thank you.

0:17

Um thank you, Mr.

0:18

Marshall, for the um for the question.

0:20

Can everyone hear me?

Speaker 4

0:21

Yes, we can hear you.

Speaker 3

0:22

Yeah, so the the first question or part of your question was um who requested this?

0:27

This was requested on behalf of the owners and the operators out at the uh University Town Center UTC project.

0:35

We do have uh Charles on board who represents that entity out there, and then again as it rates as it relates to the rate itself.

0:43

Uh once again, Mr.

0:44

Sutsina uh bond council to address that issue relative to the rate here again.

0:49

That's not a rate that we the city, the city has no uh obligation for repayment of these bonds.

0:56

It's all uh on the uh uh uh the liability of the owners of the UTC.

1:02

So hopefully I hope that answers your questions, Mr.

Speaker 2

1:07

It does.

1:09

It does.

1:09

The the other thing that I wanted to ask is what how does this benefit the city?

1:15

What is what is the upside uh in this for the city of Itsville?

Speaker 3

1:21

I'm gonna I'm gonna yield to either uh bond comms on that or Mike or Chris.

Speaker 5

1:28

Yeah,

Speaker 3

1:29

um I'm

Speaker 5

1:30

I'm happy to take that, Ron, and you know if others want to jump in, but we've we've done a number of these uh refinancings in the state of Maryland for different jurisdictions, including uh Prince George's County itself.

1:45

And the the benefit is is is simple, it's an up uh opportunity to reduce the amount of special taxes paid by the residents of that particular jurisdiction.

1:57

So,

Unassigned speaker

1:57

you

Speaker 5

1:57

know, from from my seat, the you know the city of Hyattesville

Unassigned speaker

2:01

is

Speaker 5

2:02

undertaking this transaction uh to essentially lower that special tax payment on an annual basis going going forward.

Unassigned speaker

2:13

So

Speaker 2

2:13

if I understand you correctly, the benefit is to the property owners, and there is no direct benefit to the city itself.

2:22

This mainly benefits the property owners.

2:24

Do I understand that correctly

Speaker 5

2:27

that's I mean there may be other benefits, but from from my point of view, it's a lowering of taxes for some of the citizens within

Unassigned speaker

2:36

uh

Speaker 5

2:36

within the jurisdiction.

2:38

So I don't know uh if Chris, if you have other thoughts or or

Speaker 2

2:42

that's good enough.

2:44

That's good enough.

2:45

I I get your point.

2:47

I I don't mean to cut you off, but I know they have a time limit, so I I get your point.

2:51

The last thing I will say to the mayor and council is once again if it's currently capped at five percent, that cap should stay.

2:59

Thank you for letting me have my

Unassigned speaker

3:01

time.

Unassigned speaker

3:02

All

Speaker 4

3:02

right, thank you, Mr.

3:03

Marshall.

3:04

Um

Unassigned speaker

3:05

Mr.

Speaker 4

3:06

Grinnedite, if there's no one else from the uh from the community that has a comment.

3:12

Why don't we just go ahead and move into the council meeting,

Unassigned speaker

3:14

please?

Speaker 1

3:17

All right, I think that we can do that.

3:20

We'll do uh roll call and begin.

Speaker 4

3:26

Uh okay, can we I'm gonna have to go out and come back in.

3:29

This is doesn't appear to be working for

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing██████████████████████████26%
Procedural███████████████████19%
Fiscal Sustainability█████████████████17%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████7%
Personnel Matters██████6%
Community Engagement█████5%
Budget Equity Analysis███3%
Transportation Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Hyattsville City Council Regular Meeting - July 13, 2026

The Hyattsville City Council met virtually on Monday, July 13, 2026, at 7:00 PM to discuss a range of routine and substantive items. Key actions included approving several proclamations, appointments, and consent items; adopting a resolution to refund University Town Center bonds; approving changes to retiree health benefits; and authorizing a letter to the Prince George's County Council regarding proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit legislation. Two agenda items related to the Sanctuary at Hyattsville Crossing PILOT were removed prior to the meeting. The Council also held a closed session to obtain legal advice on a business license.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the minutes of May 20, 2026, and June 8, 2026.
  • Approved eight consent items en bloc, including: a variance letter for 3000 Jamestown Rd; a one-year, $80,000 contract with Northstar Tutoring for tutoring and mentoring; acceptance of a $22,029 Police Recruitment and Retention Grant; appropriation of $7,224 in unencumbered PACT grant funds; a $97,000 stormwater management expenditure; a $146,000 lawn maintenance expenditure; a one-year, $60,000 contract with Hope Center for Wellness for youth mental health; acceptance of a $150,000 Maryland Department of Aging NORC grant; a printing services contract with House of Print and Thread; and a letter thanking community partners for World Cup watch events.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Ronald Marshall (Ward 4) commented that the cap on the UTC refunding bonds should remain at 5%. He also commended city staff (recreation, public works, police) for working in extreme heat.
  • Mike Bonds (Ward 3) expressed support for the city's letter encouraging county ADU reform, citing the severe housing shortage.

Proclamations & Appointments

  • Unanimously adopted four proclamations: National Black Business Month (August), Minority Mental Health Awareness Month (July), Women's Equality Day (August 26), and a proclamation honoring the life of Carlos Lizanne.
  • Unanimously approved appointments to the Community Emergency Response Team (Anita Williams, Dina Sorto, Gerrard Jolly, Hajah Jaward, Amy Wickner; two-year terms ending July 13, 2028) and to the Youth Advisory Council (Dashiell Jackson, Litzy Velasquez, Yasmin Pineda-Escobar, Delando Wright, Christopher Jimenez, Christopher Callejas, Victoria Ramirez, Briseyda Granados, Crismeri Sanchez, Joyce Lin, Devin Urquilla; one-year terms).

Discussion Items

  • University Town Center (UTC) Refunding Bonds (Resolution 2026-02): The Council considered a second reading to authorize refunding the 2016 UTC Special Obligation Bonds (up to $12.5 million, interest not to exceed 8%). City Administrator Tracey Douglas noted the transaction could encourage local investment and help avoid default. Bond counsel and financial advisors explained that while current interest rates are higher than 2016, the district is now expected to receive an investment-grade rating, resulting in net savings. Estimated average annual savings of approximately $50,000 through final maturity in 2034 (present value savings of about 5.3%). Several councilmembers questioned the direct benefit to the city; the savings would reduce a supplemental special tax levied on UTC property owners. The city’s debt policy requires minimum savings of 3.5% for maturities of 7–9 years, which the transaction is projected to exceed. The resolution passed with Councilmembers Solomon and Nisbett abstaining.
  • Retirement Health Benefits: Staff recommended maintaining retiree health coverage for current retirees and employees hired before July 1, 2026, and discontinuing eligibility for employees hired on or after that date. Recommendation #4 (requiring retirees to use other employer-sponsored coverage if available) was struck prior to the vote due to feasibility concerns. Councilmember Schaible noted this provision may be brought back after further study. The motion passed unanimously (with Councilmember Haba expressing reservation about the three-year delay in acting).
  • Accessory Dwelling Units (CB-074-2026): The Council debated a letter to the Prince George's County Council with recommendations on proposed ADU legislation. Housing Manager Jeff Ulysses and Senior Planner David Cristillo presented key comments: requiring two parking spaces per ADU, a cap on unrelated individuals in combined units, and fire suppression systems. Councilmembers discussed parking concerns (Ward 4 already faces critical parking shortages), fire sprinkler costs (state law requires sprinklers for new construction, but local jurisdictions may have flexibility), and the need for community input. Councilmember Schaible moved to amend the letter by striking the parking recommendation and adding a recommendation to waive fire sprinklers if legally permissible. The amendment failed 4–6–1 (proponents: Redmond, Wazak, Schaible, Dhokai; opponents: Solomon, Barnes, Strab, Haba, Lee, Mayor Croslin; abstention: Nisbett). The original letter was then adopted.

Key Outcomes

  • UTC Refunding Bonds: Resolution 2026-02 adopted (8 ayes, 0 nays, 2 abstentions). The Mayor is authorized to execute the refunding, subject to savings certification. Bond counsel will provide a legal citation confirming savings requirements.
  • Retirement Health Benefits: Approved as amended (striking recommendation #4). Coverage grandfathered for those hired before July 1, 2026; new hires not eligible for retiree health benefits.
  • ADU Letter to County Council: Approved as drafted. Council will pursue further public engagement via Hello Hyattsville and public forums before the county committee’s September hearing. City staff will investigate the feasibility of modifying the fire sprinkler requirement.
  • Proclamations, Appointments, and Consent Items: All passed unanimously.

Meeting Transcript

Unmute yourself. Once again, um when I got bounced off, Mr. Brooks was about to um speak. That was the last thing that took place. You want to pick up from there or do this? Yeah, let's do that. All right, thank you. Um thank you, Mr. Marshall, for the um for the question. Can everyone hear me? Yes, we can hear you. Yeah, so the the first question or part of your question was um who requested this? This was requested on behalf of the owners and the operators out at the uh University Town Center UTC project. We do have uh Charles on board who represents that entity out there, and then again as it rates as it relates to the rate itself. Uh once again, Mr. Sutsina uh bond council to address that issue relative to the rate here again. That's not a rate that we the city, the city has no uh obligation for repayment of these bonds. It's all uh on the uh uh uh the liability of the owners of the UTC. So hopefully I hope that answers your questions, Mr. It does. It does. The the other thing that I wanted to ask is what how does this benefit the city? What is what is the upside uh in this for the city of Itsville? I'm gonna I'm gonna yield to either uh bond comms on that or Mike or Chris. Yeah, um I'm I'm happy to take that, Ron, and you know if others want to jump in, but we've we've done a number of these uh refinancings in the state of Maryland for different jurisdictions, including uh Prince George's County itself. And the the benefit is is is simple, it's an up uh opportunity to reduce the amount of special taxes paid by the residents of that particular jurisdiction. So, you know, from from my seat, the you know the city of Hyattesville is undertaking this transaction uh to essentially lower that special tax payment on an annual basis going going forward. So if I understand you correctly, the benefit is to the property owners, and there is no direct benefit to the city itself. This mainly benefits the property owners. Do I understand that correctly that's I mean there may be other benefits, but from from my point of view, it's a lowering of taxes for some of the citizens within uh within the jurisdiction. So I don't know uh if Chris, if you have other thoughts or or that's good enough. That's good enough. I I get your point. I I don't mean to cut you off, but I know they have a time limit, so I I get your point. The last thing I will say to the mayor and council is once again if it's currently capped at five percent, that cap should stay. Thank you for letting me have my time. All right, thank you, Mr.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com