OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 2 Meeting - February 11, 2025

Board of Zoning Appeals IITuesday, February 11, 2025
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals II
DateTuesday, February 11, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:03

Oh, we did.

0:03

We have a plan.

0:21

We agree.

0:34

Yes, ma'am.

0:38

Oh my god.

0:41

Okay.

0:41

Oh, I have some questions.

1:22

I'll tell them.

1:38

I don't.

1:39

But I actually am going to see my client is that pretty interesting fact that we've got a meeting or something else.

1:49

Yeah.

1:50

Yeah.

1:52

Okay.

1:55

This is a call to order.

1:56

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division 2.

1:59

I am Craig Von Dalen, Chairperson of Division 2.

2:02

The other board members present are Tom Barnes, James Duke, David, Duncan, Beth Brandt, and Beth Brandon.

2:07

Legal Council for the Board of Days, Chris Steinmetz.

2:10

Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are at the ONA, Principal Planner 2, Michael Weigel, senior planner, Noah Stern, senior planner.

2:26

Proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure.

2:29

The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals.

2:34

As each non-expedited cases call petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand.

2:39

Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn.

2:48

Those who testify will state their names and address for the record before beginning to testify.

2:53

Petitioners and persons appearing in support of in a case in in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in support of the petition.

3:03

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in opposition to the petition.

3:11

Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition.

3:15

Petitioners will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case.

3:18

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations.

3:22

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the practitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement.

3:27

No further evidence, statements or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board.

3:32

Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance.

3:51

Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing.

4:01

The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions.

4:06

The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights of way are examples.

4:13

These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid.

4:18

Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within thirty days of completion.

4:25

Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements.

4:54

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

5:00

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited.

5:04

Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

5:09

There are five members present today.

5:11

It requires three votes to take action on any requests.

5:14

We will take this into consideration when hearing requests for continuances.

5:21

If anyone in the is anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures.

5:27

If not, board members, you have been provided meeting minutes for our January 14th, 2025 hearing.

5:32

If there are no deletions or additions, I will take a motion for their approval.

5:37

Barnes.

5:38

So moved.

5:39

Second.

5:40

Duke, second.

5:41

Thank you.

5:42

I'll call the roll.

5:43

Duncan.

5:45

Duncan, yes.

5:46

Duke.

5:47

Duke, yes.

5:48

Barnes.

5:49

Barnes, yes.

5:49

Brandon.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Procedural██████████████████████26%
Fence Regulation███████████13%
Transportation███4%
Historic Preservation███3%
Public Safety1%
Summary of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 2 Meeting - February 11, 2025

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 2 convened on February 11, 2025, at 6:00 PM under Chairperson Craig Von Dalen. Board members present included Tom Barnes, James Duke, David Duncan, and Beth Brandon. Legal counsel Chris Steinmetz and planning staff attended. The meeting covered approval of prior minutes, procedural waivers, continuances, and four variance petitions, including three fence height requests and one driveway access case. Votes were cast on each petition, with staff recommendations for denial in three cases but variances granted by the board.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes Approval: The board approved the minutes from the January 14, 2025 hearing by unanimous vote (5-0).
  • Waiver of Rules for Expedited Petitions: A motion to waive rules allowing votes on expedited petitions without individual testimony passed unanimously (5-0).

Discussion Items

  • Continuance and Waivers:

    • 2025-UV2-001 (2454 North Illinois St): Petitioner Justin Kingan requested a continuance to March 11, 2025, and a waiver for deficient notice. Staff had no objection. The board voted unanimously to continue with additional notice to the March hearing.
    • 2025-DV1-002 (8751 Michigan Rd): Petitioner Joseph Calter requested expedited treatment after reducing parking spaces to 35 per site plan dated February 5, 2025. Staff and Pike Township Presidents Association supported. Expedited status granted unanimously.
    • 2025-DV1-001 (4235 East 46th St): Petitioner Kevin Buckheit requested a three-day waiver for mailed notice (postmarked late). Staff had no issue. Waiver granted unanimously.
    • 2025-DV2-001 (7126 Spring Mill Rd): Petitioner Brian Twee requested a six-day notice waiver due to staff delay, plus agreed to two commitments. Staff had no objection. Waiver granted unanimously.
  • Expedited Petitions:

    • 2025-DV1-002 (8751 Michigan Rd): Variance to build an eating establishment with 43 parking spaces (23 maximum allowed), drive-through stacking in front yards, and no exclusive bypass aisle. Approved by unanimous vote (5-0).
    • 2025-DV2-001 (7126 Spring Mill Rd): Variance for an 8-foot privacy fence (max 6 feet) and 64-foot wide parking area within front yard (max 30 feet). Approved unanimously (5-0).
  • 2024-DV1-047 (1919 Mansfield St) – Driveway Access:

    • Petitioner James Holman requested a curb cut for driveway access from Mansfield Street instead of the alley, citing alley safety issues and narrow street parking. The gravel driveway had existed since ~1994 without permits. Staff recommended denial, citing the 2016 ordinance requiring alley access for properties with improved alleys, and noting that approving would set a poor precedent for walkability and on-street parking. The board questioned enforcement and alley condition. Board vote: 4-1 in favor (Duncan, Duke, Von Dalen, Brandon yes; Barnes no). Variance granted.
  • 2025-DV1-001 (4235 East 46th St) – Ornamental Fence:

    • Petitioner Kevin Buckheit requested a 6-foot ornamental fence (max 3.5 feet) on a 1.57-acre lot with 300 feet of frontage. The fence was erected without permit due to contractor error. Staff recommended denial, arguing 3.5-foot fence would suffice. Board added commitments: fence must remain ornate, non-pinch-point, high transparency (similar to existing). Board voted 5-0 to grant the variance.
  • 2024-DV2-047 (5088 Bonnie Bray St) – Corner Lot Fence:

    • Petitioner Danielle Day requested a 6-foot cedar fence on a corner lot (two front yard lines). Fence already installed; neighbors provided letters of support. Staff recommended denial, stating privacy fences in front yards deviate from residential character and set undesired precedent. Board discussed corner lot exceptions and visual impacts. Vote: 4-1 in favor (Duke, Duncan, Barnes, Brandon yes; Von Dalen no). Variance granted.

Key Outcomes

  • Variances Granted:
    • 8751 Michigan Rd (expedited) – approved 5-0.
    • 7126 Spring Mill Rd (expedited) – approved 5-0.
    • 1919 Mansfield St – approved 4-1.
    • 4235 East 46th St – approved 5-0 with commitments on fence style.
    • 5088 Bonnie Bray St – approved 4-1.
  • Continuance: 2025-UV2-001 continued to March 11, 2025, with new notice required.
  • Waivers Granted: All three notice deficiency waivers (cases 2025-DV1-001, 2025-DV2-001, and continuance) were approved unanimously.
  • Enforcement Discussion: Board discussed requiring improvement location permits (ILPs) for fences to reduce future violations; staff noted no current legislative appetite but acknowledged other jurisdictions require permits.

Meeting Transcript

Oh, we did. We have a plan. We agree. Yes, ma'am. Oh my god. Okay. Oh, I have some questions. I'll tell them. I don't. But I actually am going to see my client is that pretty interesting fact that we've got a meeting or something else. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. This is a call to order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division 2. I am Craig Von Dalen, Chairperson of Division 2. The other board members present are Tom Barnes, James Duke, David, Duncan, Beth Brandt, and Beth Brandon. Legal Council for the Board of Days, Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are at the ONA, Principal Planner 2, Michael Weigel, senior planner, Noah Stern, senior planner. Proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited cases call petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Those who testify will state their names and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of in a case in in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence statements and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. Petitioners will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the practitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement. No further evidence, statements or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights of way are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within thirty days of completion. Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. There are five members present today. It requires three votes to take action on any requests. We will take this into consideration when hearing requests for continuances. If anyone in the is anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures. If not, board members, you have been provided meeting minutes for our January 14th, 2025 hearing. If there are no deletions or additions, I will take a motion for their approval. Barnes. So moved. Second.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com