On October 17, 2023, the Kirkland City Council convened for a study session at 5:30 p.m. and a regular meeting at 7:30 p.m. The study session focused on the Universal Low-Income Program and Capital Improvement Program updates. The regular meeting included public comments, a special presentation, consent calendar approval, and business items on the Houghton Park and Ride acquisition, zoning code amendments, purchasing code amendments, and the 2024 state legislative agenda. The meeting adjourned at 9:21 p.m.
1. Potential Acquisition of Houghton Park and Ride
2. Kirkland Zoning Code Amendments (Ordinance O-4860)
3. Purchasing Code Amendments (Ordinance O-4861)
4. Proposed Draft 2024 State Legislative Agenda
Thank you. I'd like to call to order the city council meeting of October the 17th, 2023. Tonight's meeting is a hybrid. Community members are welcome to join us either in person or remotely through Zoom or by telephone. Clerk, will you please call the roll? Council Member Nixon? Here. Council Member Black. Here. Council Member Curtis. Here. Council Member Cohen. Here. Council Member Pascal. Here. Deputy Mayor Arnold. Here. Mayor Sweet. Here. Thank you very much. Our study session tonight is on two topics. The first is a universal low income program update. And the second is a capital improvement program update. We expect to convene our regular meeting at approximately 7 30 p.m. City Manager. Okay. Thank you, Benar. So the first topic, the Universal Low Income Program Update, is a continuation of conversations we've been having since the council retreat. Here to give you the overview of that as our financial planning manager, George Dugdale and our senior financial analyst Andrea Peterman. Welcome, George. Thank you. Just share the screen. Okay, good evening, Mayor, Council members. And we're excited to be here this evening to talk to you about the developments for the Universal Low Income Program that we've been working on for the last month, a few months since the May study session. We have 12 slides for you this evening as we walk through the current developments. And as the city manager said, I'm here as well as Andrea Peterman, and then we also have a number of staff members who are available for questions on specific parts of the effort because it really has been a cross-departmental team that's put this together. So as a bit of background, um, as a reminder for council, during the 2023-2024 budget process, we um apologies. Uh we added a service package for $680,000, which was a mixture of general fund and utility funding to provide a universal low-income relief program. The idea was to expand the current program that we have in the utilities, which uh serves senior um residents over 62 and those on um social security disability to include all residents who are low income, as well as um to expand beyond just the utilities. This was partly driven by vehicle license fees and some of the new fees and increases that we were seeing. Um, as being the the customer has to be the bill holder, and that would exclude about 96% of the participants that we uh were able to give utility relief to through our ARPA program as well as our rental assistance for ARPA program. And then as a function of the first issue, um, as I've said, the program is underutilized currently. So at the May retreat, staff proposed um a way of calculating or proposed that we would calculate standard rebate amounts for low-income residents in lieu or as an estimate of their cost of utilities for those living in multi-family buildings. So at the May retreat, we received um excellent feedback from council. Um broadly, I would think the the feedback was supportive of the notion of the program, both of expanding the eligibility of the utility program and of adding in other fees to the program. Um there were some concerns uh mentioned around the both the what we could call the frequency or the kind of delay. Um, the idea of rebates versus a discount creates a natural delay between when the cost is incurred by the resident and when the city is able to provide relief. Also a desire to ensure that language and technology barriers to access are addressed, and this was described both ways that we were able to provide online access as well as provide paper forms, language translation and other services that we know people help people access programs in general. And then council definitely expressed an interest in identifying other fee discounts. The other thing that's not here on the slide, but that I will identify is that council agreed with staff and were definitely supportive of the idea of ensuring that the program got going and that we were able to get some relief to some people while we continue to develop it.