OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division Two - September 12, 2023

Board of Zoning Appeals IITuesday, September 12, 2023
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals II
DateTuesday, September 12, 2023
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:38

No key.

0:39

All right, I'm gonna go ahead and get started.

0:45

All right.

0:47

Called order.

0:48

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division Two.

0:51

I am Craig E.

0:52

Von Dalen, Chair Person of the Division Two.

0:54

The other board members present are James Duke, Patrice Ducket Brown, Beth Brandon, Tom Barnes.

0:59

Legal Counsel for today today for the board today is Chris Steinmetz.

1:03

Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill, Principal Planner 2, Keith Holdsworth, Senior Planner.

1:10

Robert Eulin Hake, Senior Planner, Marlene Urjeda, Senior Planner, Alison Richardson, Senior Planner, and Heather Stevens, Senior Specialist and Secretary of the Board.

1:18

Matt Pleasant is the current planning administrator.

1:20

The board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case for today.

1:25

The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure.

1:28

The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals.

1:32

As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand.

1:41

Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn.

1:44

Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board.

1:48

Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify.

1:52

Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements and arguments in support of the petition.

2:00

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence.

2:06

Statements and arguments in opposition to the petition.

2:09

Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition.

2:12

The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case.

2:16

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations.

2:19

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioners, rebuttal evidence, and a brief closing statement.

2:26

Why is everyone standing?

2:27

I appreciate it.

2:29

Oh, I didn't.

2:30

You don't need to stand.

2:31

That is I really appreciate that.

2:33

Thank you.

2:34

I may have may have had a pause there that was out of the evidence statements or arguments we've heard unless it is at the discretion of the board.

2:42

Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance.

2:48

If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice signed on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition.

2:59

Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continue due to lack of proper notice, please bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing.

3:08

The board may impose various conditions on or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions.

3:13

The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights of way are examples.

3:19

These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met to be grant for a granted variance to be valid.

3:25

Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be proved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion.

3:33

Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of authorized improvements.

4:02

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

4:04

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of the public hearing process is prohibited.

4:11

Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

4:16

Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedure?

4:21

Unbeing seen before we hear special request.

4:23

Sorry, does somebody have a question about our procedure?

4:25

Nope.

4:39

Duke so move.

4:40

And do I hear a second?

4:42

Brandon, second.

4:43

Thank you.

4:44

I will now call for the vote.

4:45

Mr.

4:46

Duke.

4:46

Duke, yes.

4:47

Brandon.

4:48

Brandon, yes.

4:49

Barnes.

4:50

Barnes, yes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████72%
Procedural███████████18%
Youth Programs███5%
Alcohol Beverage Regulation██3%
Property Tax Assessment1%
Noise Ordinance1%
Summary of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division Two - September 12, 2023

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division Two held a public hearing on September 12, 2023, beginning at 6:00 PM. The board considered a special request to waive the 12-month refiling rule, several continuances and withdrawals, expedited docket cases, and five regular docket petitions. Key actions included approval of Butler University's revised variance request, denial of a multi-unit house in a historic neighborhood, and approval of a transitional living facility for at-risk youth.

Special Requests & Continuances

  • Butler University Special Request (DV2010): The board granted a unanimous request to allow Butler University to file a new rezoning petition and companion variance within 12 months of a prior denial. The new proposal removes the height variance (building now under 35 ft), and a rezoning to University Quarter District is planned. Staff supported the request due to substantial differences.
  • Continuances without notice to October 10, 2023 were granted for: Cecina High School parking variance (2023 DV2-022), monument sign variance (2023 DV2-021), and fence variance (2023 DV2-024). All unopposed.
  • Withdrawal of case 2023 UV2-004 (2029 Massachusetts Ave) was accepted, with fees transferred to a new case.
  • Waivers of notice were granted for: 5-day waiver for 2023 DV2-026 (5515 Guilford Ave); 2-day waiver for 2023 DV2-017 amended (717 E 27th St); 3-day waiver for 2023 UV2-008 (1718 SE St); 1-day waiver for 2023 DV2-025 (1449 Olive St). Staff had no objections.

Expedited Docket

  • Four petitions were approved unanimously by voice vote: 2023 DV2-020 (3 ft side yard setback), 2023 DV2-023 (5 ft rear setback), 2023 DV2-025 (single-family dwelling setbacks), and 2023 UV2-009 amended (tattoo parlor separation variance, subject to plan of operation commitment).
  • Petition 2023 UV2-010 (transitional living) was pulled from the expedited docket after an audience member expressed opposition and was heard in the regular docket.

Regular Docket Cases

2023 DV2-015: 1133 S Illinois St (Denied)

  • Petitioner (Hoosier Renovators LLC, by Mark and Kim Crouch): Requested variances to construct a three-unit multi-unit house on a 30-ft wide lot (35 ft required), with a 3-ft front setback (10 ft required) and zero-ft side setback (2 ft required). Owner Ryan Moeller stated intent to live on site.
  • Remonstrators (Jim Dewis, Donald and Melissa Dyer): Opposed citing inadequate lot width, damage to adjacent properties during demolition, privacy concerns from balconies, and skepticism about owner occupancy. A letter from Center Township Trustee LaDonna Freeman (not received by staff) was referenced.
  • Staff: Recommended approval, noting the front setback is consistent with the block and the building meets all other standards.
  • Vote: 4 no (Ducett Brown, Von Dalen, Barnes, Duke), 1 yes (Brandon) — Denied.

2023 DV2-017 amended: 717 E 27th St (Denied)

  • Petitioner (Lamon J. Henderson by Myron Cheeks): Requested variances for a three-story duplex on a 3,250 sq ft lot (7,200 sq ft required), reduced main floor area (360 sq ft vs 660 sq ft), 5-ft rear setback (20 ft required), and 44% open space (60% required). Parking garages included due to lack of on-street parking.
  • Remonstrance: None.
  • Staff: Recommended denial due to the number and severity of variances; noted the site could be developed with fewer units or single-family.
  • Vote: 5-0 Unanimous Denial.

2023 DV2-026: 5515 Guilford Ave (Approved)

  • Petitioner (Anthony and Julia Nicholson by Jerry Myers): Requested a 2-ft north side yard setback for a replacement carriage house (same footprint as original destroyed by tree). Structure not for dwelling, only storage.
  • Remonstrance: None. Staff and Meridian Kessler Neighborhood Association supported.
  • Staff: Recommended approval; the reduced setback matches historic placement.
  • Vote: 5-0 Unanimous Approval.

2023 UV2-008: 1718 SE St (Denied)

  • Petitioner (Captain Mike's Holding Court by Mark and Kim Crouch): Requested variance to operate a bar within 68 ft of a protected district (100 ft required) and a deck encroaching into the right-of-way (originally 2.3 ft, later revised to 6.5 inches). Petitioner argued the establishment is a restaurant-bar; a zoning violation triggered the petition.
  • Remonstrators (Gina Christopharo and James Bulow of Bates Hendricks Neighborhood Association): Opposed due to noise complaints, loitering, and lack of proper permits. They stated they do not oppose a restaurant but oppose a bar.
  • Staff: Recommended denial, citing self-imposed hardship, insufficient parking, potential noise impact, and retroactive correction of violations. Staff clarified a restaurant is permitted without a variance.
  • Vote: 5-0 Unanimous Denial.

2023 UV2-010: 4002 Broadway St (Approved)

  • Petitioner (Eclectic Soul Voices Corporation by Russell Brown): Requested variance to operate a transitional living quarter for up to seven males aged 14–17. The facility, Blossom House, will have 24/7 staff, no external changes, and no on-site visits. A three-year lease exists. Meridian Kessler Neighborhood Association supported.
  • Remonstrator (Ben Brockman, neighbor): Initially concerned about safety and property values, but after hearing details expressed support for the program.
  • Staff: Recommended approval; the use is small-scale and fits the residential character.
  • Vote: 5-0 Unanimous Approval.

Key Outcomes

  • Butler University granted permission to refile a variance petition (height removed, rezoning planned).
  • Expedited approvals: Four variances approved unanimously (DV2-020, DV2-023, DV2-025, UV2-009 amended).
  • Denials: Three petitions denied — DV2-015 (4-1), DV2-017 (5-0), UV2-008 (5-0).
  • Approvals: DV2-026 (5-0) and UV2-010 (5-0).
  • Other actions: Revised findings of fact adopted for 2022 DV2009; negative findings adopted for two prior petitions.

Meeting Transcript

No key. All right, I'm gonna go ahead and get started. All right. Called order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division Two. I am Craig E. Von Dalen, Chair Person of the Division Two. The other board members present are James Duke, Patrice Ducket Brown, Beth Brandon, Tom Barnes. Legal Counsel for today today for the board today is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill, Principal Planner 2, Keith Holdsworth, Senior Planner. Robert Eulin Hake, Senior Planner, Marlene Urjeda, Senior Planner, Alison Richardson, Senior Planner, and Heather Stevens, Senior Specialist and Secretary of the Board. Matt Pleasant is the current planning administrator. The board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case for today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence. Statements and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioners, rebuttal evidence, and a brief closing statement. Why is everyone standing? I appreciate it. Oh, I didn't. You don't need to stand. That is I really appreciate that. Thank you. I may have may have had a pause there that was out of the evidence statements or arguments we've heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice signed on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continue due to lack of proper notice, please bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions on or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights of way are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met to be grant for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be proved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of authorized improvements. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of the public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedure? Unbeing seen before we hear special request. Sorry, does somebody have a question about our procedure? Nope. Duke so move. And do I hear a second?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com