OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division III Public Hearing – February 18, 2020

Board of Zoning Appeals IIITuesday, February 18, 2020
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals III
DateTuesday, February 18, 2020
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:02

Call to order.

0:03

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division III.

0:07

I am Craig E.

0:08

Von Dalen, Chairperson of Division III.

0:10

The other board members present are to my left, Marisal Govea, and Anatoly Tony Boschenko, and to my right, Janice Golson Dunlap and Beth Whitaker.

0:18

Legal Counselor for the Board today is Stein is Chris Steinmetz.

0:21

Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Heather Stevens, Senior Specialist and Secretary to the Board.

0:26

Larry Callaway, Principal Planner 2, Robert Ewan Hake, Senior Planner, Marlene Irajada, Senior Planner, Alison Richardson, Senior Planner.

0:34

Matt Pleasant is the current planning administrator.

0:37

The Board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today.

0:43

Proceedings of this hearing are governed by the Board's rules of procedure.

0:46

The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals.

0:51

As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in a particular case will please stand.

0:56

Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn.

1:00

Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board.

1:04

Those who testify will state their name and address for the recording for the record record before beginning to testify.

1:12

Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition.

1:21

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence.

1:29

Statements and arguments in the opposition to the position.

1:33

Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition.

1:36

The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case.

1:40

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations.

1:44

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement.

1:50

No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board.

1:55

Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance.

2:03

If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice signed on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition.

2:15

Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing.

2:25

The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions.

2:32

The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of right of ways are examples.

2:39

These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid.

2:45

Compliance with the conditions imposed by the board must be proved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioners within 30 days of the completion.

2:53

Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permits must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements.

3:00

Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services.

3:07

A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board.

3:14

The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number.

3:23

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

3:26

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited.

3:33

Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

3:38

Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures?

3:42

None being seen, then we'll consider special requests and continuances at this time.

3:51

Thank you and good afternoon, Chairman Von Dalen, members of the board, Joe Calderon, 11 South Meridian, Indianapolis.

3:57

I represent the petitioner in 2019 D V 3044, 6139 West 79th Street.

4:05

We have been engaging both with the Pike Township Residents Association as well as a nearby property owner, having met with them both last week.

4:17

Given the fact that those discussions revealed the need for uh continuing negotiations, we seek a continuance to March 17th without additional notice.

4:30

Very well.

4:30

Is there anyone else in the audience with an interest in petition number 2019 DV 3-044 with an address of 6139 West 79th Street?

4:39

Yes, thank you, Mr.

4:40

Chairman, for the record.

4:41

My name is Murray Clark with the offices at 300 North Meridian Street.

4:44

We support this request.

4:45

I represent the uh neighboring property owner you mentioned.

4:48

We appreciate petitioners' willingness to move this forward a little bit to see if we can resolve uh current differences.

4:55

Be happy to answer any questions you might have.

4:57

Very well.

4:57

Um is there uh any comments from staff?

5:01

Thank you, Chair President Von Dale and members of the board.

5:04

Staff has no objection to this continuance request to the March 17th, 2020 hearing without additional notice.

5:10

All right, there's no one else that would like to speak on this matter.

5:13

I'll undertain a motion to continue with no additional notice to our next hearing.

5:18

I believe what was the date again?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████69%
Land Use Regulation██████9%
Procedural████6%
Community Engagement███4%
Sign Regulation██3%
Industrial Development2%
Behavioral Health Services2%
Traffic Safety1%
Parking Management1%
Summary of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division III Public Hearing – February 18, 2020

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) Division III held a public hearing on February 18, 2020, at 6:15 PM, chaired by Craig E. Von Dalen. Board members present included Marisal Govea, Anatoly Tony Boschenko, Janice Golson Dunlap, and Beth Whitaker. Legal Counsel Chris Steinmetz and Division of Planning staff, including Senior Specialist Heather Stevens and Principal Planner Larry Callaway, supported the proceedings. The board heard two continuance requests, one automatic continuance, two expedited cases, and four variance petitions, approving all but one with conditions.

Consent Calendar

  • 2020 DV 3003 (325 West Morris Street and 350 Kansas Street): An automatic continuance to the March 17, 2020 hearing was acknowledged by the board without objection.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Fountain Square Neighborhood Association (Josh Martin, 1229 Spruce Street): Expressed support for residential development on the Calvary Street properties but requested a covenant requiring adherence to D5, D52, or D8 residential standards, citing concerns about open space and stormwater mitigation. Martin noted drainage issues in the neighborhood, including water reaching the top of the sidewalk at Orange and Spruce during rain.
  • Councillor Kristen Jones (District 16, 714 Shepherd Street): Stated support for the Fountain Square Neighborhood Association's position and their due diligence process on both Calvary Street petitions.
  • Natalie Records (CEO, Collaborative Behavior Solutions): Expressed that the Arlington Avenue facility provides applied behavior analysis services to 23 children with autism and supports nearly 40 staff. She described CBS as a neighbor that enhances the area and warned that denial would remove unique opportunities for children with autism.
  • David Rutherford (property owner and attorney, 8801 Southeastern Avenue): Expressed appreciation for staff and community support on the Southeastern Avenue sign variance, noting the project took four and a half years and involved door-to-door collection of signatures.

Discussion Items

  • Continuance Requests: Joe Calderon (11 South Meridian) requested a continuance for 2019 DV 3044 (6139 West 79th Street) to March 17, 2020, citing ongoing negotiations with the Pike Township Residents Association and a neighboring property owner; Murray Clark (300 North Meridian Street) supported the request. Justin Kingan (618 East Market Street) requested a one-month continuance for 2020 DV 3001 (2050 Carrollton Avenue) to allow more time to meet with neighborhood groups and staff. Both continuances were approved without additional notice.
  • 2019 DV 3004 (8602–9010 Southeastern Avenue): David Rutherford sought a variance to legally establish and replace existing wall, pole, monument, and pylon signs within the 15-foot setback and right-of-way, with a 10-foot setback from the back of the curb. The property, in Franklin Township, is zoned D3, C4, C4, Flood Fringe, C5, SU1, and SU10. Rutherford explained that the historic village of Wanamaker was built along former State Highway 421 with a 100-foot right-of-way, leaving most signage nonconforming. Staff recommended approval with four conditions, which the petitioner accepted. The board approved the variance unanimously.
  • 2020 DV 3004 (759 and 761 South Sherman Drive): Andrew D. Baroker represented Geiger and Peters, an I-4 industrial steel manufacturer operating since 1954. The petition sought to expand an industrial building with a 30-foot north side transitional yard and legally establish an existing nine-foot yard, versus the required 50-foot side transitional yards. Baroker noted 97 notices were sent to neighbors with no objections, and four neighbors called in support. Staff had no additional comments, and the board approved unanimously.
  • 2019 UV 3010 (2630 South Arlington Avenue): Justin Kingan and Natalie Records represented Collaborative Behavior Solutions, seeking a variance for a behavioral analysis facility for autistic children, a trash container in the front yard, and a sign (sign request withdrawn). The use is not permitted in the D3 zone. CBS provides in-home and wraparound applied behavior analysis, with up to 40 hours per week per child. Staff recommended denial, citing the intensity of the use (up to 25 children and staff in summer), parking concerns, and inconsistency with the comprehensive plan's suburban neighborhood typology. The petitioner rebutted that peak on-site children number only 7–10 at a time on a six-acre site, and offered a commitment to return the property to residential use if CBS vacates. The board approved 4–1, with Marisal Govea dissenting, and directed that the commitment be memorialized in revised findings.
  • 2019 UV 3016 (1024 Calvary Street): Mark Crouch sought a variance for a two-family dwelling with a five-foot front setback and three- and five-foot side setbacks (30-foot front and 20-foot side setbacks required) on an I-4-zoned property. The Fountain Square Neighborhood Association and Councillor Jones requested a covenant to meet D5/D52/D8 standards. Staff noted the surrounding area is D8-zoned and recommended approval, but suggested D8 standards would be more appropriate than D5. The board approved unanimously.
  • 2019 UV 3017 (1018 Calvary Street): Adjacent to the previous petition, this sought a two-family dwelling with a five-foot front setback, four-foot side setbacks, and detached garages with three-foot side and five- and eleven-foot rear setbacks. The neighborhood raised stormwater concerns, noting limited green space and tree planting opportunities. Staff recommended approval, noting 47% open space if D8 standards applied. The board approved unanimously.
  • 2020 DV 3002 (1431 Lexington Avenue): Mark Crouch and Joe Belaski sought a variance for an 816-square-foot secondary dwelling over a three-car garage, exceeding the 720-square-foot maximum. The property is zoned D5 and located in a transit-oriented development area. Staff recommended denial, arguing the size could be reduced to 714 square feet without a variance and that the large garage conflicts with the comprehensive plan. The petitioner argued that the design, including the stairwell placement, justified the size and that the carriage house would serve visiting family. The board approved unanimously, overruling the staff recommendation.

Key Outcomes

  • 2019 DV 3044: Continued to March 17, 2020, without additional notice.
  • 2020 DV 3001: Continued to March 17, 2020, without additional notice.
  • 2020 DV 3003: Automatic continuance acknowledged.
  • 2019 DV 3004: Approved 5–0 with four conditions.
  • 2020 DV 3004: Approved 5–0 with no additional conditions.
  • 2019 UV 3010: Approved 4–1 (Govea dissenting), with a commitment that the variance applies only to Collaborative Behavior Solutions and the property reverts to residential use upon their departure; revised findings to be adopted.
  • 2019 UV 3016: Approved 5–0.
  • 2019 UV 3017: Approved 5–0.
  • 2020 DV 3002: Approved 5–0, despite staff recommendation for denial.

The meeting adjourned with a note from staff expressing hope that all five appointed members of Division III would be present at the March hearing to elect new officers.

Meeting Transcript

Call to order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division III. I am Craig E. Von Dalen, Chairperson of Division III. The other board members present are to my left, Marisal Govea, and Anatoly Tony Boschenko, and to my right, Janice Golson Dunlap and Beth Whitaker. Legal Counselor for the Board today is Stein is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Heather Stevens, Senior Specialist and Secretary to the Board. Larry Callaway, Principal Planner 2, Robert Ewan Hake, Senior Planner, Marlene Irajada, Senior Planner, Alison Richardson, Senior Planner. Matt Pleasant is the current planning administrator. The Board has copies of the zoning ordinance that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today. Proceedings of this hearing are governed by the Board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in a particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the recording for the record record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence. Statements and arguments in the opposition to the position. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement. No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice signed on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of right of ways are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with the conditions imposed by the board must be proved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioners within 30 days of the completion. Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permits must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures? None being seen, then we'll consider special requests and continuances at this time. Thank you and good afternoon, Chairman Von Dalen, members of the board, Joe Calderon, 11 South Meridian, Indianapolis. I represent the petitioner in 2019 D V 3044, 6139 West 79th Street. We have been engaging both with the Pike Township Residents Association as well as a nearby property owner, having met with them both last week. Given the fact that those discussions revealed the need for uh continuing negotiations, we seek a continuance to March 17th without additional notice. Very well. Is there anyone else in the audience with an interest in petition number 2019 DV 3-044 with an address of 6139 West 79th Street? Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman, for the record. My name is Murray Clark with the offices at 300 North Meridian Street. We support this request.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com