Kearney City Council Meeting – November 28, 2023
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Kearney City Council Meeting – November 28, 2023
The Kearney City Council met on November 28, 2023 at 5:30 p.m. in City Council Chambers. The meeting covered a consent agenda, a public hearing and vote on a weapons signage resolution, approval of a bond for lead service line replacement, and an open account claim to NPPD.
Consent Calendar
- Approved minutes of the November 14, 2023 regular meeting.
- Approved the claims.
- Received Planning Commission recommendations and set December 12, 2023 as the hearing date for applicable applications.
- Adopted Resolution No. 2023-166 (First Amendment to Communications Site Option and Land Lease Agreement with Verizon Wireless).
- Adopted Resolution No. 2023-167 (amending CentralSquare Solutions Agreement for KPD mobile subscriptions).
- Approved a residential utility connection agreement for 5530 East Saddlehorse Drive (Resolution No. 2023-168).
- Adopted Resolution No. 2023-169 (approving Payment No. 15 for WWTP Phase II Improvements in the amount of $1,367,498.84).
- Approved the purchase of a 2024 Ford F-350 for the Utilities Department for $54,887.10.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Joe Maul (25250 115th Road, Kearney) argued that "gun-free zone" signs invite mass shooters and urged the council to rescind the resolution, stating that armed citizens are the best defense. He noted that law enforcement is not present during most building hours.
- Kirby Wilson (2116 N Avenue, Kearney) asserted that signs only disarm law-abiding citizens and that the city should uphold the Second Amendment on all city-owned property.
- Trent Luce (Hazard, NE) spoke as a member of the Nebraska Capitol Commission, noting that the state capitol does not restrict firearms and that the council should follow that example.
- James Clark (19 Hillcrest Drive, Kearney) criticized the original resolution as overly broad, mentioning potential Fourth Amendment violations, and called for rescission.
- Dan Moose (11315 355th Road, Amherst, NE) questioned the necessity of the resolution, stating that the city already had a policy and that the new resolution appeared to expand restrictions.
- Randy Bendorf (121 18 South 51st) claimed that nearly all mass shootings since 1950 occurred in gun-free zones, arguing that the signs are ineffective.
- Travis Couture (NRA representative, formerly of Kansas legislature) recommended that if the city restricts firearms, it should provide armed security and metal detectors, citing Kansas' Public Building Security Act.
- Joshua Sykes (3611 Avenue G, Kearney) asked the council to rescind the resolution, arguing it does not stop criminals and prevents law-abiding citizens from defending themselves.
- Jasmine (last name not given) urged rescission, stating that the city should uphold the Constitution.
- Dustin Bailey (1208 West 50th Street, Kearney) framed gun rights as women's rights and asked for rescission.
- Don (last name not given, 117 East 52nd Street) expressed concern that the city was following Omaha and Lincoln's lead, which he saw as threatening individual rights.
- Doug Dutter (7025 West 85th Street, Kearney) worried that the original resolution could be used to expand restrictions in the future without public input, but acknowledged that the amendment would require separate council action.
- Milton Wood (1503 East 16th Street) argued that the federal Second Amendment already guarantees the right to carry, making the city's signage redundant.
- Susie Wilkinson (no address given) stated that posting signs makes children and grandchildren less safe by inviting attackers.
- Calvin Pemberton (Beaver City, NE) said the overwhelming majority of attendees wanted rescission, not amendment.
- Rod Swanson (2820 West 44th Street) questioned why the city needed to change a policy that had been working for 10 years.
- Ben Bergland (Gibbon, NE) criticized the city for imitating Omaha and Lincoln and urged rescission.
- Bill Hoffman (906 17th Avenue, Kearney), a former law enforcement officer at Columbine, stated that gun-free zones invite attacks and that the previous policy should remain unchanged.
- Bob Lewis (2900 Grand Avenue) recounted a story from Los Angeles where armed police presence stopped school shootings and argued that signs are ineffective.
- Doug Kramer (4639 Park Lane Drive) asked the council to rescind the resolution and let the state legislature clarify the law.
- John Kicker (3410 I Avenue) compared the signs to ineffective drug-free zone signs at schools.
Discussion Items
- Weapons Signage Resolution (Regular Agenda Item 1): City Attorney Michael Ty and Police Chief Brian Waugh explained that the original resolution (2023-149) passed on October 10, 2023 was intended to reaffirm the city's long-standing policy of restricting firearms in publicly accessible city buildings, but language was overly broad. The proposed amendment (2023-149A) narrowed the policy to specific buildings with conspicuous posting, including City Hall, the Sportsplex, and the Yanney Pavilion. Councilmember Tami James Moore acknowledged that the original wording caused confusion and concern, and she expressed support for rescinding the entire policy. Several council members noted that the state law (LB 77) had not changed the city's authority to post buildings, but they felt the issue should be left to the state legislature. After extensive public comment, Councilmember Nikilla (Mayor) made a motion to deny Resolution 2023-149A and rescind the original Resolution 2023-149. The motion was seconded and passed.
- Lead Service Line Replacement Bond (Regular Agenda Item 2): City Engineer Chris Miller presented Ordinance No. 8656, authorizing a $4,066,550 combined utilities revenue bond from the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy (NDEE) to replace lead and galvanized service lines. The loan has a 0% interest rate over 30 years, with approximately $2.5 million in loan forgiveness (grant) and an additional $406,655 for staff time. The city plan is voluntary for homeowners and will be phased over five years, starting with 200 services in a central area. The program is driven by new federal regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Council members asked about the scope, cost, and homeowner consent. The ordinance was approved unanimously.
- Open Account Claim to NPPD (Regular Agenda Item 3): The council considered a claim of $88,428.40 from Nebraska Public Power District. The claim was approved with one abstention (Mayor Nikkila abstained).
Key Outcomes
- Weapons Signage Policy: The council voted 3-2 to deny Resolution 2023-149A and rescind Resolution 2023-149, effectively removing the city's policy of posting gun-free zone signs on city buildings. The vote was: Mayor Nikkila (yes), Councilmember Moore (yes), Councilmember Kotsiopulos (yes), Councilmember Buschkoetter (no), Councilmember Schmidt (no). This means no city-imposed restriction beyond state law, which already prohibits firearms in certain locations (e.g., courtrooms, law enforcement centers, during council meetings).
- Lead Service Line Bond: Ordinance No. 8656 was passed and published as required by law, authorizing the $4,066,550 bond and related agreements. The vote was unanimous (5-0).
- Open Account Claim: The claim to NPPD for $88,428.40 was approved (3-1-1, with Mayor Nikkila abstaining, and the remaining four voting aye).
Meeting Transcript
You ready? Well, good evening, everyone, and welcome to our uh city council meeting for November the 28th. Uh if you would rise, we'll have uh a moment of silence and then we'll have a pledge of allegiance. Okay, thank you. I please do the flag of the United States of America and to the Republican undergo any visible with liberty. In accordance with section 84, 1412 of the Nebraska revised statutes a current copy of the open meetings act is available for you as posted on the wall. The council chambers uh pay you would take roll, please. Mayor Klaus Cutter here Nicola Moore here. Okay, we have no oral communications and no unfinished business and uh no public hearings. So we move right into consent agenda items one through eight and any item on the consent agenda made by the request of any council member because there's a separate item. Are there any items in council need to be removed for consideration? Okay, do we have a motion? I move to approve items one through eight of the consent agenda. Second. Nicola, more aye, Bush Cutter. Okay, thank you. And we have no consent agenda ordinances, so move right into regular agenda item one, and that pertains to the adoption of resolution number one 2023-149A, amending resolution one uh 2023-149 regarding the placement of conspicuously placed signage on publicly accessed city buildings pertaining to the carrying of weapons. Um this is not a public hearing, however, council members, and we will receive public input on this. Uh but first we'll have uh uh city attorney Mike Ty and Chief Wah, they'll uh have some discussion, and then afterwards, uh if we have speakers that would like to come to the podium, uh provide your name, uh address, and then uh we'll have three minutes uh so we can have it kind of controlled a little bit, and then uh Peggy will have a flag, so when you get close, it's kind of like the old Toastmasters thing, uh, when we're getting close to three minutes. Um, but uh we'll address some of that again after um uh Mike Ty and Chief Wah uh address the council and the crowd. So Mike. Mayor, members of council, uh Michael Ty, City Attorney, 1419 Central Avenue. You'll have to unlock your device first. As the mayor has indicated, um I I was gonna start you off with uh uh just a framework, some background, um, and uh answer questions, and then I do believe that uh Chief Waugh um is gonna speak after me. Um as you uh know the city of Carney has had a policy um of limiting uh firearms in publicly accessible buildings, some of our publicly accessible buildings since 2013. Um and that has been in place without any issues or incidences since that time. Um as you also know that uh in the last uh session of the unicameral there were a number of modifications that were made to um state statutes relating to firearms, and as a result of that, the uh Nebraska Attorney General Um actually created a memorandum that was um then sent to all law enforcement agencies and county attorneys in the state of Nebraska and outlined many of those changes um and the legal authority for um certain aspects of of firearm law in Nebraska. Um as a result of of receiving that uh the chief and I had a conversation and um that that's where we came with uh a policy to essentially confirm what uh what the city has been doing and also um looking at other buildings that that we anticipate will be coming online um in the fairly near future. The what I guess I would be referring to would be the pavilion and the sports plex. Um and and so that that's the source of uh uh what has occurred as you know a policy was presented to you uh at your October 10th meeting, and that was was uh approved. Um, but but subsequent to that we've had questions from the mayor as well as a number of citizens as to whether or not that policy was perhaps too broad and potentially confusing, and of course, there are some citizens that wouldn't want you to have a policy at all, would want you to rescind it completely. And so city staff then prepared the amendment that's before you tonight which narrows the focus to publicly accessible buildings where it is conspicuously posted. Um just for a little more framework on the statutory authority for what we're talking about, and I know this is in your your council memo. It's actually it's been both in both of your council memos, but um Nebraska revised statute section 281202.01 subparent five specifically indicates that person or persons, entities or entities that are in control of a place or premises, or or an employer in control of a place or of business, can prohibit the carrying of concealed handguns into their premises so long as they post a conspicuous notice that they are they are barred or banned, and representatives of those individuals can also indicate that that's the policy with either their place of business or premises. So that's the source of the authority that uh we've been talking about when we've been uh presenting these potential policies. Also of note in the same statutory section, just so people are aware, there's a list of places where guns are not allowed. And this is even without posting, they're just simply not allowed. And I I wanted to go through that for you just so you have some idea of some of those places as are listed in in state law. Um, and those those include police, sheriff, or Nebraska State Patrol stations or offices. It includes detention facilities, prisons, or jails. It includes courtrooms or buildings that contain a courtroom, so a courthouse. Um it includes a polling place during a bona fide election. Um it includes and again, these are where firearms are banned. It includes me the meeting of the governing body of a county, public school district, municipality, or other political subdivision. So the meeting place while the meeting is happening, it is it is barred at that location. But if that meeting is not occurring, would not necessarily continue for that location. Um it's also barred for a meeting of the legislature or a committee of the legislature, a financial institution, so banks, um, professional or semi-professional athletic events, um, buildings, grounds, vehicles, or sponsored activities for an athletic event of any public, private, denominational or parochial elementary or secondary school, um, and the thing to to note about that is um so basically school athletic activities or school-sponsored activities, with our of note for our sports plex. Um we may have some of those those age young people who are participating in activities at the sportsplex, but it's likely many of those activities will not be school sponsored. There'll be a travel league or a uh a travel team having a uh a tournament. So that exclusion that doesn't necessarily carry over to the sportsplex, okay, because it requires that it be a sponsored activity of a school or parochial school.
openpublica.com