OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Indianapolis, Indiana/Other Meetings (J-Z)
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Marion County Property Tax Board of Appeals Meeting - October 23, 2026

Other Meetings (J-Z) — Friday, October 23, 2026
BodyIndianapolis, Indiana
SessionOther Meetings (J-Z)
DateFriday, October 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:34:29

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

0:03

We'll

Speaker 1

0:03

go ahead and get started the PWO meeting for May of October 23rd, 2026.

0:12

Of ourselves.

0:13

Joe.

Speaker 2

0:17

Joe O'Connor, I'm the county assessor and a non-voting member.

Unassigned speaker

0:27

Greg

Speaker 3

0:27

Rath now, board member.

Speaker 4

0:30

Kathy Gould, board member.

Speaker 1

0:32

Steve Adrian, president.

0:34

Brian Barton, board member.

Unassigned speaker

0:37

Okay,

Speaker 1

0:37

next order of business will be minutes from last month.

0:44

I'll make a motion to accept the minutes as written.

0:47

I'll second.

0:52

See you none all in favor, say aye.

0:54

Aye.

0:54

Aye.

0:55

The ayes have

Unassigned speaker

0:56

it.

Speaker 1

1:00

Do our uh if we have any guests out there that I'm gonna talk today, can you please stand and raise your right hand so I can square you all in?

1:13

Raise your right hand.

1:14

Do you swear to tell the truth, whole truth, not the truth, so help you God?

1:19

I do.

1:21

Okay.

1:22

We have some guests, so we'll get the guests first.

1:25

Yes,

Speaker 5

1:25

please.

1:27

Yes, please.

Speaker 1

1:28

John Sturm.

Speaker 5

1:35

His parcel is 103 4364.

1:40

It's on page 193 of your agenda.

1:43

It's a 2025 130 subjective appeal.

1:49

And Shirley's passing out some information for the board.

Unassigned speaker

1:53

That's a lot.

Speaker 6

2:12

Yes,

Speaker 1

2:13

sir.

2:13

Okay.

Speaker 7

2:19

There's an extra packet of the CMA's.

2:24

So if you wanted to see what the condition of the homes that's sold are, if you find that description, I have two of them.

Unassigned speaker

2:35

Okay,

Speaker 1

2:36

one petitioner go first or

Speaker 8

2:41

yes.

Speaker 1

2:42

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

2:45

John

Speaker 8

2:46

Eric Stern.

Speaker 1

2:47

Okay.

2:48

And you feel the assessments too high.

Speaker 8

2:51

Um, there's a couple things that I need to address today.

2:53

Okay.

Speaker 1

2:53

Uh

Speaker 8

2:54

so yes, the assessment is too high for multiple reasons.

Speaker 1

2:58

Go ahead.

Speaker 8

2:59

Okay.

2:59

Um, so I'm here today um because the Marion County assessor um does not want to act in good faith and follow the DLGF guidelines.

3:10

So the first thing I'd like to submit is exhibit A1 and A2.

3:15

It is a photograph of the parcel, and it's also a and it's also a photograph of the inside of the part of the property showing the current condition, which is in a gutted, unfinished state.

3:33

So who would I need to pres uh give this to?

Speaker 7

3:36

They have it in their packets.

Unassigned speaker

3:37

Oh,

Speaker 8

3:38

okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Property Tax Assessment█████████████████████████████████████████████80%
Procedural██████11%
Data Analysis█████8%
Public Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Marion County Property Tax Board of Appeals Meeting - October 23, 2026

The Marion County Property Tax Board of Appeals (PWO) convened on October 23, 2026, to hear several property tax assessment appeals and other routine matters. The board considered both residential and commercial appeals, including requests for adjustments based on property condition, income data, and administrative errors. Key decisions included votes on individual assessments, tabling of certain appeals, and approval of exemptions and meeting dates.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes from the previous meeting were unanimously approved.
  • Bulk approvals for pages 26-106 (with exceptions), pages 107-197 (with exceptions), pages 198-289 (withdrawals), and pages 290-300 (exemptions) were passed via consent motions.

Discussion Items

  • John Sturm Appeal (Parcel 1034364): The petitioner argued his property assessment was too high, presenting evidence of a gutted, unfinished interior. He requested deductions for unfinished interior, removal of air conditioning charges, adjustment of completion percentage to 32%, and a condition rating of "very poor" (95% depreciation). Staff analyst Bradley Powers offered a final value based on 35% completion and fair condition, with values of $80,200 for 2023 and 2024, $92,800 for 2025, and $96,500 for 2026. The board voted to accept the staff's recommendation. (Note: The board voted on multiple years including 2023, 2024, and 2025, and also addressed 2026.)

  • Allison Transmission Personal Property Appeals (Two parcels): Matt Angler (Ice Miller) requested a one-month postponement to allow a meeting between Allison, the county assessor's office, and DMD regarding an abatement issue. Emily Stump (DMD) agreed. The board voted to table the appeals until the next meeting.

  • Crystal House Name Change Appeal: Terry Chase (via staff) requested correction of a name change issue that led to an incorrect tax bill. The board approved the name change and restored exemptions for 2024 and 2025.

  • David King Appeal (4742 East 17th Street): The petitioner contested a 44% assessment increase to $114,800, citing extensive needed repairs (roof, electrical, HVAC, etc.) and arguing the property should be valued as a cash sale. Staff had offered $100,000 based on poor condition. After hearing testimony, the board voted to accept staff's proposed value of $100,800 (noting the discrepancy between staff's $100,000 offer and the chairman's stated $100,800). The motion passed.

  • Crickside Square Apartments Appeal (Parcels 6022125, 6022128, and others): Staff indicated they could not meet the 5% burden of proof because the property owner refused to provide income information. They proposed lowering the assessment to the prior year's value. The board discussed the lack of cooperation and voted to reject the lower values and sustain the original assessed values for all years. The motion passed.

  • Other Bulk Actions: The board approved multiple sets of appeals via consent: pages 1-25 (with minor items), pages 26-106 (with exceptions for the already-heard cases), pages 107-197 (objective appeals, with exceptions), pages 198-289 (withdrawals), and pages 290-300 (exemptions, including a CIB building).

Key Outcomes

  • John Sturm's property was assessed at $80,200 (2023, 2024), $92,800 (2025), and $96,500 (2026).
  • David King's property was assessed at $100,800 for 2025 (the appeal year).
  • Allison Transmission appeals were tabled to the next meeting.
  • Crystal House exemption was restored for 2024 and 2025.
  • Crickside Square appeals were denied, with original assessments sustained for all years.
  • Meeting dates for the next year were approved.

Meeting Transcript

We'll go ahead and get started the PWO meeting for May of October 23rd, 2026. Of ourselves. Joe. Joe O'Connor, I'm the county assessor and a non-voting member. Greg Rath now, board member. Kathy Gould, board member. Steve Adrian, president. Brian Barton, board member. Okay, next order of business will be minutes from last month. I'll make a motion to accept the minutes as written. I'll second. See you none all in favor, say aye. Aye. Aye. The ayes have it. Do our uh if we have any guests out there that I'm gonna talk today, can you please stand and raise your right hand so I can square you all in? Raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell the truth, whole truth, not the truth, so help you God? I do. Okay. We have some guests, so we'll get the guests first. Yes, please. Yes, please. John Sturm. His parcel is 103 4364. It's on page 193 of your agenda. It's a 2025 130 subjective appeal. And Shirley's passing out some information for the board. That's a lot. Yes, sir. Okay. There's an extra packet of the CMA's. So if you wanted to see what the condition of the homes that's sold are, if you find that description, I have two of them. Okay, one petitioner go first or yes. Okay. John Eric Stern. Okay. And you feel the assessments too high. Um, there's a couple things that I need to address today. Okay. Uh

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com