OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II Public Hearing - March 8, 2022

Board of Zoning Appeals IITuesday, March 8, 2022
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals II
DateTuesday, March 8, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
1:36

Can I go ahead and start?

1:39

All right.

1:42

This is called order.

1:43

This is a public hearing in the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II.

1:46

I'm Craig E.

1:47

Von Dalen, acting chairperson to Division II.

1:50

Although I'm not sure I'm acting anymore.

1:52

Am I actually chairperson?

1:54

Yeah.

1:54

The other board members present are James Duke, Patrice Duckett Brown, Beth Brandon, Kirk Farmer.

2:00

Legal Counsel for the Board of Day is Chris Steinmetz.

2:03

Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie Anea, Principal Planner 2, Kathleen Blackham, Senior Planner, Robert Eulenhake, Senior Planner, Marlene Arejeda, Senior Planner, Jenna Cassill, Associate Planner, and Heather Stephen, Senior Specialist and Secretary to the Board.

2:18

Matt Pleasant is current planning administrator.

2:21

The board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today.

2:26

The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure.

2:29

The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals.

2:33

As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand.

2:39

Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn.

2:42

Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board.

2:46

Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify.

2:57

Statements and arguments in support of the petition.

2:59

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition.

3:08

Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition.

3:26

No further evidence.

3:27

Statements or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board.

4:49

Written requests must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number.

4:58

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

5:01

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing is process is prohibited.

5:08

All voting day will be done by roll call.

5:11

I will individually read each board member's name and ask them to vote yes or no.

5:15

Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

5:20

Before we hear special requests, I will ask for a waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedited petitions and adopt their findings of fact in a single vote rather than voted voting on each petition separately.

5:33

Do I hear a motion to do so?

5:35

Duke so moved.

5:36

Thank you, Member Duke.

5:38

Do I hear a second?

5:40

Brandon, second.

5:41

Thank you, Member Brandon.

5:43

I will now ask for a vote.

5:44

Duke.

5:45

Duke, yes.

5:46

Ducett Brown.

5:47

Dougett Brown, yes.

5:48

Brandon.

5:49

Brandon, yes.

5:50

Farmer.

5:50

Farmer, yes.

5:51

And I am also a yes.

5:53

Is there any anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures?

5:59

If not, we'll consider special requests and continuances at this time.

6:06

Thank you.

6:07

Good afternoon, Chairperson Von Dalen, members of the board, Joe Calderan, 11 South Meridian, Indianapolis.

6:14

I represent the petitioner in 2022.

6:18

DV2004 5345 West 86 81st Street.

6:24

I'm sorry.

6:24

It's in the continued port uh petition portion of your docket today.

6:29

We would ask for your indulgence to uh continue this case and transfer it to board three for hearing on April 19th.

6:40

And the reason for that is simply because the uh Pike Township Residents Association meets on the second Wednesday of every month, which next month will be April 13th.

6:52

And we have been there once before and we'd like to be go there once again with a revised site plan and heritage tree study, which are really the triggers for uh the delay in getting this done.

7:05

We have uh uh informed our planner Marlene Irajita of of this.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Affordable Housing█████████████████████████25%
Community Engagement███████████████████19%
Procedural██████████████14%
Transportation1%
Summary of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II Public Hearing - March 8, 2022

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II held a public hearing on March 8, 2022, at 6:00 PM. The meeting was chaired by Craig E. Von Dalen, with members James Duke, Patrice Duckett Brown, Beth Brandon, and Kirk Farmer present. Legal counsel was Chris Steinmetz, and staff from the Division of Planning attended. The agenda included continuances, withdrawals, expedited petitions, and a public hearing on a variance request for a proposed 14-unit apartment building on Elm Street.

Consent Calendar

  • The board approved a waiver of rules to vote on all expedited petitions in a single vote, allowing approval of findings of fact collectively. The motion passed unanimously (5-0).
  • Five expedited petitions were read and approved via a single roll-call vote (5-0):
    • 2022 DV2-007: 3001 West 60th Street – variance for a single-family dwelling on a 2.78-acre parcel (minimum 3 acres required, 20 ft frontage, 40 ft lot width).
    • 2022 UV2-003: 2802 Central Avenue – variance of use for a dog grooming business.
    • 2022 DV2-006: 2216 and 2228 North College Avenue – variance for a three-story mixed-use building with direct vehicular access to College Avenue.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Jill Steinhauer (co-owner of 1027 Elm Street): Expressed opposition to the proposed 14-unit apartment building. She raised concerns about parking congestion on the street, difficulty backing out of the alley (a one-way alley), potential for increased trash and noise from a rooftop party deck, and disappointment that the vacant lots were not maintained. She urged the board to deny exceptions and require the project to comply with all zoning standards.
  • Ethan Gilmer (resident of 1045 Elm Street and owner of 1051 Elm Street): Shared similar concerns about parking, noting that street parking is already limited. He asked how many parking spaces were planned and expressed worry about the scale of the building fitting the family-oriented street. He also acknowledged that the empty lots have been a nuisance and that some activity is welcome, but he opposed the proposed density.

Discussion Items

  • Petition 2022 UV2-002 – 1035, 1039, 1041, 1043 Elm Street: Hannah Abel (Demerley Architects) presented a request for a variance of use and development standards to allow a three-story, 14-unit medium apartment building (not permitted in the D8 zoning district) with reduced setbacks (1.5 ft rear setback vs. 10 ft required), a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.29 (max 0.60), and a livability space ratio (LSR) of 0.25 (min 0.66). The petitioner argued that the two additional units (beyond the 12-unit small apartment permitted) provide a buffer for covered parking at the rear, and that the building is close to the Red Line transit. They added a green roof and gym to improve LSR, but staff noted that the green roof is not usable space and cannot be counted. Staff recommended denial, stating the proposal represents overdevelopment; the lot size (10,400 sq ft) does not meet the 12,000 sq ft minimum for a medium apartment, and the variances are self-imposed since a 12-unit small apartment could be built without most variances. The petitioner requested a continuance to refine the plan. The board granted the continuance to the April 12, 2022 meeting (note: the petitioner had requested April 19, 2022, but the board voted for April 12th). The petitioner also withdrew the front setback variance request, as they now meet the required 7.5 ft setback.

Key Outcomes

  • Continuances (all passed unanimously, 5-0):
    • 2022 DV2-004 (5345 West 81st Street): Continued to April 19, 2022, and transferred to Board 3 at the petitioner’s request (to allow additional neighborhood meeting). Staff noted this would be the final continuance supported.
    • 2021 DV1-077A (715 South Keystone Avenue): Continued to May 17, 2022, without additional notice.
    • 2022 DV2-005 (1039 Kessler Boulevard East Drive): Continued to April 12, 2022, with new notice (petitioner absent; required for fence height and location issues).
  • Withdrawal acknowledged: 2021 DV2-057 (10 South Capitol Avenue) – withdrawn by petitioner.
  • Expedited petitions approved: As listed above in the Consent Calendar.
  • Elm Street case (2022 UV2-002): Continued to April 12, 2022, with additional notice if needed. The front setback variance was withdrawn. The petitioner is to revise plans and return.
  • Findings of fact: The board adopted findings of fact for petitions approved during the meeting, and members signed them.

Meeting Transcript

Can I go ahead and start? All right. This is called order. This is a public hearing in the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II. I'm Craig E. Von Dalen, acting chairperson to Division II. Although I'm not sure I'm acting anymore. Am I actually chairperson? Yeah. The other board members present are James Duke, Patrice Duckett Brown, Beth Brandon, Kirk Farmer. Legal Counsel for the Board of Day is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie Anea, Principal Planner 2, Kathleen Blackham, Senior Planner, Robert Eulenhake, Senior Planner, Marlene Arejeda, Senior Planner, Jenna Cassill, Associate Planner, and Heather Stephen, Senior Specialist and Secretary to the Board. Matt Pleasant is current planning administrator. The board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Statements and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. No further evidence. Statements or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Written requests must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing is process is prohibited. All voting day will be done by roll call. I will individually read each board member's name and ask them to vote yes or no. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. Before we hear special requests, I will ask for a waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedited petitions and adopt their findings of fact in a single vote rather than voted voting on each petition separately. Do I hear a motion to do so? Duke so moved. Thank you, Member Duke. Do I hear a second? Brandon, second. Thank you, Member Brandon. I will now ask for a vote. Duke. Duke, yes. Ducett Brown. Dougett Brown, yes. Brandon. Brandon, yes. Farmer. Farmer, yes. And I am also a yes. Is there any anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures? If not, we'll consider special requests and continuances at this time.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com