Education Committee Meeting Summary, November 4, 2025
Education Committee Meeting - November 4, 2025
The Indianapolis Board of School Commissioners Education Committee convened to hear a comprehensive progress report on the Indiana Local Education Alliance (ILEA), a body created by House Enrolled Act 1515 to foster collaboration between the Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS) sector and the charter school sector. Michael O'Connor, retained by the Mayor's office to manage the ILEA, detailed the alliance's composition, its four deep-dive thematic areas, and the upcoming December 31, 2025 deadline to submit recommendations to the State Legislature and Secretary of Education regarding governance, facilities, transportation, and accountability. Council members expressed strong support for local control and uniform authorization, while raising concerns about the impact on township boundaries and underlying systemic issues related to Unigov.
Consent Calendar
- No routine consent agenda items were processed; the meeting consisted entirely of a single presentation and discussion.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Councilor Dan Boots (District 3): Expressed strong support for the concept that education decisions must be local to Marion County. Stated a clear position that having multiple authorizers is a "huge problem" for accountability and argued that if the Mayor is empowered to set policy, the Mayor should possess full accountability for all charter authorizations.
- Councilor Dan Boots (District 3): Added that outlying townships would view any proposal to shrink IPS boundaries or absorb students in townships as "political suicide," predicting strong community opposition ("people would light torches and grab pitchforks") to such a move given the current financial climate.
- Councilor Keith Graves (District 9): Expressed support for a unified system, noting that current transportation setups contain "redundancy and overlap" and that technology offers opportunities for more efficient coordination between public and charter schools.
- Councilor Carlos Perkins (District 6): Argued that the current Unigov structure effectively set IPS up to fail and cited historical intent to separate systems as a source of systemic racism. Expressed the position that the community should prepare for recommendations concerning a new funding formula, facility usage, and transportation equity. Stated that denying transportation to students based on district lines creates barriers to education.
- Counselor Maggie Lewis (District 16): (Implicitly supported by context of participation) Engaged in the dialogue regarding governance models.
Discussion Items
- ILEA Composition and Structure: Michael O'Connor outlined the nine-member ILEA panel, noting the Mayor serves as Chair (with the IPS Superintendent as Vice Chair) and detailing the specific appointees representing IPS, parents, and the Mayor's office who are tasked with creating a better working relationship between charter and traditional sectors.
- Financial Landscape: O'Connor explained that IPS faces a potential loss of approximately $40 million in operating revenue in 2027 if they do not pass a new referendum, as the 2008-locked operating fund levels begin to tail off. Discussers noted that Senate Enrolled Act 1 requires property tax sharing with charter schools.
- Facilities and Co-location: The committee reviewed how facilities loads are managed, noting that IPS manages roughly 17 of 30 innovation network schools. O'Connor highlighted that while some schools are technically under-occupied by historical standards, they are "bursting at the seams" due to changing service requirements (e.g., adding counselors), complicating space utilization in a revenue-constrained environment.
- Transportation Models: The committee compared Indianapolis to Washington D.C. (mayoral-dominated, no school transportation, relies on public transit/walkability) and Denver (school board model, service provided to charters on a per-pupil basis). O'Connor confirmed no single superior transportation model was identified, though the ILEA established a task force to flesh out options for equitable access.
- Governance and Authorizers: A significant portion of the discussion focused on the lack of a single authorizing body. Councilors Boots and Perkins advocated for consolidating charter authority under a single Marion County entity (potentially the Mayor) to ensure transparency and accountability, viewing the current fragmentation as an impediment to cohesion.
- Boundary Questions: Councilor Perkins raised the prospect of shrinking IPS boundaries, a topic discussed in ILEA task forces regarding efficiency. Councilor Boots countered that such a move is politically impossible due to the financial disparity and the townships' unwillingness to absorb displaced students.
- Community Input: O'Connor clarified that all ILEA meetings have been public with significant public testimony (over six hours total) and that the ILEA itself does not plan to hold separate community conversations, as the IPS board is conducting independent listening sessions which will feed into the ILEA process.
Key Outcomes
- Next Steps: The ILEA is scheduled to complete its work and submit recommendations to the Legislative Council and the Indiana Department of Education by December 31, 2025.
- Timeline: The ILEA entity will cease to exist after the submission of recommendations; it will not be involved in the legislative implementation process should the General Assembly choose to act on the recommendations.
- Legislative Intent: The General Assembly, driven significantly by the Speaker, will review the recommendations to determine if language is sponsored to implement changes to governance, funding, facilities, or transportation, potentially through new legislation passed within the year.
- Committee Consensus: The committee expressed readiness to receive the final report and acknowledged the complex, politically charged nature of the issues regarding school consolidation, funding, and the legacy of Unigov.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening. Um I call to order the education committee meeting. I is Thursday or Tuesday, November 4th, 2025, and we're in the public assembly room. Um I would like to start with my introduction of my colleagues, starting in the front. Thank you, Madam Chair. Derek Cahill, District 23. Thank you, Madam Chair, Dr. Carlos Perkins, District 6. Good evening, everyone. Thank you, Madam Chair Keith Graves, District 9. Thank you, Madam Chair, Dan Boots, Washington Lawrence Townships, District 3. Thank you. And I am Jessica McCormick, District 16 on the West Side. We have one item on our agenda tonight. We have a presentation from Michael O'Connor from the Indianapolis Local Education Alliance, the ILEA. The floor is yours. Thank you, Madam Chair. I hope I don't disappoint since I'm the only item on the agenda. It's a lot of pressure. Thank you very much. My name is Michael O'Connor. I've been retained by the mayor's office to project manage the work done by the ILEA. The ILEA was created by House Enrolled Act 1515 was House Bill 1515. In the voluminous packet of information, I presented a copy of House Enrolled Act 1515 for the record. Should you want to access it electronically? But as I said, the uh the ILEA was uh created by the Indiana General Assembly in the last legislative session uh this year, this spring. Um and I won't I won't bore you with the legislative reading. The the intent of the legislature, and there's I know counselor boots is well aware there is no such thing as legislative intent in Indiana law, but the the desire of of the speaker and the and the folks who supported the bill and bringing people together was to create um a better working relationship between the charter sector uh uh of education, the public charter school sector in Indianapolis and the traditional public school sector at IPS and urging a group of appointees, and I'll go through them in greater detail to get together and make some recommendations towards that end. So the legislation created uh a panel, uh Indiana uh local uh uh education alliance, and then made the mayor or his designee the chair and the superintendent as part of that, uh, and and the mayor is sort of uh designated her as her as his vice chair for that group. So IPS has appointees. Uh as I said, Superintendent uh Dr. Alicia Johnson is uh the ad hoc she's serving, been at every meeting and acts as the the vice chair of the group. Tina Algren is uh is a superintendent appointee. Tina is a math teacher at uh Harshman Middle School. Andrew Neal is a uh superintendent appointee, but the the slot created uh that he fills um is for a charter school innovation network charter school parent to serve on the ILEA. So Andrew Neal is a pastor uh or a minister, he's the CEO of Outreach, a youth homeless mission, homelessness mission on the near east side of Indianapolis. Barato Britt is the appointee of the IPS board president, and he is the executive director of the Edna Martin Edna Martin Christian Center, pardon me. And so those are the four IPS appointees to the ILEA. The mayor, uh, as I said, is designated as the chair. He could have designated someone to serve in that role either on his staff, uh, but he has chosen to uh fill that slot himself. He also has been at all the meetings. Um Angela Smith Jones, former Deputy Mayor, uh, for Mayor Hogsett, currently a vice president of Indiana University, is one of the mayoral appointees. Counselor Maggie Lewis, you all know Councillor Lewis, she's the majority leader here, uh, serves on the committee. Um Toby McClamrock, uh, an attorney at Denton's former member of the Indianapolis City County Council, uh, serves as the mayor's designee in the uh Bart Peterson also, uh, a name maybe some of you recognize former mayor of the city of Indianapolis. So those are the nine members of the ILEA. As I said, there are particularly on the IPS board. The the board president had one slot, Borado Britt fills that. The superintendent had two sort of at large slots to fill. She put herself in one, Tina Algren in the other, and then a spot specifically designated to it for a parent of students in an innovation network school. At the June meeting, it was organizational in nature, again, running through what House Enrolled Act 1515 detailed in both a series of shalls by designated by SHAWS that the organization should consider.
openpublica.com