Public Safety Committee Meeting - August 27, 2025
Public Safety Committee Meeting - August 27, 2025
The Public Safety and Criminal Justice Committee met on Wednesday, August 27, 2025, at 5:30 PM in the Public Assembly Room of the City-County Building. The meeting covered two proposals and three budget presentations. Both proposals failed, and budget hearings were informational.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Proposal 244 (General Orders Board): Larry Vaughn spoke in favor, arguing the board second-guesses experienced police leadership. Keith Potts opposed, stating the board built trust between community and police.
- Proposal 245 (Curfew Fines): Larry Vaughn opposed, calling fines predatory and monetizing youth issues. Diesel Hasen (youth advocate, Pike High School) opposed, recommending reformative measures like community service over punishment.
- OPHS Budget: Multiple speakers advocated for funding the Tenant Advocacy Project (TAP) and immigrant legal services. Mark Lynch (Indy Hunger Network) requested maintained or increased funding. Tracy Pappas (Indiana Legal Services) and Blair Hedges (Indiana Legal Services) emphasized TAP's success in leveling the playing field in eviction court. John Florensic (Indianapolis Legal Aid Society) linked housing instability to youth crime. David Sneed (Indianapolis Legal Aid Society) noted negotiating over $500,000 in client debt monthly. Hannah Cartwright (Mariposa Legal) opposed a $100,000 cut to immigrant legal services, citing high unrepresented rates and upcoming ICE expansion.
Discussion Items
- Proposal 244 (General Orders Board): Councilor Hart proposed converting the General Orders Board to an advisory role, arguing the chief needs agility. Opponents (Perkins, Carlino, Boots, Delaney, Graves, McCormick, Robinson) cited the board's role in community trust and police accountability. Chief Bailey noted challenges with quorum and policy updates but did not endorse either side. Supporters (Hart, Bain, Mowry) emphasized officer morale and retention. The motion failed 3-8.
- Proposal 245 (Parental Responsibility Under Curfew): Councilor Hart introduced fines: $0 first offense (written notice), $500 second, $1,500 third. Opponents (Carlino, McCormick, Delaney, Perkins, Graves, Robinson) called fines predatory and discriminatory, arguing they don't address root causes. Supporters (Boots, Mowry, Bain) argued they hold parents accountable and deter violations. A call to question passed 6-5, ending debate. The motion failed 4-7.
- Budget Hearing – Marion County Clerk's Office: Clerk Kate Sweeney Bell presented a budget with a 5.63% decrease in character one spending due to unfilled positions. She corrected a prior error about Utah's mail-in voting. No vote taken.
- Budget Hearing – Regional Health & Mental Health Centers: George Hurd and Dr. Ashley Overley presented on behalf of four community mental health centers. They highlighted the transition to Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHC), serving 65,000 individuals, 22,000 crisis services, and 28 million in charity care. They discussed mobile crisis teams (988) and coordination with CLCR and MCAT. No vote taken.
- Budget Hearing – Office of Public Health and Safety (OPHS): Director Andrew Merkley and CFO Carlette Duffy presented a budget reduced by 2-4% ($516,246). They highlighted successes: 50% reduction in murders and non-fatal homicides since 2021, 65 Indy Peace graduates, TAP assisting 2,000 cases, 450 individuals connected to employment via Pathway to Employment. Discussion included concerns about cuts to immigrant legal services (33% reduction) and winter contingency planning after losing use of School 68. No vote taken.
Key Outcomes
- Proposal 244 (General Orders Board advisory) failed: 3 in favor (Bain, Hart, Mowry), 8 opposed.
- Proposal 245 (Curfew fines for parents) failed: 4 in favor (Bain, Boots, Hart, Mowry), 7 opposed.
- Budget hearings for Clerk's Office, Regional Health & Mental Health Centers, and OPHS were informational; no votes taken.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, everyone. It is Wednesday, August 27, 2025. It is 5 30 p.m. We're in the public assembly room of the city county, city county building. Welcome to the public safety committee of the city county council. We'll start our meeting off with introductions on the first row, Councillor Hart. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My name is Michael Paul Hart, representing District 20. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Josh Bain, District 21. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Brian Mowray, District 25. And thank you, Council. On the second row, Councilor Perkins. Thank you, Mr. Chair, Dr. Carlos Perkins, District 6. Thank you, Mr. Chairman Brian Delaney, District 2. Thank you, Chairman Jessica McCormick, District 16, West Side. Thank you, Chairman Robinson, Dan Boots, Washington Lawrence Townships, District 3. Thank you, Council. Thank you so much, Chairman Robinson. Christa Carlino, District 11, Far West Side, Speedway, and Claremont. Good evening, everyone. Keith Graves. Thanks, Mr. Chairman. District 9 on the east side of Indianapolis. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair, Frank Mascaries, Southeast Side District 19. Thank you, Councils on Leo Robinson, District 1, Chair of the Committee. We do have two proposals this evening prior to our three budget hearing proposals. I'm sorry, presentations of first proposal number 244, 2025, amends chapter 279, Division 9 of the revised code converting the general orders board into the general orders advisory board calendar of proposals, August 12th, 2025. This is a proposal introduced by Council Hart. Council Hart. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Members of the Council, you've got a couple, you got a little packet that I put together for you guys. One is the Smart Indy, uh Smart Indy round table on public safety, uh, a letter, and then the other Gmail emails for the next proposal. So no no need for that one today right now. Uh the reason I gave you these things is uh I'll allude to them as I I talk through uh my statement this evening. Uh but I just want to open up and say that you know these aren't like just like last night and in our other committee and the two this evening. Um I don't just sit around and start thinking about you know I'm gonna change uh these things, right? Everybody always comes to me with these ideas in this case. Uh these ideas generated from the community, they generated from business leaders, they generated from uh our public safety leadership and and as a part of this report. So tonight, uh members of this committee, uh I just want to discuss uh why uh I'm I'm bringing this proposal in front of you, uh, which is I've heard directly from IMPD officers, uh, from members of the community about how the current structure of the General Orders Board impacts morale and ultimately public safety.
openpublica.com