Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting – February 10, 2025
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting – February 10, 2025
The Planning and Zoning Commission met on February 10, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. in the Utility Collections Large Conference Room. All commissioners were present except Commissioner Sabree. The workshop preceding the regular meeting discussed agenda items and staff updates on City Council actions. The regular meeting addressed two public hearings: a proposed amendment to the Preserve at Thousand Oaks PUD to allow a foster-care facility (tabled due to notification error), and a rezoning request for duplex development (approved 4-2).
Consent Calendar
- CA-1: Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of January 27, 2025 – Approved unanimously.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Citizen Comment (General): No speakers signed up.
- Public Hearing PH-1 (Amend PUD for Garden of Hope):
- Applicant’s Representative (Craig Langford, Flint Rock Builders): Expressed support, stating the commercial tract (10.67 acres) is largely floodplain and has limited commercial value; the proposed use (a foster-care facility) serves a community need; staff’s recommendation of denial was a surprise received just before the meeting.
- End User (Tina, Garden of Hope): Described the facility as a 501(c)(3) residential facility for foster children, also providing therapy, a resource center serving ~800 Bell County residents annually, and donation drop-off; noted the organization previously operated in B5 zoning and was forced to relocate; argued the use is more business-oriented (75% non-residential) and not a typical group home.
- Public Hearing PH-2 (Rezone 10.36 acres from R1 to R2 for duplexes):
- Applicant (Gary W. Purser Jr.): Spoke in favor, stating the property is in a residential mix future land use area; argued that the surrounding county-standard subdivisions (built 40 years ago) are not comparable because they lack city infrastructure such as curb/gutter and asphalt; explained he initially sought R1 to expedite the process but planned to request R2 later; noted his builders prefer duplexes separated from single-family homes.
- Other Public Speaker (also Gary Purser Jr., but on PH-1): Expressed support for the foster-care facility, noting that the 90 acres of open space already given is substantial and that commercial development on that tract has not attracted interest for years.
Discussion Items
- PH-1 (Case Z25-01) – Preserve at Thousand Oaks PUD Amendment:
- Staff presented that the request to rezone 10.67 acres from B5 (Business) to R3A (Multi-Family) would eliminate the only commercial area in the PUD, contradicting the mixed-use vision of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. No written public responses were received. Staff recommended disapproval.
- During discussion, a commissioner noted that ~70% of the tract is in a flood hazard area, leaving only ~3.2 developable acres. Another asked if the applicant could relocate the facility and keep commercial elsewhere; the applicant’s representative said that is not feasible because the B5 tract is “throwaway land.”
- Assistant City Attorney Wallander alerted the commission that the public notification was sent only to property owners within 400 feet of the B5 tract rather than the entire PUD, as required for a PUD amendment. He recommended postponing action to re-notify properly. Commissioners agreed to hold the public hearing but table the item.
- PH-2 (Case Z25-02) – Rezone from R1 to R2:
- Staff reported the 10.36 acres are in the controlled growth sector; the request is consistent with the comprehensive plan but inconsistent with the rural character of surrounding large-lot, estate-style homes. One written response was received in support. Staff recommended disapproval.
- Commissioner Ellis recused himself (no reason stated in the record). Discussion focused on the applicant’s argument that the area is outdated county development not representative of current city standards. Commissioners expressed concern about the sequential zoning from agricultural to R1 to R2 and the neighborhood character.
- A motion to disapprove was made and seconded; the motion failed (2-4). A subsequent motion to approve was made and seconded; the motion passed (4-2).
Key Outcomes
- PH-1: The public hearing was held. A motion to table the item to the February 24, 2025 meeting (to allow proper notification to the entire PUD) carried unanimously.
- PH-2: Approved (4-2). The rezoning from R1 (Single-Family Residential) to R2 (Two-Family Residential) is granted, allowing development of approximately 22 duplex lots on 10.36 acres at the northwest intersection of Wells Fargo Drive and Turkey Trot Road. Fees in lieu of parkland dedication ($33,000) and parkland development fees ($19,800) will be required.
- Next Meeting: Scheduled for February 24, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.
Meeting Transcript
I will call to order the uh regular planning and zoning commission meeting for February tenth, two thousand twenty-five. Let the record show that all commissioners are present except uh Commissioner Sabree. First item on the agenda is the approval of the agenda. Chairman will move to approve the agenda. I have a motion to approve the agenda, have a second by Commissioner Rowe. Any discussion? All in favor. Motion passes unanimously. Uh next item is citizens' comments. Did anyone sign up for citizens' comments? Seeing none, now move to the next item, CA one consider the minutes of the regular planning zoning commission meeting of January twenty-seventh, two thousand and twenty-five. I have a motion on that. I have a motion by uh Commissioner uh Wilson to approve CA one. Second by Commissioner Giacomozy. Any discussion? All in favor. Motion passes unanimously. Next item on the agenda is PH one. Hold a public hearing and consider a request submitted by Republican Engineering and Development Services on behalf of DSY land company LP case number Z twenty-five-zero one to amend the preserve at a thousand oaks Plan Unit development being approximately three hundred and ninety point seven two acres out of the MJ Pleasant survey abstract number six twenty-five and s d Caruther survey abstract number one seven seven by amending the underlying zoning of approximately ten point six acres from B five business district to R three A multifamily apartment residential district. So case twenty-five oh one amendment to the PUD from B five with a PUD to R3A with a PUD. So the subject property is generally located southwest of the intersection of Stagecoach Road and East Tremere Road in Clean, Texas. If approved, the applicant intends to develop the property into a residential group home for children in foster care known as Garden of Hope. The proposed use is permitted by right in R3A multifamily apartment apartment residential district. The proposed group home facility will provide 24 hour care for children in foster care. In addition, the residential group home aspect, the facility will also include a donation drop-off location, commercial kitchen facilities, nursing facilities, and office and administrative facilities. So here's the location map giving you approximate location on the intersection of East Tremere and Stagecoach Road. This is an aerial view showing the approximate boundary of the rezone with the Mickeys across the street, Mobile Home Park to the north of that, and Spanish Oaks to the south. So this is a view facing west from the intersection of East Tremere and Stagecoach Road looking towards the property. View facing east from the intersection of East Tremere and Stagecoach Road. And a view facing south down East Tremere towards Chaparrell. And a view facing to the north from the intersection of East Tremere and Stagecoach. So the subject property is located in the intended growth sector on the growth sector map and residential mix on the future land use map. So residential mix encourages 25% non-residential, 95% residential use mix. So the property is located in development zone number eight. It consists of approximately 60% residential and 39% commercial uses. And staff finds that the applicant's request to amend the underlying zoning from B5 to R3A multifamily apartment residential district is not consistent with the recommendations in the Kaleen 2040 comprehensive plan. So when the PUD was approved in August of 2022, the preserve at 1,000 Oaks was envisioned as a mixed use development, which included residential and commercial uses. The subject property is the only area in the preserve at 1,000 oaks designated for commercial use. If approved, the proposed amendment would eliminate the opportunity for neighborhood commercial uses within the development, and approval of this request would also severely limit the opportunity to provide neighborhood scale commercial uses within walking distance for the residences in the general area. So water services are available to the property through a 16-inch water line, a water main located on the south side of Stagecoach Road. Wastewater services are available with a 15-inch wastewater interceptor located in an existing easement on the west side of the property. So access to the property is via Stagecoach to the north and East Tremere to the east. Both streets border the eastern edge of the property. Stagecoach is a 100-foot wide minor arterial and East Tremere is a 90-foot wide minor arterial. A traffic impact analysis is not required for the proposed development, but it is advisable to recheck the results of this analysis if any assumptions change. So the property is within Stillhouse Lake and Lampassus River watershed. The property is inundated in zone AE, area of the special flood hazard, and portions of the property contain a freshwater pond and freshwater emergent wetland and a river reen area, Embers Creek, as identified on the National Wetlands Inventory maps. So approximately approximately 90 acres of park open space is proposed with the plan unit development, and the proposed PUD amendment does not contemplate any changes to the open space that was stipulated with the approval of the original PUD. So staff notified 27 surrounding property owners regarding this request. Of those property owners notified, 14 reside outside the 200-foot notification boundary required by state, but within the 400-foot notification boundary required by city council, and eight people reside outside the city of Killeen.
openpublica.com