OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Jacksonville, Florida/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Jacksonville Historic Preservation Bill Work Session – October 27, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodyJacksonville, Florida
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 33:29

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Good afternoon, everyone.

0:00

I apologize for being late.

0:02

Time is 1110.

0:04

Uh the colours meeting in order.

0:06

Uh wanna go to our left and do introductions.

Speaker 2

0:12

Joe Carlucci, District 5.

Speaker 1

0:14

Jimmy Palooza, District 7.

0:16

Chris Billings, Municipal Code Compliance.

Speaker 3

0:18

Carlos Alvis of General Counsel.

Speaker 1

0:21

Thank you all for being here.

0:22

This is meant to be a relatively quick meeting.

0:25

You know, Councilmember Carlucci, you were very kind in co-introducing this bill with

Unassigned speaker

0:30

me.

Speaker 1

0:30

This is incredibly important to our historic neighborhoods.

0:33

I believe you might have had um a thought on some kind of change or alteration.

0:38

And I want to make sure that, you know, for the purpose of getting this bill quickly through uh committees, because we've been working on it for the better part of a year.

0:46

I want to make sure that maybe we had a friendly amendment, added it on there and go.

Speaker 2

0:49

Yeah, no, I appreciate the the question for that.

0:52

You're recognized.

0:55

Oh man, I appreciate it.

0:56

So yeah, I've been working with Michelle on it's a friendly amendment, but what I've what I found as I kind of was diving through the bill was um

Unassigned speaker

1:06

a

Speaker 2

1:06

lot of San Marco isn't historically designated, surprisingly enough, um, but it's also kind of by design, it's been a whole thing.

1:14

Um so if anything, it was just gonna be to add an exhibit with a a map that kind of draws in an area of San Marco and St.

1:22

Nicholas that says it's all of these areas plus what's in exhibit A, which is exhibit A would just be a map highlighting the certain areas in in my district.

1:32

That that would potentially fall into having these uh benefits.

Speaker 1

1:38

Understood.

1:38

I I personally would love to see that.

1:41

I think the question was does HPC as a body have purview over those areas.

1:47

Um this is obviously going through HPC, and I just do we want Michelle to kind of jump in on that to verify or you're

Speaker 2

1:55

I mean my my goal was it would fall in they would have purview as it pertains to this process.

2:01

Um they might not have purview in like other senses, maybe they like they do uh with certain other approvals that they give for demolition or improvements.

2:10

Um but if if they're going through this process to acquire a property that the city's foreclosing on, um, if San Marco Preservation wants to, you know, partake in a revitalization program like that's outlined in the bill, then they would have to go through the same process, um, which maybe if you can outline the process that HBC what is it?

2:31

HPC?

2:32

Yeah, historic preservation.

2:34

Yeah, what what is that process that they have for it right now?

Unassigned speaker

2:38

Well,

Speaker 2

2:38

right now identify.

2:39

Right now

Speaker 1

2:40

there's nothing, right?

2:40

So

Speaker 2

2:40

that's

Speaker 1

2:40

the demolition by neglect um committee task force went through.

2:45

Hey, we think that it'd be great to have these kind of uh opportunities to make sure we can get these properties out of the hands of bad landlords and landowners who have just kind of consistently sat on properties.

2:56

When it came to um even Arlington as well, right?

3:00

Because we talked about Arlington and San Marco a little bit in some of our other notice meetings.

3:03

I think our conversation was well, one of the things we can do is if there is a property um that might be in danger

Unassigned speaker

3:10

and

Speaker 1

3:10

this and there's a lot of code violations or liens, the city might be able to take it and put a once it's in the city's possession, you can put a uh historic landmark status on it.

3:20

And now HPC does have purview over it.

Speaker 2

3:22

So

Speaker 1

3:22

that was something else that we kind of discussed.

3:23

And I, you know, Michelle, I don't want

Unassigned speaker

3:25

to

Speaker 1

3:26

pretend I'm a lawyer here.

3:27

I'm gonna throw it to you if you want

Unassigned speaker

3:28

to

Speaker 1

3:29

lawyer it up and tell us how you feel about that.

Speaker 3

3:32

Oh, I agree with that.

3:33

Um that's that's the way it could work, absolutely, is an un designated structure.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████88%
Procedural████7%
Public Comment███5%
Summary of Proceedings

Jacksonville Historic Preservation Bill Work Session – October 27, 2026

On October 27, 2026, Jacksonville City Council members, planning and code staff, and Historic Preservation Commission representatives met to review proposed historic preservation legislation and a friendly amendment. No agenda or minutes were available for this meeting; the transcript opens with “Time is 1110” and “Good afternoon,” while the provided timestamp is 19:00 UTC.

Discussion Items

  • Councilmember Carlucci offered a friendly amendment adding an Exhibit A map to extend the bill’s benefits to areas in San Marco and St. Nicholas that are not currently locally designated. General Counsel staff and HPC participants confirmed that a non-designated property could be landmarked after the city acquires it, allowing the new disposition process to apply.
  • The group reviewed the process: Municipal Code Compliance would pull properties with liens and identify historic status, total fines, and accumulated liens. HPC would create an endangered historic homes list at least once each calendar year, and the administration/mayor’s office could further narrow the list. HPC’s role would be limited to identifying priorities, not conducting legal or enforcement review.
  • If the city forecloses on a qualifying property, it would be landmarked and offered first to qualified historic preservation nonprofits; if no nonprofit can take it, it would go to private bidders with a minimum bid of $10,000. Councilmember Carlucci estimated the program would likely involve only about seven or eight properties in three years, not 185.
  • Councilmember Palooza suggested adding Durkeeville to the map; the East Side (about 900 properties, on the National Register but with no current overlay) and Normandy Boulevard were also discussed for possible inclusion. Staff said planning could draw the map within about two weeks using the San Marco overlay and a simple outline for St. Nicholas.
  • Participants discussed changing the eligibility age threshold from 50 years to 70 years after public comment; Councilmember Carlucci and General Counsel staff agreed to 70.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Mr. Nuni, in a two-minute public comment, urged that the age threshold be applied citywide rather than only to mapped historic areas. He said he would also speak to the issue at that night’s council meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • The group agreed to add a friendly amendment with an Exhibit A map including San Marco, St. Nicholas, and Durkeeville, with East Side and Normandy Boulevard still under consideration.
  • The age threshold for qualifying structures was revised to 70 years.
  • Planning staff will prepare the map; it is needed for the enrolled bill when it reaches full council.
  • The bill is expected to move through Rules, Neighborhoods, and Finance committees, with a committee meeting scheduled for the following Monday morning.
  • No formal vote was taken at the work session; HPC participants expressed strong support for the bill and its intent.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everyone. I apologize for being late. Time is 1110. Uh the colours meeting in order. Uh wanna go to our left and do introductions. Joe Carlucci, District 5. Jimmy Palooza, District 7. Chris Billings, Municipal Code Compliance. Carlos Alvis of General Counsel. Thank you all for being here. This is meant to be a relatively quick meeting. You know, Councilmember Carlucci, you were very kind in co-introducing this bill with me. This is incredibly important to our historic neighborhoods. I believe you might have had um a thought on some kind of change or alteration. And I want to make sure that, you know, for the purpose of getting this bill quickly through uh committees, because we've been working on it for the better part of a year. I want to make sure that maybe we had a friendly amendment, added it on there and go. Yeah, no, I appreciate the the question for that. You're recognized. Oh man, I appreciate it. So yeah, I've been working with Michelle on it's a friendly amendment, but what I've what I found as I kind of was diving through the bill was um a lot of San Marco isn't historically designated, surprisingly enough, um, but it's also kind of by design, it's been a whole thing. Um so if anything, it was just gonna be to add an exhibit with a a map that kind of draws in an area of San Marco and St. Nicholas that says it's all of these areas plus what's in exhibit A, which is exhibit A would just be a map highlighting the certain areas in in my district. That that would potentially fall into having these uh benefits. Understood. I I personally would love to see that. I think the question was does HPC as a body have purview over those areas. Um this is obviously going through HPC, and I just do we want Michelle to kind of jump in on that to verify or you're I mean my my goal was it would fall in they would have purview as it pertains to this process. Um they might not have purview in like other senses, maybe they like they do uh with certain other approvals that they give for demolition or improvements. Um but if if they're going through this process to acquire a property that the city's foreclosing on, um, if San Marco Preservation wants to, you know, partake in a revitalization program like that's outlined in the bill, then they would have to go through the same process, um, which maybe if you can outline the process that HBC what is it? HPC? Yeah, historic preservation. Yeah, what what is that process that they have for it right now? Well, right now identify. Right now there's nothing, right? So that's the demolition by neglect um committee task force went through. Hey, we think that it'd be great to have these kind of uh opportunities to make sure we can get these properties out of the hands of bad landlords and landowners who have just kind of consistently sat on properties. When it came to um even Arlington as well, right? Because we talked about Arlington and San Marco a little bit in some of our other notice meetings. I think our conversation was well, one of the things we can do is if there is a property um that might be in danger and this and there's a lot of code violations or liens, the city might be able to take it and put a once it's in the city's possession, you can put a uh historic landmark status on it. And now HPC does have purview over it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com