The Johns Creek City Council held a work session on June 1, 2026, at 5:03 PM. The meeting covered e-bikes in parks, landscaping policies, a multimodal transportation policy, home occupation regulations, and a naming issue for a city asset. Key decisions included direction to prohibit e-bikes in parks (except to designated parking), continued discussion on landscaping and multimodal policies, and significant revisions to a home occupation ordinance.
Thank you, Mayor. We are recording. Okay. I just want to call this meeting of the Johns Creek City Council to order this work session on June 1st, 2026 at 5.03 p.m. Thank you. Would you lead the pledge? Be glad to I pledgedly just to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic. Mayor Shermarks? None, thank you. Thank you. The first item on our ongoing projects is e-bikes and electric scooters and parks. We have Assistant City Manager Haggard for presentation. Good evening, Mayor and Council. Tonight we're seeking counsel direction regarding the use of e-bikes and electric scooters in city parks. Before I begin, I'd like to note there is a minor correction to the memo, an incorrect State Code reference related to e-bikes was used. However, the correction does not affect the discussion or options presented tonight. While council updated the code earlier this year regarding e-bike use on public sidewalks, park use was not specifically addressed. Since then, staff has observed the increased use of e-bikes and scooters throughout parks grounds, including areas beyond sidewalks and trails. In some cases, this has resulted in conflicts with other park users, damage to park grounds, and police involvement. The current code does not clearly regulate e-bike or scooter use in parks. So staff has outlined several potential approaches for council's consideration, ranging from prohibiting e-bikes and electric shooters in parks to allowing broader use with options options such as limiting operation to parking lots or other designated areas. Tonight we are seeking council's policy direction on the desired approach so we can return with ordinance amendments that reflect council's intent. And with that, I'll answer questions. I think you are asking for us to opine on one of the options. I'll just start out by saying that I think we ought to go to no motorized bikes inside the parks. So I agree with that. My one caveat is non-motorized bikes, and I know you are not asking that, but I would like to allow children to continue to use bikes on sidewalks and trails in the park. Non-motorized bikes. Thank you, Chris. Again. That's the stuff like if you see a something is not working, we need to come back and discuss. So I really appreciate that. Option one. Which is again if you have a consensus, that's fine, but maybe the stretchy is going to be option three, but I would prefer option one. You mind option one? I'll give it a lot of the questions. Okay. Okay. But I am with option one. Larry? So I am also with option one, but uh with a little caveat. So um if someone is driving their uh riding or e-bike to one of the parks, I don't want them to have a uh to leave them outside the park. That's a great point. So I want a designated trail or sidewalk, if you will, to a designated parking lot with a designated parking area, just like motorcycle parkings here. So it's they go in, they park it, and that's it. Because it I think it's unrealistic, like we talked about last time on this subject for individuals to leave their bike on old Alabama as an example. They're gonna be worried about it being stolen, so they'll they'll break the rule and just drive it in anyways. So let's make it so it's reasonable in what we're asking them to do, but they should not be playing around on the e-bikes in the parks. Option one and three, just tweak it like something. Yeah, I think it's it's one as the as a foundation, but with with um a use to a parking spot designated parking spot.