Environmental Sustainability Committee Hearing on Health in All Policies and Bird Safety – February 23, 2026
Environmental Sustainability Committee Hearing on Health in All Policies and Bird Safety – February 23, 2026
The Environmental Sustainability Committee of the Indianapolis City-County Council met on the evening of February 23, 2026, to hear two presentations: one on Health in All Policies (HiAP) from the Marion County Public Health Department, and one on bird-safe building design from Bird Safe Indy (a committee of the Amos Butler Audubon Society). Committee members discussed integrating health considerations into city policy and explored potential legislative measures to reduce bird-window collisions. No formal votes or decisions were taken.
Health in All Policies Presentation
- Sydney Granland, Planning and Collaboration Coordinator in the Chronic Disease Department at the Marion County Public Health Department, presented on the social determinants of health (SDOH) and the HiAP framework. She displayed a life expectancy map of Marion County showing disparities (e.g., lower life expectancy in the near east side compared to the Geist area) and explained that only one-fifth of health outcomes are attributable to healthcare access.
- Granland emphasized moving upstream—addressing root causes of poor health—and described the HiAP approach as cross-sector collaboration to embed health considerations into all policy decisions. She noted that the city’s sustainability plan (Thrive) already references HiAP and highlighted overlaps between environmental and public health goals (e.g., improved air quality from climate strategies benefits respiratory health).
- She offered a menu of implementation options: conducting an inventory of existing health-conscious policies, creating a HiAP working group, adopting health impact assessments or checklists for projects (citing the Kansas Health Institute’s tool and Chicago’s decision-support tools), adding health requirements to zoning and land use, integrating health reviews into contracting/bidding, and requiring health impact statements for projects seeking Board of Zoning Appeals or Metropolitan Development Commission approval.
- Granland shared a quote from Councillor Hart’s newsletter: "Indianapolis talks about health like it is only a doctor visit problem, but the healthiest communities treat health like infrastructure, the same way we treat roads, public safety, and utilities."
- Committee members asked questions about quantifying health costs, engaging neighborhoods, and breaking down silos. Councillor Brown requested metrics to compare health outcomes against economic development claims; Granland agreed to research that. Councillor Delaney noted the city already has pieces of HiAP (e.g., tree preservation, Vision Zero) but lacks an umbrella framework. Councillor Hart praised the presentation and linked public health to public safety.
Bird-Safe Building Initiative Presentation
- Jesse Green, Community Outreach Coordinator for Bird Safe Indy, and Wesley Homoya, Head of Surveys for Bird Safe Indy, presented on bird-window collisions. They showed radar imagery of 420 million birds migrating over the United States in a single night, and noted that Chicago’s McCormick Place had recorded 40,000 bird deaths since 1978—including 1,000 in one night. Nationally, an estimated 1 billion birds die from window strikes annually, and the 2025 State of the Birds report indicates ongoing population declines of 29% since 1970.
- In Indianapolis, Bird Safe Indy surveys have documented thousands of bird strikes. They cited examples of 30+ birds found in a single morning on one survey route. The presenters argued that bird mortality harms Indianapolis’s image as a clean, healthy city for conventions and tourism, and that the outdoor recreation economy tied to birding generates $108 billion in national spending, 1.4 million jobs, and $38 billion in tax revenue.
- Green described a three-pillar approach: Lights Out (turning off non-essential lights during migration), Windows (using bird-safe glass in new construction, especially within the first 100 feet where most collisions occur), and Action (adopting a bird-safe building policy/ordinance). They requested that the council support moving toward bird-safe standards for new commercial buildings, using model ordinances from the American Bird Conservancy.
- Green and Homoya noted existing local partnerships: Eagle Creek Park (treating windows), NCAA (working on solutions), DNR (formed a working group on government buildings), IU Indy (conducting research), Feather Friendly (window treatment provider), and the American Bird Conservancy.
- Committee members expressed interest. Chairman Barth asked why bird-safe design is not standard practice; Green responded that awareness is relatively new and that developers may perceive added cost. Councillor Brown requested data on the percentage of total project cost for bird-safe treatments (e.g., for a 100-foot-tall building) and suggested incentive structures (e.g., fast-track permitting, recognition programs). Councillor Delaney pointed out that the city’s Holiday Park Nature Center already has bird-safe dots, which can serve as an educational example. Councillor Doak inquired about residential solutions; Homoya listed options including stickers, films, chalk, strings, and mesh.
- Green offered to coordinate a survey walk so committee members can observe the problem firsthand and to connect the council with leaders from cities that have already passed bird-safe ordinances.
Key Outcomes
- No ordinances were introduced or voted on. The committee expressed support for continuing the dialogue.
- Chairman Barth suggested coordinating any survey walk through the Office of Sustainability to facilitate participation.
- The committee requested follow-up information from Bird Safe Indy: cost data from other cities, developer incentives, and contacts with jurisdictions that have adopted bird-safe standards.
- The committee acknowledged the need to engage developers and other stakeholders in a 360-degree review before advancing a potential ordinance.
- Councillor Delaney honored the memory of Officer Brian Elliott, who died in the line of duty, and thanked Councillor Hart for also attending the funeral.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening. Welcome to the February meeting of the Environmental Sustainability Committee of the Indianapolis City County Council. Let's get started by introducing counselors. Let's start with Councillor Roberts. Thank you, Mr. Chair Nick Roberts, District 4. Thanks, Mr. Chair. Jesse Brown, District 13. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mike Doak, District 24. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Michael Paul Hart, representing District 20. Thank you, Mr. Chair Briandelaney, representing District 2. Thank you, Mr. Chair, Dr. Carlos Perkins, District 6. Thank you, Chairman Andy Andy Nielsen, District 14. Thank you, Counselors, and I'm John Barth, Chair of the Committee. I represent Council District 7. Okay, this evening we have uh two um presentations. Um one of them um has the potential to be an ordinance depending on the will and the interest of the committee. Um we're gonna start with a presentation from the Marion County Health Department and Sydney Granland, if I got that right, we'll give the presentation. We'll turn it over to you. Okay, this is my first time here, so thanks for having me. Um my name is Sydney Granland. I'm the planning and collaboration coordinator in the chronic disease department at the Marion County Public Health Department. Um I've been in this role since October of 2023, but I come from a sort of planning and zoning uh sustainability background. So that is the mindset going into this presentation. Oops. Okay. Um so I have an overview of what we'll cover today. Um, just a general, I feel like I'm talking to experts, you guys all know your community so well. Uh, but I'll just do a kind of touch up on the social determinants of health and what the concept of moving upstream, um, health and all policies, sustainability and public health, and how they are one and the same, uh, different health and all policies models throughout the country, as well as some opportunities that I think exist in Indianapolis. So I like to start out with this map. Um, it is the life expectancy map um for Marion County, and you can see the darker areas have a longer life expectancy at birth, and the lighter areas have a shorter life expectancy at birth. Um and I think this map does a really good job of introducing the concept of the social determinants of health. You know, why is the life expectancy so much different in um on the near east side compared to the Geist area, for example. Um and it's not necessarily that there's not doctors' offices around there, it's not that those people don't go to the doctor. Um it's really about the environment that they live, work, and play in. So um the federal government in Healthy People 2030 breaks down the social determinants of health into these five overarching categories. Um I won't go into too much detail, but they are education access and quality, economic stability, um, social and community context, health care access and quality, and neighborhood and built environment. And I think this graphic itself is really insightful because you can see that healthcare access and quality is only a fifth of a person's health here. Um that's not the exact number that it comes down to, but you can see it's not everything. Like there's a lot more that go into someone's health and well-being than just do you go to the doctor, yes or no. So I think the the big question from that is kind of like okay, well, what do we do about it? I think we've thought of health as sort of this like individual responsibility.
openpublica.com