The Joliet City Council held a pre‑council meeting on Monday, September 14, 2026 at 5:30 PM in Council Chambers to review agenda items for the regular council meeting. Councilman Cardenas was absent. The meeting included public comments, an update on the Southeast Joliet Sanitary District, and discussion of numerous ordinances and resolutions. No votes were taken on agenda items; the council only voted unanimously to enter closed session.
Mayor, right? Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the pre-council meeting for the City of Joliet. Uh today uh Monday, September 14th, 2026, 530 in council chambers, the honorable mayor Terry Darcy presiding. We'll be in with roll call. Mayor Darcy. Here. Councilman Cardenas is absent. He did let me know that he would not be in attendance this evening. Councilman Clement? Here. Councilman Hug? Here. Councilman Abarro? Here. Councilman Marino? Here. Councilman Mudron. Councilwoman Quoman. Here. Councilman Rudin. Here. Next is citizens to be heard on agenda items. We do have one person signed up. Delilah. Good evening, Delilah Lagrette, Jackson Township Assessor. I am here speaking as the assessor tonight. Um I'm here this evening to speak on the preliminary plat of Third Coast. As the assessor for all of the South End of Joliet, anything south of Schweitzer Road. I wanted to bring to your attention the risk of any new industrial buildings being built without them having immediate access to use them. If any new industrial building were allowed to be built, but not be able to be occupied based on kind of what I understand from this agreement, right? Like they can build the building, but they gotta wait for the bridge and such uh to be in place. That does affect the entire region. Every year I have multiple appeals from industrial for vacancy reasons. The amount that they are able to use for vacancy reasons is dependent on the entire vacancy in the area. Um so just to give you an example for this year. I have a building that's about 30% vacant. It was last year as well. Last year, the Joliet area, specifically Cushman and Wakefield call it the Joliet corridor. Uh last year the vacancy rate was 5.9%. We you all of us, um, we took a $400,000 loss based on that 33% vacancy of their building. This year, their appeal is requesting two million dollars of lowering. They have the current rate at 8.1%. So the amount of value that can be adjusted is based on that entire region vacancy rate. If buildings are built without any access to use them, they will be a hundred percent vacant at that point. Every warehouse in the area can use that increase in vacancy. Allowing buildings that cannot be occupied to be built will have a direct effect on the city's equalized assessed value. As the vacancy climbs, the EAV can go down, and as you know, equalized assessed value is the very first step of that tax cycle for you guys. My request here for you is to find a way to not approve any building permits at all until there is full appropriate access to this part of Third Coast. I don't want to see an increase in residents' tax bills. I don't want to see IDOT needing to allow 53 to be used the same way they needed to allow it on the west side of 53.