The Las Vegas Planning Commission met on January 14, 2026, starting at approximately 6:00 PM and concluding after 9:00 PM. The meeting included public comments, housekeeping, consent items, and 20 public hearing items covering variances, special use permits, site development plans, and zoning changes. Key decisions included approvals for a tiny‑home park denial, three group home/daycare facilities with conditions, and a new elementary school. The commission also elected its 2026 officers.
Note: The meeting transcript indicates the meeting was properly noticed and recorded. The agenda and minutes were not available for cross‑reference.
Good evening, everyone. We are ready to begin. This planning commission meeting is called to order. This meeting has been properly noticed and posted in compliance with the open meeting law. These proceedings are being video recorded and can be viewed live on City of Las Vegas TV on Cox Cable Channel 2. You can also watch the meeting live online and access other city content by visiting Las Vegas Nevada dot gov backslash connect. The proceedings will be rebroadcast on City of Las Vegas TV the Saturday after the meeting at ten AM Monday at midnight and the following Tuesday at six PM. Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Vice Chair Cassama. Present. Commissioner Schlottman. Present. Commissioner Rogan. Present. Commissioner DeSalvio. Commissioner Lebaux. Present. You have a quorum. Thank you. I call to your attention the information printed in your agenda concerning our actions and the appeal and review process if appropriate. Please read this carefully, and if you have any questions, staff is available. Also, the second page of the agenda contains our rules of conduct. Next up is public comment during this portion of the agenda. Comments must be limited to matters on the agenda for action. If you wish to be heard, come to the podium and give your name for the record. This is to voice my opposition for item number 18, which is regarding the proposed changes to 5924 West Lone Mountain Road. I've lived in this area for approximately for over 30 years. Whoops, I'm just decided to get really funky here. Fortunately, the majority of the land in this area has been developed. But there's a vacant dirt parcel next to this business that I fear they will purchase so that they'll be able to expand. I now do oppose this. It started as what appeared to be a family-owned company, but the business has continued to grow and develop beyond what it was zoned for. Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the zoning issues be done before the work has happened? One asks that it be changed from residential to service commercial, another to limited commercial, another two limited material and lumber yard use in a residential area. Lil Sopratos is located next to this parcel, very close to the parcel. I live across the street in Rancho Altamere. Probably shouldn't have said that, but anyway. They say that they need to bring in materials, but it appears that they have a pile of sand there in the center that they've been driving their vehicles around. We do not need a construction yard in this area. And I'm disappointed that the commission is recommending approval to an entity that is obviously not played by the rules. The property has already been developed into a business. Is there not a penalty or fine for this? I ask that you at least deny the zoning one and SUP One requests. Why would you reward them for not following the law? Thank you. Thank you, ma'am. Anybody else under this item? Come on down, sir. Folks, if you're gonna speak on an item, rules for tonight, or please come down as soon as that item is called so we can have an efficient meeting. Please state your name for the record and let us know what you're referring to.