OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Indianapolis Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 3 – August 19, 2025

Board of Zoning Appeals IIITuesday, August 19, 2025
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals III
DateTuesday, August 19, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 5:08:04

Transcript — Verbatim
0:03

Okay, good afternoon.

0:05

I'm going to call the meeting to order.

0:07

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division 3.

0:12

I am Brian Hannon, Acting Chairperson of Division III.

0:15

The other board members present today are Rihanna Bender, Rod Bohannon, Percy Bland Jr.

0:21

and David Duncan.

0:22

Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmetz.

0:25

Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill.

0:29

Current planning administrator, Robin Ulanke, senior planner, Michael Weigel, senior planner, Noah Stern, senior planner, and Marty Weistie, specialist and secretary to the board.

0:39

The board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today.

0:44

The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure.

0:48

The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals.

0:53

As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand.

1:00

Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn.

1:04

Petitioners should be on the left and remonstrators remonstrators on the right as you face the board.

1:09

Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify.

1:14

Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes of presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition.

1:24

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition.

1:32

Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition.

1:36

The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes of rebuttal and submation of the case.

1:41

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations.

1:46

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and brief closing statement.

1:52

No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board.

1:57

Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance.

2:05

If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including the posting of notice signed on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition.

2:18

Anyone in this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like to put the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing.

2:29

The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions.

2:35

The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking areas, and the dedication of rights of way are examples.

2:42

These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid.

2:49

Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be proved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion.

2:57

Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements.

3:04

Failure to comply with any condition or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Bureau of Business and Neighborhood Services.

3:14

A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board.

3:21

The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number.

3:30

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

3:34

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing is prohibited.

3:41

Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure that all cell phone ringers are turned off.

3:48

We do have five members of the board present today.

3:50

It requires three votes to take action on any request.

3:54

We will take this into consideration when hearing requests for continuance.

3:58

If your petition received an indecisive vote, your petition will be automatically continued to the September 16th, 2025 hearing.

4:06

Now, board members have been provided with meeting minutes from our July 15th, 2025 meeting.

4:11

If there are no deletions or additions, uh I will take a motion for their approval.

4:16

Bohannon so move bland second.

4:20

Okay, we have a motion and a second.

4:23

Uh I will now call the roll.

4:25

Bender?

4:26

Yes.

4:26

Bland, yes.

4:28

Bohannon.

4:28

Bohannan, yes.

4:30

Duncan?

4:31

Duncan, yes.

4:32

And Hannon is a yes.

4:34

Okay.

4:35

Thank you.

4:36

We have approved the minutes.

4:38

Is there anyone in the audience who has any questions about our procedures?

4:44

Okay.

4:45

If not, uh, before we hear special requests, I will ask for a waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedited petitions and adopt their findings of fact without any additional testimony from the individual petitioners.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Procedural█████████11%
Public Safety█████6%
Sidewalk Management████5%
Sign Regulation████5%
Homelessness███4%
Hotel Management██3%
Community Engagement██2%
Historic Preservation██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Indianapolis Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 3 Public Hearing – August 19, 2025

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 3 met on August 19, 2025, at 6:15 PM ET under Acting Chairperson Brian Hannon. Board members Rihanna Bender, Rod Bohannon, Percy Bland Jr., and David Duncan were present. The hearing considered continuances, expedited petitions, and 10 regular cases involving variance requests across Indianapolis. Key issues included extensions for temporary structures, pedestrian connectivity waivers, setback reductions, use variances for transitional housing, event centers, recreational vehicle parking, signage, and adaptive reuse of a former big-box store.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of July 15, 2025 minutes – Unanimously approved.
  • Waiver of rules for expedited petitions – Unanimously approved, allowing votes without additional testimony.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • 2025-UV3-006 (2308 Shelby Street): Neighbor Beth Brandon (Hervey St.) opposed the outdoor recreation/entertainment variance, citing overdevelopment, safety concerns due to the clear sight triangle, and historic district context. Ed Barry (E. Bradbury Ave.) argued the use is out of character with the historic Garfield Park Historic District. Richard Whitney (E. Bradbury Ave., neighborhood association president) stated the board voted 5-2 against the variance due to lack of trust in the property owner. Ed Mahern (Tabor St.) noted nearby infants and asked the board to deny the petition.
  • 2025-UV3-020 amended (3615 S. Rural Street): Neighbor Timothy Brock (3515 S. Rural) opposed the event center, citing prior dumping, rodent issues, noise, drainage problems, and safety for children and elderly residents on the dead-end street. He expressed concerns about gravel parking, snow removal, and increased traffic.
  • 2025-UV3-024 (10859 E. Washington Street): The Warren Township Development Association expressed support (letter in packet). The Metropolitan Planning Organization opposed use aspects, but staff disagreed. Councillor Michael Paul Hart also supported the project.

Discussion Items

  • 2025-DV3-001 (5510 Millersville Road): Petitioner Ted Nolteen (Atty.) and Tom Dock (NOAH's Animal Hospital) requested a two-year extension for a temporary modular building. They cited 15,000+ patients in 12 months (70% urgent/emergent), a broken leg injury to Dr. Thomas, and ongoing engineering issues. Staff opposed, noting this would be the third extension (total 6 years) and that the site had other code violations (unenclosed dumpster, illegal signage). After discussion, the board amended the request to a one-year extension with a commitment to file a rezoning petition within six months. Approved 4-1 (Bland dissented).
  • 2025-DV3-024 (2747 N. Emerson Avenue): Petitioner Joe Calderon (Atty.) requested a waiver of pedestrian connectivity requirements for an industrial site (concrete contractor). He argued there is no existing sidewalk on Emerson Avenue, and requiring a walkway is impractical due to drainage ditches and grade changes. Staff opposed, citing a planned sidewalk project (ST26501) and the ordinance's intent to provide safe pedestrian access. The petitioner noted the building expansion is private and no public incentives are involved. Approved 4-1 (Hannon dissented).
  • 2025-DV3-026 (95 S. Mitthoeffer Road): Petitioner Misha Rabinowich (Atty.) and architect Drew White (Studio Axis) sought a variance to reduce the south transitional yard setback from 20 feet to 0.5–11 feet for a credit union expansion. The site is near the Pennsy Trail. The petitioner stated 430 transactions daily (up to 730 peak), and the expansion is needed to serve the community. They offered additional landscaping and removed some parking spaces. Staff recommended denial, arguing alternative site plans could avoid the encroachment. Approved 4-1 (Bender dissented).
  • 2025-UV3-006 (2308 Shelby Street): Petitioner Walter Racinos (owner) requested a use variance for outdoor recreation/entertainment on a deck, plus setback and clear sight triangle variances. He built the deck to support a future restaurant with live music. He expressed frustration with neighbors and the HOA, noting prior issues (prostitution raid at a massage parlor tenant). Staff and neighbors opposed. The board voted unanimously to deny (0-5).
  • 2025-UV3-012 amended (2319, 2327, 2331 N. Gale Street): Petitioner David Gilman (Atty.) and ICNA Relief USA Programs sought a variance for transitional living quarters for homeless women and children. The site is a duplex split by D5 and C5 zoning. The organization runs 27 such homes nationally; this would be Indiana's first. They have support from the Muslim community, the school, and Councillor Bob Osley. Staff recommended denial, arguing the same services could be provided without the variance. The board approved 5-0 with a commitment to operate per the submitted plan.
  • 2025-UV3-016 (1659 E. Sumner Avenue): Petitioner Aaron Donovan (owner) requested variances for a second primary building (1,414 sq. ft.) and a reduced east side setback (4 feet vs. 7 feet required). The owner built without permits and has since paid fines. They argued the city's own zoning charts were confusing, and the site has unique hardships (storm sewer bisects the parcel). Staff recommended denial, calling it overdevelopment. Approved 4-1 (Duncan dissented).
  • 2025-UV3-020 amended (3615 S. Rural Street): Petitioner Maurice Scott (Atty.) and Ricardo Lopez Jr. (owner) sought a use variance for an event center (weddings, corporate events) on a 4.81-acre farm property. They planned to reduce parking to 100 spaces and add landscaping. Staff opposed, citing incompatibility with residential surroundings, drainage, noise, and traffic safety. A neighbor testified against it. Denied 2-3 (Bohannon and Duncan voted yes; Bland, Hannon, Bender voted no).
  • 2025-DV3-027 (3303 S. State Street): Petitioner David Deering (Atty.) and Melissa Yoberto (GoPro Investments) sought variances for recreational vehicle parking, gravel area width, and fence height. After withdrawing several requests (RV count reduced to 2, parking width reduced to 30 ft.), the remaining variance was for a 6-foot front yard fence (max 3.5 ft. allowed). The owners cited proximity to I-65 and a concrete plant, needing the fence to block noise, dust, and contain a Bernese Mountain Dog. Staff opposed, recommending landscaping instead. Approved 5-0.
  • 2025-UV3-022 (6520 E. 82nd Street): Petitioner Pat Rooney (Atty.) and Taha (smoke shop owner) sought to add a tenant panel to an existing pole sign (lit, 30 ft. tall) along the congested 82nd Street corridor. The sign would be the seventh freestanding sign within 1,000 feet. Staff cited the Castleton Strategic Revitalization Plan calling for reduced sign clutter. The petitioner argued the business is hidden and losing customers. Approved 3-2 (Bland and Duncan dissented).
  • 2025-UV3-024 (10859 E. Washington Street): Petitioner Andy Metzel (Atty.) and Jeff Carlson (President, University Loft Company) requested a use variance for furniture warehousing/assembly and a fence variance for a 5-6 ft. metal fence around the front parking lot. The property is a former Sam's Club (135,000 sq. ft.). The use variance had staff support (adaptive reuse, no incentives); the fence variance was contested. The board split the vote: use variance approved 5-0; fence variance approved 4-1 (Bender's vote not explicit in transcript but implied). Commitments included use-specific limitations, landscaping, and removal of spear tops on fencing.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved variances:
    • 2025-MO2-001 (one-year extension, rezoning commitment) – 4-1
    • 2025-DV3-024 (pedestrian connectivity waiver) – 4-1
    • 2025-DV3-026 (setback reduction, credit union) – 4-1
    • 2025-UV3-012 (transitional living quarters) – 5-0
    • 2025-UV3-016 (second primary building) – 4-1
    • 2025-DV3-027 (fence height) – 5-0
    • 2025-UV3-022 (sign panel) – 3-2
    • 2025-UV3-024 part A (use variance) – 5-0
    • 2025-UV3-024 part B (fence variance) – 4-1 (exact tally not fully recorded but granted)
  • Denied variances:
    • 2025-UV3-006 (outdoor recreation, deck, setbacks) – 0-5
    • 2025-UV3-020 amended (event center) – 2-3
  • Continued cases (to September 16, 2025): 2025-DV3-025, 2025-DV3-023, 2025-DV3-020, 2025-UV3-023, 2025-UV3-021 (acknowledged).
  • Expedited case: 2025-SE3-001 (manufactured home) – Unanimously granted.
  • Resolution: 2025-BZ3-001 – Unanimously adopted, authorizing staff participation in court proceedings.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, good afternoon. I'm going to call the meeting to order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division 3. I am Brian Hannon, Acting Chairperson of Division III. The other board members present today are Rihanna Bender, Rod Bohannon, Percy Bland Jr. and David Duncan. Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Eddie O'Neill. Current planning administrator, Robin Ulanke, senior planner, Michael Weigel, senior planner, Noah Stern, senior planner, and Marty Weistie, specialist and secretary to the board. The board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on the left and remonstrators remonstrators on the right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes of presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes of rebuttal and submation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and brief closing statement. No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including the posting of notice signed on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anyone in this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like to put the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping and screening, the paving of parking areas, and the dedication of rights of way are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be proved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified, an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any condition or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Bureau of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure that all cell phone ringers are turned off. We do have five members of the board present today. It requires three votes to take action on any request. We will take this into consideration when hearing requests for continuance. If your petition received an indecisive vote, your petition will be automatically continued to the September 16th, 2025 hearing. Now, board members have been provided with meeting minutes from our July 15th, 2025 meeting. If there are no deletions or additions, uh I will take a motion for their approval. Bohannon so move bland second. Okay, we have a motion and a second. Uh I will now call the roll. Bender? Yes. Bland, yes. Bohannon.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com