OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Jacksonville, Florida/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Jacksonville Waterways Commission Meeting – October 22, 2026

City Council — Thursday, October 22, 2026
BodyJacksonville, Florida
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, October 22, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:05:57

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

0:01

Good

Speaker 1

0:01

afternoon, everybody.

0:03

Um first thing I'd like to share is that the projects that we applied for last year, the 26 projects uh were all funded in full.

0:11

So we have received those agreements, and those will be going through our process for execution at the city level.

0:19

Um

Unassigned speaker

0:20

so

Speaker 1

0:20

you'll see those listed under 2026 on that top sheet that you have in the handouts of one the the spreadsheet with the yellow and orange cells on

Unassigned speaker

0:29

them.

Speaker 1

0:30

Um so as a reminder, those three that have been approved were downtown dredging,

Unassigned speaker

0:35

uh

Speaker 1

0:36

Sisters Creek Transient facilities, the bathhouse in particular.

0:41

That's uh like we're chopping that construction into two phases, and then the TK Stokes boat ramp bulkhead design project.

0:48

So those were the ones that uh we that you all asked that we applied for this past year, and we just received word um uh just a couple weeks ago that we are receiving those, and um but this sheet kind of shows you all the all the active projects um in the in recent years, and I like to show it this way because it should it demonstrates how design projects which are in yellow have to graduate to a construction project eventually.

1:22

Um those are the orange ones, so we can kind of see that that flow of projects um as they advance over time.

1:30

Um so you'll see um the projects in 22, the yellow ones, uh the hands chan Tansler Marina Project, that was a design project that fine funded, but that's a 36 million dollar project.

1:45

There's no way we can afford that with fine because of the caps.

1:49

So city council has already funded

Unassigned speaker

1:54

uh

Speaker 1

1:54

12 million dollars for the first phase of that marina development, and we'll have to go back for future allocations of dollars for that one.

2:02

So that one for construction wise we'd have to bite that marina project into smaller pieces and use all the money every year, or we can ask city council to fund that, and we can go after a bunch of other projects.

2:17

That's the way we've been handling that project.

2:20

So that's why you you don't see that as a uh construction project down the line here.

Unassigned speaker

2:25

Uh

Speaker 1

2:26

Pottsburg Creek, um that was a design project in 22.

2:30

And if you look down in 25, we received the construction dollars for that, and that one went out to bid recently.

2:38

Uh we had to reject all bids, uh, but that will be be readvertised soon.

2:43

And so um we'll be breaking ground sometime next year on that project.

2:48

Um Mike McHugh boat ramp.

Speaker 2

2:52

Why were they rejected?

Speaker 1

2:53

Uh there was there's a protest by one of the uh we had 14 contractors re um respond to that that project, which is awesome.

3:03

We don't usually have that many.

3:05

Um, but there was because of the competitive nature of it, they were debating some points, and they found a discrepancy within the advertisement that went out that our procurement division decided, okay.

3:18

The only uh fair way to resolve that was to reject all bids and put it back out.

3:24

So

Speaker 3

3:25

yeah.

Speaker 1

3:25

So we were losing some time on that, but we're gonna we'll do it right.

3:30

Um, since it was deemed a legitimate thing.

3:34

So it had to do with like qualifications for some of the work.

3:37

And one place that says you had to provide it, another place said you could provide it later.

3:42

So it was like, well, you know, we rejected other people that so anyway.

3:47

Went above my head, and uh they made the decision.

3:51

So we'll that'll be moving on, like I said, it will be rebid and

Unassigned speaker

3:55

I don't

Speaker 1

3:56

know, whenever procurement can get through their process and get back out there.

Unassigned speaker

4:00

Uh

Speaker 1

4:00

the Mike McHugh boat ramp project, that one is complete.

4:03

Not only designed, but construction is now done, and that boat ramp has reopened, as well as the Oak Harbor bulkhead that was done a couple years ago, and that's open.

4:12

And the Thomas Creek Fish Camp Adaptive Kayak Launch, that was completed.

4:16

Um you'll see that's only listed as design, but it was actually constructed using uh CIP dollars, so that was not constructed with fine dollars, only designed.

4:28

Um and working our way down to 23.

Unassigned speaker

4:33

Um so

Speaker 1

4:34

Sisters Creek and the downtown dredging project were new designs that year, and those are the two that I mentioned were funded this year in 26.

4:43

So you'll see them turning from yellow in 23 to orange in 26.

4:49

And 24 um we had one new design project, the Wayne B.

5:05

So we'll be talking about that one shortly.

5:08

Um 25.

5:11

I mentioned Pottsburg uh Sidon Park developed.

5:14

That's a new passive park on the waterfront off Hector Drive.

5:18

So that's a new design that just kicked off.

5:20

And um,

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Works█████████████████████████████████████████████50%
Construction███████████████17%
Land Use and Zoning█████████10%
Public Safety████████9%
Public Comment█████6%
Water Safety███3%
Floodplain Management██2%
Procedural██2%
Parks and Recreation█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Jacksonville Waterways Commission Meeting – October 22, 2026

The Jacksonville Waterways Commission met on October 22, 2026, to consider staff recommendations for projects to be submitted for 2027 Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) grant funding. Staff reported that all 26 projects applied for in the previous cycle were fully funded. The meeting focused on reviewing proposed projects, discussing alternatives, and voting on the final recommendation.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • John Nooney (8,356 Baskum Road, Jacksonville) expressed full support for all projects discussed, emphasizing the importance of public waterway access as a quality-of-life issue. He commented on potential land acquisition projects and urged the commission to continue its work.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation of Recommended Projects
    Sisters Creek Dock Extension (continuation): $2.0 million FIND request; total project $4.4 million including City match. This is phase two of transient facilities (500 feet of docks and gangway) after phase one (bathhouse) was funded in the previous cycle.
    Wayne B. Stevens Boat Ramp Conversion: Originally intended as a boat ramp replacement, the design revealed a JEA force main under the ramp. The project was redesigned as a kayak launch and fishing pier, with adaptive reuse of existing piles. Design and permitting to be completed by summer 2027.
    St. John's Marina Boat Ramp Replacement (special request from Parks and DIA): $1.3 million request. The downtown ramp is closed due to adjacent construction; this project would replace the ramp and integrate with ongoing parking reconfiguration under the Acosta Bridge, resulting in a net gain of two dedicated trailer spaces plus flexible spaces.
    Stenson Park Bulkhead Replacement: A smaller, optional project to replace deteriorated wood bulkhead with vinyl sheet piling and concrete cap. If funded, FIND would cover half the cost.
  • Alternatives and Other Projects
    Staff presented a list of potential alternative projects, including Met Park dock redevelopment (design permits pending, construction cost ~$1 million—not included in park budget), Mayport boat ramp dock replacement design (recommended as top alternative), back river channel marking (for safety and future dredging eligibility), and acquisition projects (FIND funds only 25% of value, higher risk).
    Acquisition projects: Three properties noted, including John Nooney’s property, but staff cautioned about appraisal risks.
    Pottsburg Creek project: Design funded in 2022, construction dollars awarded in 2025; bids rejected due to a protest over advertising discrepancy; project to be rebid.
    Mike McHugh boat ramp: Completed and reopened.
    Thomas Creek Fish Camp Adaptive Kayak Launch: Completed using city CIP dollars, not FIND.
    Pottsburg Creek / Sidon Park development: A new passive park design underway, not ready for current cycle.
  • Key Discussion Points
    The commission discussed the status of the Met Park dock redevelopment and whether to recommend it as an alternative. Staff noted that the park redesign has a separate timeline and placing docks may need to await park construction. The Mayport boat ramp dock replacement design was suggested as a priority alternative because design projects are needed and the docks require frequent maintenance.
    Regarding back river channel marking, the commission noted that safety buoys had stabilized the shoaling issue and that channel marking could help future dredging eligibility but might involve jurisdictional questions.
    The acquisition projects were considered risky; John Nooney’s property was mentioned as possibly lower risk given his interest in public access, but appraisal uncertainties remain.

Key Outcomes

The commission passed two motions unanimously:

  1. Recommendation of Staff-Selected Projects: Support for the four recommended projects (Sisters Creek Dock Extension, Wayne B. Stevens conversion, St. John's Marina replacement, Stenson Park bulkhead) as the primary application list.
  2. Alternative Project Priority Order: Should project substitutions be needed, the commission directed staff to prioritize the Mayport boat ramp dock replacement design first, then fill remaining funds by proceeding down the list of potential alternatives as provided.

Next Steps: The staff will present the recommendation to the full Waterways Commission at its meeting on October 23, 2026. Following committee support, legislation will be prepared for City Council approval, and applications will be developed for the 2027 FIND cycle.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everybody. Um first thing I'd like to share is that the projects that we applied for last year, the 26 projects uh were all funded in full. So we have received those agreements, and those will be going through our process for execution at the city level. Um so you'll see those listed under 2026 on that top sheet that you have in the handouts of one the the spreadsheet with the yellow and orange cells on them. Um so as a reminder, those three that have been approved were downtown dredging, uh Sisters Creek Transient facilities, the bathhouse in particular. That's uh like we're chopping that construction into two phases, and then the TK Stokes boat ramp bulkhead design project. So those were the ones that uh we that you all asked that we applied for this past year, and we just received word um uh just a couple weeks ago that we are receiving those, and um but this sheet kind of shows you all the all the active projects um in the in recent years, and I like to show it this way because it should it demonstrates how design projects which are in yellow have to graduate to a construction project eventually. Um those are the orange ones, so we can kind of see that that flow of projects um as they advance over time. Um so you'll see um the projects in 22, the yellow ones, uh the hands chan Tansler Marina Project, that was a design project that fine funded, but that's a 36 million dollar project. There's no way we can afford that with fine because of the caps. So city council has already funded uh 12 million dollars for the first phase of that marina development, and we'll have to go back for future allocations of dollars for that one. So that one for construction wise we'd have to bite that marina project into smaller pieces and use all the money every year, or we can ask city council to fund that, and we can go after a bunch of other projects. That's the way we've been handling that project. So that's why you you don't see that as a uh construction project down the line here. Uh Pottsburg Creek, um that was a design project in 22. And if you look down in 25, we received the construction dollars for that, and that one went out to bid recently. Uh we had to reject all bids, uh, but that will be be readvertised soon. And so um we'll be breaking ground sometime next year on that project. Um Mike McHugh boat ramp. Why were they rejected? Uh there was there's a protest by one of the uh we had 14 contractors re um respond to that that project, which is awesome. We don't usually have that many. Um, but there was because of the competitive nature of it, they were debating some points, and they found a discrepancy within the advertisement that went out that our procurement division decided, okay. The only uh fair way to resolve that was to reject all bids and put it back out. So yeah. So we were losing some time on that, but we're gonna we'll do it right. Um, since it was deemed a legitimate thing. So it had to do with like qualifications for some of the work. And one place that says you had to provide it, another place said you could provide it later. So it was like, well, you know, we rejected other people that so anyway. Went above my head, and uh they made the decision. So we'll that'll be moving on, like I said, it will be rebid and I don't know, whenever procurement can get through their process and get back out there. Uh the Mike McHugh boat ramp project, that one is complete. Not only designed, but construction is now done, and that boat ramp has reopened, as well as the Oak Harbor bulkhead that was done a couple years ago, and that's open. And the Thomas Creek Fish Camp Adaptive Kayak Launch, that was completed. Um you'll see that's only listed as design, but it was actually constructed using uh CIP dollars, so that was not constructed with fine dollars, only designed. Um and working our way down to 23.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com