Transportation and Land Use Committee Meeting on Western Loudoun Rural Uses - January 29, 2026
Transportation and Land Use Committee Meeting
Date: January 29, 2026
The Transportation and Land Use Committee (TLUC) of the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors met to discuss and vote on a series of staff recommendations related to the Western Loudoun Rural Uses and Standards project, specifically addressing wineries, breweries, distilleries, lodging uses, and events. The meeting included public comment, staff presentations, and extensive deliberation on multiple motions. The committee voted on 15 motions, with outcomes ranging from unanimous approval to narrow defeats.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Representatives from Hunt Country Celebrations, 48 Fields, Walsh Family Wine, Joutique Concierge, Hillsboro Vineyards, and Lark Brew and Co. spoke in opposition to proposed new regulations. They argued that the regulations would harm the agritourism industry, which supports dozens of local businesses, preserves agricultural land, and contributes significantly to the local economy. Speakers emphasized that existing noise, lighting, and traffic ordinances should be enforced rather than creating new zoning restrictions. They cited a low complaint rate (0.1% of zoning enforcement cases involving wineries/breweries) and urged the committee to consider the economic impact, including $23.68 million in transient occupancy tax revenue and 1,100+ emails from residents supporting the industry.
Discussion Items
- Staff Presentation: Staff presented a comprehensive overview of the proposed changes, including clarifying definitions for private parties vs. special events, consolidating lodging uses, verifying agricultural operations, and establishing consistent use-specific standards. Legal counsel advised that ABC uses (farm wineries, limited breweries, distilleries) are not automatically protected as agricultural operations under state law, and that the county may define bona fide agricultural production for building code exemptions.
- Key Debates:
- Private Parties and Special Events: The committee debated whether to increase the number of annual parties for lodging uses (from 10 to 25) and whether to allow ABC uses to hold private parties by right as accessory uses. Supporters argued it supports the industry; opponents feared it would circumvent existing event facility regulations.
- Agricultural Definitions: A major point of contention was the creation of definitions for “agricultural operation,” “agricultural production,” and “agricultural products.” Some members argued these definitions are necessary to clarify the zoning ordinance and align with state code, while others warned they could inadvertently regulate ABC uses beyond state authority or create non-conforming status for existing businesses.
- Setbacks and Parking: The committee considered a 50-foot setback for outdoor private party areas at bed-and-breakfasts and farm wineries, but the measure failed due to concerns about making existing uses non-conforming. Parking ratios were revised to include outdoor tasting areas, with field parking permitted.
- Enforcement: The committee acknowledged that current enforcement is complaint-based and that proactive enforcement in Western Loudoun had been approved at a prior meeting. The role of the fire marshal and sheriff’s office in responding to safety concerns was discussed.
Key Outcomes
- Motion 1A (Staff motion on private parties/special events clarity): Passed 3-2.
- Motion 1A Alternative (Turner) – Increase lodging parties to 25 annually: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 1A (Kirshner) – Allow ABC uses to hold private parties and events related to product sales as accessory, with enforcement of existing noise/lighting ordinances: Passed 3-2.
- Motion 1B – Require proof of lodging operation before hosting private parties: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 1C – Separate agritourism from cultural tourism, make it accessory to agricultural operations: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 2A – Establish guest activity hours for lodging private parties (7am-11pm Fri/Sat/Sun, 7am-10pm other days): Passed 4-1 (Chair Randall dissented on Sunday 11pm).
- Motion 2B – Consolidate lodging use tables: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 2C – Minimum guest rooms for lodging (homestay 1-4, B&B inn 1-10, country inn 5-40 after friendly amendment): Passed 5-0.
- Motion 2D – Create parking ratios for private parties based on capacity, permit field parking: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 2E – 50-foot setback for outdoor private party areas at B&B homestay/inn: Failed 2-3.
- Motion 3A – Separate agriculture classification and use “agricultural production”: Passed 3-2.
- Motion 3B – Create verification process for bona fide agricultural production for building code exemption: Passed 3-2.
- Motion 3C – Establish “agricultural operation” use with standards: Passed 3-1-1 (3 in favor, 1 opposed, 1 abstention).
- Motion 3D – Add definition of “agricultural products” consistent with state code: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 4 – Establish limited distillery as separate principal use: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 5A – Develop consistent framework for use-specific standards for ABC uses: Passed 3-1 (1 absent?).
- Motion 5B – Revise parking ratios for ABC uses to include outdoor tasting areas: Passed 5-0.
- Motion 5C – Establish guest activity hours for ABC uses (7am-11pm Fri/Sat/Sun, 7am-10pm other days): Passed 5-0.
- Motion 5D – 50-foot setback for outdoor tasting areas at farm wineries: Failed for lack of a second.
All approved motions will be forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors for further action, with subsequent review by the Planning Commission and public hearings.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, everyone. I would like to call to order the January twenty-ninth, twenty twenty six transportation land use committee meeting. This room has a hearing loop. If you need hearing assistance, switch your hearing aids to telecoil mode. If you need a headset, we have those available as well. Please see the clerk to request one. So we will now begin the public input portion of the meeting. Before we get started, I'd like to take a moment to remind the public about how the Board of Supervisors conducts public input at the Transportation Land Use Committee meetings. Please silence all cell phones at this time if you haven't done so already. Members of the public may sign up to speak during tonight's public input session until the last piece speaker takes the podium, at which time no more signups will be taken, and we actually have a full house, so we actually have a waiting list. After you book a venue, you'll need a party planner, a caterer, a rental company, a decorator, a florist, a wedding cake maker, a DJ musician, fashion apparel store, bartender, photographer, wedding officiant, uh invitation designer, limousine service, and or a local accommodation. I know that's a long list, but I wanted to emphasize the number of businesses that would be adversely impacted if we create new unnecessary regulations for wineries and breweries. The members of Hunt Country Celebration believe strongly that we can get along with our neighbors by enforcing the rules that currently exist. We believe that helping preserve these wineries and farm breweries is the best way to sustain natural beauty, the natural beauty in Loudoun County. Supporting these venues will continue to make Loudoun County the special place that we all know and love for generations to come. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Brooke. Um actually, yeah. No clapping. You can do jazz hands, please. That thank you. All right, next is Mary uh Schilling. Or sorry, Macy Schilling. I got that. Good evening. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak. My name is Macy Schilling. I am a mother, a resident of Loudoun County, and the owner of 48 Fields, Schilling Wedding Planning, and Loudoun Cider House. My children play here, they go to school here. We are raising our family here because we generally love or genuinely love the community and everything it represents. I'm here tonight because I am deeply concerned that the proposals for strict regulations on events will not preserve Loudoun County, but instead quietly dismantle it. An event is never just one business. Every wedding celebration or tasting held in Loudoun supports dozens of local businesses who rely on seasonal event income to survive, many of whom have built their livelihoods right here in Loudoun. When you restrict events, you are not only impacting one venue, but you are pulling the foundation out from under an entire local economy. Small family-owned businesses like mine are not large corporations who have investors to fall back on to absorb policy changes. Events are not optional for us, they are how we survive. They are what allow farms, wineries, and breweries to remain viable and keep land agricultural instead of selling it off. And when these businesses can no longer operate sustainably, they do not turn into peaceful open space. They close. And when they close, the only buyers left are developers and data centers. And that is a painful irony. The very residents who we are or who are asking for these restrictions because they want to protect Loudoun's rural character are unknowingly accelerating the loss of it. If small agritourism and event-based businesses are pushed out, Loudoun will not become quieter or more rural. It will become just the opposite. These policies will force businesses like mine and many others out. They are the reason this land has been preserved at all. Please do not regulate us out of the county. We are so trying hard to protect. We are your neighbors, we are families, and we want nothing more than to continue living, working, and raising our children right here in Loudoun County.
openpublica.com