OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Indianapolis, Indiana/Board of Zoning Appeals I
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division One Meeting – October 7, 2026

Board of Zoning Appeals I — Wednesday, October 7, 2026
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals I
DateWednesday, October 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:52:31

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division One.

0:03

I am David Duncan, acting chairperson of Division One.

0:07

The other board members present here are Jennifer Witt and John Wolski.

0:11

Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmitz.

0:14

Staff members present today for the Division of Planning are Bryce Patz, current planning administrator, Jeff York, current planning manager, Noah Pappis, current planning manager.

0:24

Josh Lefke, manager of co-compliance, Michael Weigel, Principal Planner 1, Adam Shushewski, Senior Planner, Jasmine Dillard Nikolich, Senior Planner, Drew Haynes, Senior Planner, Samuel Sparzo, Senior Planner planner, and Marty Westy, administr Marty Weiss Weistee, Administrative Coordinator.

0:43

The board has copies of the board.

0:46

The board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case here today.

0:51

The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure.

0:55

The exp expedite cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals.

1:01

As each non-expedite case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interest interested in that particular case will please stand.

1:07

Those who tend to intend to testify will please remain standing to be sworn.

1:11

Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board.

1:15

Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before being beginning to testify.

1:20

Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition.

1:29

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition.

1:39

Staff will then present the administrators' comments beginning regarding the petition.

1:43

The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case.

1:47

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentation.

1:51

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement.

1:57

No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board.

2:02

Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance.

2:09

If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of notice sign on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue in the petition.

2:22

Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing.

2:32

The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions.

2:38

The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, the dedication of rights away are examples.

2:45

These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for the grand variance to be valid.

2:51

Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion.

2:58

Unless otherwise specified, the improvement location permit must be attained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements.

3:05

Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services.

3:13

A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board.

3:19

The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number.

3:28

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

3:31

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited.

3:38

Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

3:45

There are three members present today.

3:46

It requires three votes to take in action on any request.

3:50

We will take this into consideration when hearing requests for continuance.

3:54

If your petition receives an indecisive vote, your petition will be automatically continued to the November 10th, 2026 hearing of this board.

4:03

Is there anyone in the attendance who has any questions about our procedures?

Unassigned speaker

4:09

Okay,

Speaker 1

4:10

seeing none, before we hear special requests, I will ask for a rave waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedite petitions and adopt their findings of fact without any additional testimony for the individual petitioners.

4:24

Do I have a motion?

Speaker 2

4:27

I move.

Speaker 1

4:31

Second.

Speaker 3

4:34

Second.

4:35

Wit.

Speaker 1

4:36

I will now ask for a vote.

4:37

Witt?

Speaker 3

4:38

Yes.

Speaker 1

4:39

Wolski?

Speaker 3

4:40

Yes.

Speaker 1

4:41

And I'm a yes.

4:44

We will consider special requests and continuances at this

Unassigned speaker

4:47

time.

Unassigned speaker

4:52

Is

Speaker 1

4:52

there anyone in the audience?

4:53

Uh if there's anyone in the audience with an interest in the request, please stand.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Can you can you please state your name and address for the record?

Speaker 4

5:05

Uh Jesse Martinez, 2674 Shirley Drive.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use████████████████████████████████32%
Fence Regulation█████████████████17%
Procedural█████████████13%
Transportation Safety███████████11%
Storage Unit Regulation████████8%
Public Safety█████5%
Community Engagement████4%
Traffic Calming███3%
Sidewalk Management███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division One Meeting – October 7, 2026

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division One met on October 7, 2026, with Acting Chair David Duncan and members Jennifer Witt and John Wolski. The board addressed continuances, withdrawals, expedited petitions, and four non‑expedited variance requests involving fences, clear‑site triangles, carports, and outdoor storage.

Preliminary Matters (Special Requests & Continuances)

  • 2026‑DV1‑044 (2674 Shirley Drive): Granted 30‑day continuance to November 10, 2026, for additional notice.
  • 2026‑DV1‑047 (2502 North Delaware Avenue): Granted continuance to November 10, 2026, with new notice due to possible petition changes.
  • 2026‑DV1‑042 (1039 Kessler Boulevard East Drive): Withdrawn; garage addition confirmed compliant with approved plans.
  • 2026‑DV1‑035 (first agenda item): Withdrawn.
  • 2026‑UV1‑026 (3434 Garden Avenue): Granted continuance to November 10, 2026, for further discussions.
  • 2026‑UV1‑028 (case number read): Continued to November 10, 2026, with additional notice due to missing notarized affidavit.
  • 2026‑DV1‑036 (6317 Askin Avenue): Granted two‑month continuance to December 1, 2026, to allow time for easement consents or plan revisions.
  • 2026‑UV1‑002 (5301 West 56th Street): Dismissed by the board after staff recommended that the petitioner either withdraw or be dismissed due to unresolved fire code variance issues.
  • 2026‑UV1‑020 (3503 North College Avenue): Granted 30‑day continuance to November 10, 2026.
  • 2026‑UV1‑027 (2450 Lafayette Road): Granted 30‑day continuance to November 10, 2026, with additional notice.

Expedited Petitions

Three expedited petitions were approved unanimously without additional testimony:

  • 2026‑DV1‑031 (4850 West 78th Street): Variance to permit a six‑foot fence in the front yard, partially within clear‑site triangle and easements.
  • 2026‑DV1‑043 (820 West 54th Street): Variance to permit a detached garage in the front yard of a single‑family residence.
  • 2026‑DV1‑046 (6145 North Ewing Street): Variance to permit a detached accessory structure, detached garage, and secondary dwelling unit with an eight‑foot side yard setback (15 feet required).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • 2026‑DV3‑011 (St. Rock Catholic Church fence): Ann Shott, a neighbor, expressed safety concerns about the existing fence and wall, noting that parish families were not adequately informed about the proposal. She urged the board to prioritize pedestrian safety and proper communication. Jill Palmer (Department of Public Works) testified that the wall creates a safety hazard by obstructing driver sight lines and cited a 2024 crash report that attributed the crash to the wall. She requested denial of the clear‑site triangle variance.
  • 2026‑UV1‑022 (used car sales at 3441 West Washington Street): No opposition was voiced from the audience. The petitioner explained the business had been operating for about a year and wanted to add occasional vehicle sales.
  • 2026‑DV1‑045 (Naomi Street fence and carport): Tabitha Grab and Brian Moore, neighbors, opposed the eight‑foot fence, saying it blocks sunlight, is an eyesore, and that the carport encroaches too close to the property line. Grab noted the petitioner had built without permits. Moore presented documentation of a small‑claims court judgment related to the fence.
  • 2026‑UV1‑024 (portable storage unit at 5699 East 71st Street): No public opposition was heard. The petitioner stated the unit is used for winter maintenance materials and has letters of support from two neighborhood organizations.

Discussion Items

  • 2026‑DV3‑011 – St. Rock Catholic Church: The petitioner proposed relocating the fence 16 feet inward from the corner of Meridian and Sumner and modifying the opaque concrete block section to increase visibility. DPW and staff argued the proposal still encroaches on the intersection decision‑site distance triangle and would jeopardize public safety. Staff recommended approval of the fence height variance only if the fence is moved outside the clear‑site triangle. The board split the variance into two parts: A (encroachment into clear‑site triangle) and B (fence height outside triangle).
  • 2026‑UV1‑022 – Used car sales on West Washington Street: The petitioner sought a variance of use to operate automobile sales in an I‑3 zone along a Transit‑Oriented Development (TOD) corridor. Staff recommended denial, citing the comprehensive plan’s call for pedestrian‑oriented uses and the availability of 45 permitted uses in I‑3. The petitioner agreed to commitments for no flashing lights, keeping the site clean, and limiting the variance to the current tenant.
  • 2026‑DV1‑045 – Fence and carport on Naomi Street: The petitioner requested an eight‑foot fence (maximum six feet) and a carport with a one‑foot side setback (seven feet required). Staff noted the carport was built without permits and recommended denial because a six‑foot fence is allowed and a standard shed could meet storage needs. The board discussed the practical difficulty of placing a carport on a narrow lot with an existing driveway. The petitioner offered commitments to maintain the property and avoid flashing lights.
  • 2026‑UV1‑024 – Outdoor storage unit: The petitioner requested a variance to keep a 200‑square‑foot portable storage unit for maintenance tools and salt. Staff recommended denial, arguing that a shed could serve the same purpose and that allowing outdoor storage undermines the C‑3 district’s low‑intensity character. The board asked the petitioner to commit to painting the unit to match the building and removing logos; the petitioner agreed.

Key Outcomes

  • Expedited petitions (3): All three variances were granted unanimously (3–0).
  • 2026‑DV3‑011 (St. Rock fence): Part A (clear‑site triangle encroachment) received an indecisive vote (2–1, Walski yes, Witt no, Duncan yes) and was automatically continued to the November 10, 2026 hearing. Part B (fence height outside triangle) was approved unanimously (3–0) subject to commitments that the fence may be repaired but not altered, and guardrails will be installed behind the relocated fence.
  • 2026‑UV1‑022 (West Washington used car sales): Indecisive vote (2–1, Walski yes, Witt yes, Duncan no) and continued to November 10, 2026.
  • 2026‑DV1‑045 (Naomi Street fence and carport): Indecisive vote (2–1, Walski yes, Witt yes, Duncan no) and continued to November 10, 2026.
  • 2026‑UV1‑024 (East 71st Street storage unit): Variances granted unanimously (3–0) subject to a commitment to paint the unit to blend with the building and remove commercial logos, with final approval by staff.
  • Continuances and dismissals: All special requests were approved as detailed above, including a dismissal for 2026‑UV1‑002.

Note on date discrepancy: The official meeting date provided is October 7, 2026, though the transcript repeatedly references “October 6, 2026.” The summary uses the date supplied by the user.

Meeting Transcript

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division One. I am David Duncan, acting chairperson of Division One. The other board members present here are Jennifer Witt and John Wolski. Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmitz. Staff members present today for the Division of Planning are Bryce Patz, current planning administrator, Jeff York, current planning manager, Noah Pappis, current planning manager. Josh Lefke, manager of co-compliance, Michael Weigel, Principal Planner 1, Adam Shushewski, Senior Planner, Jasmine Dillard Nikolich, Senior Planner, Drew Haynes, Senior Planner, Samuel Sparzo, Senior Planner planner, and Marty Westy, administr Marty Weiss Weistee, Administrative Coordinator. The board has copies of the board. The board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case here today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The exp expedite cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedite case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interest interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who tend to intend to testify will please remain standing to be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before being beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments beginning regarding the petition. The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentation. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement. No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of notice sign on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue in the petition. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, the dedication of rights away are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for the grand variance to be valid. Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified, the improvement location permit must be attained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. There are three members present today. It requires three votes to take in action on any request. We will take this into consideration when hearing requests for continuance. If your petition receives an indecisive vote, your petition will be automatically continued to the November 10th, 2026 hearing of this board. Is there anyone in the attendance who has any questions about our procedures? Okay, seeing none, before we hear special requests, I will ask for a rave waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedite petitions and adopt their findings of fact without any additional testimony for the individual petitioners. Do I have a motion? I move. Second. Second. Wit. I will now ask for a vote. Witt? Yes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com