Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 1 Meeting - March 4, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 1 Meeting - March 4, 2025
The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 1 met on March 4, 2025 at 6:15 PM for a public hearing. Chairperson Peter Nelson presided. The board approved minutes from February 4, 2025, waived rules for expedited petitions, and handled several continuances and special requests. Four expedited petitions were granted unanimously. Four regular hearing cases were heard, with votes and commitments recorded. A fee reduction request was granted, and procedural matters were resolved.
Consent Calendar
- Minutes Approval: The board approved the meeting minutes from February 4, 2025 (motion by Witt, second by Duncan; unanimous vote).
- Waiver of Rules: A motion to waive rules of procedure to allow voting on all expedited petitions without additional testimony passed unanimously.
- Automatic Continuances Acknowledged:
- 2025 DB1004 (1135 and 1141 North Tacoma Ave) – continued to April 1, 2025 per registered neighborhood organization.
- 2025 DV1003 (2703 Cardigan Road) – continued to April 1, 2025 per registered neighborhood organization.
- 2025 UV1002 (6145 North Ewing Street) – withdrawal acknowledged at petitioner's request.
- Other Procedural Actions:
- Continuance Granted (2025 DV1005): Petitioner's representative Hannah Abel requested without objection to continue case 2025 DV1005 (6462 Broadway) to April 1, 2025 without additional notice; granted unanimously.
- Expedited Docket Transfer (2024 DV1044 amended): Petitioner Mark Crouch requested to move case 2024 DV1044 (289 North Cole Street) to the expedited docket due to an amended site plan with staff support; granted unanimously. Staff clarified a typo in the original staff report (first recommendation said 'denial' but should now read 'recommending approval').
- Two-Day Waiver (2025 DV1007): Staff requested a two-day waiver of legal notice for petition 2025 DV1007 (6138 Central Avenue) because staff was late sending notice; granted unanimously.
- Fee Reduction Request (2025 PTN025): Petitioner Harriet Greenland (1144 Navajo Trail South Drive) initially requested fee waiver or reduction for a fence variance; staff noted a policy against waivers but board can reduce to $100. No second was received for the $100 reduction. Later, after testimony, a motion to reduce to $250 (50% of $585) was made and passed (Witt, McBride, Nelson yes; Duncan, Catona no). Staff later clarified the exact amount as $292.50 (50% of $585). The fee reduction was granted.
- Expedited Petitions (Unanimously Granted):
- 2024 DV1044 amended (289 North Cole Street) – variance for detached garage in front of primary dwelling; all yes.
- 2024 DV1045 (4496 Saguaro Trail) – variance for building addition with 11-ft rear yard setback (30 ft required); all yes.
- 2025 DV1006 (5320 Central Avenue) – variance for building addition with 8.66-ft rear yard setback (20 ft required); all yes.
- 2025 DV1007 (6138 Central Avenue) – variance for building addition with 5-ft rear yard setback (20 ft required); all yes.
Discussion Items
- 2024 DV1046 – 8654 West 86th Street (Pike Township): Petitioner Gary James requested variance to install a 6-ft decorative aluminum wrought iron fence (with brick columns and planter boxes) in the front yard (max 3.5 ft permitted). The property is on a main road (35 mph, school zone). Staff recommended denial, stating no practical difficulty and the fence is purely decorative; a 3.5-ft fence would suffice. Neighbor across the street wrote a letter supporting the variance. Pike Township Residents Association (representing ~88,000 households) also supported. Board expressed concern about future replacement with a less aesthetic fence; petitioner agreed to a commitment that the fence will maintain substantially similar design and opacity as shown. Motion to grant with commitment passed unanimously (5-0).
- 2024 UV1030 amended – 2927 West Washington Street (Wayne Township): Petitioner TechLich Fakadu (Douglas Fucardo) sought use variance to allow a four-unit multifamily building and a detached fifth dwelling unit on a property zoned C4. He purchased the property as a rental, unaware of zoning restrictions. Staff recommended denial, citing that the property can be used as a single-family home, the parcel is too small for five units, and parking is insufficient. There was discussion about a 1996 case (str 96-03962) that may have involved three units, but staff found no permits for the current interior configuration. Board voted unanimously (5-0) to deny the variance.
- 2025 UV1001 – 3854 Washington Boulevard (Washington Township): Petitioner Timothy Funston requested use variance for a 995-sq-ft second primary dwelling (carriage house) exceeding the 720-sq-ft limit for secondary dwellings. The carriage house was built in 2001; petitioner purchased the property with it. Meridian Kessler Neighborhood Association (land use committee) supported. Staff recommended denial, characterizing the request as a use variance (second primary dwelling) due to the size, and expressing concern about future replatting or separate sale. Board discussed a commitment preventing subdivision or separate sale of the carriage house from the primary dwelling. Petitioner agreed. Motion to grant with commitment passed unanimously (5-0).
- 2025 UV1003 – 9615 Southeastern Avenue (Franklin Township): Petitioner Grateful Ventures LLC (Greg Ilco representing Jeff Gance) sought use variance to operate a financial planning and insurance office in an existing single-family house on a residential (DA) lot. The office would have two full-time employees and about one client visit per week. Franklin Township Civic League supported. Staff recommended denial, stating the use is not permitted in DA district, can be a home occupation if owner lives there (petitioner does not plan to reside on site), and may set a precedent for commercial uses. Board discussed a commitment limiting the variance to the current owner (Grateful Ventures LLC) and to the specified business use. Petitioner accepted. Motion to grant with commitment passed 3-2 (Duncan, Witt, Catona yes; Nelson, McBride no).
Other Testimony
- Testimony from Harriet Greenland (Prospective Petitioner): Following the regular agenda, Harriet Greenland (who had earlier received a fee reduction for petition 2025 PTN025) provided additional testimony about her fence variance request. She described a neighbor dispute involving harassment and safety concerns, and explained that a taller fence (6 ft with 2-ft lattice, total 8 ft) would provide privacy and separation. Board members heard her story but did not take a vote on the underlying variance (the petition is not yet docketed for a full hearing). The board acknowledged her situation and noted the fee reduction would allow her to pursue the case.
Key Outcomes
- Unanimous Votes: Minutes approved, rule waiver, continuances, expedited petitions, 2024 DV1046 granted, 2025 UV1001 granted, 2024 UV1030 denied.
- Split Vote: 2025 UV1003 granted 3-2 (with commitment).
- Fee Reduction: Petition 2025 PTN025 fee reduced from $585 to $292.50 (50% reduction).
- Commitments Recorded:
- 2024 DV1046: Fence must maintain substantially similar design and opacity as in the application.
- 2025 UV1001: No replatting or separate sale of the carriage house from the primary dwelling.
- 2025 UV1003: Variance limited to Grateful Ventures LLC and to financial planning and insurance use; any transfer of ownership terminates the variance.
- Next Steps: Petitioner for 2025 PTN025 can schedule a hearing with the reduced fee. Other continued cases go to April 1, 2025 hearing.
Meeting Transcript
For two microcontrollers, good afternoon, everybody. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division 1. Uh, calling this meeting to order. I am Peter Nelson, Chairperson of Division One. Other board members present are Andrew Cotona, Jennifer Witt, David Duncan, and Aaron McBride. Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill, Principal Planner 2, Robert Ulenake, Senior Planner, Noah Stern, Senior Planner, Michael Weiger, excuse me, Michael Weigel, senior planner, Kyle Mullins, associate planner, Marty Weistie, Senior Board Specialist and Secretary to the Board. The board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement. No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice sign on subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anybody at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights of way are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five business days, or excuse me, five days of the board's decision and must include the per person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. Board members, you have been provided with meeting minutes for a February 4th 2025 hearing. If anybody needs to see them, let me know. They're right here. If there are no deletions or additions, I will take a motion for their approval. Is there a motion? Wit, summit. Second. Duncan, second. All right. Motion and a second. I will call for a vote. Duncan. Duncan, yes. Witt. Witt, yes.
openpublica.com