OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Kansas City, Missouri/City Council Business Session
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Kansas City Council Business Session: Building Code and Budget Forecast - October 22, 2026

City Council Business Session — Thursday, October 22, 2026
BodyKansas City, Missouri
SessionCity Council Business Session
DateThursday, October 22, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 21:23

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Welcome to today's business session.

0:03

First item is approved of minutes from business session on October 8th.

0:07

Is there a motion?

0:08

So I'll move.

0:10

We've moved to second.

0:10

All in favor indicated by saying aye.

0:12

Aye.

0:13

Aye.

0:13

All opposed.

0:14

Motion passes.

0:15

Now we will do uh building code process and recommendations been a long path.

0:21

ACM Binkley.

Speaker 2

0:22

Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.

0:24

Thank you for allowing us to come and talk with you today about ordinance 260137.

0:29

Um you all adopted this, um, guiding the city planning commission or city planning and development department um to proceed with chapter 18 amendments and the like.

0:38

Um with me today is um Uraimana Pali, um deputy director for city planning and development, and to my right, your left is Heath Perkins, deputy building official.

0:47

Um they have been the um gentlemen who have kind of taken the um helm on this and uh move this forward.

0:54

So they'll give you a short presentation.

0:55

I will note you have a very thick packet in front of you.

0:58

Don't worry, we're not going through all of it.

Speaker 3

0:59

We're only gonna hit

Speaker 2

1:01

about eight slides, okay?

1:02

But the rest of it's there for your um edification and um at your leisure, especially if you can't sleep tonight.

1:08

So okay.

Speaker 4

1:10

Mayor and city council members, good afternoon.

1:12

Uh with city planning and development.

1:15

Um the ordinance uh when it was passed in February, there were a few major objectives that was outlined in the uh ordinance.

1:24

The first one was to review the whole 2024 2024 package and then do a comprehensive robust engagement.

1:34

Uh I think this was some of the lessons learned from the previous engagement process, and then come back to you all uh with recommendations within nine months.

1:45

There were other two things which were asked us for to be for consideration.

1:49

One is to make sure we have regional competitiveness throughout, and once the code is adopted, have a process for training the staff.

2:00

So the first thing which we did was we looked around 13 jurisdictions around Kansas City, and most of those jurisdictions are currently in 2012 or 2018 code, and they are moving towards the 2024 code.

2:17

Uh having said that, most of them have deferred the energy code provisions, or they have made some amendments to the energy code instead of completely adopting it as is as defined in 2024.

2:36

So these two slides provide a summary of each jurisdiction and where they are on the adoption process.

2:42

A public engagement had been a key in this uh whole engage um in this whole adoption process.

2:49

So what we did was we had three initial meetings, one at NNI, the other one was at Mohat Center, the third one was at South Patrol.

2:59

During these three meetings, we presented to the public all the amendments which we are proposing.

3:05

In addition to that, uh I would like to give a shout out to our neighborhoods department who helped us go for the outreach program, and then we were able to meet the HBA, AGC, and other agencies, either via teams, face-to-face meetings, or whenever they required us to have a conversation.

3:25

So we took all the recommendations from all these agencies as well as our in-house subject matter experts, and then we had a final meeting at NNI where we presented these are the amendments that we are going to propose to city council for adoption.

3:42

Um there were still some recommendations provided after that, and then we did include them in our recommendations.

3:49

So if you look at a high-level recommendation summary of the entire code, what we are saying is we are requesting to adopt the 2024 code with amendments, and Heath will talk a little bit about the amendments.

4:03

Um we also wanted to make sure we always talk about affordability and attainability of housing, so we took that into consideration, and it aligns with our citywide business goals of housing.

4:17

So we have uh more options when the houses are smaller in size, which is 2500 square foot.

4:25

Um, what we have done is we have made some modifications to the energy code, even if the houses are bigger.

4:33

And finally, we are pre-adopting the 2027 single stair four-story, which will help us with apartment buildings more uh and reduce the cost of construction.

4:45

I'll pass it over to Heath.

Speaker 5

4:49

Good afternoon, Council and Mayor.

4:51

Um, as we look at this pretty busy slide, I'll start on the left and then we'll go to the chart.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Some of the recommendations to try to make housing a little bit cheaper on the energy code side was to try to provide some easily reduced elements.

Speaker 5

5:07

One of the items that we did was is we took there's four, there's three main sections of the code on talking with energy compliance.

5:15

There's a prescriptive path, which is kind of cookie cutter.

5:18

You go to the code, follow this chart, you're complying.

5:22

There's total building performance, which is the building, the section that's most used, which uh use software and get a score, typically a HERS score.

5:29

And then the third version is another software method that gives you an ERI score.

5:34

So on the prescriptive side, we reduced the uh the code from the uh what's in the 24 for uh vertical walls um and what was in the 21 that we're currently in, we reduced it down to R15.

5:50

Um before that was an R30 or a combination of insulation in the wall or and exterior insulation, which typically required you to go to a thicker uh uh a bigger stud, which caused raised cost of construction.

6:04

So our proposal was to do R15, um, which is what you can get the most you can get of conventional insulation in a standard size stud wall to make it easier for the builders to maintain their stud sizes.

6:17

Um we did provide an option that if you used R19 in foam, which is a slightly higher cost, but between that and insulating with some foam in the attic, you'd be able to get out of blower door testing of the house.

6:29

So while the insulation itself costs a little bit more, the overall cost should be negligible a difference because you're getting out of testing.

6:36

Um that was our changes for the prescriptive side.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████40%
Public Engagement██████████11%
Summary of Proceedings

Kansas City Council Business Session: Building Code and Budget Forecast - October 22, 2026

The Kansas City, Missouri City Council convened on October 22, 2026, for a business session. Council members approved the October 8 business session minutes, heard staff recommendations on the 2024 building code adoption process under Ordinance 260137, and received the citywide business plan and five-year forecast. The meeting then moved toward legislative session.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved, by unanimous voice vote, the minutes of the October 8, 2026 business session.

Building Code Process and Recommendations (Ordinance 260137)

  • City staff, including ACM Binkley, Deputy Director Uraimana Pali, and Deputy Building Official Heath Perkins, presented on Ordinance 260137, adopted in February 2026, which directed City Planning and Development to review the 2024 building code package with robust public engagement and return recommendations within nine months.
  • Staff reviewed 13 jurisdictions around Kansas City; most are currently on 2012 or 2018 codes and moving toward 2024, with many deferring or amending energy code provisions.
  • Engagement included three initial public meetings at NNI, Mohat Center, and South Patrol, outreach through the Neighborhoods Department, meetings with HBA, AGC, and other agencies, and a final meeting at NNI where proposed amendments were shared.
  • Staff recommended adopting the 2024 code with amendments to support housing affordability and attainability, including options for houses smaller than 2,500 square feet, energy code modifications, and pre-adoption of the 2027 single-stair, four-story apartment provisions.

Energy-specific recommendations:

  • On the prescriptive energy path, staff proposed reducing wall insulation to R15 to allow conventional insulation in standard stud walls; an R19 and foam option could avoid blower door testing.
  • Added an exception for homes under 2,500 square feet of conditioned space, allowing a straight HERS score of 70 or less, consistent with Kansas state law for homes under 2,500 square feet and previous city amendments.
  • Maximum Energy Rating Index set at HERS 70 for homes under 2,500 square feet and 63 for homes over 2,500 square feet, up from 54 in the 2024 code; lower scores are more efficient but costlier to build.
  • An electrical amendment would eliminate kitchen island outlet requirements for small homes to reduce costs.

Commercial and trade recommendations:

  • Introduce a commercial contractor license, a requirement staff said Kansas City is the only big city in the metro lacking.
  • Clarify exterior wall projection definitions, create a process for common walls on shared properties, and adopt 2027 IBC exit requirements allowing four-story single-stair apartment buildings instead of three.
  • Switch plumbing code from the Uniform Plumbing Code toward the International Plumbing Code using IPC/UPC combination amendments.
  • Modify International Mechanical Code sections to align with state boiler law, adding an exception for state compliance; amend commercial electrical code for kitchen outlet clarity.
  • No council questions were recorded on this item.

Citywide Business Plan and Five-Year Forecast

  • Finance Director Bretton Siverley and Deputy Director Teresa Danielson presented the citywide business plan, required by charter to be adopted by November 1, and the five-year forecast.
  • The forecast includes Resolution 26086, adopted earlier that week, limiting debt service paid for public safety sales tax initiatives and saving about $5 million.
  • The general fund operating deficit is projected at $140.8 million for FY28, including $21 million in support for the public mass transportation fund, primarily with one-time sources, and $6.4 million for the street maintenance fund, maintaining an additional $6 million per year for resurfacing.

Revenue assumptions:

  • FY26 earnings tax collections came in below budget, revising FY27 estimates down by an estimated $10 million; a 3% growth rate is projected over the forecast.
  • Local use tax revenue includes a $12.7 million refund to the state in FY27 for prior-year exempt purchases, with 6.4% moderate growth projected.
  • FY27 service charges include $14 million in new Medicaid reimbursement for ground emergency medical transportation (GEMT).

Expenditure assumptions:

  • Wages assumed at 3% annually; FY28 includes a 27th pay period for all except police at an estimated $9 million cost.
  • Pension costs forecast at 12.5%; health care at 5.5% in FY28 and 5.25% thereafter.
  • Personnel costs make up 70% of general fund expenditures.
  • Transfers to special revenue funds rise from $12.1 million to $67.6 million by FY32 because those funds face inflationary pressure and rely on the general fund.
  • FY26 is the first operating deficit since FY21.
  • Fund balance is projected at 24.7% in FY27 against the 25% target, then below target from FY28 through FY32.

Councilman Duncan asked about the story behind the revenue changes. The finance director explained that earnings tax collections were slightly below estimates, use tax was reduced by a state refund plus an artificially inflated prior-year base, and GEMT reimbursement was an additional positive: the state now allows Medicaid managed-care reimbursement, adding $14 million to the existing roughly $8 million GEMT revenue.

Discussion of Ordinances, Resolutions, and Communications

  • The final agenda item was discussion of ordinances, resolutions, and communications for floor introduction. The mayor stated the hearing would stand adjourned to legislative session; a brief exchange indicated time constraints, with one speaker noting 20 minutes remained.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the October 8, 2026 business session minutes unanimously.
  • Received and discussed the building code recommendations and five-year forecast; no formal vote was recorded on either presentation.
  • The business plan and forecast will guide the submitted budget due in February 2027.
  • The meeting moved to adjourn to legislative session after the final agenda item was announced.

Meeting Transcript

Welcome to today's business session. First item is approved of minutes from business session on October 8th. Is there a motion? So I'll move. We've moved to second. All in favor indicated by saying aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed. Motion passes. Now we will do uh building code process and recommendations been a long path. ACM Binkley. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. Thank you for allowing us to come and talk with you today about ordinance 260137. Um you all adopted this, um, guiding the city planning commission or city planning and development department um to proceed with chapter 18 amendments and the like. Um with me today is um Uraimana Pali, um deputy director for city planning and development, and to my right, your left is Heath Perkins, deputy building official. Um they have been the um gentlemen who have kind of taken the um helm on this and uh move this forward. So they'll give you a short presentation. I will note you have a very thick packet in front of you. Don't worry, we're not going through all of it. We're only gonna hit about eight slides, okay? But the rest of it's there for your um edification and um at your leisure, especially if you can't sleep tonight. So okay. Mayor and city council members, good afternoon. Uh with city planning and development. Um the ordinance uh when it was passed in February, there were a few major objectives that was outlined in the uh ordinance. The first one was to review the whole 2024 2024 package and then do a comprehensive robust engagement. Uh I think this was some of the lessons learned from the previous engagement process, and then come back to you all uh with recommendations within nine months. There were other two things which were asked us for to be for consideration. One is to make sure we have regional competitiveness throughout, and once the code is adopted, have a process for training the staff. So the first thing which we did was we looked around 13 jurisdictions around Kansas City, and most of those jurisdictions are currently in 2012 or 2018 code, and they are moving towards the 2024 code. Uh having said that, most of them have deferred the energy code provisions, or they have made some amendments to the energy code instead of completely adopting it as is as defined in 2024. So these two slides provide a summary of each jurisdiction and where they are on the adoption process. A public engagement had been a key in this uh whole engage um in this whole adoption process. So what we did was we had three initial meetings, one at NNI, the other one was at Mohat Center, the third one was at South Patrol. During these three meetings, we presented to the public all the amendments which we are proposing. In addition to that, uh I would like to give a shout out to our neighborhoods department who helped us go for the outreach program, and then we were able to meet the HBA, AGC, and other agencies, either via teams, face-to-face meetings, or whenever they required us to have a conversation. So we took all the recommendations from all these agencies as well as our in-house subject matter experts, and then we had a final meeting at NNI where we presented these are the amendments that we are going to propose to city council for adoption. Um there were still some recommendations provided after that, and then we did include them in our recommendations. So if you look at a high-level recommendation summary of the entire code, what we are saying is we are requesting to adopt the 2024 code with amendments, and Heath will talk a little bit about the amendments. Um we also wanted to make sure we always talk about affordability and attainability of housing, so we took that into consideration, and it aligns with our citywide business goals of housing. So we have uh more options when the houses are smaller in size, which is 2500 square foot. Um, what we have done is we have made some modifications to the energy code, even if the houses are bigger. And finally, we are pre-adopting the 2027 single stair four-story, which will help us with apartment buildings more uh and reduce the cost of construction. I'll pass it over to Heath. Good afternoon, Council and Mayor. Um, as we look at this pretty busy slide, I'll start on the left and then we'll go to the chart. Some of the recommendations to try to make housing a little bit cheaper on the energy code side was to try to provide some easily reduced elements. One of the items that we did was is we took there's four, there's three main sections of the code on talking with energy compliance.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com