OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division III Meeting - December 17, 2024

Board of Zoning Appeals IIITuesday, December 17, 2024
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals III
DateTuesday, December 17, 2024
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
1:08

Well, you're going to continue to hear that's like a very good idea.

2:13

I'm going to call this meeting to order.

2:15

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division III.

2:19

I'm Joanna Taft, Chairperson of Division III.

2:22

Other board members present to my right are Brian Hannon and coming in in style is Percy Bland, Junior.

2:32

To my left is Rod Bohannon and to and Rayanna Binder.

2:36

Legal counsel for the board to get today is Chris Steinmetz.

2:39

Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill, Principal Planner 2, and interim current planning administrator.

3:15

As each non-exponented case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand.

3:23

Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn.

3:31

Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify.

3:57

Staff will then present the administrator's comments regarding the petition.

4:05

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations.

4:09

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement.

4:16

No further evidence.

4:17

Statements and arguments will be met, will be heard unless it's at the discretion of the board.

5:00

The installation of landscaping screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights away are examples.

5:05

These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid.

5:12

Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion.

5:19

Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements.

5:26

Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services.

5:35

A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board.

5:42

The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number.

5:50

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

5:54

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending out before the board outside of the public hearing process is prohibited.

6:02

Please be courteous and orderly at all times and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

6:19

And at 2 30, um we are going to go down to four members.

7:13

So I'm going to pass that down.

7:16

And if there is after we've looked at it, we're going to need a motion for approval.

7:26

And maybe I'm just trying to that's going to take us a little bit of time.

7:34

I don't know if I can move on with some things and then come back to that.

7:38

I'm going to do that.

7:39

Okay.

7:40

Is there anyone in the audience that says any questions about our procedures?

7:44

Okay.

7:45

Um so be as we're preparing to do our special requests.

7:50

I'm going to ask for a waiver of the rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedited petitions and adopt their findings of fact without any additional testimony from the individual petitioners.

8:00

So I need a motion.

8:02

Bohan is so moved.

8:03

I need a second.

8:04

Hannon second.

8:06

Okay, I'm going to pull the board.

8:07

Um Bohannon.

8:08

Bohan, yes.

8:09

Bland.

8:10

Land, yes.

8:11

Bender.

8:11

Yes.

8:12

Hannon.

8:13

Yes.

8:13

And Taft, yes.

8:15

Um, so we do have we have way of those rules.

8:19

Uh let's go back to the minutes.

8:24

Um has uh is anybody able to make a motion to approve those minutes.

8:31

Hannon so moved to approve the minutes.

8:34

Can I have a second?

8:34

Oh Hannah's second.

8:36

I'm going to now ask for a vote.

8:37

O'Hannon.

8:38

Bohanon, yes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use██████████████████████████████████34%
Procedural█████████████████████████████████33%
Fence Regulation█████████████13%
Sign Regulation█████████9%
Community Engagement██████6%
Public Safety████4%
Public Engagement1%
Summary of Proceedings

Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division III Meeting - December 17, 2024

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division III held a public hearing on December 17, 2024, at 1:00 PM in the Public Assembly Room, City-County Building. The board addressed multiple petitions including continuances, withdrawals, waiver requests, and full hearings on variances and special exceptions. The meeting was chaired by Joanna Taft, with board members Brian Hannon, Percy Bland, Rod Bohannon, and Rihanna Bender present. Staff recommended denial on several petitions, but the board granted variances in multiple cases.

Consent Calendar

  • 2024-MO3-001 (8645 E 25th St): Automatic continuance filed by a registered neighborhood organization to January 21, 2025 hearing – acknowledged.
  • 2024-DV3-033 (2731 Columbia Ave): Petitioner withdrew – acknowledged.
  • 2024-SE3-003 (9910 E Washington St): Automatic continuance to January 21, 2025 – acknowledged.
  • 2024-UV3-015 (1311 & 1315 Standish Ave): Petitioner withdrew – acknowledged.
  • 2024-UV3-017 (8949 E Washington St): Continuance requested by petitioner to January 21, 2025 for further neighborhood engagement – granted.
  • 2024-UV3-019 (4033 E Southport Rd): Continuance requested by petitioner to January 21, 2025 (originally intended to withdraw but agreed to continuance due to lack of staff report) – granted.
  • 2024-DV3-034 (2739 Columbia Ave): Petitioner withdrew – acknowledged.
  • Waivers of Notice: Granted for late notices: 2024-DV3-039 (9 days), 2024-UV3-018 (7 days), 2024-DV3-038 (9 days), 2024-DV3-036 (9 days), 2024-DV3-035 (9 days) – all waived.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • 2024-UV1-022 (Rancho Enterprises, 9111 Crawfordsville Rd): Mark Crouch, petitioner, argued that the plumbing contractor business has operated without disturbance for two years, and that the town of Clermont supports the use with three commitments (personal to petitioner, no outdoor storage, shed as approved). Robert Lutz, attorney for the Town of Clermont, stated the town supports the variance with those conditions. Staff recommended denial, citing incompatibility with the Village Mixed-Use comprehensive plan and concern about expansion. No other remonstrators appeared.
  • 2024-DV3-035 (6301 McFarland Rd): Royce Cole, property owner, requested a 21-foot setback (30 required) for an attached garage, citing a need for line-of-sight security to the existing detached garage and to avoid major roof reconstruction. Richard Wilson, president of Perry Manor HOA, testified that the HOA board did not take a formal position and left the decision to the city. Remonstrators Russell McMahon and Dave Salomone spoke against, arguing precedent and that the property could accommodate the garage within setbacks.
  • 2024-DV3-036 (1541 W Thompson Rd): Cindy Thrasher, petitioner, requested a 25-foot-tall pole sign (max 20 feet) for a gas station at the busy intersection of Harding and Thompson. She argued the business is less visible after the new SR 69 alignment. No remonstrators spoke. Staff recommended denial, stating a pylon sign (up to 25 feet) is an alternative and that the request is self-imposed.
  • 2024-DV3-038 (1502 Pleasant St): Anthony Walters, property owner, requested a variance to allow a 4-foot-tall fence (permitted 3.5 feet) and an encroachment within the clear sight triangle at the intersection of Spruce and Pleasant Streets. He explained the fence was constructed after an initial city inspection found no violation, but a later inspector cited issues. No remonstrators appeared. Staff recommended denial due to safety concerns from the clear sight triangle encroachment and the fence height exceeding limits.

Discussion Items

  • 2024-UV1-022 (Rancho Enterprises): Full hearing. Petitioner emphasized community support and commitments. Staff argued the commercial contractor use is not appropriate for the Village Mixed-Use corridor and that the applicant failed to meet findings of fact. The board granted the variance with the three commitments from the town.
  • 2024-DV3-035 (Cole garage): Full hearing. Petitioner argued the corner lot creates a practical difficulty; remonstrators opposed setting a precedent. Staff found no practical difficulty as the garage could be relocated to meet setbacks. The board denied the variance (4-1, Hannon in favor).
  • 2024-DV3-036 (pole sign): Full hearing. Petitioner noted visibility issues; no opposition. Staff denied due to available alternatives (pylon sign). Board denied (4-1, Bohannon in favor).
  • 2024-DV3-038 (fence): Full hearing. Petitioner relied on earlier inspector approval and argued safety is not compromised because Pleasant Street is one-way. Staff emphasized the clear sight triangle prohibition and need for an encroachment license. Board granted the variance unanimously (5-0).
  • Expedited Items (approved without additional testimony):
    • 2024-DV3-029 (405 Fintail Dr): Variance for a 20.87-acre motor truck terminal (max 10 allowed). Staff recommended approval with three commitments. Petitioner Brian Tuohy requested slight language modifications. Granted unanimously.
    • 2024-UV3-018 (975 Hosbrook St): Variance to permit limited C-1 commercial uses (e.g., business school, medical office) in D-8 zone. Staff recommended approval subject to a list of permitted uses. Granted unanimously.
    • 2024-DV3-039 (2806 & 2802 Washington Blvd): Variance for two four-unit apartments with increased front yard setback (27 ft vs 19.9 max) and reduced side setback (5.8 ft vs 8). Initially had remonstrators but after discussion, remonstrators withdrew, and case was moved to expedited docket. Granted unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • 2024-UV1-022 (Rancho Enterprises): Variance granted (4-1; Bland, Bohannon, Binder, Taft in favor; Hannon opposed) subject to three commitments: personal to petitioner, no outdoor storage, shed as approved.
  • 2024-DV3-035 (Cole garage): Variance denied (1-4; Hannon in favor; Bland, Taft, Bohannon, Binder opposed).
  • 2024-DV3-036 (pole sign): Variance denied (1-4; Bohannon in favor; Hannon, Bland, Taft, Binder opposed).
  • 2024-DV3-038 (fence): Variance granted (5-0) for 4-foot fence and clear sight triangle encroachment, subject to obtaining an encroachment license from BNS.
  • 2024-DV3-029 (truck terminal): Variance granted (5-0) with commitments to preserve northern landscaping, limit terminal to 20.87 acres, and coordinate trail connection with DPW.
  • 2024-UV3-018 (975 Hosbrook): Variance granted (5-0) to permit specified C-1 uses only.
  • 2024-DV3-039 (Washington Blvd apartments): After moving to expedited, variance granted (5-0).

Meeting Transcript

Well, you're going to continue to hear that's like a very good idea. I'm going to call this meeting to order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division III. I'm Joanna Taft, Chairperson of Division III. Other board members present to my right are Brian Hannon and coming in in style is Percy Bland, Junior. To my left is Rod Bohannon and to and Rayanna Binder. Legal counsel for the board to get today is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill, Principal Planner 2, and interim current planning administrator. As each non-exponented case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Staff will then present the administrator's comments regarding the petition. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement. No further evidence. Statements and arguments will be met, will be heard unless it's at the discretion of the board. The installation of landscaping screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights away are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending out before the board outside of the public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. And at 2 30, um we are going to go down to four members. So I'm going to pass that down. And if there is after we've looked at it, we're going to need a motion for approval. And maybe I'm just trying to that's going to take us a little bit of time. I don't know if I can move on with some things and then come back to that. I'm going to do that. Okay. Is there anyone in the audience that says any questions about our procedures? Okay. Um so be as we're preparing to do our special requests. I'm going to ask for a waiver of the rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedited petitions and adopt their findings of fact without any additional testimony from the individual petitioners. So I need a motion. Bohan is so moved. I need a second. Hannon second. Okay, I'm going to pull the board. Um Bohannon. Bohan, yes. Bland. Land, yes. Bender. Yes. Hannon. Yes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com