OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Livonia, Michigan/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Livonia City Council Study Meeting – January 14, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, January 14, 2026
BodyLivonia, Michigan
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, January 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
Meeting Thumbnail
⇩ GET FROM SOURCE

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Original source
Transcript — Verbatim

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:47

Welcome to the January 14th, 2026 study session of the Lavonia City Council.

0:52

Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance led by the Honorable Brennan McCullough.

Unassigned speaker

0:58

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the

Speaker 2

1:01

United

Speaker 3

1:02

States

Speaker 2

1:02

of America.

Speaker 1

1:15

This meeting sets the agenda for the 2033 regular meeting, which is a voting meeting that will take place on Monday, January 26, 2026, where tonight's items will be officially voted on.

1:29

We will move right into audience communication.

1:32

We have three minutes.

1:35

And we've set aside 30 minutes for audience communication.

1:38

Name and address for the record, please.

Unassigned speaker

1:41

Steve

Speaker 4

1:41

King, Coventry Gardens.

Unassigned speaker

1:44

I want

Speaker 4

1:44

to talk about mitten.

1:46

Okay.

1:47

You guys, Mitten comes before you all the time.

1:49

You hear this term.

1:50

I don't know how many people on council even know what mitten is.

1:53

The Michigan Intergovernmental Trade Network, Mitten, is frequently promoted as a tool that helps municipalities save money through increased competition.

2:02

In practice, Mitten functions primarily as an administrative convenience for staff rather than a mechanism that produces measurable cost savings for taxpayers.

2:11

What Mitton actually does centralizes the posting of bids, RFPs, RFQs, on a single online platform.

2:19

It automates notifications to registered vendors and reduces the effort required to publish bid notices.

2:26

This simplifies the workload for the employee responsible for procurement, but does not alter the underlying economics of the purchase.

2:35

Who benefits most?

2:36

The primary beneficiary of mitten is the individual submitting and managing bids.

2:42

The system minimizes manual work, reduces paperwork, and allows procurement staff to check a procedural box by claiming bids were widely advertised.

2:54

These conveniences improve staff efficiency but do not inherently lower prices.

3:14

Larger vendors with automated bid systems gained an advantage, reducing true competition.

3:21

Administrative efficiency does not equal financial efficiency.

3:34

Faster or easier bid posting does not guarantee better pricing.

3:40

Lower contract costs or improved fiscal outcomes without price benchmarking or post-award analysis.

3:47

Claims of savings remain unproven.

4:18

So I'm hoping this new council refuses to do what we've always done and challenges every penny spent, every ordinance, every policy, every procedure.

4:32

Let's go back to square one.

4:34

Love what you're doing with the charter.

Speaker 5

4:48

And I would like to talk about uh the limiting of public comment.

Unassigned speaker

4:53

Uh currently the city council limits the commenting period at the beginning of meetings to 30 minutes.

Speaker 5

5:01

According to the number, this lovely document, limiting public comment.

5:08

A rule limiting the period of public comment may

Unassigned speaker

5:11

not

Speaker 5

5:12

be implied as to a manner that denies a person the right to address the public body, such as limiting all public comments to a half-hour period.

5:22

Currently, the Lavonia City Council limits audience communication to 30-minute period.

5:28

That is against the Open Meeting Act.

5:30

You are in violation of the Open Meetings Act.

5:34

Now you are not in violation when you limit the amount of time people can speak.

5:38

So as you allow me three minutes to speak, that's fine.

5:42

You allow people to speak two minutes on an issue, that's fine.

5:46

That's all fine and dandy according to OpenSmeeting

Unassigned speaker

5:48

Act.

Speaker 5

5:49

Now, allowing people to attend the open meeting act.

6:08

You are not in compliance with the Americans with Disability Act.

Unassigned speaker

6:14

The

Speaker 5

6:14

State of Michigan requires state and local boards to and commission to provide reasonable accommodations, which could include an option to participate virtually to qualified individuals with disabilities who request accommodation to fully participate in a meeting as a board or commission member or member of the general public.

6:34

So I would like to have the city or the city council here to identify what procedure they do have that they put out and publish what is the procedure that they use to allow people to attend a meeting who cannot get up the uh ramp, the stairs, into this building, down the ramp, and attend a meeting.

6:59

I know we have the area back there where somebody who is able to get in here could speak in the back of the room on a microphone, wouldn't be on camera like I am right now, but I don't know how that would work for somebody who is unable to get here to attend.

7:17

So I would like the city to at least or this council to publish how that is done so that somebody who cannot make it to a meeting would know how that would happen instead of this vague system where we have everybody complaining on Facebook because like you, I'm tired of seeing it on Facebook.

7:34

Thank

Unassigned speaker

7:35

you.

Speaker 6

7:38

Name and address for the record, please.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Public Engagement█████████████13%
Parks and Recreation█████████████13%
Technology and Innovation████████████12%
Procedural█████████9%
Budget Equity Analysis█████5%
Environmental Protection███3%
Disability Rights██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Livonia City Council Study Meeting – January 14, 2026

The Livonia City Council held a study session on Wednesday, January 14, 2026, to prepare the agenda for the January 26, 2026 regular voting meeting. The agenda listed an 8:00 p.m. start, but the minutes record the meeting was called to order at 9:22 p.m. and adjourned at 10:21 p.m. All council members were present. Staff presented seven new business items; council directed each item to either the consent or regular agenda. No final votes were taken at the study meeting.

Consent Calendar

Items placed on the consent agenda for January 26, 2026:

  • Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (Item 1): Three-year renewal at $96,237 per year through MIDEAL contract pricing, presented by Information Systems Director Casey O'Neil. Covers core services expiring February 2026. Directed to consent by Councilmember McCullough.
  • Shelden Park general contractor (Item 2): Award to KEO and Associates as low bidder at $3,160,822 for the $5 million bonded renovation project. Bids came in below the $3.6–$3.8 million estimate. Directed to consent by Councilmember Budzinski.
  • Special assessment date (Item 6): Set a date to adopt a resolution placing special assessments on unpaid 2025 sidewalk charges. Directed to consent by Councilmember Ptashnik. Note: agenda cites CR 95-25; minutes cite CR 74-24.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Steve King (Coventry Gardens) criticized Mitten/MITN (Michigan Intergovernmental Trade Network) as an administrative convenience rather than a proven cost-saving tool and urged council to re-examine routine spending. He later opposed the Shelden Park splash pad, advocated for a pool, and called for more citizen input on the park and senior-center furniture purchases.
  • Jim Biga (resident) argued the 30-minute public comment period violates the Michigan Open Meetings Act and raised ADA concerns, asking for a published procedure for remote/virtual participation accommodations.
  • Neil Moroski (15971 Penn Drive) criticized Councilmember Ptashnik's car-wash comments and vote, saying residents do not want a car wash at the Buca di Beppo site and that the council should address oversaturation.
  • Jerry Karaszynski (19488 Bainbridge) asked council to address deer overpopulation regionally, review golf course fertilizer and herbicide use for environmentally friendly alternatives, and later supported the senior-center furniture purchase because savings could be redirected to Hillcrest Park playground equipment. He also suggested coordinating Microsoft license renewals across city departments.
  • Matt Hansen (Quakertown) urged rescission of the December 17 Buca site car-wash approval so the current council could reconsider it; he said the approval contradicted Councilmember Ptashnik's stated policy on car-wash clustering.
  • Nas Simpson (18957 Aspen Drive) suggested using organic fertilizers and pesticides/herbicides at Livonia golf courses that are not damaging to human health.
  • Greg Ralko (Golf Villa) criticized the Buca car-wash approval, said council should have asked the developer for a traffic contingency, and urged rescission.
  • Cindy Fleming (Lavonia) asked how the 2026 sidewalk repair item needed to be amended to include the 2027 year; Zilincik clarified he would return in 2027 with the contract amount for council approval.
  • Denise Mica (resident) asked whether future bid packages could include competitive options for the following year instead of price extensions; she also questioned whether removing trash/recycling items from the furniture proposal would reduce assembly/labor costs.
  • Council responses: Councilmember McCullough said Mitten is a procurement website, not a cooperative purchasing agreement, while MIDEAL is a State of Michigan cooperative purchasing contract that can offer good pricing; he cautioned that some cooperative agreements are money grabs. Councilmember Ptashnik said a rescission can be moved by any councilmember and noted the council receives many calls, emails, and voicemails beyond those attending; her car-wash concern was tied to traffic from the Whole Foods-area development. Councilmember Brockway said he would take up the ADA/Zoom request through a Committee of the Whole review.

Discussion Items

  • Senior Wellness Center furniture (Item 3): Parks and Recreation Superintendent Ted Davis requested waiver of formal bidding and $51,894.87 in furniture purchases through cooperative pricing based on user preferences, including chairs without wheels, smaller card tables, second-level seating, and benches. Councilmember McCullough proposed removing trash receptacles and recycling centers from the scope, saving about $11,000; Davis agreed to obtain a revised proposal. Denise Mica noted assembly fees might also drop and raised concerns about chair heights. Directed to the regular agenda.
  • 2026 Asphalt Road Program (Item 4): City Engineer Todd Zilincik requested approval of Contract 26-A with Nagle Paving at $3,806,939.15 by extending Contract 25-A unit prices. The program covers 22 segments in the fourth year of the 2022 road millage, with a $10.2 million total budget; work includes the Harrison Street corridor and Myrna Road. Nagle is a Livonia business with bidder preference. Directed to the regular agenda.
  • 2025 Sidewalk Program final costs (Item 5): Request to approve final costs and additional appropriations for Contract 25-G, closing out 2025 work so the Treasurer's Office can send single-lot assessments. Final contract amount was $1,102,784.95 with a 10% administrative fee; about 182 assessments at roughly $1,000 each (about $250 per flag). The project came in about $100,000 under budget. Directed to the regular agenda.
  • 2026 Sidewalk Repair Program (Item 7): Request to extend Contract 25-G unit prices with Joe Rotondo Construction Corp. for Contract 26-G and to authorize an appropriation for Precision Concrete Cutting, Inc. Zilincik said the request included extending unit prices into 2027, but he would return in 2027 for council approval of the contract amount. Councilmember McDonnell said she preferred a one-year contract and preserving the option to bid in 2027; council discussion clarified the January 26 action would cover 2026 only. Directed to the regular agenda.
  • ADA/Zoom referral: Councilmember Brockway said he would work with legal, the clerk, and communications on adding Zoom/remote participation to meetings. Councilmember Ptashnik noted prior difficulties syncing Zoom with the television broadcast and said closed captioning had been added. Councilmember Budzinski noted that all public meetings and committee meetings would need to be Zoom-compatible, with budget implications. The matter was directed to the regular agenda as a Committee of the Whole report/recommendation.
  • Other council discussion: Councilmember McDonnell acknowledged a resident email about possible bocce ball court improvements; no action was taken.

Key Outcomes

  • Because this was a study meeting, no ordinance or contract was formally adopted. Council directed agenda placement for the January 26, 2026 regular meeting: consent = Items 1, 2, and 6; regular = Items 3, 4, 5, and 7; plus the ADA/Zoom referral.
  • For Item 3, council directed staff to remove trash receptacles and recycling centers and return with a revised not-to-exceed amount.
  • For Item 7, council discussion indicated approval would be for 2026 only, with Zilincik returning in 2027 for the second-year renewal amount.
  • Meeting adjourned at 10:21 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Welcome to the January 14th, 2026 study session of the Lavonia City Council. Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance led by the Honorable Brennan McCullough. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. This meeting sets the agenda for the 2033 regular meeting, which is a voting meeting that will take place on Monday, January 26, 2026, where tonight's items will be officially voted on. We will move right into audience communication. We have three minutes. And we've set aside 30 minutes for audience communication. Name and address for the record, please. Steve King, Coventry Gardens. I want to talk about mitten. Okay. You guys, Mitten comes before you all the time. You hear this term. I don't know how many people on council even know what mitten is. The Michigan Intergovernmental Trade Network, Mitten, is frequently promoted as a tool that helps municipalities save money through increased competition. In practice, Mitten functions primarily as an administrative convenience for staff rather than a mechanism that produces measurable cost savings for taxpayers. What Mitton actually does centralizes the posting of bids, RFPs, RFQs, on a single online platform. It automates notifications to registered vendors and reduces the effort required to publish bid notices. This simplifies the workload for the employee responsible for procurement, but does not alter the underlying economics of the purchase. Who benefits most? The primary beneficiary of mitten is the individual submitting and managing bids. The system minimizes manual work, reduces paperwork, and allows procurement staff to check a procedural box by claiming bids were widely advertised. These conveniences improve staff efficiency but do not inherently lower prices. Larger vendors with automated bid systems gained an advantage, reducing true competition. Administrative efficiency does not equal financial efficiency. Faster or easier bid posting does not guarantee better pricing. Lower contract costs or improved fiscal outcomes without price benchmarking or post-award analysis. Claims of savings remain unproven. So I'm hoping this new council refuses to do what we've always done and challenges every penny spent, every ordinance, every policy, every procedure. Let's go back to square one. Love what you're doing with the charter. And I would like to talk about uh the limiting of public comment. Uh currently the city council limits the commenting period at the beginning of meetings to 30 minutes. According to the number, this lovely document, limiting public comment. A rule limiting the period of public comment may not be implied as to a manner that denies a person the right to address the public body, such as limiting all public comments to a half-hour period. Currently, the Lavonia City Council limits audience communication to 30-minute period. That is against the Open Meeting Act. You are in violation of the Open Meetings Act. Now you are not in violation when you limit the amount of time people can speak. So as you allow me three minutes to speak, that's fine. You allow people to speak two minutes on an issue, that's fine. That's all fine and dandy according to OpenSmeeting Act.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com