Kansas City Council Business Session: Community Safety Facilities Update, September 3, 2026
Kansas City Council Business Session: Community Safety Facilities Update - September 3, 2026
This summary is based on the raw transcript; no agenda or minutes were provided. The main substantive item was a Community Safety update from the Department of Community Safety (DOCS), covering the temporary and permanent detention/rehabilitation center (DRC), the Community Resource Center (CRC), and public safety sales tax financing.
Consent Calendar
- The council approved the minutes of the August 13 business session by voice vote.
Discussion Items: Community Safety Update
System Overview
- Director Diana Knapp introduced the DOCS leadership team and described the proposed system as one of treatment and accountability, incorporating restorative justice and ending reliance on detention as a behavioral health backstop.
- Dr. Robin Timmy (Falcon Correctional and Community Services) said the system is for people at risk of or who have committed municipal ordinance violations, such as trespassing, domestic violence assault, and disorderly conduct; sentences are up to 180 days, reduced to 120 after good time. State crimes are handled by the county. The DRC and CRC are meant to work together across a continuum from deflection and diversion to in-custody treatment and re-entry.
Detention and Rehabilitation Center (DRC)
- Andy Pitts (Trainer) reported that the modular detention center at Front Street received its temporary occupancy permit; administrative offices are moving in and the permanent certificate of occupancy is pending. The impound/tow lot relocation is still being evaluated at several sites.
- The permanent DRC is being planned for 272 beds, compared with 136 in the modular facility. Prior studies projected 191-306 beds with a preferred long-term range of 250-306; facility capacity is considered full at 80%. The increase reflects higher-than-assumed female population and classification needs: female beds rise from 36 to 64.
- Design goals include restorative justice, no razor-wire perimeter, interior courtyards, natural light, and program spaces for counseling, workforce development, and education. Staffing is about 80% of operational cost, so efficiency is a design priority.
Community Resource Center (CRC)
- Sean Zotki (Multi-Studio/Perkins Eastman) said the CRC program is complete and includes crisis observation/stabilization, outpatient treatment, residential treatment, re-entry/resource services, and a community hub. The site is not yet selected; it should integrate with the neighborhood, connect to public transit, and be near the existing care network.
- He cited precedent savings: San Antonio saw $96 million in taxpayer savings over 10 years; Yavapai County saw about $1.2 million over five years; Miami-Dade is beginning a similar facility. The presenters' position was that care outside detention is substantially less expensive.
Finance and Public Safety Sales Tax
- The finance presenter said the one-quarter cent public safety sales tax approved in April 2025 generates about $25 million annually. FY27 budgeted expenditures are just under $25 million, including $7.5 million in one-time transfers to the general fund.
- Capital cost estimates currently include $201 million for the permanent DRC, $89.2 million for the CRC, $94 million for Central Patrol replacement, and $18.4 million for tow lot relocation. Annual debt service is $34.2 million, about $10 million more than annual tax revenue. Financing terms would be up to 19 years against the 20-year tax.
- Estimated future operating needs include $3.8 million for permanent jail operations, $2 million for maintenance reserve, $1.1 million for CRC operations, and $700,000 for radio site controller equipment.
- The five-year forecast shows a net surplus of about $75,000 in FY27 and about $9 million in FY28, but the finance presentation explicitly concluded that public safety sales tax revenues are insufficient to support debt service for all proposed capital projects plus additional operational expenditures. Options presented were prioritizing/adjusting scope, using other fund sources, or raising additional revenue.
Council Questions and Positions
- The mayor asked about the modular facility's opening and staffing. Director Knapp said she could not yet give a date; the first operational step would be taking over releases from KCPD after occupancy, and she was optimistic but cited hiring hurdles.
- Councilman Curls raised safety concerns from his facility tour, especially upper bunks without ladders. Staff acknowledged the risk for an older, higher-need population, said the permanent facility will have floor-level bunks, and that temporary fixes are limited. On staffing, Interim HR Director Caleb Swaite described incentive pay, Local 500 wage negotiations, and hiring above the minimum; the goal is full staffing.
- Councilman Bunch said the large group made it hard to hear and suggested quieter entry/signage options.
- Councilman O'Neill questioned why the council is being asked to consider a roughly $400 million program when only about $100 million of bond capacity is available, and urged staff to scale the vision to a manageable budget. Staff responded that these are policy choices and noted draws on the fund have grown since the tax was renewed.
- Councilwoman Patterson commended finance for stating clearly that revenues are insufficient and called for value engineering to reduce project costs and leave reserves for unforeseen needs.
- Councilwoman Robinson said the temporary modular facility does not meet restorative-justice or expected standards of care and expressed opposition to using it for its full lifecycle. She asked for a clear timeline for the permanent facility and said an ordinance/direction is needed to prioritize what was promised to voters. She emphasized the CRC is critical infrastructure, particularly for the 3rd District.
- Councilman Rogers said the $19.37 per hour starting wage makes hiring difficult and called for more competitive pay.
- Councilman Ray argued that council has already given direction through multiple resolutions, that the permanent facility is a top priority, and that staff should come back faster with a staffing plan. The mayor directed staff to return with what they need to hire and open the facility.
Key Outcomes
- The only formal action was approval of the August 13 minutes.
- No binding council decision was made on the DRC, CRC, Central Patrol, or tow lot relocation.
- Council members generally expressed the need to prioritize projects, value-engineer costs, and address staffing shortfalls before opening the modular facility.
- Staff was directed to provide an updated staffing/hiring plan and to identify what is needed to recruit and retain workers. The finance presentation will likely inform future budget and prioritization decisions.
Meeting Transcript
Okay. Welcome to business session. Our first item is approval of minutes from business session of August 13th. Is there a motion? Second. Moved and seconded the item be approved. All in favor any game by saying aye. All opposed. Motion passes. Community safety update. Come one, come all right. So that's right. Good afternoon, Honorable Mayor and Council Members. I am Diana Knapp, Director of the Department of Community Safety. With me in the council chamber today is Deputy Director Megan Case, Deputy Director Lucas Castalleja, Public Safety Task Force Director Joe Williamson, and our senior leadership team. Today you will hear from our consultants who have been working in collaboration to bring you an overview of the recommended system, and you will hear from our colleagues in finance regarding construction and operational costs and these planned initiatives for the Department of Community Safety. We are excited and enthusiastic to be here at this pivotal moment, creating a system of treatment and accountability that incorporates restorative justice principles and no longer relies on detention as a behavioral health backstop in the city. The Front Street Facility Project, which includes the standing up of an entire department, has proceeded with unprecedented progress. Over a few short weeks, we've been able to assemble an amazing, overwhelmingly qualified leadership team to a person. They joined this team because of their excitement about putting in place the system that you all envisioned. What an opportunity. First, you will hear from Dr. Timmy about the system we are building, the reasons why, and how the future DOCS supports a safer and healthier Kansas City. Then you will hear specifically about the detention rehabilitation center, the DRC, and its development in the design phase, followed by the Community Resource Center, CRC, which now has a completed architectural program and a team ready and eager to begin design. Finance will then provide cost information before we turn things over to Council for your questions. I now turn over to Dr. Robin Timmy. Thank you, Director Knapp. Honorable Mayor, members of council, City Manager Vasquez. My name is Dr. Robin Timmy with Falcon Correctional and Community Services. I'm a clinical psychologist, board certified in forensic psychology, and I've been working with a team of diligent experts for about the last 14 months, building a system, not just planning facility or facilities to expand access to care and break the cycle of recidivism for people who violate city ordinances. The integration between these two projects is unusual, but it's particularly meaningful because of the complementary nature of the projects to build a system that obviously streamlines public safety in Kansas City. We're always working toward making Kansas City a center of excellence. By thinking systemically, recognizing the unique needs of this population, envisioning a safer and healthy Kansas City through principles of restorative justice. The team has grown significantly as the city established a Department of Community Safety led by an executive team with unmatched credentials in modern approaches to public safety, an ACM, a director, deputy director is perfectly qualified for this innovative system. We always ground our understanding of the specific population we are discussing in who they are and what they need. These are people who are at risk of violating municipal ordinances, people who have violated municipal ordinances, and who repeatedly cycle through a system that has been relatively ineffective. State crimes, we must remember, including misdemeanors and felonies, processed through the state system, and detention services are provided at the county level. The most common ordinance violations that we see in the population include trespassing, domestic violence assault, and disorderly conduct, all under the jurisdiction of the municipal court with sentences up to 180 days, which become 120 after good time. Ordinance violations are not victimless. But what excites us is that in this population, we can identify the services people need to desist from these behaviors in the future, and those services can be provided at the least restrictive level, required to return people to the community safer and healthier than when they were arrested. And this is done through a continuum of treatment and accountability. A system that includes two facilities providing opportunities for prevention, deflection, diversion, in custody treatment and programs, and community reintegration and restoration. The community resource center provides community-based voluntary and out of custody screening, assessment, treatment, and community linkages, able to accept walk-in referrals, law enforcement assisted diversion, post-arrest diversion, and re-entry services for those whose clinical and social services are best addressed outside of a detention setting. And the detention and rehabilitation center provides a similar continuum of care and services, but in a secure and rehabilitative detention setting, optimizing the time a person spends separated from the general public and eliminating what we call dead time, creating individualized and restorative pathways that set people up for success. So when we take these facilities and we overlay them on what's known as the sequential intercept model, the throughput that reflects a person's journey across municipal systems of public health and public safety, we see how these facilities complement one another. Two components of one system. On the left side of your screen is where somebody may enter the justice system or be diverted from it. And so the police we spoke with want more options here.
openpublica.com