Indianapolis BZA Division 1 Hearing - June 6, 2023
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Indianapolis Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 1 Public Hearing - June 6, 2023
The Indianapolis Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Division 1 held a public hearing on June 6, 2023, starting at 6:15 PM. Chairman Peter Nelson presided, with board members David Duncan, Renee Napoleon (alternate), and Aaron McBride (alternate) present. Legal counsel was Chris Steinmetz. The board heard requests for variances of development standards and use, expedited petitions, and administrative items. The meeting included withdrawals, continuances, and votes on several petitions. Due to only four members present, any split vote would cause the petition to be continued to the next available hearing on July 6, 2023.
Consent Calendar
- The board unanimously approved a waiver of rules of procedure to vote on all expedited petitions without additional testimony.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Councillor Kristen Jones (District 16) spoke in support of the fence variance for the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahdo Cathedral, citing safety concerns for children and noting no opposition from neighbors.
- Bobby Gutierrez, a resident at 1741 Lafayette Road, opposed the pylon sign for the Lafayette Rooms event center, stating it would be intrusive in the residential neighborhood. He did not oppose the wall sign or the event center itself.
Discussion Items
Withdrawals and Continuances
- Petition 2023-UV-1006 (Martin Petroleum Inc.) was withdrawn after staff recommended rezoning instead of a variance. The board approved transferring applicable fees to the companion rezoning petition 2023-CZN-830/C-VR-830.
- Petition 2023-UV-1011 (6809 West Washington Street) was continued to July 6, 2023, without additional notice at the request of Councillor Evans for further neighborhood discussions.
- Petition 2023-UV-1010 (1946 North Euclid Avenue) was automatically continued to July 6, 2023, due to a timely request from a registered neighborhood organization.
- Petition 2023-DV-1022 (2247 Broadway Street) was continued to July 6, 2023, with additional notice to allow for an amendment.
Expedited Docket
- Petition 2023-DV-1023 (4511 Central Avenue) was approved unanimously. It allowed a detached garage with a 5-foot north side yard setback (7 feet required).
- Petition 2023-UV-1008 (545 Southeast Street) was approved unanimously. It permitted building additions, making the residential component of a live-work unit the dominant use.
- Petition 2023-UV-1009 (Two jets LLC) was approved unanimously. It allowed an addition to an existing single-family dwelling with a 2-foot west transitional side yard (10 feet required).
- Petition 2023-UV-2006 (2320 Duke Street) was approved unanimously. It permitted a rubber press (heavy manufacturing) use.
Petition 2023-DV-2004: Fence Variance (849 South Belmont Avenue)
- The Eritrean Orthodox Tewahdo Cathedral requested a 54-inch decorative fence in the front yard and clear sight triangle. Maximum fence height is 42 inches, and encroachments in clear sight triangles are prohibited. Attorney Adam Lenkowski presented the petitioner's case. Remonstrators were not present, but Councillor Jones spoke in support. Staff recommended denial, noting the fence height may obstruct sight lines and pedestrian safety. The petitioner had moved the fence from the clear sight triangle, but staff could not verify exact measurements. The board approved the variance, subject to the commitment that the relocation be per the site plan.
Petition 2023-DV-1024: Sign Variances (1718 Lafayette Road)
- Lafayette Rooms LLC requested a 12.5-foot tall, 11.25-square-foot pylon sign and a 40-square-foot wall sign (max 6 square feet) for an event center. Attorney David Deering argued the variances were necessary because the property remains zoned residential despite years of commercial use. Staff recommended denial, citing procedural issues and lack of demonstrated hardship. The board split the vote. The pylon sign was denied (0-4), while the wall sign was approved (3-1, Nelson dissenting). Both petitions were continued for adoption of findings of fact.
Key Outcomes
- All expedited petitions (2023-UV-1008, 2023-UV-1009, 2023-UV-2006) were approved unanimously (4-0).
- Petition 2023-DV-2004 was approved unanimously (4-0), with a commitment to adhere to the site plan for the fence relocation.
- Petition 2023-DV-1024 A (pylon sign) was denied (0-4); Part B (wall sign) was approved (3-1). Both remained continued for adoption of findings.
- Petition 2022-DV-2045 (amended findings of fact) was adopted, marking the first opportunity to obtain the third required signature (Renee Napoleon).
- The hearing adjourned after all business was completed.
Note: No agenda or minutes were available; this summary is based solely on the raw transcript.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, everyone. I am going to call this meeting to order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division 1. I am Peter Nelson, Chairman of Division 1. Other board members present are David Duncan, Renee Napoleon, an alternate, and Aaron McBride, also an alternate to the board. Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Jeff York, Principal Planner 2. Eddie O'Neill, Principal Planner 2, Robert Ulenke, Senior Planner, and Marlaney Arahetta, Senior Planner, and Heather Stefan, Senior Specialist and Secretary to the Board. Matt Pleasant is the current planning administrator. The board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuance or were withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. The petitioner will then be allowed a five minutes for rebuttal and summation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement. No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it's at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including the posting of notice sign on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching the decision on certain petition. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights of way are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with these conditions imposed by the board must be proved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of filing of a petition for a judicial review of a board's decision. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. I will note since we only have four members here present today. If we do have a split vote, um that petition will be continued to the next available hearing, which appears to be July July 6th for division one. Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures? If not, before we hear special requests, I will ask for a waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote on all expedited petitions and adopt their findings of fact without any additional testimony from the individual petitioners. Is there a motion? So moved. Motion by Duncan. Do we have a second? Second, McBride. Motion and a second will call for a vote. Duncan? Duncan, yes. Napoleon?
openpublica.com