OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting - April 14, 2026

Common Council & CommitteesThursday, April 16, 2026
BodyLa Crosse, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council & Committees
DateThursday, April 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:20:27

Transcript — Verbatim
0:14

I got to the place under the bridge.

0:20

Blocking entry to the well, I guess I could have gone through it, but it wouldn't be theme.

0:26

So I just kind of hung out and watched it.

0:53

Yeah.

1:36

Thanks for everyone joining us online.

1:51

Well, welcome everyone.

1:53

Thank you for joining us for the Tuesday, April 14th, 2026 meeting for the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee.

2:01

We have all members present either in person or online.

2:06

Except Officer Hughes, who is excused.

2:12

The first item of business is the approval of our minutes for March 10th, 2026.

2:17

Maybe for a motion to approve those units.

2:26

Second, also second by Robbie.

2:29

Any corrections or modifications to the minutes.

2:45

No minutes are approved.

2:47

Thank you.

3:26

I think that's a great idea.

3:32

Let's say she I can screen share.

3:39

Oh yeah, I've done this before.

3:43

Okay, let's do my tab.

3:48

Well, hello everyone.

3:49

It's really good to see you.

3:53

Okay.

3:58

Okay.

4:02

Here's what we got today.

4:04

All right.

4:04

So the biggest change from last time, this I created for Legistar because this is now in the legislative cycle.

4:11

There is a different legislative file number than what we've been following in VPAC.

4:16

I've linked it right here.

4:17

So that will be the item in front of JA and comment council.

4:20

So if you have commentary like to direct, I would say like add it to that agenda item.

4:25

Um and if there is a vote today on this item, I would say like what you've done previously for legislative items, I would just have it accompany that file.

4:33

So I just want to get that out of the way.

4:34

So the biggest change, I will go to my legislative summary in a minute, but the biggest changes to the ordinance from last time is uh I'd like to thank Brandy and Smith Spikes for helping me uh get really educated about e-bikes.

4:48

So thank you very much for that.

4:49

The language that has changed around e-bikes in this version is that it no longer says like prohibited with power unit in operation previously.

5:00

That language had been taken like from state law.

5:01

Um we've changed it now, so it's just the throttle part that it would not be allowed that like e-pedal assist is allowed to.

5:10

So when e-bikes are allowed on sidewalks, you can use pedalists.

5:13

This is just the throttle function that's not going to be allowed.

5:16

But e-bikes on sidewalk would be the same as regular bike use on sidewalk, so they're just gonna be the same.

5:21

The other thing that has changed since last time is the provision for e-scooters on sidewalks.

5:29

This is now the exact same as what it is for bikes.

5:32

So it prohibits e-scooters on sidewalks in the downtown lacrosse area, um, but they're otherwise allowed on sidewalks.

5:40

Uh council members thought this was uh it's a way to regulate this in a way that makes sense that's consistent with our other laws that we have without getting you know the ins and outs of our tirials, roads of miles per hour.

5:53

This has a lot of continuity with the bikes, and it's closer to the default per se law.

5:58

So that is the biggest change since last time.

6:02

And then again, the e-bike riding on sidewalks.

6:05

I just says you can't do it with that throttle engage.

6:08

The whole purpose is to prevent, you know, the real fast zoom, but you can use pedal assists and the rules of riding on the sidewalk are the same as they are for regular bikes, you'll pedestrians obey a reasonable speed line.

6:21

So those are the most significant changes from last time.

6:25

I with the help of my legal assistant, I created a one-page summary of the changes from existing law to now.

6:33

My original one was five pages.

6:35

I'm like, this is just no, we need a cut this down.

6:37

So this is just like general highlights of changes that I created to aid in the legislative file.

6:44

So take a look at that if you like, but it essentially kind of outlines all the changes I made, clean up language, introducing the e-scooter legislation, the e-bike update, everything we've talked about before and more.

6:57

So I just created that as an easy guide for people to look at.

7:00

It's not all encompassing, but I think it hits the good highlights, and it'll be a good starting point when the legislative sessions happen.

7:06

So I guess any questions at this point, or where would you like me to start?

7:16

Does anyone have questions in general?

7:20

And can we um I'm starting to see a lot more of this type of why we're here across various like jurisdictions?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Active Transportation████████████████████20%
Transportation Safety█████████████████17%
Parks and Recreation████████████████16%
Public Safety██████████████14%
Procedural█████████████13%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████11%
Technology and Innovation██████6%
Public Engagement███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting - April 14, 2026

Note: The instruction for this summary stated the meeting date as April 16, 2026. However, all official meeting materials (agenda, minutes, transcript) indicate the meeting occurred on Tuesday, April 14, 2026 at 8:30 AM. This summary uses the correct date from the source documents.

The Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) met on April 14, 2026 in the Miller Room of City Hall and via Zoom. The meeting was called to order at 8:31 AM and adjourned at 9:49 AM. Seven members were present, one excused. The committee discussed and voted on a proposed electric scooter and electric bicycle ordinance, received a public involvement summary for the Green Bay Street project, and heard an update on the bicycle and pedestrian count program.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes: The minutes from March 10, 2026 were approved via motion by Kevin Hundt, seconded by Robert Young. The motion carried on a voice vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Flint Carl Law (West Salem resident, Regional Rep of ABA Wisconsin): Expressed concern about the optics of e-bike and e-scooter use, stating that the general public cannot differentiate between e-bikes, e-scooters, and motorcycles. He advocated for education over legislation and noted that New Jersey recently passed restrictive e-bike/e-scooter legislation classifying throttle-equipped devices as motorcycles.
  • Greg Pump (resident at 429 2nd Street): Strongly opposed allowing bicycles and e-bikes on sidewalks in Riverside Park, citing heavy foot traffic, senior citizens, disabled individuals, strollers, and near-miss incidents he observed daily. He requested that the city require dismounting and walking bikes in Riverside Park, similar to policies in Savannah, Georgia.

Discussion Items

  • 24-1118: Electric Scooters and Electric Bicycle Ordinance
    • Attorney Alan presented updated ordinance language, noting key changes from prior drafts:
      • E-bikes: throttle operation prohibited on sidewalks; pedal-assist allowed. E-bike sidewalk use now equivalent to regular bikes.
      • E-scooters: sidewalk prohibition aligned with bike rules—prohibited in the downtown La Crosse area only, otherwise allowed.
      • The downtown area definition was made consistent across play vehicles, e-scooters, and bikes.
    • Discussion centered on the standard of "reasonable rate of speed" vs. a fixed speed limit. Member Andrew Ericson proposed a definition limiting sidewalk speed to 10 mph except when conditions require slower speeds, but this was not formally seconded. Staff and other members (Randi Pueschner) supported the flexible reasonable-speed language.
    • Kevin Hundt proposed an amendment to remove Riverside Park International Gardens and Levees from the prohibited-area list in section 34-68(D1), arguing the current language would restrict biking there even though existing enforcement is lacking. His amendment lacked a second.
    • Staff noted that this ordinance also goes before the Board of Park Commissioners on April 16, then to Judiciary & Administration and Common Council.
  • 25-1324: Green Bay Street Project Discussion
    • Staff presented results of public involvement: a February 24 public meeting had 47 attendees; an online survey garnered 305 responses. Key survey findings: 66% rated current conditions 7 or higher on a 0-10 scale; support for various bicycle infrastructure alternatives ranged from 8% to 25% positive.
    • Cost estimate for full protected bike lanes from 14th Street to Losey Boulevard: $800,000 to $1,000,000 to adjust curbs and storm structures. The option approved would affect the section from 9th to 14th Street currently under design.
    • Discussion included piecemeal implementation (similar to Amsterdam's multi-decade approach) and the possibility of painted lanes as a temporary measure where protected lanes are infeasible (e.g., high driveway density near West Avenue).
    • The Board of Public Works will consider the project on April 20, 2026 at 10:00 AM.
  • Update on Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Program
    • Staff (Sammy and Sam) proposed purchasing Eco Counter equipment: one mobile multi-counter (tubes for bikes, infrared for pedestrians) and three nano counters (infrared for foot traffic). Total cost: $12,505, covering hardware and 5 years of software.
    • Half the funding was approved by the Plan Steering Committee; the other half is sought from the La Crosse Area Planning Coalition. Goal is deployment by July 2026.
    • Committee members suggested coordination with La Crosse County's existing mobile counter to boost data.

Key Outcomes

  • Ordinance Vote: Motion to recommend adoption of the e-scooter/e-bike ordinance as written passed 4 to 3 (Boldon, Hundt, and Young opposed). The recommendation will move to the Board of Park Commissioners, Judiciary & Administration Committee, and Common Council.
  • Kevin Hundt's amendment to remove Riverside Park restrictions from the ordinance was not seconded and therefore not voted on.
  • The Green Bay Street project will be forwarded to the Board of Public Works on April 20 for a recommendation on which bicycle facility option to pursue.
  • The bicycle/pedestrian count program funding will be pursued with an additional $6,252.50 request from the Plan Coalition.
  • A future agenda item was requested for "Week Without Driving" (October 1-8, 2026) to consider co-sponsorship.

Meeting Transcript

I got to the place under the bridge. Blocking entry to the well, I guess I could have gone through it, but it wouldn't be theme. So I just kind of hung out and watched it. Yeah. Thanks for everyone joining us online. Well, welcome everyone. Thank you for joining us for the Tuesday, April 14th, 2026 meeting for the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee. We have all members present either in person or online. Except Officer Hughes, who is excused. The first item of business is the approval of our minutes for March 10th, 2026. Maybe for a motion to approve those units. Second, also second by Robbie. Any corrections or modifications to the minutes. No minutes are approved. Thank you. I think that's a great idea. Let's say she I can screen share. Oh yeah, I've done this before. Okay, let's do my tab. Well, hello everyone. It's really good to see you. Okay. Okay. Here's what we got today. All right. So the biggest change from last time, this I created for Legistar because this is now in the legislative cycle. There is a different legislative file number than what we've been following in VPAC. I've linked it right here. So that will be the item in front of JA and comment council. So if you have commentary like to direct, I would say like add it to that agenda item. Um and if there is a vote today on this item, I would say like what you've done previously for legislative items, I would just have it accompany that file. So I just want to get that out of the way. So the biggest change, I will go to my legislative summary in a minute, but the biggest changes to the ordinance from last time is uh I'd like to thank Brandy and Smith Spikes for helping me uh get really educated about e-bikes. So thank you very much for that. The language that has changed around e-bikes in this version is that it no longer says like prohibited with power unit in operation previously. That language had been taken like from state law. Um we've changed it now, so it's just the throttle part that it would not be allowed that like e-pedal assist is allowed to. So when e-bikes are allowed on sidewalks, you can use pedalists. This is just the throttle function that's not going to be allowed. But e-bikes on sidewalk would be the same as regular bike use on sidewalk, so they're just gonna be the same. The other thing that has changed since last time is the provision for e-scooters on sidewalks. This is now the exact same as what it is for bikes. So it prohibits e-scooters on sidewalks in the downtown lacrosse area, um, but they're otherwise allowed on sidewalks. Uh council members thought this was uh it's a way to regulate this in a way that makes sense that's consistent with our other laws that we have without getting you know the ins and outs of our tirials, roads of miles per hour. This has a lot of continuity with the bikes, and it's closer to the default per se law. So that is the biggest change since last time. And then again, the e-bike riding on sidewalks. I just says you can't do it with that throttle engage. The whole purpose is to prevent, you know, the real fast zoom, but you can use pedal assists and the rules of riding on the sidewalk are the same as they are for regular bikes, you'll pedestrians obey a reasonable speed line. So those are the most significant changes from last time.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com