Good morning.

This is the recommending committee for February 2nd, 2026.

We officially called the order, and I am assuming we are in compliance with the open meeting law.

Yes, we are.

Thank you very much.

Our item number three is public comment.

Comment during this portion of the agenda must be limited to matters on the agenda for action.

If you'd wish to say anything, please step forward now.

Hearing and seeing none, we'll close the public comment period.

Moving on to item number four for possible action to approve the final minutes by reference of the January 20th, 2026 recommending committee meeting.

I'll entertain a motion.

Move to approve.

There is a motion, please vote.

And post.

Those minutes are approved.

Moving on to item number five.

Bill number 2026 dash two for possible action adopts a certain document entitled Development Agreement for Property Formerly Known as Cashman, including the incorporated Cashman site development standards and other incorporated elements.

This is sponsored by Councilwoman Chandra Summers Armstrong.

And I will turn it over to you, Ms.

Glenar.

Good morning.

Um Stephanie Gronar, 1980 Festival Plaza Drive here on behalf of the applicant Lenar Homes.

Um on your aerial, you see the first item is Cashman.

Uh you all just saw this and approved it at City Council.

This is the development agreement that goes with the application.

In the development agreement, you'll see we've maxed out the possible density for R3.

So while uh you all approved about 781 units on the property, it does allow up to twelve twenty-one.

That would require us to come back with a revised plan that you all would have to vote on, but just in case there's questions on the density, that's why that's in the development agreement.

The other reason for the development agreement is just to allow for the standards to develop the project that you all approved.

Um it gives some flexibility and it allows for a more urban project than a normal R3 project would allow.

Um and you all have seen that and approved it.

So I'm happy to answer any questions you have today, but we'd very much appreciate your recommendation of approval.

And thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Seth Floyd for the record.

And uh with me today I have Christian Gates from our planning team.

As you know, these came together uh rather quickly.

It's always a heavy lift, and Christian did most of that lifting, so I wanted him to have a chance to do the staff report and answer any questions that you have.

Perfect.

Good morning, Chairman.

This is Christian Gates for the record.

Uh the ordinance before you is the formal adoption of the development agreement for a property formally known as Cashman, uh, which was approved by the City Council on January 21st of this year.

Uh that development agreement meets all statutory requirements of NRS 278 point zero two zero one and will help facilitate 781 to 121 units of housing on 50 point fifty-four acres within the downtown area.

Staff therefore seeks your approval.

Thank you.

Nice shot, Mr.

Gates.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Um and thank you for uh presenting today.

I just had a question about the standards even incorporate for the commercial part.

They don't.

They contemplate that the commercial would just comply with your code when that future development comes into place.

All right.

I just wanted to know if there were anything that spoke to the commercial holding.

Um, because I know that in Desert Pines, we did spell out what our preference was for that commercial development.

So I want I was wondering if there was anything that was um included in in this development agreement about that.

That portion was actually excluded from the development agreement intentionally, so the development agreement will only cover the residential portion, and that future parcel that has to be mapped still was excluded with a legal description to take that out of the development agreement.

Okay, that's helpful for me to know.

Thank you.

Yeah.

Okay, this is a public hearing.

The question here, yeah.

More of a comment just because um, thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Uh, you know, we as elected officials talk to a lot of people, and I have got a lot of.

Well, if Cashman doesn't work out for you guys, I have this great plan B project.

So just to the world out there, we're moving forward.

There's no plan B project that will um culminate here.

Uh, in addition to that, Christian, I don't think we've met before.

Welcome to the deep end.

Uh looks like you did a great job on this DA.

And just for the viewers at home, can you tell us how many units there are and maybe a little bit of timeline?

Maybe the timeless is for Ms.

Grown Hour.

Uh yes, madam chairwoman.

Uh, through you for the Cashman site, uh, believe the proposed development was specifically for 700 or um not cashman, 1221 units.

Um for a general timeline uh per se, I believe I would just defer to the um applicant just to kind of go over that a little bit more.

Thank you.

I um I I do want to say thank you to Christian as well.

Um, I told Seth and Peter I mentioned the team at the last hearing, but Christian did a lot of the work and we really appreciate all of his efforts.

Um he's right, the development agreement's 1221.

The units we proposed and that you all approved were 781, so 781 units.

The timeline is um gonna take a little while, obviously.

We have to do some demolition on the property.

So um I would anticipate um within a year you'll see some dirt movement after it's demolished.

That's an estimate.

Thank you, Mr.

Chair.

Okay, and this is a public hearing for anybody who would like to comment.

Hearing and seeing none, we'll close the public comment period and I'll entertain a motion.

We'll move to approve agenda item five.

There's a motion to approve.

Please vote.

And post, and that item passes and it'll be heard at the February 4th, 2026 City Council meeting.

Moving on to item number six, bill number 2026-3 for possible action adopts that certain documented title development agreement for property formerly known as Grant Sawyer, including the incorporated grant sawyer site development standards and other incorporated elements sponsored by councilwoman Chandra Summers Armstrong.

Ms.

Groener, I'll turn it over to you.

Thank you again.

Um, Stephanie, you're on our 1980 festival plaza drive here on behalf of the applicant Lenara Homes.

The property on your aerial is the former Grant Sawyer um property.

The seller of this property is the state of Nevada, so different than the last application that that Lenar is under contract with to buy the land.

Um, you all just saw this application for 290 units on this property and approved it.

And so the development agreement, similar to the last item, is simply to allow for flexibility with the R3 standards to allow this to be a little bit more of an urban neighborhood in an R3 development.

The development agreement does allow up to 780 units.

So again, that's more than what we came through with and what we approved.

If we were to shift or do some other plan, we would have to come back before you with that application.

And that's not our intent.

It's just simply to provide flexibility in the development agreement.

Um again, we very much appreciate your staff's hard work quickly on this item, and we'd ask for your approval today.

Thank you very much.

And Mr.

Floyd, is it Mr.

Gates again?

Or is it uh I will be turning it over.

I think we're just confirming a number here, but as soon as he's ready, I'll turn it over to Christian.

Thank you so much.

I'll go ahead and read in the report first.

Uh so again, good morning, Chairman.

But uh similar to the bill before this uh for the adjacent site, the ordinance before you is the formal adoption of the development agreement for property formally known as Grant Sawyer, uh, which was approved by the city council on January 21st of this year.

Uh that development agreement meets all statutory requirements of NRS 278.0201 and will help facilitate 290 to 580 units on housing on uh 22.77 acres within the downtown area.

Uh staff therefore seeks your approval.

Thank you.

Nice job again.

Are there any questions up here?

Hearing and seeing none, this is a public comment period for anybody who would like to comment.

Hearing and seeing none, we'll entertain a motion.

There's a motion, please vote.

And post.

And that item passes and it'll be heard on the February 4th, 2026 City Council meeting.

Thank you, Ms.

Crown.

Thank you very much.

Have a good day.

And we are now on to item number seven, citizen participation.

Public comment during this portion of the agenda must be limited to matters within the jurisdiction of the recommending committee.

No subject may be acted on by the recommending committee unless that subject is on the agenda.

If there's anybody who would like to step forward, please do so now.

Hearing and seeing none, we can close the public comment period and we are officially adjourned.

Thanks, everyone.