OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Johns Creek Planning Commission Meeting - June 2, 2026

City CouncilTuesday, June 2, 2026
BodyJohns Creek, Georgia
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, June 2, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:02:48

Transcript — Verbatim
0:10

Whoa, that's loud.

0:12

Good evening.

0:13

I'm Arthur Holtz and I'd like to call the what is today?

0:17

June 2nd, 2026 meeting of the City of Johns Creek Planning Commission order.

0:21

At this time, I'd like to ask everyone to please silence or turn off your cell phones if you'd be so kind.

0:27

The Planning Commission is a recommending body to the mayor and the City Council, and we follow guidelines in conjunction with a public hearing to assist in formulating a recommendation.

0:38

Copies of the Planning Commission procedures and staff reports are available at the entrance to this chamber in the back of the room.

0:44

The presiding officer will call cases on the agenda for public hearing.

0:48

First, the presiding officers shall recognize the planning staff to make a presentation of the case with their recommendations, and then we will open to a public hearing.

0:57

The applicant shall receive a time period of 10 minutes to present their case.

1:02

If there is any concurrent variance, each shall grant the applicant an additional 10 minutes.

1:30

Any opposition, if there is, is granted an equal time per period to present data, evidence, and their opinions.

1:37

If a large number of people wish to speak in opposition, is it is advisable request to speak to appoint spokespersons to make that presentation.

1:46

The city is not obligated to provide the full time period to opponents if they elect not to use their time, and the opposition is not granted a rebuttal period.

1:57

Any member of the hearing body upon recognition by the presiding officer should may ask questions of any person giving public comment.

2:05

After completing this process, the presiding officer will indicate that the public hearing is closed.

2:11

Upon closing the public hearing, the planning commission can no longer be addressed by the applicant or by the opposition.

2:18

The planning commission may still ask questions of city staff at this time.

2:22

Once all questions have been asked and addressed, the presiding officer will call for a motion, and if properly seconded will call for a vote on the matter.

2:32

The presiding officer will then state the vote and recommendation for the record.

2:36

I would ask all present to please act courteously and refrain from any outbursts or comments, etc.

2:42

I would like to recommend recognize my colleagues on the dais tonight.

2:46

Um Vicky Horton, Commissioner Horton, Commissioner, Commissioner Cal Couch, Commissioner Carnwall, Commissioner Katzen, Commissioner Anon, and Commissioner Ross, who are all up here with me, and again I'm Arthur Holst.

2:59

The first item of business on the agenda is we did not have a meeting in May.

3:04

Um we had a meeting on April 14th, so I hope everybody had a chance to review the meeting minutes.

3:09

I think they were pretty straightforward.

3:12

Um I don't know if there's any questions or comments on those.

3:18

I'd like to make a motion to accept them as written.

3:21

Okay.

3:22

Okay.

3:23

Motion made.

3:24

All those in in accept in accepting.

3:27

Aye.

3:28

Okay.

3:28

Great.

3:29

So actually the vote is six with one abstention, right?

3:35

Because you unfortunately couldn't be with us, so that's technically how the vote would work.

3:40

But thank you.

3:41

Obviously, that passed.

3:42

The next item of business on the agenda is zoning ordinance text amendment A-26-004.

3:51

I'm going to ask Ms.

3:52

Argerwald to come up and do this, please.

3:54

Thank you.

3:55

Good evening, Planning Commissioners.

3:57

Good to see you all.

3:58

Tonight we have one agenda item, which is a text amendment.

4:01

Um, and I'll um brief that presentation to you.

4:05

Text amendment A-26-004.

4:08

This text amendment is a council initiative to determine feasibility of advanced air mobility, which is called AAM, and what reports within John Screen.

4:19

This amendment uh will call will lead to amending the zoning ordinance to establish specific zoning districts, allowing for the proposed use through the special use permit process.

4:31

It would require um the special use permit to be reviewed and approved by Planning Commission and then by City Council once any application is submitted.

4:41

Um this amendment would establish standards to regulate advanced air mobility and what reports ahead of the Federal Aviation Administration's FAA final approval for AAM passenger carrying operations in the United States.

5:00

Advanced air mobility is an umbrella term that includes aircraft that are highly automated, electrically powered, and have vertical takeoff and landing capabilities.

5:11

Vertiports are areas that are specifically designated to serve AAM aircraft, including electrical, vertical takeoff and landing, for example, evital aircrafts, and may be located at airports, on building rooftops, on parking structures, as well as at grade.

5:33

These vertiports may be subject to additional regulations to accommodate AAM as compared to conventional helicopters and airplanes.

5:42

Because AAM can operate as both a rotary wing and fixed wing aircraft.

5:49

Now, for most of you may have had the chance to look at uh and search for what these are, but here is an example, a picture just to kind of tell you.

5:58

The first picture on your left uh upper corner is uh example of an evitol, which is actually the aircraft electronic aircraft that can take the cargo or passengers.

6:09

And the second picture on the lower right corner is an example of a vertiport.

6:14

Now that's just one example, which may be there for one aircraft.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Technology and Innovation█████████████████████████████████████████████57%
Transportation Safety██████████13%
Zoning Regulations█████████11%
Procedural████████10%
Community Engagement██████7%
Public Safety██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Johns Creek Planning Commission Meeting - June 2, 2026

The Johns Creek Planning Commission met on June 2, 2026, at 12:00 PM (local time) and considered a single major agenda item: a council-initiated zoning ordinance text amendment (A-26-004) to establish regulations for advanced air mobility (AAM) and vertiports. After staff presentation and commissioner discussion, the commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the amendment to the City Council.

Consent Calendar

  • The commission approved the minutes from the April 14, 2026, meeting as presented. The vote was 6-0 with one abstention (Commissioner Anon was absent at that meeting).

Discussion Items

Text Amendment A-26-004 – Advanced Air Mobility and Vertiports

  • Staff, led by Ms. Hargerwell, presented the proposed amendment, which adds definitions for advanced air mobility (AAM), evtols, vertiports, and related terms to the zoning ordinance. It designates vertiports as a special use permit use in specific zoning districts: OI, C1, C2, M1, M1A, mixed-use (TCX, TCB), and industrial. The amendment includes standards: a minimum 200-foot setback from residential or agricultural property lines (as a starting point, subject to adjustment), operating hours of 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM, and requirements for applicant submittals including site plans, FAA/GDOT compliance evidence, frequency of operations, fire prevention, emergency landing areas, and a demonstration of need.
  • Staff noted that this is a proactive measure to set guardrails before applications arrive; no specific vertiport is proposed. The amendment is a framework for future special use permits, which will require separate public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
  • Commissioners asked about: the rationale for the 200-foot minimum (based on noise comparisons to helicopters, with evtols quieter), potential interference with technology (no known examples, but noted for future consideration), the requirement for applicant to show approach zones and glide paths, emergency procedures, and the role of FAA and GDOT in regulating flight paths. They also discussed that commercial operators would be required (not hobbyists), and that no active vertiports or licensed aircraft exist yet in metro Atlanta.
  • The commission praised staff for thorough research given the nascent technology. Commissioner Holtz recommended that when presenting to City Council, staff should proactively flag unknowns and suggest a future review period (e.g., every six months or year) to update the amendment as technology evolves.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion: Commissioner Couch moved to approve text amendment A-26-004. Commissioner Katzen seconded.
  • Vote: The motion passed 7-0. The Planning Commission recommends approval to the City Council.
  • Next Steps: The amendment will go before the City Council for final consideration. The commission noted that a public hearing on a future special use permit for a vertiport would provide additional public input.

Other Updates

  • The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for August 4, 2026 (no meeting in July). That agenda includes a rezoning case for Johns Creek United Methodist Church on Bell Road, proposing a CUP district for single-family detached housing and shared open space. Staff indicated the proposal is a joint development with the church.
  • The home occupation text amendment (discussed at the April meeting) was the subject of a council work session on June 1, 2026, and will be considered by City Council on July 13, 2026.
  • The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Whoa, that's loud. Good evening. I'm Arthur Holtz and I'd like to call the what is today? June 2nd, 2026 meeting of the City of Johns Creek Planning Commission order. At this time, I'd like to ask everyone to please silence or turn off your cell phones if you'd be so kind. The Planning Commission is a recommending body to the mayor and the City Council, and we follow guidelines in conjunction with a public hearing to assist in formulating a recommendation. Copies of the Planning Commission procedures and staff reports are available at the entrance to this chamber in the back of the room. The presiding officer will call cases on the agenda for public hearing. First, the presiding officers shall recognize the planning staff to make a presentation of the case with their recommendations, and then we will open to a public hearing. The applicant shall receive a time period of 10 minutes to present their case. If there is any concurrent variance, each shall grant the applicant an additional 10 minutes. Any opposition, if there is, is granted an equal time per period to present data, evidence, and their opinions. If a large number of people wish to speak in opposition, is it is advisable request to speak to appoint spokespersons to make that presentation. The city is not obligated to provide the full time period to opponents if they elect not to use their time, and the opposition is not granted a rebuttal period. Any member of the hearing body upon recognition by the presiding officer should may ask questions of any person giving public comment. After completing this process, the presiding officer will indicate that the public hearing is closed. Upon closing the public hearing, the planning commission can no longer be addressed by the applicant or by the opposition. The planning commission may still ask questions of city staff at this time. Once all questions have been asked and addressed, the presiding officer will call for a motion, and if properly seconded will call for a vote on the matter. The presiding officer will then state the vote and recommendation for the record. I would ask all present to please act courteously and refrain from any outbursts or comments, etc. I would like to recommend recognize my colleagues on the dais tonight. Um Vicky Horton, Commissioner Horton, Commissioner, Commissioner Cal Couch, Commissioner Carnwall, Commissioner Katzen, Commissioner Anon, and Commissioner Ross, who are all up here with me, and again I'm Arthur Holst. The first item of business on the agenda is we did not have a meeting in May. Um we had a meeting on April 14th, so I hope everybody had a chance to review the meeting minutes. I think they were pretty straightforward. Um I don't know if there's any questions or comments on those. I'd like to make a motion to accept them as written. Okay. Okay. Motion made. All those in in accept in accepting. Aye. Okay. Great. So actually the vote is six with one abstention, right? Because you unfortunately couldn't be with us, so that's technically how the vote would work. But thank you. Obviously, that passed. The next item of business on the agenda is zoning ordinance text amendment A-26-004. I'm going to ask Ms. Argerwald to come up and do this, please. Thank you. Good evening, Planning Commissioners. Good to see you all. Tonight we have one agenda item, which is a text amendment. Um, and I'll um brief that presentation to you. Text amendment A-26-004. This text amendment is a council initiative to determine feasibility of advanced air mobility, which is called AAM, and what reports within John Screen. This amendment uh will call will lead to amending the zoning ordinance to establish specific zoning districts, allowing for the proposed use through the special use permit process.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com