OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Johns Creek City Council Work Session - June 9, 2025

City CouncilMonday, June 9, 2025
BodyJohns Creek, Georgia
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, June 9, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:49:58

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Thank you, Mayor.

0:00

We're recording this evening.

0:02

Great.

0:02

I just want to call this meeting to order.

0:04

Welcome everybody to this work session, June 9th at 501 p.m.

0:08

Thank you.

0:09

Would you lead the pledge?

0:14

I pledge allows to the flag to the United States America.

0:30

Mayor's remarks.

0:31

Thank you.

0:32

The first item under strategic priorities is the performing arts center.

0:36

Manager Career for presentation.

0:38

All right.

0:39

Good evening, Mayor and Council.

0:41

The next steps for the potential performing art center all require direction from the council.

0:45

So I'm glad you guys are here tonight.

0:47

The memo in your agenda packet reviews the past discussions of the issue.

0:52

In that review, the memo walks through the city's strong and stable financial position, which shows the city has accruals and other saving mechanisms in addition to the proposed use of cash on hand for the project.

1:05

The memo uses a lot more words, but I'm going to summarize it as saying the financing portion of the project makes good financial sense.

1:14

As validated by our outside financial advisor, the three best options for financing are general obligation bonds, public facility authority financing, or the Georgia Municipal Association lease purchase program.

1:27

Determining which financing mechanism makes the most sense is best answered by the intended use of the facility.

1:34

On the top of the fifth page of the memo is a graphic that represents a continuum between community use and use of the facility by outside groups.

1:44

Determining the most appropriate financing method depends on how you want to use the facility.

1:50

So depending on the financing method you choose, the memo outlines other potential follow-up questions related to a bond issuance if that happens to be the most appropriate financing mechanism.

2:02

But the big question I'm really hoping to get clear direction from the council on tonight is your intended use of the facility.

2:09

Where do you fall in that continuum between community use and use by outside or private groups?

2:14

So with that introductory and summary, happy to go into more details if needed in the conversation, but I'll pass it back to you, Ms.

2:20

Mayor.

2:20

Okay, well thank you.

2:21

And I correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that we also probably are expected to give some idea of what kind of path we would like to go down, if any.

2:34

Yes, absolutely.

2:35

So in the memo, it kind of links the different continu anticipated use of the facility to different financing mechanisms.

2:43

So happy to talk through that some more if you'd like.

2:46

But yes, if you can weigh in on both, your intended use of the facility and which finding method financing method you think is most appropriate.

2:53

Sure.

2:54

Thank you.

2:54

Well uh so from additional information that we've gotten since the last time we really dove deep on the financial aspects, uh, which was two meetings ago.

3:05

I think it sounds like the brick and mortar program is not necessarily a fit because of some of the usage issues and and almost sovereignty of the city with the project.

3:18

You know, I've always envisioned this as a community multi-purpose uh center.

3:24

And obviously it's going to have a performance and art uh bent to it, but that would continue to be my vision.

3:32

And uh, you know, I think that you've done a good job laying out the cash on hand, and then I think with that a 40 million dollar bond question to the voters in the fall is uh appropriate, but that's where I am.

3:50

Thank you, Kimberly.

3:52

Like the memo is pretty detailed and you went into pretty much all the aspects.

3:57

So it's my city's intention should be primary community use.

4:04

So going with the geobond.

4:11

Currently we don't have any uh big capital projects that I would really want to roll into this one because the other ones are all uh most of the ones in the CIP or other ones are we can cover through the general fund or appearance or place.

4:32

So those can be easily addressed in there.

4:34

So I would rather just stick to the uh the whatever you want to call it, community center or performance theater, so that and primary community use.

4:45

And you pretty much explained in the memo, like it's not really focused on a specific group.

4:50

It's more for the like a broad community and like multi-use of this facility.

4:57

So I would really just keep it to one.

5:02

Anything?

5:03

Any other questions we need to do or we are good?

5:05

Uh no, you actually answered the follow-up questions in the memo as well with your remarks.

5:09

Thank you.

5:10

Thank you.

5:12

Firstly, uh thank you, Kimberly, because I know this has been Kimberly K.

5:16

Chris, uh a lot of work on staff, and thank you very much for answering all my numerous questions and emails so uh timely.

5:24

I very much appreciate it.

5:26

And thank you to council, because I know we've put uh all put a lot of work into going over this stuff and preparing for today.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████████████25%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████19%
Capital Improvement Plan█████████████████17%
Arts And Culture████████████████16%
Public Engagement█████████9%
Fiscal Sustainability█████5%
Special Events███3%
Parks and Recreation██2%
Volunteer Management██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Johns Creek City Council Work Session - June 9, 2025

The Johns Creek City Council met for a work session on Monday, June 9, 2025, at 5:01 PM at City Hall. The meeting covered strategic priorities, ongoing projects, and council initiatives. The primary focus was the performing arts center, where the council reached consensus on financing and next steps.

Performing Arts Center – Next Steps

  • City Manager Kimberly Greer presented a memo reviewing the city's financial position and three financing options: general obligation bonds, public facility authority financing, and Georgia Municipal Association lease purchase. She asked council for direction on the intended use of the facility and the preferred financing method.
  • Council members expressed support for a general obligation bond (GO bond) as the preferred financing mechanism, citing transparency and favorable terms. All seven members indicated consensus for a GO bond.
  • Discussion centered on the scope of the referendum. Council agreed to a single-issue referendum for the performing arts center only (not bundled with other projects). The bond amount was set at $40 million as a maximum ceiling.
  • The term of the bond was debated: 20 years vs. 30 years. Council members Stacey, Chris, Larry, and Bob favored 20 years, while others preferred 30. The mayor noted that 20 years would result in an estimated annual cost of $83 per median home versus $74 for 30 years. Via consensus, the council selected a 20-year term with a 10-year call option.
  • Council also discussed the need for a community education campaign prior to the November 2025 election. Staff will prepare materials, with a timeline aiming for a presentation at the July 14 work session.
  • A special called meeting was tentatively scheduled for June 26, 2025, at 6:00 PM to finalize the referendum resolution and language.
  • Council directed staff to draft a resolution calling for the referendum, adjusting parameters to the 20-year, $40 million maximum, and to include a resolution of intent to reimburse.

FY2025 Millage Rate

  • Staff recommended advertising the current millage rate of 3.646 mills for the FY2025 property tax year. Three public hearings are required: Monday, July 14 at 11:00 AM, Monday, July 14 at 6:00 PM, and adoption on Monday, July 28.
  • Council unanimously agreed to advertise the current rate.

Annual Resurfacing Bids

  • Director Brian O'Connor presented a recommendation to award the 2025 main road and neighborhood resurfacing contracts to Allied Paving Contractors, Inc. The proposed work included McGinnis Ferry Road, Old Alabama Road (four sections), three neighborhoods, and the Ocee Park parking lot.
  • Council discussed the Pavement Quality Index (PQI) score, recently reduced from 70 to 65. Council members raised concerns about the necessity of some projects and the need for more granular data.
  • After debate, consensus was reached to proceed with McGinnis Ferry Road and sections 1 and 4 of Old Alabama Road (from city limit to Haynes Bridge Road, and from Preston Oaks to Jones Bridge Road). The neighborhoods and Ocee Park parking lot were deferred for further analysis and a future decision. Staff will adjust the CEI and contingency amounts accordingly.
  • The total estimated cost of the approved main road segments is approximately $1.5 million, satisfying the LMIG commitment.

Volunteer Led Special Events Policy

  • Council discussed the need for a formal policy to define roles, decision-making processes, and accountability for volunteer-led special events. The current code of conduct does not address procedural guardrails.
  • Council supported developing a policy and referred the matter to the Arts and Culture Committee (ACE) for initial review. The committee will provide feedback, and the policy will return to council for final approval.

Executive Session & Adjournment

  • The meeting moved to executive session to discuss legal matters and then adjourned at approximately 7:00 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Thank you, Mayor. We're recording this evening. Great. I just want to call this meeting to order. Welcome everybody to this work session, June 9th at 501 p.m. Thank you. Would you lead the pledge? I pledge allows to the flag to the United States America. Mayor's remarks. Thank you. The first item under strategic priorities is the performing arts center. Manager Career for presentation. All right. Good evening, Mayor and Council. The next steps for the potential performing art center all require direction from the council. So I'm glad you guys are here tonight. The memo in your agenda packet reviews the past discussions of the issue. In that review, the memo walks through the city's strong and stable financial position, which shows the city has accruals and other saving mechanisms in addition to the proposed use of cash on hand for the project. The memo uses a lot more words, but I'm going to summarize it as saying the financing portion of the project makes good financial sense. As validated by our outside financial advisor, the three best options for financing are general obligation bonds, public facility authority financing, or the Georgia Municipal Association lease purchase program. Determining which financing mechanism makes the most sense is best answered by the intended use of the facility. On the top of the fifth page of the memo is a graphic that represents a continuum between community use and use of the facility by outside groups. Determining the most appropriate financing method depends on how you want to use the facility. So depending on the financing method you choose, the memo outlines other potential follow-up questions related to a bond issuance if that happens to be the most appropriate financing mechanism. But the big question I'm really hoping to get clear direction from the council on tonight is your intended use of the facility. Where do you fall in that continuum between community use and use by outside or private groups? So with that introductory and summary, happy to go into more details if needed in the conversation, but I'll pass it back to you, Ms. Mayor. Okay, well thank you. And I correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that we also probably are expected to give some idea of what kind of path we would like to go down, if any. Yes, absolutely. So in the memo, it kind of links the different continu anticipated use of the facility to different financing mechanisms. So happy to talk through that some more if you'd like. But yes, if you can weigh in on both, your intended use of the facility and which finding method financing method you think is most appropriate. Sure. Thank you. Well uh so from additional information that we've gotten since the last time we really dove deep on the financial aspects, uh, which was two meetings ago. I think it sounds like the brick and mortar program is not necessarily a fit because of some of the usage issues and and almost sovereignty of the city with the project. You know, I've always envisioned this as a community multi-purpose uh center. And obviously it's going to have a performance and art uh bent to it, but that would continue to be my vision. And uh, you know, I think that you've done a good job laying out the cash on hand, and then I think with that a 40 million dollar bond question to the voters in the fall is uh appropriate, but that's where I am. Thank you, Kimberly. Like the memo is pretty detailed and you went into pretty much all the aspects. So it's my city's intention should be primary community use. So going with the geobond. Currently we don't have any uh big capital projects that I would really want to roll into this one because the other ones are all uh most of the ones in the CIP or other ones are we can cover through the general fund or appearance or place. So those can be easily addressed in there. So I would rather just stick to the uh the whatever you want to call it, community center or performance theater, so that and primary community use. And you pretty much explained in the memo, like it's not really focused on a specific group. It's more for the like a broad community and like multi-use of this facility.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com