OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Lake County Board of Elections Meeting – September 1, 2026

County Boards & CommissionsTuesday, September 1, 2026
BodyLake County, Indiana
SessionCounty Boards & Commissions
DateTuesday, September 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:32:24

Transcript — Verbatim
0:03

All right, good afternoon, and uh welcome to this uh special meeting of the Lake County Board of Elections and Register and Voter Registration.

0:11

It is Tuesday, September 1st, 2026 at 243 p.m.

0:16

Uh if we could just all please stand for the pledge if we're able to pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which is saying one nation under guy indivisible with a liberty and justice for all thank you and welcome everyone.

0:35

Uh Michelle, if we could have roll call, please.

0:38

Clerk Brown.

0:39

President Ms.

0:40

Mara Campbell here in the rear.

0:42

Present.

0:43

Ms.

0:43

Foss.

0:43

Here.

0:44

Mr.

0:44

Reed?

0:45

Here.

0:45

Chairman Smith.

0:46

I am here.

0:47

We uh all members are present in person.

0:48

We do have a quorum.

0:50

Um there are no minutes to approve.

0:53

I think we're at old business uh then and first issue is the local public question rename request by Crown Point and Whiting, and I assume we're gonna take Tri-Creek and River Forest separately.

1:05

You could do a little bit once because it is a generic of making the public question number three and or four based on the state as two statewide public questions.

1:16

So it makes sense.

1:17

We just haven't had the situation for in the past, and are requesting your approval to FS.

1:25

Yeah, so just to add a little color to this.

1:27

Um we do have two public questions regarding our constitution that are already on the ballot that are numbered number one and number two, is my understanding.

1:37

And the current uh school board questions do not have a number next to them.

1:42

Uh, and it's my understanding that all superintendents from Crown Point, Whiting, Tri-Creek, and River Forest have requested that their questions when they are on the ballot are numbered sequentially after the two constitutional questions.

1:56

So they will either be numbered three and four or just three if they only have one question.

2:00

And it was, I believe it was um asked by each superintendent to the board to do that.

2:08

Correct.

2:08

All right, Lori, anything else on that?

2:10

No.

2:10

Okay, any questions by the board before we consider those requests?

2:15

Okay, hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to rename the request pursuant to the um uh request from Crown Point, Whiting, Tri-Creek, and River Forest.

2:24

Motion to approve, Mr.

2:26

Chair.

2:27

Motion by Clerk Brown is our second.

2:28

I'll second.

2:29

Second by Miss Foss Eggman.

2:30

We is there any discussion?

2:32

Okay, hearing none, all those in favor standing by by saying aye.

2:35

Aye, any opposed?

2:36

Motion carries.

2:37

Is there any other old business?

2:40

All right, hearing none, um, I believe then we do have some new business.

2:44

Uh, this is under 5.1 in our agenda.

2:47

It is a challenge by Miss Lucinda Murphy against um Miss Ms.

2:55

Christina McNeely.

2:57

So I know I saw Mr.

2:59

Murphy and Ms.

3:00

Mrs.

3:00

Murphy here together, the challenger.

3:02

Is there anybody here on behalf of hi?

3:04

You're the respondent.

3:06

Okay.

3:06

Um why don't we do this?

3:07

Why don't we get um the Murphy's over here and Ms.

3:10

McNeely, if you wouldn't mind over here?

3:12

Get you on either side, we'll swear you in and we'll um kind of set off set forth the challenge and the procedure that we're gonna move forward with here today.

3:27

I think we have the witnesses in the yes, good point.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Election Procedures█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Public Comment███████████████████22%
Voter Accessibility████████████████19%
Procedural████5%
Public Finance Management1%
Summary of Proceedings

Lake County Board of Elections Meeting – September 1, 2026

The Lake County Board of Elections met on Tuesday, September 1, 2026, at 2:30 PM in the Commissioners Courtroom in Crown Point. All five members were present in person – Chairman Smith, Clerk Brown, Ms. Candelaria Reardon, Mr. Mellon, and Mr. Reed – constituting a quorum. The board unanimously approved administrative rename requests for local public questions and, after a lengthy evidentiary hearing, voted 5‑0 to uphold a candidate residency challenge, removing Christina McNeely from the ballot for the School City of Hammond Board of School Trustees.

Consent Calendar

  • Local Public Question Rename Requests (Crown Point, Whiting, Tri‑Creek, River Forest): The superintendents of these school corporations requested that their local public questions be numbered sequentially after the two statewide constitutional questions already on the ballot. The board unanimously approved the rename, making the local questions number three and four (or just three if only one question).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Late Public Comment (after adjournment motion): An unidentified speaker noted that “Carly is in jail,” stating she had said she would be unavailable on a tour. The comment was entered into the record. No other public comments were offered.

Discussion Items

Candidate Residency Challenge – McNeely (New Business Item 5.1)

  • Petitioner’s Case (Lucinda Murphy): Murphy argued that Christina McNeely, a candidate for the School City of Hammond Board, did not satisfy Indiana’s one‑year residency requirement in the school corporation district. He introduced property tax records showing McNeely owns a home in Crown Point (Exhibits A, B), has claimed a homestead deduction on that property for 2023‑2026 (Exhibits C, D), and had her voter registration in Crown Point from December 2021 until she filed a VRG‑7 change to a Hammond address on May 19, 2026 (Exhibit F). Murphy also submitted a water bill showing zero usage at the Hammond address (Exhibit G). He argued that by operation of law—based on the homestead definition (IC 6‑1.1‑12‑37) and the change‑of‑precinct statute (IC 3‑5‑5‑10)—McNeely’s principal place of residence is Crown Point and she only moved to Hammond after the critical one‑year window (November 3, 2025, to November 3, 2026).
  • Respondent’s Case (Christina McNeely): McNeely testified that she has lived at 6526 Arkansas Avenue in Hammond since August 9, 2024, with her significant other. She acknowledged owning the Crown Point property but said it is occupied by her parents and she pays the mortgage there. She presented extensive documentary evidence showing her Hammond address on: driver’s license (issued May 19, 2026), employment W‑2s (2024 and 2025), 401(k) plan, bank and credit card statements, car loan invoices, utility bills, Hammond Education Foundation invoice, YMCA membership, and unsworn declarations from three neighbors and her mother. McNeely argued that ownership does not equal residency and that the homestead exemption is a property‑tax concept, not the controlling residency standard under the Indiana Election Code (IC 3‑5‑2.1‑90). She maintained that she never had two driver’s licenses simultaneously and that her voter registration change occurred on the same day as her ID change because the BMV offers voter registration at that time.
  • Rebuttal & Discussion: Murphy rebutted with McNeely’s Indiana driver record (Exhibit H) and voter record (Exhibit I), asserting they show she never relinquished her Indiana license and had been registered in both states. The board heard legal guidance from counsel Mr. Tolbert on the rebuttable presumption created by a homestead exemption (IC 3‑5‑5‑6) and that the standard of proof is preponderance of the evidence. Board members discussed the difficulty of determining subjective intent, the weight of documentary evidence, and the timing of McNeely’s ID and voter registration changes coinciding with the opening of the candidate filing period (May 19, 2026). Chairman Smith noted past board precedents where homestead exemptions were considered but not dispositive.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to Uphold Challenge: Trustee Foss made a motion to uphold the challenge (i.e., remove McNeely from the ballot), seconded by Clerk Brown.
  • Vote: 5‑0 in favor (Chairman Smith, Trustee Foss, Trustee Reed, Trustee Candelaria Reardon, and Clerk Brown). The challenge was upheld, removing Christina McNeely from the ballot for the School City of Hammond Board of School Trustees.
  • Next Steps: Counsel advised the respondent of her right to file an appeal in circuit or superior court. The board’s next regular meeting is scheduled for September 15, 2026, at 10:00 AM in the Commissioners Courtroom.

Meeting Transcript

All right, good afternoon, and uh welcome to this uh special meeting of the Lake County Board of Elections and Register and Voter Registration. It is Tuesday, September 1st, 2026 at 243 p.m. Uh if we could just all please stand for the pledge if we're able to pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which is saying one nation under guy indivisible with a liberty and justice for all thank you and welcome everyone. Uh Michelle, if we could have roll call, please. Clerk Brown. President Ms. Mara Campbell here in the rear. Present. Ms. Foss. Here. Mr. Reed? Here. Chairman Smith. I am here. We uh all members are present in person. We do have a quorum. Um there are no minutes to approve. I think we're at old business uh then and first issue is the local public question rename request by Crown Point and Whiting, and I assume we're gonna take Tri-Creek and River Forest separately. You could do a little bit once because it is a generic of making the public question number three and or four based on the state as two statewide public questions. So it makes sense. We just haven't had the situation for in the past, and are requesting your approval to FS. Yeah, so just to add a little color to this. Um we do have two public questions regarding our constitution that are already on the ballot that are numbered number one and number two, is my understanding. And the current uh school board questions do not have a number next to them. Uh, and it's my understanding that all superintendents from Crown Point, Whiting, Tri-Creek, and River Forest have requested that their questions when they are on the ballot are numbered sequentially after the two constitutional questions. So they will either be numbered three and four or just three if they only have one question. And it was, I believe it was um asked by each superintendent to the board to do that. Correct. All right, Lori, anything else on that? No. Okay, any questions by the board before we consider those requests? Okay, hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to rename the request pursuant to the um uh request from Crown Point, Whiting, Tri-Creek, and River Forest. Motion to approve, Mr. Chair. Motion by Clerk Brown is our second. I'll second. Second by Miss Foss Eggman. We is there any discussion? Okay, hearing none, all those in favor standing by by saying aye. Aye, any opposed? Motion carries. Is there any other old business? All right, hearing none, um, I believe then we do have some new business. Uh, this is under 5.1 in our agenda. It is a challenge by Miss Lucinda Murphy against um Miss Ms. Christina McNeely. So I know I saw Mr. Murphy and Ms.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com