OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II Public Hearing – May 21, 2019

Board of Zoning Appeals IITuesday, May 21, 2019
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals II
DateTuesday, May 21, 2019
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
1:44

I don't have Gabon.

1:46

Where is my head?

1:55

I don't have a matter lost.

2:02

Hello, everyone.

2:03

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division II.

2:06

I am Mark Young, Chairperson of Division II.

2:08

The other board members present are Alicia Reuter to my left.

2:13

Mary Kelly and James Duke to my right, and Margaret Banning walking up the stairs as we speak.

2:31

Robert Ulenhake, Senior Planner, and Paige Story, Senior Planner.

2:34

Keith Hoseworth is the current planned administrator.

2:37

The board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record for each case heard today.

3:06

Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify.

3:10

Petitioners and persons appearing in support of a case being heard should have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition.

3:19

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition should have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition.

3:28

Staff would then present the administrator's comments regarding the petition.

3:36

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentation.

3:40

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal.

3:42

Other petitioners, rebuttal evidence, and a brief closing statement.

5:00

A person may file a written request to receive notice of a filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board.

5:06

The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number.

5:15

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

5:18

Please be advised that contact the members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited.

5:25

Please be courteous and orderly at all times and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

5:31

Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures?

5:35

If not, we will consider special requests and continuances at this time.

6:05

So we just needed a little more time to excuse me, get that together.

6:09

Okay.

6:10

You are asking for a continuance?

6:11

Please.

6:12

Sorry.

6:14

Is there anyone in the audience that has any interest in 2019 D V two Zero 10 429 Parkway Avenue?

6:22

Staff.

6:24

Thank you, Chairperson Young, members of the board.

6:26

Staff has no objection to this continuance request without notice.

6:30

Okay.

6:30

You're just looking for a month continuance?

6:32

Sure.

6:32

So that would be the I'm sorry, where are we at?

6:36

June.

6:39

Is it the 18th or the Division 2?

6:44

Because we had to move the 2019.

6:46

So June 11th, right?

6:52

I entertain a motion to move 2019 D V two Zero One Zero to the June 11th hearing date, and that's without additional notice.

7:02

All in favor?

7:04

Opposed.

7:05

Thank you.

7:06

Thank you.

7:13

Good afternoon, Board Members.

7:15

Joe Calderan, attorney with offices at 11 South Meridian.

7:19

I represent the petitioner in 2019 D V 2008, 5325 Searley Road.

7:26

It's uh towards the middle portion of the new petitions on page two of your docket.

7:33

Uh we would request a continuance to June 11th.

7:37

Uh my client did meet with our planner Friday.

7:41

Uh we presented uh revised plans last night to the Decatur Township Civic Council.

7:47

However, staff has not uh had a chance to uh look at revised plans.

7:52

So we would appreciate the continuance without additional notice to June 11th.

7:57

Thank you.

7:59

So anyone in the audience that has any interest in 2019 D V two Zero Zero Eight 5325 Surley Road.

8:06

Staff?

8:07

Thank you, Chair Person Young, members of the board.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████68%
Procedural███████████████23%
Permitting Process██████9%
Summary of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II Public Hearing – May 21, 2019

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Division II met on May 21, 2019, beginning at 1:00 p.m. in the Public Assembly Room of the City-County Building, Indianapolis, Indiana. Chair Mark Young presided with board members Alicia Reuter, Mary Kelly, James Duke, and Margaret Banning present. The board heard eight petitions, approved seven, denied one, and continued six docket items to later June 2019 hearings.

Continuances and Procedural Actions

  • 2019-DV2-010 (429 Parkway Avenue) – continued to June 11, 2019, without additional notice at the petitioner's request; staff had no objection.
  • 2019-DV2-008 (5325 Seerley Road) – continued to June 11, 2019, without additional notice; attorney Joe Calderon requested time for revised plans and review by the Decatur Township Civic Council.
  • 2019-UV2-001 (1151 West Thompson Road) – continued to June 11, 2019, without additional notice; attorney John Cross cited a pending HOA and city-county councilor review.
  • 2019-UV2-006 (3380 North Sherman Drive) – continued and transferred to the June 18, 2019 BZA III hearing without additional notice so the petitioner could provide additional information.
  • 2019-SE2-001 (916 and 926 East 19th Street / 1901 Cornell Avenue) – automatically continued to June 11, 2019; the automatic continuance was acknowledged.
  • 2019-DV2-006 (619 East Minnesota Street) – continued to June 11, 2019, without additional notice; staff noted the petitioner planned to amend the request.

Discussion Items / Petitions Heard

2019-DV2-003 – 1140 Ohio Street (Approved 5-0)

  • Petitioner Mark Crouch sought a variance of development standards to convert a two-family dwelling into single-family attached dwellings and legally establish a zero-foot west side yard, a 2.5-foot east side yard, 2.5 feet between dwellings, and 39.5% open space (four-foot side yards, 10 feet between dwellings, and 55% open space required).
  • Staff recommended approval subject to the site plan dated April 1, 2019; a discrepancy between the referenced site plan and the one included in the staff report was clarified.
  • The board voted 5-0 to approve.

2019-DV2-004 – 232 North Oriental Street (Approved 5-0)

  • Petitioner Josh Hreha requested variances for a garage addition, reduced setbacks, porch steps encroaching 5.5 feet into the right-of-way, access to Oriental Street, and 26% open space (15-foot rear setback, four-foot side setback, 18-foot front or average setback, and 55% open space required).
  • Hreha stated the proposed configuration mirrors a home across the street and had neighborhood association support.
  • Staff had no additional comments; the board voted 5-0 to approve.

2019-DV2-007 – 1440 Hoyt Avenue (Approved 5-0)

  • Mark Crouch, for Goris Homes LLC, requested a variance to construct a detached garage creating 41% open space (60% required) and to legalize an existing 13-foot front setback, zero-foot side setbacks, and zero-foot separation from adjoining dwellings (18-foot front or average, three-foot side setback, and 10-foot separation required).
  • Staff recommended approval subject to a commitment that the grant remains valid only while the existing structure is retained; if the structure is torn down or expanded, the grant is invalid.
  • The board voted 5-0 to approve with that commitment.

2019-DV2-009 – 421 East Morris Street (Approved 5-0)

  • The petition sought to legally establish an existing single-family dwelling and garage with a 10-foot front setback, two-foot side setbacks, a two-foot separation from a primary dwelling, and 51% open space (18-foot front or average, three-foot side setbacks, 10 feet between dwellings, and 60% open space required).
  • Staff had no additional comments; the board voted 5-0 to approve.

2019-UV2-005 (Amended) – 6158 West 10th Street (Approved 5-0)

  • Homes in Motion LLC requested a variance of use for a real estate office in a residential structure, plus one 24-square-foot ground sign; the original request for two 15-square-foot wall signs was removed by amendment.
  • Attorney John Cross said the neighborhood supported the petition subject to commitments preventing the variance from running with the land. Staff recommended approval subject to those commitments.
  • The board voted 5-0 to approve, subject to the submitted site plan and the commitments.

2019-DV3-008 (Amended) – 7307 Holliday Drive West (Setback Approved 4-1; Fence Approved 5-0)

  • Andrew Thompson requested a variance for an addition with an eight-foot north side setback and a 20-foot aggregate side setback (12-foot side and 30-foot aggregate required) and a six-foot-tall privacy fence along the east side lot line within the front yard of 73rd Street (maximum four feet with 30% opacity or less).
  • Staff had a split recommendation: denial of the reduced setback and approval of the fence as amended.
  • The board voted on Part A (the setback) 4-1 to approve, with Alicia Reuter dissenting, and Part B (the fence) 5-0 to approve. The case was continued for updated findings of fact.

2019-DV2-005 – 3820 South Sherman Drive (Approved 3-2)

  • Amanda Faux-Smith, for Amandeep Singh, requested variances to legalize a rebuilt porch with a two-foot side setback and a 20-foot front setback from the proposed right-of-way of Sherman Drive, and to legalize a storage barn with a one-foot south side setback (three-foot side setback and 35-foot front setback from the proposed right-of-way required).
  • Faux-Smith withdrew the request related to the barn's side setback, stating the barn would be moved to comply.
  • Staff recommended denial, arguing the work was done without proper permits and the deficient setbacks created maintenance and trespass concerns.
  • The board approved the petition 3-2; it was continued for revised findings.

2019-UV2-007 (Amended) – 1027 Sears Street (Denied 5-0)

  • Ana Lopez, through Amanda Faux-Smith, requested a variance of use to store multiple commercial vehicles in a proposed garage and to legally establish a shed with a five-foot north side setback (seven-foot side and 19-foot aggregate side setback required).
  • Staff recommended denial, stating contractor vehicle storage is not permitted in residential districts, no peculiar hardship existed, and the use would extend commercial activity into a residential neighborhood.
  • The board voted 5-0 to deny and continued the case for adoption of findings of fact; staff said it would clarify whether the existing shed must be brought into compliance.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved: 2019-DV2-003, 2019-DV2-004, 2019-DV2-007, 2019-DV2-009, 2019-UV2-005, 2019-DV3-008 (both parts), and 2019-DV2-005.
  • Denied: 2019-UV2-007.
  • Continued: 2019-DV2-010, 2019-DV2-008, 2019-UV2-001, 2019-UV2-006, 2019-SE2-001, and 2019-DV2-006 to later June 2019 hearings.
  • Several approvals were conditioned on site plans, commitments not to let variances run with the land, or commitments to retain existing structures; certain cases were continued to adopt or revise findings of fact.

Meeting Transcript

I don't have Gabon. Where is my head? I don't have a matter lost. Hello, everyone. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division II. I am Mark Young, Chairperson of Division II. The other board members present are Alicia Reuter to my left. Mary Kelly and James Duke to my right, and Margaret Banning walking up the stairs as we speak. Robert Ulenhake, Senior Planner, and Paige Story, Senior Planner. Keith Hoseworth is the current planned administrator. The board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record for each case heard today. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of a case being heard should have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition should have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff would then present the administrator's comments regarding the petition. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentation. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal. Other petitioners, rebuttal evidence, and a brief closing statement. A person may file a written request to receive notice of a filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contact the members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures? If not, we will consider special requests and continuances at this time. So we just needed a little more time to excuse me, get that together. Okay. You are asking for a continuance? Please. Sorry. Is there anyone in the audience that has any interest in 2019 D V two Zero 10 429 Parkway Avenue? Staff. Thank you, Chairperson Young, members of the board. Staff has no objection to this continuance request without notice. Okay. You're just looking for a month continuance? Sure. So that would be the I'm sorry, where are we at? June. Is it the 18th or the Division 2? Because we had to move the 2019. So June 11th, right? I entertain a motion to move 2019 D V two Zero One Zero to the June 11th hearing date, and that's without additional notice. All in favor? Opposed. Thank you. Thank you. Good afternoon, Board Members. Joe Calderan, attorney with offices at 11 South Meridian. I represent the petitioner in 2019 D V 2008, 5325 Searley Road.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com