OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/La Crosse, Wisconsin/Common Council & Committees
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

La Crosse Board of Estimates Finalizes 2027 Operating Budget on October 12, 2026

Common Council & Committees — Monday, October 12, 2026
BodyLa Crosse, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council & Committees
DateMonday, October 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:03:37

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

2:05

Hello, everyone.

2:06

We're going to call this meeting in order at four.

2:07

Oh, five PM

Unassigned speaker

2:09

on

Speaker 1

2:09

October twelfth, twenty twenty six.

2:13

All Board of Estimates members are present.

2:18

All right.

2:19

We'll move on to our first agenda item twenty-six dash zero five eighty eight, the twenty twenty-seven operating budget.

2:26

At this time, I'm going to call our deputy director to do a presentation.

Speaker 2

2:46

Afternoon.

2:48

All right.

3:06

Okay.

3:08

So where we're at in the process is we're with the Board of Estimates who is tasked with submitting a proposed budget to the common council on or by the third Tuesday in October per code of ordinances.

Unassigned speaker

4:54

Okay, so next I will uh detail out uh kind of a definition of the unassigned fund balance that is referenced in the fund balance policy.

Speaker 2

5:03

Um also goes by another name of reserve funds.

5:07

Essentially, unassigned fund balance is the uh measure of the general funds net worth.

Unassigned speaker

5:12

Uh

Speaker 2

5:13

so essentially you take your cash on hand and funds to be received, minus our liabilities, and that is your total fund balance.

5:21

Um, there's different types of fund balance.

5:24

Uh, if you look on to the right of this slide at the bottom right, there is three different types of fund balance that we have.

5:31

So this is just a condensed version of our balance sheet from our audited financials.

Unassigned speaker

5:37

Uh

Speaker 2

5:37

so we have non-spendable fund balance, which is essentially cash that we can't spend.

5:42

Uh, the most common type is if we've advanced funds from the general fund to a different fund.

5:47

We can't spend those because the general fund doesn't technically have

Unassigned speaker

5:50

them.

Unassigned speaker

5:51

Uh

Speaker 3

5:51

committed funds would be funds that uh this body

Speaker 2

5:55

has committed towards or assigned committed towards a different purpose of the unassigned fund balance.

6:00

So the 250,000 is the airport committed fund balance towards the airport air service development that was committed two years ago, I believe.

Unassigned speaker

6:12

And

Speaker 2

6:12

then that brings us to the unassigned unassigned fund balance, which is basically the fund balance that we can appropriate to whatever purpose we

Unassigned speaker

6:20

want.

Unassigned speaker

6:22

Uh,

Speaker 2

6:22

just to kind of clear things up, fund balance is not a separate bank account.

6:26

Uh, it is more an accounting term or item on the general fund balance sheet.

6:38

The next slide details out our history of the unassigned fund balance.

6:42

Um, we got two graphs.

6:44

One on the left is in dollar amounts.

6:47

So the orange line will show per policy what is the minimum requirement for our fund balance.

Unassigned speaker

6:53

And

Speaker 2

6:53

the blue line would be our actual uh based on year end.

6:59

And the graph on the right has it in percentage form.

7:04

And I started with uh 2018 because in 2017 is when they changed the fund balance policy from 25% to 20%.

Unassigned speaker

7:14

So

Speaker 3

7:14

as you can see, over the last six

Speaker 2

7:16

years, uh there's been a steady increase to the uh unassigned fund balance.

7:25

Okay, uh, that is all I wanted to cover on the unassigned fund balance.

7:29

Next, I'm gonna get into the debt levy adjustment.

7:31

So the debt levy adjustment is part of the overall levy limit rules that the state imposes on municipalities.

7:40

Um, and as a reminder, those are the uh limits that they place on us of how much we can raise our levy each year.

7:49

Um so generally it's limited to the net new construction.

Unassigned speaker

7:53

Now

Speaker 2

7:53

there are several adjustments.

7:55

The two most common ones are debt levy adjustment and the TID closures.

Unassigned speaker

8:01

Uh

Speaker 2

8:01

so specifically on debt levy, uh, they allow municipalities to adjust the allowable levy limit up to the total amount of debt payments for that budget year.

8:10

Now the graph on the left side of this slide shows the adjustment that we've used throughout the years, essentially the cumulative adjustment.

8:19

So in 2026 budget year, we use $6.5 million debt levy adjustment to be able to increase our levy above the net new construction amount.

8:31

So uh with our 2027 estimated general obligation debt payments of 18.5 million for the 2027 operating budget, that leaves our debt levy adjustment capacity at 11.9 million, which means in 2027, if we wanted to, we could increase our levy above net new construction by 11.9 million.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████████████████████████████████42%
Public Safety██████████████████18%
Public Engagement████████8%
Personnel Matters██████6%
Economic Development█████5%
Technology and Innovation█████5%
Procedural████4%
Transportation Safety███3%
Public Administration██2%
Summary of Proceedings

La Crosse Board of Estimates Budget Meeting Summary - October 12, 2026

The La Crosse Board of Estimates met on Monday, October 12, 2026, at City Hall Council Chambers to review and finalize the recommended 2027 operating budget. The session was called to order at 4:04 p.m. per the minutes (4:05 p.m. per the transcript) and adjourned at 6:06 p.m. Mayor Shaundel Washington-Spivey and Interim Finance Director Dan Deigier were non-voting. Also present were council members Aron Newberry, Barb Janssen, Chris Kahlow, Erin Goggin, Jennifer Trost, Larry Sleznikow, Mackenzie Mindel, Rosanne Northwood, and Tamra Dickinson. Councilmember Newberry was excused at 5:30 p.m. Finance staff noted the Board is tasked with submitting a proposed budget to the Common Council by the third Tuesday in October.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of the September 1 and 2, 2026, minutes was listed on the agenda, but the board took no action.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A public hearing was opened and closed during the meeting. One speaker, Ash Lyke of the Town of Greenfield, criticized the proposed cuts, saying library and transit services would be negatively affected while the police department was not being cut and was instead increased by $1.4 million. Lyke also questioned why Flock camera contracts are housed in the IT department.

Discussion Items

  • Finance staff presented the unassigned fund balance: it is the general fund's net worth, is not a separate bank account, and is subject to a policy minimum changed from 25% to 20% in 2017. The balance has generally risen since 2018; 2024 was an outlier partly because of a large transit reimbursement, investment earnings, and a $1.5 million ARPA contribution. The following year used $1.5 million of that balance plus a $2 million health insurance contribution.
  • For 2027, estimated general obligation debt payments are $18.5 million. The city used $6.5 million of debt levy adjustment in 2026, leaving about $11.9 million in debt levy capacity for 2027. Net new construction is 0.4%, allowing only a $144,000 levy increase without additional adjustments.
  • Finance staff recommended two scenarios to meet the Expenditure Restraint Program (ERP). Scenario 1, recommended by the Mayor, meets ERP with no tax increase: the mill rate remains unchanged at 8.52 and there is a $0 tax impact on a home with no assessment change; it uses $680,921 of fund balance and raises the operating levy by $1.774 million (4.16%). Scenario 2 meets ERP with no fund balance use: the mill rate would rise 1.53% to 8.65, a $13.06 annual increase on a $100,000 home, with a $2.4 million (5.75%) operating levy increase.
  • Staff explained that state shared revenue is increasing 1.9% for 2027 and makes up about 29% of operating revenues, while the certified inflation rate is 3.4%.
  • Amendment #1 (Revenue) revised engineering revenue down by $609 and increased non-departmental state aid revenue by $549,820. Amendment #2 (Expenses) added $137,220 for employer-side dental insurance premiums, removed a $60,000 vacancy allowance, restored $5,000 for the international committee, added $35,000 for liability insurance, $7,000 for Diggers Hotline, $10,000 for contracted services, and increased membership expenses mainly for LADCO. Total expense increase was $284,947, a 3.3% increase from the 2026 adopted budget.
  • Department heads described the impact of cuts: Engineering is about 98% labor; library is about 83% labor (85% including contracted security); transit is 95-96% salary and benefits; IT is about 46% personnel and 54% software/infrastructure. Transit said it has not been fully funded since 2017 and service reductions are likely. The library said losing five positions represented about 70 years of institutional knowledge. Engineering/streets said cutting two street positions removes one snow plow route and cutting two LTEs reduces force-multiplier capacity.
  • The HR director said eliminating the safety/risk specialist means two HR generalists absorb those duties, and reported workers' compensation costs fell from about $472,000 in 2023 to $289,000 in 2025 and $139,000 through July 2026; the position's 2027 cost would be about $84,000.
  • Police Chief comments: the police department cut $745,000 in personnel, equivalent to five officers, and the apparent budget increase reflects prior underfunding of overtime and benefit payouts rather than new ongoing spending. The IT director noted IT cut $208,000 for 2027 and the 2027 Flock line item is $8,000.
  • Councilmember Trost moved to have Finance prepare a non-ERP budget scenario; she argued the current approach of repeated cuts is unsustainable. Finance staff said opting out would likely mean replacing about $1.7 million in ERP funding in 2028. Councilmember Janssen said a prior ERP opt-out was a one-time reset funded with ARPA, and this was not the year to repeat it. The motion failed.
  • Councilmember Sleznikow said he could not support taking money from reserve funds and would not vote for Scenario 1. Councilmember Goggin echoed opposition to fund balance use, saying the city needs to be better stewards of public money. Councilmember Kahlow reported that League of Municipalities discussions focused on ERP and levy limits putting a stranglehold on municipal budgets. Councilmember Janssen said public safety should be prioritized and suggested cutting travel from council and other budgets.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to prepare a non-ERP budget scenario: failed 4-5 (yes: Newberry, Trost, Mindel, Northwood; no: Janssen, Kahlow, Goggin, Sleznikow, Dickinson; non-voting: Deigier, Washington-Spivey).
  • Motion to hold the second Board of Estimates meeting on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, at 4:00 p.m.: carried 5-3 (yes: Janssen, Trost, Mindel, Northwood, Dickinson; no: Kahlow, Goggin, Sleznikow; excused: Newberry).
  • Motion to open the public hearing: carried 8-0. Motion to close the public hearing: carried 8-0.
  • Amendment #1 (Revenue) was adopted 6-2 (yes: Northwood, Dickinson, Trost, Janssen, Mindel, Kahlow; no: Goggin, Sleznikow).
  • Amendment #2 (Expenses) was adopted 6-2 (yes: Northwood, Dickinson, Trost, Kahlow, Mindel, Sleznikow; no: Janssen, Goggin).
  • The board did not take final action on the full 2027 operating budget at this meeting. It will continue at the October 13, 2026, 4:00 p.m. meeting, with the Mayor recommending Scenario 1.

Meeting Transcript

Hello, everyone. We're going to call this meeting in order at four. Oh, five PM on October twelfth, twenty twenty six. All Board of Estimates members are present. All right. We'll move on to our first agenda item twenty-six dash zero five eighty eight, the twenty twenty-seven operating budget. At this time, I'm going to call our deputy director to do a presentation. Afternoon. All right. Okay. So where we're at in the process is we're with the Board of Estimates who is tasked with submitting a proposed budget to the common council on or by the third Tuesday in October per code of ordinances. Okay, so next I will uh detail out uh kind of a definition of the unassigned fund balance that is referenced in the fund balance policy. Um also goes by another name of reserve funds. Essentially, unassigned fund balance is the uh measure of the general funds net worth. Uh so essentially you take your cash on hand and funds to be received, minus our liabilities, and that is your total fund balance. Um, there's different types of fund balance. Uh, if you look on to the right of this slide at the bottom right, there is three different types of fund balance that we have. So this is just a condensed version of our balance sheet from our audited financials. Uh so we have non-spendable fund balance, which is essentially cash that we can't spend. Uh, the most common type is if we've advanced funds from the general fund to a different fund. We can't spend those because the general fund doesn't technically have them. Uh committed funds would be funds that uh this body has committed towards or assigned committed towards a different purpose of the unassigned fund balance. So the 250,000 is the airport committed fund balance towards the airport air service development that was committed two years ago, I believe. And then that brings us to the unassigned unassigned fund balance, which is basically the fund balance that we can appropriate to whatever purpose we want. Uh, just to kind of clear things up, fund balance is not a separate bank account. Uh, it is more an accounting term or item on the general fund balance sheet. The next slide details out our history of the unassigned fund balance. Um, we got two graphs. One on the left is in dollar amounts. So the orange line will show per policy what is the minimum requirement for our fund balance. And the blue line would be our actual uh based on year end. And the graph on the right has it in percentage form. And I started with uh 2018 because in 2017 is when they changed the fund balance policy from 25% to 20%. So as you can see, over the last six years, uh there's been a steady increase to the uh unassigned fund balance. Okay, uh, that is all I wanted to cover on the unassigned fund balance. Next, I'm gonna get into the debt levy adjustment. So the debt levy adjustment is part of the overall levy limit rules that the state imposes on municipalities.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com