Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II Meeting - July 11, 2023
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II Meeting - July 11, 2023
The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division II convened on July 11, 2023, at 6:15 PM. Chairperson Craig E. Von Dalen presided, with members James Duke, Beth Brandon, Tom Barnes, and alternate David Duncan present. Legal Counsel Chris Steinman and several Division of Planning staff members attended. The board heard three continuance requests, one expedited docket, and five non-expedited variance petitions, concluding with votes on each.
Continuances and Special Requests
- 2023 DV2-010 (526 Blue Ridge Road): Petitioner Dana Kevin Sindelar requested a continuance because half the neighborhood was on vacation. Remonstrator Andy Wirt (representing Butler University) preferred to proceed, but neighbors Evelyn and Richard Turner had no objection. Staff had no objection. The board voted unanimously to continue to August 8, 2023, without additional notice.
- 2023 UV2-004 (2029 Massachusetts Avenue): Staff requested a continuance on behalf of the petitioner to September 12, 2023, with additional notice, due to an error in the staff report. No audience interest. The board voted unanimously to continue.
- 2023 DV2-013 (4809 East 70th Street): Staff requested a continuance on behalf of the petitioner to August 8, 2023, without additional notice. No audience interest. The board voted unanimously to continue.
Expedited/Consent Docket
- 2023 DV2-011 (multiple addresses in Pike Township): Arbor Homes and Apex Realty Group requested a variance of development standards for single-family dwellings with reduced front yard setback, main floor area, and open space. No opposition was voiced. The board voted unanimously to approve via the previously adopted waiver of rules.
Petition 2023 DV2-005: 4540 Park Avenue – Carriage House Variances
- Petitioners: Thomas and Kelly Creveling, represented by Mark Demerley. Requested variances for a detached carriage house with secondary dwelling: reduced open space (72% vs. 75% required) and increased square footage (850 sq. ft. vs. 720 sq. ft. max).
- Public Comments: No remonstrators appeared. The petitioner noted support from the Meridian Kessler neighborhood and neighbors.
- Staff Recommendation: Split – opposed to the square footage overage due to the incidental and subordinate use requirement, but not opposed to the open space reduction given the lot's below-minimum area.
- Discussion: The board debated the calculation of floor area, particularly whether the staircase should be counted, and the petitioner argued the stairway should not be counted on the second floor. The board split the vote into two ballots.
- Key Outcomes: Ballot A (open space): 5-0 approval. Ballot B (square footage): 5-0 approval. Both variances granted.
Petition 2023 DV2-008: 3802 East 10th Street – Fueling Station and Laundromat
- Petitioner: Jabo Investments LLC, represented by Joseph D. Calderon. Requested a variance to allow 0% building transparency on the south facade (40% required) and a canopy light level waiver (withdrawn).
- Public Comments: Chris Staub, president of the Near East Side Community Organization (NESCO), spoke in opposition only because the petitioners had not yet shared signage and canopy designs. He acknowledged the petitioners had agreed to community commitments and that the only remaining variance concerned the windows.
- Staff Recommendation: Denial, citing the importance of transparency for crime prevention and the availability of design alternatives.
- Discussion: The board noted the 19-foot separation from the sidewalk and the security concerns of placing a cashier with a back to glass. The petitioner committed to install window boxes for public art, share sign plans, and add landscaping.
- Key Outcomes: Vote: 4-1 approval (Barnes no). Variance granted.
Petition 2023 DV2-009: 6151 North Keystone Avenue – Panda Express Drive-Through
- Petitioner: Kite Realty Group, represented by Henry Clover and Joseph D. Calderon. Requested variances for a restaurant with drive-through: stacking in the front yard, no screening, 24 parking spaces (23 max), and 0% transparency on the north facade.
- Public Comments: No remonstrators appeared. The Greater Allisonville Community Council submitted a letter of support.
- Staff Recommendation: Denial, stating that a compliant site plan was possible and that the requested variances were self-imposed due to the lot's geometry.
- Discussion: The petitioner argued the preferred plan improved stacking and safety, and that the building orientation was constrained by access easements. The board questioned the percentage of drive-through business (about 50-60%) and pedestrian access.
- Key Outcomes: Vote: 4-1 approval (Barnes no). Variance granted.
Petition 2023 DV2-012: 3777 North Meridian Street – Perimeter Fence
- Petitioner: The Enclave at Meridian LP, represented by Joseph D. Calderon and Raymond Williams. Requested a variance for a six- to eight-foot decorative fence in the front yard (four-foot limit) and side/rear yards (six-foot limit) for security.
- Public Comments: No remonstrators appeared. The petitioner noted that residents were excited about the fence and that Mapleton Fall Creek had initially supported then opposed, but no one testified in opposition.
- Staff Recommendation: Denial, citing the fence's aggressive design ("Enforcer" style) and the availability of other security measures like cameras and guards.
- Discussion: The board expressed concerns about the fence's aggressive design and height. The petitioner committed to lowering the front yard fence to five feet, using a standard pinch-point fence, and keeping side/rear at six feet.
- Key Outcomes: Vote: 5-0 approval. Variance granted as modified by the commitments.
Petition 2023 UV2-007: 128 North Traub Avenue – Multi-Unit Use Variance
- Petitioner: CK Rents LLC, represented by KW Martinez. Requested a variance of use to allow a four-unit multi-unit house and a detached accessory dwelling (total five units) in a D5 zone, plus a three-foot side setback. The property currently operates as a legally non-conforming five-unit use.
- Public Comments: No one appeared in person. A letter of remonstrance from an adjoining neighbor was received.
- Staff Recommendation: Denial, stating the request was for insurance/financing purposes, that the difficulty was self-imposed, and that the proposed density (36 units per acre) far exceeded the comprehensive plan's recommendation.
- Discussion: The petitioner argued the variance would protect affordable housing and allow refinancing. The board noted that the property could continue as is under the LNCU, and that granting the variance would allow a future rebuild at higher intensity, potentially harming neighbors.
- Key Outcomes: Vote: 5-0 denial. The board will adopt findings of fact at a later meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Three continuances granted (2023 DV2-010, UV2-004, DV2-013).
- Expedited docket approved unanimously.
- Carriage house variances (DV2-005) approved 5-0 on both ballots.
- Fueling station variance (DV2-008) approved 4-1.
- Panda Express variances (DV2-009) approved 4-1.
- Fence variance (DV2-012) approved 5-0 with modified commitments.
- Multi-unit use variance (UV2-007) denied 5-0.
Meeting Transcript
This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division II. I am Craig E. Von Dalen, Chairperson of Division Two. The other board members present are James Duke, Beth Brandon, Tom Barnes, and David Duncan, an alternate from Division One. Legal Counsel for the Board today is Chris Steinman. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill, Principal Planner 2, Robert Euland Haig, Senior Planner, Marley Marlaney or Ajeda, Senior Planner, Alison Richardson, Senior Planner, and Heather Stephens, Senior Specialist and Secretary to the Board. Matt Pleasant, the current planning administrator, the board has copies of the zoning ordinance, which will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after our request for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who tend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for presentation of evidence statements and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the motion or the petition. No further evidence, statements or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedures, including posting of the notice signed on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued to lack a proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of a parking area, the dedication of rights of ways are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with the conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permit, it must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of the decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of the public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures? There are not. Before we hear special requests, I'll ask for a waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote on for all expedited petitions and adopt their findings of fact without any additional testimony from the individual petitioners. Do I hear a motion? Brandon, so moved. And a second? Duke second. Thank you. I'll now ask for a vote. Duke. Duke, yes. Brandon. Brandon, yes. Barnes. Yes. Duncan. Duncan, yes. And I'm also yes. We'll now reconsider special requests and continuances at this time.
openpublica.com