OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Indianapolis, Indiana/Board of Zoning Appeals III
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Indianapolis BZA Division III Meeting - September 15, 2026

Board of Zoning Appeals III — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionBoard of Zoning Appeals III
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:21:37

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:02

I'm going to call this meeting to order.

0:04

This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division III.

0:08

I'm Joanna Taft, Chairperson of Division III.

0:11

Other board members present to my right is Percy Bland Jr.

0:15

And to my left, Brian Hannon.

0:17

And we may have a fourth member joining us.

0:19

We're not sure.

0:21

Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmetz.

0:24

Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Jeffrey York, current planning manager, Noah Pappas, current planning manager, Michael Weigel, Principal Planner 1, Adrian Baker, Principal Planner 1, Robert Ulenhaik, Senior Planner, Josh Levesque, LeVec, Senior Planner, Adam Sheshevsky, Senior Planner, Drew Haynes, Senior Planner, David Unram, Unram, Garza, Senior Planner, Marty Weiste, Administrative Coordinator, and Secretary to the Board.

0:59

The Board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today.

1:05

The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure.

1:09

The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals.

1:14

As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand.

1:21

Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn.

1:25

Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board.

1:30

Those who intend to testify will those who will testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify.

1:38

Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statement, and arguments in support of the petition.

1:47

Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition.

1:56

Staff will then present the administrator's comments and regarding the petition.

2:01

The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case.

2:05

Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations.

2:09

Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement.

2:15

No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it's at the discretion of the board.

2:21

Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance.

2:29

If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice sign on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition.

2:42

Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing.

2:52

The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions.

2:57

The installation of landscaping screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights away are examples.

3:03

These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid.

3:10

Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion.

3:18

Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of authorized improvements.

3:25

Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services.

3:33

A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board.

3:39

The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number.

3:48

Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary.

3:52

Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of the public hearing process is prohibited.

4:00

Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off.

4:07

There are four members.

4:38

And then if it's um if we have the fourth member come and it's two against two, we have to hear the case over again.

4:45

So just keep that in mind if you're um asking if if your hearing is scheduled today.

4:52

So if we get an indecisive vote, the petition will be automatically continued to the October 20th hearing.

5:07

If there are no deletions or additions, I'll take a motion for their approval.

5:12

Hannon so moved.

5:13

Is there second?

5:14

Yes, Blaine second.

5:16

Um I'll now poll the board.

5:18

Um Bland.

5:19

Yes, Hannon, yes, Joanna, Taft, yes.

5:24

Okay.

5:25

Um is there anyone in the audience has any questions about our procedures?

5:30

Before we have special requests, um, I'll ask for a waiver of our rules of procedure to allow the board to vote for all expedited petitions and adopt the findings of fact without any additional testimony from the individual petitioners.

5:42

So I need a motion.

5:45

I need a second.

5:46

Hannon's second.

5:47

I'm gonna pull the board, Land.

5:49

Land, yes.

5:50

Hannon, yes, Taft, yes.

5:53

So we will consider special requests and continue continuances at this time.

6:07

Thank you, and good afternoon.

6:09

Uh Chairperson Taft, members of the board, Joe Calderon, 11 South Meridian, Indianapolis, and I call your attention uh to item uh numbered eight, and that is the first petition for public hearing 2026 DV3016A at uh 10220 East Washington Street through lots of hard work and collaboration between uh my client, the developer, and uh the remonstrator.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning and Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Procedural██████████12%
Transit-Oriented Development████████9%
Economic Development██████7%
Home Occupation Permits██████7%
Transportation Safety████5%
Cell Tower Regulation███3%
Transportation██2%
Building Code Enforcement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Indianapolis BZA Division III Meeting - September 15, 2026

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division III, convened on September 15, 2026, at 6:15 PM under Chairperson Joanna Taft, with members Percy Bland Jr. and Brian Hannon present. The board heard procedural requests, expedited petitions, and two full public hearings, granting all variances and special exceptions after discussions on conformity with zoning ordinances and the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) overlay district.

Consent Calendar

  • Agenda Approval: Motion by Hannon, second by Bland, unanimously approved with no deletions or additions.
  • Expedited Procedure Waiver: Motion to waive rules for voting on expedited petitions without additional testimony; unanimously approved.
  • Continuances:
    • 2026-DB-3031 (10401 E. Washington St.): Automatic continuance to October 20, 2026, acknowledged.
    • 2026-UV3-016 (2705 E. Washington St.): Acknowledged.
    • 2026-DV3-027: Petitioner-requested one-month continuance to October 20, 2026, granted unanimously.
  • Withdrawal: 2025-DV3-035 (7930 Castleton Rd.)—corrected to 2026-DV3-035 (328 W. 28th St.) and withdrawn since property is within the clear site triangle; acknowledged.
  • Notice Waivers:
    • 2026-UV3-013 (5930 McFarland Rd.): Two-day waiver of posted notice and three-day waiver of mailed notice granted.
    • 2026-DV3-036 (2403 E. Thompson Rd.): Two-day waiver of legal notice granted.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Councillor Hart (District 20): Spoke in support of economic development on East Washington Street, referencing a vision plan for the Washington Square Mall and 500 constituent emails. He urged the board to support redevelopment petitions, emphasizing interconnected projects like the Thunderbird District. He noted the importance of revitalizing the East Side and requested continued board support for related cases.
  • Paul Kinfield (3260 N. Drexel Ave.): Initially opposed expedited case 2026-SE2-001 (4501 E. 32nd St., wireless facility). After discussion with the petitioner outside the hearing, his concerns were resolved, and the case was returned to the expedited docket.

Discussion Items

  • Case 2026-UV3-011 – 2001 W. Washington St. (O'Reilly Auto Parts Use Variance):
    • Petitioner (Bill Neemeyer, Don's Legacy LLC): Requested a variance to operate an auto parts store on a 2.142-acre lot (exceeding the 0.5-acre limit in the C4 TOD district). Argued that the use is retail, not repair; highlighted a $100,000 facade improvement, 12 full-time jobs, and community support. Stated that minor services (light bulb, wiper blade, battery replacement, and diagnostic checks) are free customer accommodations and do not constitute repair as defined by the ordinance.
    • Staff (Josh Levesque): Recommended denial, stating the TOD district's intent to prioritize walkability over auto-centric uses. The ordinance defines auto parts stores under automobile service/repair, and the lot size and pedestrian frontage classification make the variance inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff proposed commitments if granted: no diagnostic testing, maintenance, or repair; variance terminates upon O'Reilly's closure or sale of the strip mall.
    • Board Deliberation: Questions focused on whether the half-acre rule creates a site-specific hardship (the lot was assembled in the 1980s, predating the 2021 TOD overlay) and the scope of permissible services. The petitioner agreed to limit services to bulbs, wiper blades, batteries, and diagnostics at no charge, and accepted a commitment that the variance would terminate when O'Reilly's operations end.
  • Case 2026-UV3-013 – 5930 McFarland Rd. (Home Occupation/Electrical Contractor):
    • Petitioner (Noah Worley): Sought to legalize an existing 4,000 sq. ft. accessory structure built in 2022. Requested use variance for an electrical contractor office and material storage (500 sq. ft.), development standard variances for accessory building larger than primary (1,100 sq. ft. house), and a 13.5-ft. side setback (15 ft. required). Explained that a grade drop prevented attaching the structure to the house, and the building also serves family hobbies. Presented support letters from eight surrounding neighbors.
    • Staff: Noted a violation opened in September 2025. Recommended denial of the use variance (contractor not permitted in DA zoning) and the side setback variance (adequate space exists). Found hardship for the size variance due to grade issues. Proposed commitments: vegetative screening along north and south property lines (12 evergreens, 48 shrubs per detailed spacing) and tying approval to a plan of operation.
    • Board Deliberation: Petitioner agreed to all commitments. The board decided to vote on all variance requests together with the stated commitments.

Key Outcomes

  • Expedited Docket (voted as a group after opposition resolved): All six petitions were granted unanimously (3-0):
    • 2026-SE2-001: Special exception for a 165-ft. wireless communication facility at 4501 E. 32nd St.
    • 2026-DV3-016A: Variance for drive-thru access via Ring Road at 10220 E. Washington St. (conditioned on Sept. 14, 2026 site plan).
    • 2026-DV3-032: Variance for a 6-ft. tall wooden privacy fence in front yard at 2522 N. Butler Ave.
    • 2026-DV3-036: Variance for front, side, and aggregate setbacks at 2403 E. Thompson Rd.
    • 2026-UV3-014: Use variance for a 727-sq. ft. secondary dwelling unit without owner occupancy at 4038/4040 Otterbean Ave.
    • 2026-UV3-017: Variance for tree service contractor, gravel driveway, and side setbacks at 2331 Musing Rd.
  • Full Hearing – Case 2026-UV3-011: Granted (3-0) with commitment that the variance terminates upon the end of O'Reilly's business operations at the site.
  • Full Hearing – Case 2026-UV3-013: Granted (3-0) with commitments: vegetated buffering along north/south lot lines (specific quantities) and approval tied to the provided plan of operation.
  • Procedural Note: The board noted that a tie vote (2-2) would automatically continue a petition to the October 20, 2026 hearing. No such tie occurred.

Meeting Transcript

I'm going to call this meeting to order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals, Division III. I'm Joanna Taft, Chairperson of Division III. Other board members present to my right is Percy Bland Jr. And to my left, Brian Hannon. And we may have a fourth member joining us. We're not sure. Legal counsel for the board today is Chris Steinmetz. Staff members present today from the Division of Planning are Jeffrey York, current planning manager, Noah Pappas, current planning manager, Michael Weigel, Principal Planner 1, Adrian Baker, Principal Planner 1, Robert Ulenhaik, Senior Planner, Josh Levesque, LeVec, Senior Planner, Adam Sheshevsky, Senior Planner, Drew Haynes, Senior Planner, David Unram, Unram, Garza, Senior Planner, Marty Weiste, Administrative Coordinator, and Secretary to the Board. The Board has copies of the zoning ordinances that will be incorporated by reference into the record of each case heard today. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. As each non-expedited case is called, petitioners and remonstrators interested in that particular case will please stand. Those who intend to testify will please remain standing and be sworn. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who intend to testify will those who will testify will state their name and address for the record before beginning to testify. Petitioners and persons appearing in support of the case being heard shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statement, and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence, statements, and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrator's comments and regarding the petition. The petitioner will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal and a summation of the case. Rebuttal must be limited to the subject matter of the initial presentations. Remonstrators will then be allowed five minutes for rebuttal of the petitioner's rebuttal evidence and a brief closing statement. No further evidence, statements, or arguments will be heard unless it's at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice sign on the subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continued due to lack of proper notice must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping screening, the paving of parking area, and the dedication of rights away are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of the public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. There are four members. And then if it's um if we have the fourth member come and it's two against two, we have to hear the case over again. So just keep that in mind if you're um asking if if your hearing is scheduled today. So if we get an indecisive vote, the petition will be automatically continued to the October 20th hearing. If there are no deletions or additions, I'll take a motion for their approval. Hannon so moved. Is there second? Yes, Blaine second. Um I'll now poll the board. Um Bland. Yes, Hannon, yes, Joanna, Taft, yes. Okay. Um is there anyone in the audience has any questions about our procedures?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com