This Business Session of the Kansas City Council, held on January 13, 2022, at approximately 8:15 PM, focused on a presentation by Councilman Ellington concerning city employee COVID-19 testing policies, alleged retaliatory actions, and broader issues of pay equity and discrimination. Numerous city employees from multiple departments testified about the financial burden of weekly testing, denied religious exemptions, and inadequate wages. The council discussed potential resolutions to address payroll deductions, align policies with the fire department, and audit COVID-related spending.
Two is there a motion? So moving second. All in favor indicate by saying aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed. The motion passes. Our first item is uh city employee presentation brought to us by councilman Allington. Councilman, if you'd like to uh kick us off, thank you. I appreciate you, Mr. Mayor. I'm gonna be as concept and concise as I can be. As I did in committee, though, I'm just gonna uh read the uh part of section 1.8 and again ask for uh protection for anybody that talks. Section 1.8 deals with employee testimony before the city council. Uh individual employees who have views or opinions about an issue, project, court case, pending ordinance, resolution, or other enabling legislation, city programs, etc. that are deviant or conflicting with those of the city's officials, representatives shall not use city work time to present their views, identify themselves to city employees while presenting their views, where city issue uniforms, badges, or any other items that might identify themselves to city employees, drive a city vehicle to a meeting, make statements that would lead a person to believe that they are speaking on behalf of the city. So I'm asking again that for anybody that speaks, they're being protected. And since I got the city manager and the mayor in here, I want to do that in front of you guys. Sir. All right, thank you. So uh this is an extremely serious situation. Extremely serious situation. And I often talk about politics is war without bloodshed and war is bloody politics, and some don't know the extent of that, but my crusade is a little different, and this is one of the reasons why I engaged in this meeting and while I committed to working with the city workers, and I'm committing to do everything that I can. Uh two weeks ago, we had a public meeting, and that public meeting uh I committed to filing two pieces of legislation. Uh one piece came through committee yesterday. I'm looking for the things that I already had up. Okay. One came through committee yesterday, and that was the one dealing with testing and regulating that the city follows state protocols and mandates. Hey, Howard, what happened to the PDF? See here, Dr. Oh, there it is. Okay. This one actually got held in the committee. I just put it up there so the workers know that I kept my word. And again, this one dealt with uh pertaining to state law vaccines, medical mandates, medical procedures, medical practices, uh, etc. And this is extremely important because this is part of the crux of what we're what we're here today. I've redacted all of the names from the emails that I put out, but just creating a factual trail that uh employees can follow or anybody else can follow. On December the 27th, I sent the email to my colleagues and the city manager inquiring about a $97 test fee, uh and also about denials of religious and health exemptions. Uh and also a few other uh inequality issues when it comes to the departments, rules, policies, and what looks like federal abuse. The email was responded to on December the 28th. Uh, and just to read a uh insert to clarify some incorrect information in the email. The city is not requiring employees to pay $100. I never stated $100, I said 97 for tests in uh insulating any sort of weekly fee of employee. We simply are increasing the frequency of testing. Um go to the AR 33. AR33, the option will require that you sign a payroll deduction uh form and 97 dollars will be deducted from your paycheck. And the regional email that I sent to my colleagues, I said that I think there's potential red flags and that we're not getting transparent and honest information in the response email that you all got. It said that I was inaccurate in my information, yet the city sends out a policy that states this option will require that you sign a payroll deduction form, and $97 will be deducted from your paycheck. Third party acknowledgments. I'll put this in here.