OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Jonesboro, Arkansas/Meeting Portal
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Jonesboro Board of Zoning Adjustment Meeting - September 15, 2026

Meeting Portal — Tuesday, September 15, 2026
BodyJonesboro, Arkansas
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, September 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 41:04

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:09

I need a motion and a second to approve the minutes from August the 11th.

0:14

So move.

0:15

Second.

0:15

Thank you very much.

0:16

First of all, I'd like to apologize for missing the last meeting.

0:21

We did not have quorum, but we do today.

0:23

So we're gonna start out with Walter Jackson.

0:27

Come on up.

0:28

Tell us your name and what you want to do.

0:34

Walter Jackson, and I'm wanting to do a duplex at 323 North Bridge.

0:40

There's an old house there that I've owned for several years that we want to tear down, and I own a lot of other duplexes and triplexes in the neighborhood in that three block area, and uh the lots over there.

0:53

It's an old part of town, so the lots are all 50 foot wide, so it doesn't really allow for parking in the rear or driveways to get to the rear for to be able to use the lot.

1:03

I own the apartments to the south of it, and to the north of it.

1:08

There's Jonesboro Housing Authority owns a couple little houses there.

1:14

Let me throw something out.

1:15

Have you thought about building a single family home?

1:19

Well, I mean you could it's zoned for multifamily.

1:21

It might not have these troubles.

1:23

Yeah, it's zoned for multifamily and it's 204 feet deep.

1:26

Yeah.

1:27

Uh the the duplex is not taking it.

1:29

Do you know how that ordinance came about?

1:31

Uh-huh.

1:32

Yes, sir.

1:32

You've been down Matthews and saw those.

1:34

Yes, sir.

1:35

What we call spaceships?

1:36

Yeah, they're all level.

1:37

That's why they're all right.

1:38

That's why we are trying to avoid in Jonesborough.

1:41

Those are all vinyl siding and low pitch roofs and all around them.

1:45

And then there's no door on the front and all the above.

1:47

So mine are all three.

1:49

That's why we're here.

1:50

Yeah.

1:51

Minor brick with the steeper roofs and gables and stuff.

1:54

They're they're nicer looking.

1:55

Okay.

1:57

All right.

1:58

Um gentlemen, do you have any questions for this man?

2:12

Oops.

2:15

There it goes.

2:16

There it went.

2:17

Okay.

2:18

Having IT problems.

2:21

Everybody understand what Mr.

2:22

Walter Jackson is asking.

2:31

Mr.

2:32

Jackson, how members show up today, didn't we?

2:36

Go ahead.

2:36

How are your other duplexes?

2:39

Are they forward-facing doors?

2:42

Street facing doors.

2:43

No, sir.

2:45

They're all they're all built the same way.

2:47

If it's kind of like, you know, if you got two lots, you have two facing each other with the sidewalk up the middle or yeah.

2:55

Uh well, that's who I'll say you might if you went south a little bit, you can see those triplexes there.

3:01

That's a different, that's a whole different thing though, because it's got the big parking lot in the front.

3:07

Uh the 323 bridge would just have a parking for four cars in the front.

3:16

If you go north the next block up on bridge, you can see two duplexes there on the east side of the street that are mine.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations████████████████████████████████████████40%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████████20%
Access Management████████████████16%
Transportation Safety███████████11%
Economic Development███████7%
Procedural██████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Jonesboro Board of Zoning Adjustment Meeting - September 15, 2026

The Jonesboro Board of Zoning Adjustment met on September 15, 2026, beginning at 7:30 PM. The board considered several variance requests for multi-family residential and commercial developments. The meeting included discussion of design standards, traffic flow, parking requirements, and grading challenges. The board voted to approve or table each item.

Consent Calendar

  • The minutes from the August 11 meeting were approved by motion and second.

Discussion Items

  • Walter Jackson – Duplex at 323 North Bridge: Mr. Jackson requested variances to allow side-facing doors and front parking for a new duplex. He explained that the 50-foot-wide lot and existing infrastructure make rear parking infeasible. He cited similar variances granted for other properties he built in the area (e.g., 509 Miller in 2020). Board members discussed concerns about front parking and door orientation but recognized the practical constraints of the lot and the applicant's positive track record. The city planning representative noted the code encourages rear parking but acknowledged the difficulty on this site.
  • Chick-fil-A – Variance Requests (GBC Design): The applicant sought three variances for a new Chick-fil-A on a 1.8-acre site: (1) an exit not meeting cross-access requirements, (2) a curb cut closer than 85 feet from an intersection, and (3) three access points (two entrances, one exit) instead of the allowed maximum. The project engineer explained the P-15 prototype with an isolated drive-thru and emphasized the site's 11-foot grade change. A letter from George Dim of Tommy's Car Wash objected to the side connection due to traffic conflict concerns. Board members expressed reluctance about granting multiple variances but were satisfied with the revised plan turning one access into an entrance-only. The representative recused himself.
  • McAllister Engineering – Setback Variance for Duplex (Mapry Properties): A variance was requested to reduce the east side setback from 7.5 feet to 6 feet for an existing duplex built 1.18 feet over the setback. The applicant stated the building is being renovated. The board moved to grant the variance to avoid requiring demolition.
  • Doug (representing grocery store) – Driveway Location Variance: The applicant requested a variance from shared access requirements on Southern Ridge Boulevard, citing that 18-wheelers serving the grocery store would create a hardship for the adjoining property to the west if required to share a driveway. Board discussion raised concerns about setting a precedent and the impact on future development of the western lot. The city planner noted that the code requires shared entrances to reduce curb cuts on a collector street. The applicant argued that 18-wheelers cannot safely use the side exit and that the adjoining lot has sufficient frontage (approximately 280 linear feet) for its own driveway. The board granted the variance.
  • Fencing (Moss Fencing): This item was tabled to the next meeting as the applicant did not appear.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved: Variance for Walter Jackson's duplex at 323 North Bridge (side-facing doors, front parking) – vote: 3 in favor.
  • Approved: Three variances for Chick-fil-A (cross-access, curb cut distance, number of access points) – vote: 3 in favor, 1 recused.
  • Approved: Setback variance for McAllister Engineering/Mapry Properties duplex – vote: 3 in favor.
  • Approved: Driveway location variance for grocery store (waived shared access on Southern Ridge) – vote: 3 in favor.
  • Tabled: Moss Fencing item to next meeting.
  • The board adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

I need a motion and a second to approve the minutes from August the 11th. So move. Second. Thank you very much. First of all, I'd like to apologize for missing the last meeting. We did not have quorum, but we do today. So we're gonna start out with Walter Jackson. Come on up. Tell us your name and what you want to do. Walter Jackson, and I'm wanting to do a duplex at 323 North Bridge. There's an old house there that I've owned for several years that we want to tear down, and I own a lot of other duplexes and triplexes in the neighborhood in that three block area, and uh the lots over there. It's an old part of town, so the lots are all 50 foot wide, so it doesn't really allow for parking in the rear or driveways to get to the rear for to be able to use the lot. I own the apartments to the south of it, and to the north of it. There's Jonesboro Housing Authority owns a couple little houses there. Let me throw something out. Have you thought about building a single family home? Well, I mean you could it's zoned for multifamily. It might not have these troubles. Yeah, it's zoned for multifamily and it's 204 feet deep. Yeah. Uh the the duplex is not taking it. Do you know how that ordinance came about? Uh-huh. Yes, sir. You've been down Matthews and saw those. Yes, sir. What we call spaceships? Yeah, they're all level. That's why they're all right. That's why we are trying to avoid in Jonesborough. Those are all vinyl siding and low pitch roofs and all around them. And then there's no door on the front and all the above. So mine are all three. That's why we're here. Yeah. Minor brick with the steeper roofs and gables and stuff. They're they're nicer looking. Okay. All right. Um gentlemen, do you have any questions for this man? Oops. There it goes. There it went. Okay. Having IT problems. Everybody understand what Mr. Walter Jackson is asking. Mr. Jackson, how members show up today, didn't we? Go ahead.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com